Explosions and street fighting grip Yemen capital

Yemen's President Ali Abdullah Saleh speaks during an interview with selected media, including Reuters, in Sanaa Reuters – Yemen's President Ali Abdullah Saleh speaks during an interview with selected media, including Reuters, …

SANAA (Reuters) – Renewed fighting in Yemen's capital between a powerful tribal group and President Ali Abdullah Saleh's forces has killed at least 19 people this week and rocked Sanaa with explosions, officials said on Wednesday.

World powers have been pressing Saleh to sign a Gulf-led deal to end his three-decade rule and stem spreading chaos in unstable Yemen, a haven for al Qaeda militants and neighbor to the world's biggest oil exporter, Saudi Arabia.

Kuwait, part of the Gulf Cooperation Council that tried unsuccessfully to broker a power transfer deal, said it had evacuated its diplomats from Yemen. Qatar, another GCC member, also suspended most operations there. Italy has shut its mission, citing threats against Western embassies.

Witnesses said they heard several blasts but were not sure of the cause or damage near the Hasaba district, the focal point of fighting last week that killed at least 115 people and pushed the country closer to civil war.

"There are very powerful explosions. Sounds like missiles or mortars. May God protect us," a Hasaba resident said.

After a lull of several hours, large blasts began shaking northern Sanaa and nearby areas late on Wednesday, residents said. There was no immediate report of casualties or damage.

This week, there have been three main flashpoints in the country -- the fighting in the capital, government troops gunning down protesters in Taiz in the south and a battle with al Qaeda and Islamic militants in the coastal city of Zinjibar.

Residents also reported overnight fighting near Sanaa airport, which was closed briefly last week during skirmishes between Saleh's forces and opponents within the powerful Hashed tribal confederation, who are led by Sadeq al-Ahmar.

Fourteen soldiers were killed in overnight fighting with the tribesmen, the Defense Ministry website said.

State TV said troops had retaken a number of government buildings seized by tribesmen and found several bodies inside.

Medical officials told Reuters at least five other people had been killed in the recent fighting, which may have entered a new phase with some troops in armored vehicles joining the opposition, suggesting more military defections from Saleh.

"MOVE OUT OF THE WAY"

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Saleh received "a very good offer" from Gulf Arab nations to end the crisis and suggested she saw no hope of a resolution without his departure.

"We cannot expect this conflict to end unless President Saleh and his government move out of the way to permit the opposition and civil society to begin a transition to political and economic reform," Clinton told a news conference.

In a statement issued partly in response to Clinton's remarks, a Yemeni government spokesman said Saleh was prepared to sign the Gulf-sponsored power transition plan and that "the timing of the signing would be set soon through consultation between Yemen and the GCC," state media reported.

Saleh has exasperated his rich Gulf Arab neighbors by three times agreeing to step down, only to renege at the last minute.

Some military leaders broke away from Saleh in March after his troops fired on protesters calling for an end to his 33-year-old rule. Yemen is on the brink of financial ruin, with about a third of its 23 million people facing chronic hunger.

The political risk consultancy Eurasia Group said in a report the most likely outcome is that Saleh leaves through a political deal he brokers from a position of weakness, or is ousted by force by breakaway military units and tribal leaders.

"Saleh leaving power early does not result in a functional Yemeni state that can reassert control over the country in the short term," the report said.

The president's close relatives, who control Yemen's most lucrative sources of revenue and state assets, are pressuring him not to give up power, a diplomatic source told Reuters.

Analysts are worried that instability in Yemen, sitting on a shipping lane that carries about 3 million barrels of oil a day, could embolden a local al Qaeda wing which has attempted attacks on the United States and Saudi Arabia.

Locals and Yemeni troops have been fighting to recapture the coastal city of Zinjibar, which was taken over by several hundred al Qaeda and Islamist militants at the weekend.

(Reporting by Mohammed Mukhashaf in Aden, Khaled al-Mahdi in Taiz, Sara Anabtawi and Firouz Sedarat in Dubai, Eman Goma in Kuwait and Saleh al-Shaibani in Muscat and the Washington Bureau; Writing by Jon Herskovitz; Editing by Jon Hemming)

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

2,015 Comments

  • 173 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 17 users disliked this comment
    stirandsavor Sun Apr 24, 2011 02:15 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Egypt, Yemen, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Jordan Morroco, Lebanon....next?
  • 223 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 29 users disliked this comment
    Dom Wed May 25, 2011 11:08 am PDT Report Abuse
    And so it continues, all over Africa and the Middle East. We see the issue as youthful “tweeters” yearning to breathe free vs. tyrannical dictators, but the situation is far more complex than that. How many times have we seen it: A dictator in power for decades has plundered his country amassing a vast personal fortune, while suppressing the “rights” of untold numbers of his countrymen. Yet when the political tides finally shift and the end is seemingly inevitable, he refuses to step down – preferring even to throw his country into bloody civil war. We in the West view these “leaders” as quintessentially evil. And yet, surely there is something deeper at play here than simple malevolence. A merely evil person would simply take his fortune and run to a luxurious “exile.” Why do these despots cling to power so tenaciously, even at the risk of losing everything – including their lives, even believing that they are “right” to do so?

