U.S. official in Sanaa, al Qaeda militants flee prison

SANAA (Reuters) – A senior U.S. official held talks on Wednesday with government officials in Yemen, which is teetering on the brink of civil war over President Ali Abdullah Saleh's refusal to meet protesters' demands to step down.

The United States and Saudi Arabia fear that a power vacuum and tribal warfare in Yemen will be exploited by the local wing of al Qaeda to launch attacks in the region and beyond.

On Wednesday, dozens of al Qaeda militants escaped from a prison in the city of al-Mukalla in southern Yemen, a region where security forces and militants often clash.

A Yemeni government source said Jeffrey Feltman, U.S. Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs, would meet Foreign Minister Abubakr al-Qirbi and Vice President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, who is acting president.

He was also due to hold talks with Saleh's son, Ahmed Ali Abdullah Saleh, who had been widely thought to be next in line for the presidency until protests broke out earlier this year.

Saleh is in Saudi Arabia recovering from injuries sustained in an attack on his palace in Sanaa nearly three weeks ago.

Feltman's talks will cover a transfer of power from the president to his deputy, the government source said.

As commander of the Republican Guards, the main strike force in Yemen, Ahmed Ali holds an influential position in the country of 23 million, which sits on the southern border of Saudi Arabia, the world's top oil exporter.

Saleh has defied calls from global leaders, elements in his own military and tens of thousands of protesters to end his 33- year-old rule, which has brought Yemen close to financial ruin.

He has also exasperated his rich Gulf Arab neighbors by three times agreeing to step down, only to pull out of a power transition plan at the last minute and cling on to power.

AL QAEDA MILITANTS ESCAPE FROM PRISON

In an early bid to placate protesters demanding his ouster, Saleh promised not to hand power to his son, but many Yemenis say Saleh relatives including Ahmed Ali still hold key levers of power, blocking any transition without Saleh's consent.

Opposition parties allied with youth activists have also insisted that Saleh formally hand over power to Hadi as a step toward a new government and democracy.

An aide to Saleh said on Wednesday his health was on the mend and that he had been receiving guests and giving orders on Yemen's day-to-day affairs, including power and fuel shortages.

"The president has rejected a request from several members of his family to come to Riyadh to visit him, and stressed that he will return home soon," Ahmed al-Sufi, the president's media secretary, told Reuters.

Dozens of al Qaeda militants escaped from a jail in Mukalla following an attack on the compound. State media said three were killed in a clash with troops and two were recaptured.

"Ten of the escapees are dangerous elements who belonged to a cell that had attacked government officials and tourists," a local security official told Reuters.

One soldier was killed and two were wounded when militants opened fire on al-Munawara prison in Mukalla, a security official said.

"The militants opened fire on the prison gates and exchanged fire with the guards, injuring two and killing one," the security official said, adding that 62 prisoners had fled.

All the prisoners were Yemeni and most had been jailed after returning from Iraq where they fought in militant ranks, he said.

(Reporting by Mohamed Sudam in Sanaa and Mohammed Mukhashaf in Aden; writing by Sami Aboudi; editing by Alistair Lyon)

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

2,405 Comments

  • 61 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 3 users disliked this comment
    George Thu Jun 02, 2011 05:55 am PDT Report Abuse
    Stay the hell out of it
  • 94 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 7 users disliked this comment
    TinkerDave Thu May 26, 2011 07:31 am PDT Report Abuse
    Can we please stay out of this one?For once.
  • 409 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 45 users disliked this comment
    Dom Wed May 25, 2011 11:08 am PDT Report Abuse
    And so it continues, all over Africa and the Middle East. We see the issue as youthful “tweeters” yearning to breathe free vs. tyrannical dictators, but the situation is far more complex than that. How many times have we seen it: A dictator in power for decades has plundered his country amassing a vast personal fortune, while suppressing the “rights” of untold numbers of his countrymen. Yet when the political tides finally shift and the end is seemingly inevitable, he refuses to step down – preferring even to throw his country into bloody civil war. We in the West view these “leaders” as quintessentially evil. And yet, surely there is something deeper at play here than simple malevolence. A merely evil person would simply take his fortune and run to a luxurious “exile.” Why do these despots cling to power so tenaciously, even at the risk of losing everything – including their lives, even believing that they are “right” to do so?

