Obama drops plan to limit global warming gases

WASHINGTON – Environmental groups and industry seem headed for another battle over regulation of greenhouse gases, as President Barack Obama said he will look for ways to control global warming pollution other than Congress placing a ceiling on it.

"Cap-and-trade was just one way of skinning the cat; it was not the only way," Obama said at a news conference Wednesday, a day after Democrats lost control of the House. "I'm going to be looking for other means to address this problem."

Legislation putting a limit on heat-trapping greenhouse gases and then allowing companies to buy and sell pollution permits under that ceiling narrowly passed the House in 2009 as a centerpiece of Obama's domestic agenda, but it stalled in the Senate.

Republicans dubbed the bill "cap-and-tax" because it would raise energy prices. They then used it as a club in the midterm elections against Democrats who voted for it. Thirty of the bill's supporters were among some 50 House Democrats whom voters turned out of office Tuesday.

"It's doubtful that you could get the votes to pass that through the House this year or next year or the year after," Obama said Wednesday.

The new battle over global warming in Congress will target the Environmental Protection Agency, which is poised to regulate greenhouse gases for the first time, after the Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that it could treat heat-trapping gases as pollutants.

John Engler, a former Michigan governor who leads the National Association of Manufacturers, said he expects a Republican-controlled House to take a "fresh look that will get at a lot of questions" dealing with the EPA's role in regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

Environmentalists, meanwhile, urged Obama to hold his ground.

"While there will be attacks on (EPA's) authority, it is important that there not be any surrender on EPA's ability to do the job," said Trip Van Noppen, president of Earthjustice.

The Senate in June rejected by a 53-47 vote a challenge brought by Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski that would have denied the EPA the authority to move ahead with the rules. Six Democrats voted with Republicans to advance the "resolution of disapproval," which the White House had threatened to veto. A similar resolution has broad support in the House, with 140 co-sponsors.

Engler said efforts to block the EPA will only be strengthened by Tuesday's election results.

Obama, when asked about the EPA's authority Wednesday, said that while a court order gave the EPA jurisdiction, the agency still wants help from Congress.

"I don't think ... the desire is to somehow be protective of their powers here," Obama said.

"One of the things that's very important for me is not to have us ignore the science, but rather to find ways that we can solve these problems that don't hurt the economy, that encourage the development of clean energy in this country, that, in fact, may give us opportunities to create entire new industries and create jobs."

___

Associated Press writer Ken Thomas contributed to this report.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

1,516 Comments

  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Ken Sat Nov 06, 2010 04:07 am PDT Report Abuse
    I SeeYou..........if the average person could invest the same amount into an IRA as they pay into social security, they would be wealthy at retirement in lieu of receiving chump change. Like all social programs, it was mandated to take care of those too irresponsible to plan for retirement........the responsible folks get ripped. I pay the maximum and will never see a dime from SS. I retired as a CSRS employee but am forced to pay into something I will never benifit from because the government decided I make too much. How would you like having your paycheck raped and pillaged to contribute to a program you will never benifit from??? I am sick and tired of paying the way for a bunch of lazy bums supported by the government. Anyone who can't make it in America is a total loser in life. Of course, I I exclude the mentally/physically challenged and those hurt by the current economy
  • 2 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Joe C Fri Nov 05, 2010 08:51 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Are you folks really that ignorant? Its no wonder you have no success in your lives nor will you ever become leaders. Whoever did this to you is NOT looking out for the future of America.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Casey McGirk Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:18 am PDT Report Abuse
    More insanity
  • 2 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 1 users disliked this comment
    UDIBAH Fri Nov 05, 2010 08:28 am PDT Report Abuse
    IMPEACH HIM.........
  • 3 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 3 users disliked this comment
    LarryC Fri Nov 05, 2010 08:24 am PDT Report Abuse
    Defund the EPA, problem solved. Man made globol warming is a bigger joke than the imposter, lying, POS in the Whitehouse. Remove him from office now.
  • 3 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 6 users disliked this comment
    SP Fri Nov 05, 2010 07:25 am PDT Report Abuse
    It just goes to show that there is no stopping global warming gases from me or my supporters.

    That's cuz we tea baggers are taking this planet to hell in a tithing basket!

    You betcha!

    *wink*

    And folks, don't forget to donate your monthly government mental disability checks over the next 24 months, I need all of your help for 2012.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 2 users disliked this comment
    Bryan Fri Nov 05, 2010 07:02 am PDT Report Abuse
    He better be careful how fast he back peddles, he might slip.
  • 3 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 4 users disliked this comment
    CynicalbyNature Fri Nov 05, 2010 06:30 am PDT Report Abuse
    I wish that he would have told Governor Arnold, Governor-to-be Brown, and all of the liberal Dems. in California. Beginning in January, as AB32 takes root, we'll see the California version of cap-n-trade followed by a mass exodus of residents to other states.
  • 6 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 3 users disliked this comment
    Larry Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:28 pm PDT Report Abuse
    "Cap-and-trade was just one way of skinning the cat; it was not the only way," Obama said at a news conference Wednesday, a day after Democrats lost control of the House. "I'm going to be looking for other means to address this problem."

    Tell Obama to look for other ways to address the problem of unemployment and no jobs instead .... and if he wants to try "cap and trade" tell him to apply it to China - they are the worst polluters who really don't even care - as long as they can sell their cheap junk to everyone else ...

    And what I am seeing in this is incredible - the man is a loser to start, made big promises and delivered on none of them - and just lost again recently in the elections - and still thinks he is God of the Universe .... that man Obama really has no clue ... he still acts and talks as if he is going to change the world and the reality is this - most people have stopped even listening to him and are just waiting for the next election to vote him out ... so who is he really talking to - the wall ? or just himself ?

    Wait til he tries changing the laws so he can stay in power longer ... that ought to be interesting to see...
  • 5 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 6 users disliked this comment
    The Great Rage Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:00 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Yep, force industrial nations to limit what they produce. All the while, Latin America and Africa dump all they want into the atmosphere and oceans.

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.