Feedbackula - Black Ops 2 Outrage Special!

loading...

Show Episodes

  • Nov 16, 2012
  • 19,081 Views

Johnny straps on some kevlar and steps into the line of fire to find out what you've been saying about Call of Duty: Black Ops 2.

Download Subscribe to RSS Feed

Choose your preferred download format:

HD H.264 MP4
288.7MB 
Sign In
Hi-Res H.264 MP4
287.6MB 
Sign In
Lo-Res IPOD / PSP
73.6MB 
Sign In
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
WeWerePirates 100 pts

I'm not a fan of feedbackula as a concept, taking an advarserial stance with readers is kind of a poor attitude. When you have a much stronger platform to air views, as well as more time to formulate them and editor to edit them is pretty uneven. Even so I had to gawk at the train wreck this particular topic was bound to be.

 

But hidden among the cherry picked straw men there is a valid complaint about the review that isn't answered: iterative titles are not treated consistently. Some are marked down heavily, some aren't marked down at all, some are marked down a bit. How should iterative titles be treated? well in a consistent manor would be a start.

 

Reviews are consumer advice, readers aren't primarily reading because they care what a particular reviewer's opinions are. What the reviewer thought of the game is just a means to making to making decision whether or not to buy a game. If how iterative games are treated varies from review to review then that makes it harder to extract and colate information between reviews. So personally I think readers are rightfully unimpressed and nonplussed with the difference in score between Pokemon, or BlOps 1.  And seriously, cross referencing the review with every other review is the only way to avoid that? No, an editorial decision on how iterative title should be handled would avoid inconsistency.

 

Shaun McInnis recent opinion piece on AC3: Liberation in combination with his review, is a great example of striking the right balance between personal opinion and writing a functional review. There are reviewers who attract readers/viewers based on their opinions, such as Yahtzee and there are certainly a place for opinion pieces such the previously mentioned or the "postscript" which Edge magazine now attaches to many of its reviews. But a good review is about trying to view the game objectively.

 

Video games have benefited greatly from the iterative approach. A film sequel being better breaks the odds but we demand it in our games. Skyrim was iterative of Oblivion, Arkham City of Arkham Asylum, Portal 2 of Portal. The difference between them and the much maligned annual titles is level of innovation. Is there some arbitrary level of innovation between titles above which iteration is good, bellow which is bad. Also if you look at the innovation in the CoD series not title by title but over time periods the level of innovation is not bad: Oblivions nearest contemporary would be what, CoD 2? Skyrim is MW3. Indie games function on the basis of lower financial risk allowing greater creative risk yet even indie games learn from commercial games and hence from their iterations.

 

TLDR: Grow an attention span.

 

Finally I think this video misses the biggest reason for CoD hate: the community is shitty.

benbonney 49 pts

Im such a COD hater mainly for its community and lack of change, black ops 2 was a good single player experience, multiplayer is good but only with friends really

WCK619 656 pts

I burst out laughing at the random comment about the tuna can...

RuthlessRich 75 pts

I'm not sure that constant innovation IS a must. Let me draw some parallels with the film industry here. I'm an avid action fan and I appreciate the gradual evolution that action movies have gone through from the well muscled wizz-bang Arnie-Stallone era of the early 80s to the 90s tech revolution that brought us Jurassic Park and the Matrix trilogy and recently to the more clinical brutality of Bourne and Taken. However, I don't expect every new movie to bring something new to the table ( e.g. Air Force One = Die Hard on a plane, Under Siege = Die Hard on a ship, Lockout = Die Hard in space). If EA wants to produce more of, and make money from, something that people like that's fine, well done them, and one shouldn't be ashamed to partake, just as I would love, and pay to see, a new Expendables movie every year.

 

The issue I think is that in the gaming community's never-ending quest to justify itself and achieve mainstream recognition (at some point we've all received that snort of derision when we've told someone about our hobby) it needs to be seen to be moving. And we don't appreciate that the most heavily marketed titles - the ones that non-gamers tend to hear about the most - are the likes of COD and FIFA which, although perfectly commendable pieces of work, don't change very much with each iteration.

 

It's important to realise that our favourite medium has come a long way and that there are many kinds of game developer, just like there are many kinds of film maker, musician, writer and others artists. Some will pursue artistic/narrative/gameplay originality because they have particular ideas to express, others will aim to entertain and make some cash along the way, and others just want to emulate their heroes. There is no need to try to like every game, just because it's a game.

 

This comment ran away from me a bit. Thanks for reading =)

maxikex 5 pts

I fucking love this show! Jonny is funny as hell XD

sg_hobbes 24 pts

best reason for why people hate cod ever. intelligent and well said

 

rykeut 17 pts

Great show! The comments are funny in their own right, but the best parts are the host's interjections and analyses.

Bavoke 20 pts

what a nice guy, saying sorry to the camera! ^^

stoo6747 5 pts

This is the first time I have watched Feedbackula and this is hilarious! Nice work.

xX_MOBIUS1_Xx 35 pts

Oh Johnnu, I dont know if I should feel bad for you or envy you for having to go through all of the comments for BLOPS2.  If Hurricane Sandy was the Superstorm of the century the reviews section for FPS games must be the Shitstorm of the century......or at least for that year until the next iteration of said FPS franchise.....

onioneater 5 pts

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL I like COD.