    The answer to this question lies in the dominant political and cultural force in much of the Middle East and in Africa. It is a force that is largely unappreciated by Americans in particular, for it plays little role here. That force is TRIBALISM – the loyalty felt and owed to members of one’s own tribe, over the myriad other tribes with which it competes for power and resources. It is a much stronger force than patriotism because it is rooted in blood and the kinship of extended families. What we westerners view as “corruption” – graft, nepotism and illegal patronage is considered not just the norm, but a duty in these countries. Other tribes may resent the leader in power for patronizing his own, but given the opportunity, they would do the same. The tribe comes first.

    The importance of tribalism to the psyche of these “leaders,” can hardly be overstated. Tribalism was at the root of the genocidal carnage in Rwanda between the Hutus and Tutsis. It is why the Baathists in Iraq, whose senior members were part of Saddam Hussein’s Albu Nasir tribe, fought fiercely to protect his regime – and their privileged position in it. It is why Gaddafi’s tribe, the Qadhafa, or the Syrian President Assad’s tribe, the Alawites, will fight just as fiercely to support them. It is why Gbagbo in the Ivory Coast clung to power until he was forcibly ousted (and why the violence didn’t stop with his departure): It is their DUTY to their tribe on which they have bestowed decades of largesse and have received their loyalty and support in return. Abdicating power also means ceding the authority and privileges of the entire tribe. This cultural imperative is all the stronger in leaders of military background, for whom the soldier’s concepts of duty and honor are bound together with tribal allegiance.

    This is also why colonialism has been so destructive in these regions. Mixing these tribes together in some artificial geopolitical entity that we call a “country,” and expecting them to “share” its resources “democratically” is a purely Western concept. It is a recipe for continuous strife until one tribe garners sufficient power to install a “strongman” in the leadership role and forcibly suppresses other tribes in this ersatz “country,” plundering its resources for himself and his tribe. It is a winner-take-all system, and always has been. “Peace” lasts only until another tribe, or temporary alliance of several tribes, obtains sufficient power to overthrow the existing order in favor of their own. This is what is occurring in many countries in Africa and the Middle East today. Until we in the West at least appreciate this seemingly alien concept of tribalism, we risk blundering into these conflicts. We may think we are protecting innocent civilians, but we are also taking sides in what are essentially tribal civil wars, some of which have been ongoing for centuries.
  • 112 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 17 users disliked this comment
    slappy Thu May 26, 2011 04:58 am PDT Report Abuse
    Western civilization began revolting against its tyrants in the late 1700s. It's taken the people of the Middle East and Africa 200 plus years to catch up. We need to let this happen and let the people of those countries decide their fate.
  • 132 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 21 users disliked this comment
    Prince Wed Apr 27, 2011 01:10 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Yemen will soon be free. the question is who will take over???
  • 10 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Clown Thu Jun 02, 2011 09:36 am PDT Report Abuse
    let the muslims sort it out for themselves.
  • 197 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 38 users disliked this comment
    Inscrutable Sun Apr 24, 2011 06:40 am PDT Report Abuse
    We've deposed Saddam, at a terrible cost, and what has it gotten us? Instead of paying for the war and reconstruction with Iraqi oil, we continue to pour our own money into the God-forsaken place, building infrastructure, when our own infrastructure is crumbling away before our eyes! I say leave these people alone, get out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, and let them sort it out themselves. They will get their own oil production back on line after the insurrections, because they want our money so badly.
  • 93 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 17 users disliked this comment
    robert Thu May 26, 2011 09:37 am PDT Report Abuse
    soon the headline will read,cival war looms,20 million unemployed americans attack the state governments,and 50 million seniors are on there way to washington to burn it to the ground
  • 528 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 114 users disliked this comment
    TPChief Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:37 pm PST Report Abuse
    A lot of folks can't understand how we came to have an oil shortage here in our country.
    Well, there's a very simple answer. Nobody bothered to check the oil. We just didn't know we were getting low.. The reason for that is purely geographical. US oil is located in: Alaska, California, Coastal Florida, Coastal Louisiana, North Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Texas

    All our dipsticks are located in DC. Have a nice day.
  • 82 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 15 users disliked this comment
    Jeremiah T Wed May 11, 2011 08:29 am PDT Report Abuse
    Can really see were the people in charge put their priorities. They only care about their ego and personal wealth
  • 14 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 1 users disliked this comment
    C S Sun May 29, 2011 09:31 am PDT Report Abuse
    Ever since Obama got into office the press has stopped wanting to see the coffins of returning soldiers.

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.