8:34 AM, 06/28/12
Obama And Romney Locked In Tight Race In Michigan, North Carolina, New Hampshire
6:41 PM, 06/27/12
Obama Campaign: Mitt Romney Is An 'Outsourcing Pioneer'
6:12 PM, 06/27/12
Dems Find A Way To Annoy NASCAR Crowd
In a surprise decision, the US Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act passed in 2010. You will hear a lot of commentary from legal and policy experts in the next few weeks about this decision, but this post is about what the Court action means for YOU personally. The outcry from the right will be deafening, and there will be attempts by the House Republicans between now and November to take out sections of the law, although the Senate Democratic majority is not likely to approve any of those actions. Obviously, if the Republicans win the Presidency and the Senate in November, the ACA may not survive to its full 2014 implementation date. Now is the time to acquaint yourself with what the health reform law really means to you -- while you still have it.
And, yes -- this time around -- we can make Mitt Romney and the Republicans pay the political price they deserve to pay for promising to take away vitally important and popular health care benefits from the American people. Wishful thinking? Hardly.
Today, the institutional legitimacy of the Court was buttressed. President Obama wasn't the only winner at the Supreme Court. So was the Supreme Court itself.
The American people no longer need to fear that every one of us could lose our health insurance at any time. They have been given hope. And for this I say again: Thank God.
On Monday the U.S. Supreme Court took a new step in protecting juvenile offenders. In Miller v. Alabama it ruled that states could not mandate life without the possibility of parole sentences for youth involved in homicide cases.
Senator McConnell doesn't have a constitutional leg on which to stand when he argues against the right of citizens to know the identity of secret donors funding campaign expenditures to influence their votes.
As reports that the JPMorgan Chase trading debacle may lead to losses of $9 billion, it's critical that our nation understand what is, and is not, acceptable behavior for a bank in our capitalist economy.
Senator Rand Paul, that scion of small government, wants the government to decide when a woman can choose her own reproductive fate.
The unimaginable hardships these families face on the way to the United States are a testament to the desperation and fear that drive them to leave their home countries.
The more your speech and behavior contributes to the general sense that being LGBT is normal, the more LGBT persons will be able to enjoy acceptance and normality in everyday life. And the more others who believe in equality will be empowered to say so.
The seduction of drones' short-term impacts loses its appeal alongside the significant long-term strategic and moral costs of this tactic.
Congressman Charles Rangel made it through a tough primary fight on his way to a 22nd term in the House. He overcame the keen opposition of a talented young challenger, of Barack Obama, the New York Times, op-ed writers, political pundits and the shifting demographics of his district.
Application of the "Washington model" suggests that it will be difficult for the Democrats to reach their goal of three to six pickups in California's congressional delegation. The model predicts that the Democrats will win 32 seats and the Republicans will take 19, with two pure toss-ups.
With the Lawrence v. Texas decision, our lives and the law changed forever. No longer were we to be thought of as criminals. And the recognition that the nation's Constitution requires respect for our lives has inspired victory after victory for LGBT students, workers, couples, and parents.
In the end the Roberts decision is not just a win or loss for ideology or legal theory. It's an example to the world that in the United States there's something called the Rule of Law. That's a victory for everyone.
Racism has clearly emerged as a significant factor underlying opposition to the Affordable Care Act and must be a part of any honest attempt at understanding how some Americans formed opinions about it.
In this case, Chief Justice Roberts bucked history and his generation's preference for ideological confrontation in order to preserve the institutional reputation of the Supreme Court.
By standing on the sidelines and criticizing all efforts toward greater disclosure, Mitch McConnell creates the impression that he seeks to allow wealthy and powerful individuals and corporations to wield great influence in election, without accountability.
He simply answered "yes" and slid the mic away to laughs from the crowd, before continuing with: "If we do our job from a grassroots standpoint, we won't have to worry about it. We will send him back home to Kenya or wherever it is."
Laurence J. Kotlikoff, 2012.28.06
Nathan Harden, 2012.28.06