    The answer to this question lies in the dominant political and cultural force in much of the Middle East and in Africa. It is a force that is largely unappreciated by Americans in particular, for it plays little role here. That force is TRIBALISM – the loyalty felt and owed to members of one’s own tribe, over the myriad other tribes with which it competes for power and resources. It is a much stronger force than patriotism because it is rooted in blood and the kinship of extended families. What we westerners view as “corruption” – graft, nepotism and illegal patronage is considered not just the norm, but a duty in these countries. Other tribes may resent the leader in power for patronizing his own, but given the opportunity, they would do the same. The tribe comes first.

    The importance of tribalism to the psyche of these “leaders,” can hardly be overstated. Tribalism was at the root of the genocidal carnage in Rwanda between the Hutus and Tutsis. It is why the Baathists in Iraq, whose senior members were part of Saddam Hussein’s Albu Nasir tribe, fought fiercely to protect his regime – and their privileged position in it. It is why Gaddafi’s tribe, the Qadhafa, or the Syrian President Assad’s tribe, the Alawites, will fight just as fiercely to support them. It is why Gbagbo in the Ivory Coast clung to power until he was forcibly ousted (and why the violence didn’t stop with his departure): It is their DUTY to their tribe on which they have bestowed decades of largesse and have received their loyalty and support in return. Abdicating power also means ceding the authority and privileges of the entire tribe. This cultural imperative is all the stronger in leaders of military background, for whom the soldier’s concepts of duty and honor are bound together with tribal allegiance.

    This is also why colonialism has been so destructive in these regions. Mixing these tribes together in some artificial geopolitical entity that we call a “country,” and expecting them to “share” its resources “democratically” is a purely Western concept. It is a recipe for continuous strife until one tribe garners sufficient power to install a “strongman” in the leadership role and forcibly suppresses other tribes in this ersatz “country,” plundering its resources for himself and his tribe. It is a winner-take-all system, and always has been. “Peace” lasts only until another tribe, or temporary alliance of several tribes, obtains sufficient power to overthrow the existing order in favor of their own. This is what is occurring in many countries in Africa and the Middle East today. Until we in the West at least appreciate this seemingly alien concept of tribalism, we risk blundering into these conflicts. We may think we are protecting innocent civilians, but we are also taking sides in what are essentially tribal civil wars, some of which have been ongoing for centuries.
  • 252 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 28 users disliked this comment
    stirandsavor Sun Apr 24, 2011 02:15 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Egypt, Yemen, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Jordan Morroco, Lebanon....next?
  • 43 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 2 users disliked this comment
    Perro Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:57 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Can we please stay out of these countries forever.
  • 51 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 3 users disliked this comment
    Marco Thu Jun 02, 2011 05:43 pm PDT Report Abuse
    NATO=North Atlantic Treaty Organization. How is this the North Atlantic's problem ????.
  • 193 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 24 users disliked this comment
    slappy Thu May 26, 2011 04:58 am PDT Report Abuse
    Western civilization began revolting against its tyrants in the late 1700s. It's taken the people of the Middle East and Africa 200 plus years to catch up. We need to let this happen and let the people of those countries decide their fate.
  • 297 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 44 users disliked this comment
    Inscrutable Sun Apr 24, 2011 06:40 am PDT Report Abuse
    We've deposed Saddam, at a terrible cost, and what has it gotten us? Instead of paying for the war and reconstruction with Iraqi oil, we continue to pour our own money into the God-forsaken place, building infrastructure, when our own infrastructure is crumbling away before our eyes! I say leave these people alone, get out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, and let them sort it out themselves. They will get their own oil production back on line after the insurrections, because they want our money so badly.
  • 193 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 28 users disliked this comment
    Prince Wed Apr 27, 2011 01:10 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Yemen will soon be free. the question is who will take over???
  • 125 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 20 users disliked this comment
    Jeremiah T Wed May 11, 2011 08:29 am PDT Report Abuse
    Can really see were the people in charge put their priorities. They only care about their ego and personal wealth

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.