Journal Community

Explore Group

Is it ethical or moral for any religion to claim it is the one true faith? Are such claims by religions a cause of world conflict?

« »
Recommend a comment by clicking the recommendation icon
  • I don't think the analogy holds because in a way you are telling the other person that you don't respect their religion or religious beliefs.

    Recommend

  • I think that people can agree to disagree while still respecting the others right to believe otherwise. It is sort of like politics. I can respect you being a liberal, even though I disagree with your political beliefs. If you cannot respect people who have different opinions than you do you are cutting yourself off from most of humanity. There are infinite shades of belief and infinite subjects to agree or disagree about.
    All the best,
    Ron Wagner

    4 Recommendations

  • truly this thread is bound toward trolling and i understand that there is little conversation being had.

    But the question is written in a way to stand the writer on a block of moral high ground. As if the writer had the authority to judge ethics outside of religion. But everyone judges based on their belief system.

    To me the question is.... Can a faith be a search for the truth? Can there be a religion that's true and one that's not?

    as far as world conflict is concerned, i don't think humanity every really needed many reasons.

    2 Recommendations

  • Nonsubscriber comments are set to "Hide" Show this comment +

    Yes... When your religion is the right one... Christianity.

    The problem - or a gift to us - is that freedom of religion must exist for Christianity to be practiced.

    The cost for becoming Christian is to live a life filled with love... thus a Christian Nation affords everyone the right to practice what they wish but when trouble comes we can come together as a nation, and the Christians can band together in the name of helping their neighbors.

    Not a bad trade, huh? And it is the most fair system in the world as it affords everyone the right to follow the denomination or church of their choice... or no church at all if they wish.

    To see true Christianity in action see www.TrueChristianChurch.com

    Recommend

  • The world would be a far better place if there were no religions or if all religion was able to interact with other religions on a peaceful and loving basis, rather then look at others with fear or distrust. In addition, no government should be religiously controlled. As far as Christians "living with love"... Would you call the Christian Crusades and Inquisition "living with love"? I wouldn't.

    1 Recommendation

    • The Crusades were in response to the Muslim invasion of the Holy Land. Muslims took over Jerusalem in 638 and for a while Christians were allowed to practice their religion but had to pay a speical tax called the jizya.
      Then in 1099 the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was destroyed and there was a new wave of persecution of Christians. The Muslims also attacked the Byzantine Empire and defeated the Byzantines in 1071. The Byzantine emporer asked the Pope for help. That was the beginning of the Crusades. The Muslims also moved into Europe and even conquered the southern part of Spain for awhile. They were not finally driven out of Spain until King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain marshalled their armies and drove the Muslims out of Spain in teh late 15th century. The Muslims were the aggressors.

      As for the Inquisition, there will always be those who claim a religion and do not follow the precepts of that faith. That was the case here when the Roman Catholic Church in the 12th century introduced torture to get heretics and those opposed to the church to recant. They obviously were not followoing the commands of Christ to "love your neighbor as yourself" (Matthew 22:39). Jesus said," Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves." (Matthew 7:15) He knew that there would be some that would try to pretend to be Christian and use Christianity for their own purposes. That does not negate the teachings of Christ. Jesus said, " If you love me, you will keep my commandments." (John 14:15) Those who do not keep His commandments do not love Him, nor do they love the God who sent Him. Jesus said "You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will recognize them by their fruits." (Matthew 7: 16-20)

      Chist said we shuld love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us (Matthew 5:44), in addition to "love your neighbor as yourself" (Matthew22:39). Do you think that this would would be more peaceful if everyone followed these commands?

      Recommend

    • @ Will Jones:

      Russia? William Murray said "the Christian Crusades" and when someone speaks of the "Christian Crusades" it is usually understood to mean the Crusades against the Muslims who invaded and conquered the Holy Lands, parts of Northern Africa and southern Spain and attacked the Byzantine Empire druing the Middle Ages, between 1095 and 1291 A.D.

      The Northern Crusades, according ot Widkipedia, started later, in 1193, almost 100 years after the beginning of the Crusades against the Muslims. Though apparently called crusades by some, they were really conquests of pagan lands and not really in the same category as the Crusades against the Muslims, who had been the aggressors. They were not even called "crusades" until the 19th century. That didn't make these 'crusades" right and again as I said above , there are those who will claim Christianity for their own purposes, not as someone who is humble and obedient to the commands of Christ. They are, as Jesus said, "in sheep’s clothing" but inwardly were "ravenous wolves". Jesus never said to conquer other lands militarily, though Biblically defense is permitted. Quite frankly I had not remembered hearing about these "crusades" before. I had to look them up. I guess you learn something new every day.

      Recommend

      • Nonsubscriber comments are set to "Hide" Show this comment +

        Estonia, and Lithuania were their winter base camps, iirc. Bush's committing 9/11 after being cheated into office by the SCOTUS' Roman Catholics for PNAC's "New Pearl Harbor," is nothing but another Crusade with false Jews of Netanyahu's Mossad helping just as false Jews helped Hitler.

        Recommend

  • It is ethical, moral and legal to believe one's faith is the correct, good and essential for oneself.
    It is unethical, immoral, illegal and wrong for one to try to decide for others what is good, correct and essential for them.
    Therefore, the only way we can live at peace with others is by allowing them to have the same rights we claim for ourselves. To put it in religious terms, you are only responsible for your own salvation, not for the salvation of others.
    Hint: Megalomania is the crazy notion you, or me, are God and decide for others. It is crazy!

    1 Recommendation

Page: « Previous Next »

Add a Comment

We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules. All comments will display your real name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Or log in or become a subscriber now for complete Journal access.

  • Clear
  • Post
Your Profile Here…

Set up your profile to connect with members of Journal Community.

Your profile gives you access to personal messages, connections, and Group invitations.

Your Groups Here…

Participate in engaging dialogue on topics that matter to you and other members of your group.

When you join groups you'll find them for easy access here. Learn new perspectives and educate each other.....