What
You're Missing in Our Subscriber-only CounterPunch Newsletter
A Special Investigation:
China's Mass Murder for Body Parts
CounterPunch
outlines the terrible evidence that thousands of Falun Gong members
have been killed to supply China's body parts trade with the
West. Larry Lack reviews
the evidence and explains why the US government is keeping its
mouth shut. CounterPunch
Online is read by millions of viewers each month But remember, we are
funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition
of CounterPunch.
Please support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter,
which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or
by making a donation towards the cost of this online edition. Remember contributions
are tax-deductible.Click
here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please:Subscribe
Now
A New Situation is Arising and We Must
Live With It
Who's
Afraid of an Iranian Bomb?
By URI AVNERY
At the height of the epic Battle of
Britain in 1940, when British airmen were killed at an appalling
rate ("never was so much owed by so many to so few"),
an official in charge of propaganda had a bright idea to raise
morale. On the walls at the Royal Air Force bases a poster appeared
with these words: "Who is afraid of the Ju-87?" (At
the time, one of the most effective German planes.)
An anonymous pilot penciled
in: "Sign here!" Within a few hours, all the pilots
of the base had signed.
If today someone were to hang
a poster with the slogan "Who is afraid of the Iranian nuclear
bomb?" I believe that all the people in Israel, and many
beyond, would sign.
It seems that we Israelis are
always in need of something to be afraid of. When we open our
eyes in the morning, we must see the danger-of-the-day. Otherwise,
what is there to get up for? Perhaps it's not the public that
is to blame, but the politicians who use fear as a means of control.
Not so long ago, it was Hizbullah.
Muslim fanatics, crazy Shiites, who want to annihilate Israel.
A huge arsenal of rockets. God protect us!
In the meantime there was a
war, the rockets were launched, the damage to life and property
was comparatively slight (for those who were not hit, of course).
The terrible danger of Hizbullah was pushed into a corner. True,
Hizbullah remained where it has been, the rockets are being replenished
and Nasrallah continues to infuriate, but all this has ceased
to evoke any real interest. A used danger is not exciting anymore.
Now the army chiefs, bankrupted
in Lebanon, are making a big effort to create a new fear: Hamas
in the Gaza strip. Now, here we have an immediate and terrible
danger. Tons and tons of "regular explosives" are coming
in through the tunnels. Any moment now, Hamas will be equipped
with modern anti-tank weapons, as well as anti-aircraft missiles.
Hamas is building underground fortifications. Isn't that scary?
The military and political
parrots in the media are fully mobilized. This entire media parrotry
is repeating the bloodcurdling message morning, noon and night:
Gaza is becoming a second South Lebanon! Something has to be
done! We cannot wait! The army must go in, occupy the Strip,
or at least parts of it!
Bur the public is not really
buying it. It is hard to create fear when the enemy is not able
to shoot back. Our aircraft and tanks and brave boys are killing
there without hindrance. So what is there to fear?
* *
*
But the Iranian story is something
else altogether. There is indeed cause for fear.
Here we have an enemy who declares
that he is opposed to the very existence of our state, and who
may soon be facing us with weapons of mass destruction.
The elected president of Iran,
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is really enjoying letting loose provocative
declarations. That's his private hobby, but also a successful
domestic political ploy. He has said that the Holocaust did not
happen at all, and if it happened, it was smaller than announced,
and the whole thing has to be researched. He also prophesies
the destruction of the "Zionist regime".
To tell the truth, he did not
quite say that he intends to "wipe Israel from the map",
as was reported. According to the most accurate translation that
I have seen, what he actually said was "Israel will be wiped
from the map of the future". But that is scary enough.
It is scary because in a few
years, Iran may well have a nuclear bomb. It seems that this
cannot be prevented. 25 years ago, Israel bombed an Iraqi nuclear
reactor. Iran has learned the lesson and has distributed its
nuclear facilities in many different places. Israel's capabilities
are not sufficient for their destruction. The appointment of
Avigdor Liberman, a proponent of Fascist ideas, as "Minister
in Charge of the Strategic Threat", does not change anything
in this respect.
If Israel, which is only the
fourth or fifth military power on earth, cannot do it, what about
the US, the No. 1 in almost everything? Well, they are not able
to, either. Installations buried deep in the earth may not be
destroyed, and the ensuing war cannot be won without putting
forces on the ground. And after the fiascoes in Iraq and Afghanistan,
there are not many sane American generals who long for that.
So it is quite possible that
in a few years, the Iranian president will not only have boasts
on his lips but also nuclear weapons in his hands. And if that
isn't scary, I don't know what is scary.