TERMINATOR-SSD 162 pts

BEST....SONG..........EVERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Fighting40 52 pts

Whoever came up with this show deserves a medal, because this is just so hilariously funny!

k2theswiss 45 pts

lol kudos to who ever did the cod song at 1 minute mark

Slayer70 6 pts

I WAS THINKING ABOUT GETTING A CAFFEINE TATTOO AWHILE BACK, THEN I DECIDED AGAINST IT BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WOULD PROBABLY LOOK RIDICULOUS.  I WAS RIGHT.

genjuroT 64 pts

Good show ol chap. Nice to see gamespot roughly say that cod is stagnant and money grubbing. The only way to force them to make great inovations, improvements, and mechanics is to stop buying the doo doo they flush annually. We are the toilets! :O

HSV002 63 pts

Best episode of feedbackula so far!!!

bmart970 160 pts

I see his point about gamers wanting to feel like they are valued. I really saw this when Halo was under Bungie. I liked the community they provided and the free stuff (like blue flames) that they gave to the people who made accounts on their site. I wish more game companies were like this, it seemed like they cared about more than the money.

SASHA 8 pts

Love the Carmina Burana thing!

 

89iajo 5 pts

I love that song, I want it on itunes.

 

I love to laugh at this show over the weekend.

 

Fartman7998 95 pts

Still love this show! 

 

But Black Ops 2 is a solid game.  At first, I WAS drinking the haterade and wondering, "Hey, why didn't it get the usual 9-point-something?"  However, after spending some time with the game, I see just why it didn't. 

Codester_41 190 pts

I don't know why so many people hate gamespot reviewers for having opinions...

bmart970 160 pts

 Codester_41 They don't, as long as they share their opinion.

zeusbark 32 pts

Geeeezzz... unbelievable, if these people hate GS reviews so much why do they keep watching them? And who cares about the reviewer's score, it's just an opinion after all. Reviews just give you an idea of what the game is like so you can take a desicion of wether to buy it or not. This show really shows =P how dumb are most of these users leaving all these hateful comments. 

Keep up the good work Jonny! 

HSV002 63 pts

Good job Jonny, this show is fkn fantastic!! I love how stupid the community really is.

lampboy 17 pts

Loving Feedbackula. More please.

Thumbler76 128 pts

I'm enjoying Black ops 2 a lot. At least there aren't enemies crying with baby voice "I'feel sooooo coooooooold, soooooo coooooooold"! Any relation with borderlands 2 midgets is purely casual.

samsta2 21 pts

Great show. Hit the nail on the head.

Mr_Ploppy_z 15 pts

I want horses in multiplayer, Call Of Horsey best Call of Duty game

sestraux 9 pts

good singing, boys. well,done!

DanteReal69 12 pts

hahahaha lol  3 time watching it lol

WillyChong 133 pts

Damn you FEEDBACKULA, I missed nearly 4 of your videos there god dammit, Gamespot should put this on their front page and maintain a little longer! I thought you died and Gamespot put you off air for good, Jonhny!

Skaylay 5 pts

The first fps game I trashed before finishing SP.. terribad bo2 terribad,

dmblum1799 48 pts

Btw, looking back, after playing it a ton, Borderlands 2 does deserve a 9.0!

gamingfrendly 613 pts

i feel of the chair this was hilarious

Patchezs 33 pts

Definitely true about sports titles stagnating each year, especially from EA Sports. I suppose it would put a reviewer in a difficult place, because out of context the game itself might be solid, but in reality it's almost a carbon copy of a game released only one year ago. But last I checked these games are still getting solid 8.0's for releasing practically the exact same game on an annual basis. At what point does it actually start to effect the review score? Is it possible to do more than just say "great game but don't bother if you have last year's version"?

_Judas_ 60 pts

 Patchezs I agree on some points you make, but the basics of some games are unchangeable; Football is football. You can't introduce too many new elements; how much can you alter a already decent football-game such as the FIFA-series? I bet there are many ways, but EA have done a lot of small tweaks all along the series. I believe FIFA 13 is a pretty awesome football-simulation experience; before FIFA 11 came out, I remember thinking it would be cool to control the goalie. I accept the fact that the FIFA-games are all pretty similiar, and I guess these casual CoD-gamers also accept the fact that the CoD-games keep the basic action just the way it is. And we all know that the CoD-games sell many, many copies, so why would 'Treyarch' or 'Infinity Ward' mess with the formula?  Is FIFA 13 as good as FIFA 12 if it is the exact same game just with updated squads, or will the similarity ruin the score? Isn't it a good game even though it is the same?

max-hit 229 pts

Well said Johnny specially what u said about FIFA.

erMonezza 84 pts

Another great episode... and a 13 minutes long. Very nice.

terminator661 6 pts

Kudos to Gamespot for making one of the most ballsiest and entertaining shows on COD: Black ops 2. I especially liked how they pointed out the bad grammar in each of the comments. Well done, thoroughly entertaining. :)

Patchezs 33 pts

 terminator661 Agreed. Definitely a ballsy move to lay bare some of the criticism of the site's reviews and deal with it in such an entertaining way. But, the trouble is, it almost makes me want to leave horribly offensive comments with really, really bad spelling and grammar just to get them read on the next episode...

LastMatic 6 pts

'I gotta take a piss, OPEN YR MOUFS - YOLO!!!!!' < hahahahahah

Conversation powered by Livefyre