Opinion

The Weekly Standard

Harbingers of Success

Washington (The Weekly Standard) Vol. 016, Issue 36 - 06/06/2011 – Ronald Reagan’s defeat of Jimmy Carter in 1980, and the subsequent rapid American recovery at home and abroad, didn’t come out of the blue. There were plenty of signs before Election Day 1980 that such a reversal and triumph were possible:

* The late 1970s featured a broad-based rebellion throughout America against big-government, welfare-state liberalism—in the form of tax revolts at the state and national level, the rise of religious conservatism, and popular resistance to elite acquiescence in a foreign policy of weakness and accommodation.

* The late 1970s saw the election of strong conservative leaders abroad who were willing to take on the political establishments and welfare states in their own countries—such as Menachem Begin, who charged out of the political wilderness to victory in Israel in 1977, and Margaret Thatcher, who prevailed against many in her own party and won election in Great Britain in 1979.

* The late 1970s also saw an inspiring popular rebellion against a seemingly well-established dictatorship in Poland, led by Lech Walesa and (in a sense) by Pope John Paul II.

Needless to say, history doesn’t repeat itself. We can’t expect a moment like the pope’s visit to Poland in June 1979. We can’t perhaps expect another Reagan here at home. But there is the real possibility that we are today at a big, pre-recovery-of-the-West moment similar to the late 1970s. The Tea Party is of no less importance than the tax revolt, and the widespread sense that America needs finally to deal with her out-of-control spending and debt is no less fundamental than the sense of liberalism’s failure in the late 1970s. The revulsion (not too strong a word) at the cavalier and disdainful treatment of an old and deep ally like Israel is as heartfelt as the sense of disgust at Jimmy Carter’s foreign policy. The electoral and governing successes of conservative prime ministers Stephen Harper in Canada and Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel are comparable to the achievements of Thatcher and Begin. The Arab Spring in the Greater Middle East, and even the Jasmine Revolution in China, are reminiscent of Solidarity. These developments of 2009-2011 could be precursors of not just a renewal of American conservatism, but a renewal of the West, just as the events of 1977-1979 were harbingers of better days to come.

Of course, as signs of renaissance came into view in the late 1970s, many conservative elites were lapsing into despair, and many in the Republican party waffled and wavered. So it is now. The main obstacle to November 6, 2012, turning out as happily as November 4, 1980, is a kind of premature intellectual resignation, a pseudo-sophisticated political pessimism, that would lead us to settle over the next year for uninspiring champions and timid agendas.

The obstacles to success today remain daunting. It’s understandable that politicians and commentators may lose heart. But here’s a suggestion: Read up on Stephen Harper. Listen to Benjamin Netanyahu. They had (and have) tougher rows to hoe than conservatives in America. Are we truly less able than the tiny state of Israel, or our northern neighbor Canada, to produce a platform that—to quote Ronald Reagan in 1976—“is a banner of bold, unmistakable colors, with no pastel shades,” and to find serious and courageous leaders to explain, and then implement it?

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

16 Comments

  • 9 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 4 users disliked this comment
    bil Tue May 31, 2011 03:03 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Yes, we can vote better but will we? Just as the Nixon, Ford and Carter years were the triumph of progressive bi-partisanship, (but a miserable real world failure) so future wonks will look at Bush - Obama as the rise of two party cognoscenti (Should have worked dammit!). Why managed economies don’t work will always remain a mystery to the wanna-be masters of the rest of us.
  • 2 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 1 users disliked this comment
    Herder of Cats Wed Jun 01, 2011 06:52 am PDT Report Abuse
    It's the economy stupid.
    Misery Index = Unemployment rate + Inflation rate
    http://www.miseryindex.us/

    When Carter left office it was 20.76-the highest ever since 1948. It is over 12 now and mostly in unemployment. If inflation kicks in (like everyone is predicting), no way any sitting president gets re-elected...
  • 18 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 15 users disliked this comment
    Concerned in California Tue May 31, 2011 02:39 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Well written, but factually inaccurate. The tea party movement represents Americas disdain against the fiscally irresponsibility in government, but Reagan brought us the most striking deficit spending in our recent history, Bush Sr. continued this deficit spending for his 4 years (“It’s the economy, stupid). We long for a balanced federal budget, like we had in the last few years of the Clinton administration. Our national debt is a disgrace, but it wasn’t Carter or Clinton who added to it, the debt came down during both their terms. And if Bush Jr. had not left the worst fiscal mess since 1932 for Obama to clean up, we would not be in the mess we are today.
    As for the Arab Spring, that is the people pushing for liberal reform against oppressive, conservative regimes
  • 12 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 10 users disliked this comment
    Edward Tue May 31, 2011 05:58 pm PDT Report Abuse
    I actually lived during the 80's. I remember terms like the rust belt and record unemployment rather than rapid economic recovery. Revisionist history.
  • 18 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 18 users disliked this comment
    lee Tue May 31, 2011 03:10 pm PDT Report Abuse
    The most damage done was when the republicans took control of the congress in 1994 and kept it up to 2006. The republicans controlled the white house for 24 out of the last 36 years and the supreme court for 50 years. The federal reserve is always controlled by either a republican or libertarian. Supply side economics and republican power has created a 14 trillion dollar hole, two wars and a broken middle class.

    In 1959 corporations paid 30% of total taxes and individuals paid 55%, in 2009 corporations paid 6% of taxes and individuals 84%. The tax rate on the very rich has dropped from 90% in the 1950s to 25% now. The wealthy have invested in politicians, and as union power diminished politicians of all stripes have flocked to the corporate feeding trough. Corporations have the same rights as people backed by the supreme court. We have lost our democracy and now we are servants of the wealthy class.
  • 8 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 9 users disliked this comment
    a realist Tue May 31, 2011 02:08 pm PDT Report Abuse
    This article brought to you by AIPAC.
  • 13 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 15 users disliked this comment
    John W Tue May 31, 2011 04:50 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Why is it no on wants to admit that Carter was almost as much of a loser as Obama is?
  • 8 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 10 users disliked this comment
    Rudkus Tue May 31, 2011 01:03 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Oh crap...I read a Bill Kristol column and forgot to wear my wellies.
  • 4 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 6 users disliked this comment
    jorge Wed Jun 01, 2011 04:03 am PDT Report Abuse
    yes, what did Reagan did?.....Since the end of WWII every Us president (democrat and republican) cut the US debt, it was 130% of GDP at the end of WWII, when Carter left office it was 33% of GDP. Reagan, used the goverment credit card, cut taxes and got us into debt, he acknowledge it in his authorized biography "My biggest regret' he said. The US debt at the end of his presidency was 52% of GDP. He cut the taxes for everyone specially the wealthy, but increased the "fees" for everything, and who got hurt the most?, The mantra "Less taxes more revenue" never materialized. Read the US reprorts and stop listening or reading at Mr. Kristol....he does knows what he is talking about, but he does not want you to know.
  • 5 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 13 users disliked this comment
    A_Nonny_Moose Tue May 31, 2011 05:22 pm PDT Report Abuse
    I feel like I should have worn a full body condom to read this article.

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.