* *
*
If so, why am I not scared?
I live in Israel, and I fully
intend to continue living here. Israel is a small country, and
a large part of its population lives in Greater Tel-Aviv. I live
in the center of the city, in what the Americans would call Ground
Zero.
If a small and primitive nuclear
weapon of the Hiroshima type falls on the building where I live,
a large part of the Israeli population will be annihilated. Two
or three such bombs are enough to put an end to Israel (together
with the neighboring Palestinian territories).
But I don't believe this will
happen.
In order to believe in such
a possibility, one has to see the leaders of Iran as a bunch
of lunatics. In spite of the efforts of Ahmadinejad to convince
us that he is mad, I am not so sure.
I believe that the Iranian
leadership, and especially the religious-political leadership,
is composed of very sane people. Since assuming power, they have
trodden with caution and competence. They have not started any
war. On the contrary, they boast that in the last 2000 years
Iran has not started any war at all. And in the Iranian establishment,
the president is just a politician who is completely subservient
to the Ayatullahs, who are in effective control. (Curiously
enough, the same system prevails in our own fundamentalist parties,
Agudat Israel and Shas.)
I do not ignore what Ahmadinejad
has said. After Adolf Hitler and Mein Kampf, who would
dare to ignore such statements of intent? But the Iranian president
does not have the power of the German Fuehrer, the two countries
are completely different, and so are the historical circumstances.
The annihilation of Tel-Aviv
would inevitably bring about the annihilation of Tehran and the
precious treasures of the ancient and glorious Persian culture.
In chess terms, it would not be an exchange of queens, but an
exchange of kings. It is much more reasonable to assume that
between Iran and Israel a "balance of terror" will
be established, like the one that prevented World War III between
the US and the Soviet Union, and that is now preventing a renewal
of the Indian-Pakistani war.
* *
*
In spite of this, we should
not wait inactively for the creation of a situation in which
Israel, Iran and perhaps Arab states like Egypt and Saudi Arabia
will possess nuclear bombs. The nuclear genie is out of the bottle,
and is spreading throughout the world.
If there is no military option,
what can be done?
In order to forestall the danger,
the main effort should be to make peace with the Palestinian
people, and with the entire Arab world. People like Ehud Olmert
may delude themselves that the Palestinian problem can be isolated
from global and regional processes. But the problem is influenced
by many factors, which are in constant flux.
The relative strength of the
US, our only ally in the world (except for Fiji, Micronesia and
the Marshall islands), is decreasing slowly but persistently.
Iran is becoming a regional power. The nuclear aspects give the
historic conflict a new dimension. As the Greek philosopher said:
panta rhei, everything is flowing.
Generals can hallucinate about
a huge victory over Hamas in Gaza, Olmert can ask himself Hamlet-like
"to talk or not to talk" (with Mahmoud Abbas), but
in the meantime things are happening that ought to accelerate
the achievement of a historic reconciliation between the two
peoples.
If the elected leadership of
the Palestinian people signs an agreement with us announcing
the end of the conflict, and if the entire Arab world makes peace
with us along the lines of the "Saudi initiative",
the rug will be pulled out from under the Ahmadinejads everywhere.
If the Palestinians themselves accept the idea of the coexistence
of Israel and Palestine, and if Egypt, Jordan and most of the
Arab world endorse it, on behalf of whom will the Iranians liberate
Palestine?
In the framework of the process
of achieving Israeli-Palestinian peace, it will also be necessary
to examine the idea of creating a nuclear weapons-free region.
Is effective mutual inspection possible? Can there be iron-clad
guarantees? At the moment, that is difficult to assess. But it's
worthwhile to find out.
* *
*
Anyway, there is no reason
for apocalyptic nightmares. Even a nuclear bomb in Tehran's hands
is not the end of the world, and not even the end of Israel.
A new situation will arise, and we must live with it.
The fathers of Zionism called
on the Jews to take their fate into their own hands and return
to the stage of history, and those who followed took upon themselves
all the dangers involved. The world is a dangerous place, there
is no existence without danger. I only hope that we shall have
the good sense not to increase the dangers that are out there
anyhow.
Like those brave British airmen,
we have the right to be afraid. But we must face the new situation
with a clear mind and sober resolution.
CounterPunch
Speakers Bureau Sick of sit-on-the-Fence speakers, tongue-tied and timid?
CounterPunch Editors Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St Clair
are available to speak forcefully on ALL the burning issues,
as are other CounterPunchers seasoned in stump oratory. Call
CounterPunch Speakers Bureau, 1-800-840-3683. Or email beckyg@counterpunch.org.