Gashes on Bones Suggest T. Rex Was a Cannibal

The monstrous Tyrannosaurus rex was not only a danger to other dinosaurs, but to itself.

Scientists have now found signs T. rex could have been a cannibal - gouges on the bones of these giants that could only have been made by another T. rex.

As vertebrate paleontologist Nicholas Longrich of Yale University was searching through fossil collections for mammal toothmarks on dinosaur remains, he discovered a bone with gashes up to nearly a half-inch (1.3 cm) deep in it. Given the age and location of the fossil, the marks had to be made by T. rex.

"They're the kind of marks that any big carnivore could have made, but T. rex was the only big carnivore in western North America 65 million years ago," Longrich explained. [See "The World's Deadliest Animals"]

It was only after he identified the culprit that Longrich realized the victim was another T. rex. After combing through a few dozen T. rex bones from several different museum fossil collections, he discovered a total of one arm bone and three foot bones, including two toes, that showed evidence of T. rex cannibalism.

"It's surprising how frequent it appears to have been," Longrich said. "It could mean that they were really thorough at cleaning up after animals died in the environment. Or it could mean that they were killing and eating each other fairly often."

The U- and V-shaped gouges are of the kind T. rex made when it was stripping meat from a carcass, Longrich said. The marks appear to have been made some time after death, Longrich said - the culprit might have picked at the smaller foot and arm bones after eating most of the meat off the more accessible parts of the carcass.

However, Longrich is uncertain as to whether these marks are the result of fighting or scavenging, adding that if two T. rex battled to the death, the victor might have made a meal out of his adversary.

"Modern big carnivores do this all the time," Longrich said. "It's a convenient way to take out the competition and get a bit of food at the same time." Cannibalism is widespread in the animal kingdom, including female spiders that eat their mates, chimpanzees that consume infant chimps, and great white sharks that eat their siblings in the womb.

Although only one other dinosaur species, the bipedal predator Majungatholus, was a known cannibal, Longrich said the practice was probably more common than we think.

"Until now we had only one documented example of cannibalism in dinosaurs, so you'd tend to assume it's pretty rare," Longrich told LiveScience. "All of a sudden, we have four examples of cannibalism in T. rex. So that's definitely a surprise."

The scientists detailed their findings online Oct. 15 in the journal PLoS ONE.

LiveScience.com chronicles the daily advances and innovations made in science and technology. We take on the misconceptions that often pop up around scientific discoveries and deliver short, provocative explanations with a certain wit and style. Check out our science videos, Trivia & Quizzes and Top 10s. Join our community to debate hot-button issues like stem cells, climate change and evolution. You can also sign up for free newsletters, register for RSS feeds and get cool gadgets at the LiveScience Store.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

54 Comments

  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    chuck 2 hours ago Report Abuse
    I read a post down below that the T-Rex had a very small brain. If thats true i would say he would go on more instinct that anything. So its seems if he's going more in instinct then he was probably more of a scavenger than a hunter. And while he was so intimidating and probably got his way most times hunting for him was probably nothing more that overpowering other dinos who he encountered on a daily basis. With his teeth of course.
  • 3 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Skptc101 4 hours ago Report Abuse
    "... T. rex was a scavenger, not a hunter."

    Why not? The T. rex was certaily fast enough to run down prey. See:

    Science Daily - T. Rex Quicker Than Professional Athlete, Say Scientists

    Excerpt: "The University of Manchester study used a powerful supercomputer to calculate the running speeds of five meat-eating dinosaurs that varied in size from a 3kg Compsognathus to a six-tonne Tyrannosaurus.

    The study -- believed to be the most accurate ever produced -- puts the T. rex at speeds of up to 18mph, fractionally quicker than a sportsman such as a professional soccer player."
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 1 users disliked this comment
    Seek Jesus 4 hours ago Report Abuse
    I'll wait and see what Jack Horner at Montana State U has to say about this. Then will can be sure of the facts.
  • 3 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Skptc101 4 hours ago Report Abuse
    "Scientists still actually know very little about dinosaurs."

    "Actually", scientists DO understand the T. rex's evolutionary tree fairly well. See:

    Science Daily - Tyrannosaurus Redux: T. Rex Was More Than Just a Large Carnivore at Top of Food Chain, New Findings Reveal

    Excerpt: "A new paper describing recent research and a new evolutionary tree is published in the journal Science.

    "T. rex is the most iconic of all dinosaurs," says Mark Norell, curator in the Division of Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History. "Its star power has allowed a research focus into questions not normally undertaken with fossils, questions like bone growth, biomechanics, and neurology."

    "We know more about tyrannosaurs than any other group of dinosaurs -- even more than some groups of living organisms," says Stephen Brusatte, a graduate student affiliated with the Museum and first author of the paper. "
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 3 users disliked this comment
    La Dee Dah 11 hours ago Report Abuse
    That's what my wife calls it: T-Rex
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Frequent Flyer 14 hours ago Report Abuse
    Scientists still actually know very little about dinosaurs. I'm with Squanto in that I think it more likely T. rex was a scavenger, not a hunter. Look at bears for a contemporary example. Polar bears are hunters and true carnivores due to their environment. Every other variety that comes to mind are omnivores and occasional hunters, but primarily scavengers. It's hard to imagine an animal as large as T. rex finding enough food by hunting alone.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 10 users disliked this comment
    Gregory 15 hours ago Report Abuse
    Carbon dating can only go so far back in time. I'm don't remember the figure, but I think it is only 50,000 years. What these scientists need to do, is to time-date these fossils. They haven't done that, I suspose, as they already know that the fossils are millions of years old. That's a pre-supposition of theirs...and I don't agree with.

    If we found a fossil of a Panda....and noticed how big its teeth were, are we to deduce if it's a meat-eater because of that feature? It chews and eats bamboo.
    Comment hidden due to low rating. Show Comment
  • 1 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 9 users disliked this comment
    Gregory 15 hours ago Report Abuse
    They died in Noah's flood and got bruised and battered...Then, covered over with tons and tons of separated mud(s), that solidfied into the various rock strata.
    Comment hidden due to low rating. Show Comment
  • 4 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    J 16 hours ago Report Abuse
    Since A seems to be directly involved in the discovery of this baby dragon, certainly he must have tons of pictures. Seems something like that would cause a media frenzy. I wonder why A would share this amazing discovery with us but keep the media out of it? A... you got those pics online somewhere? Would be nice to see your baby dragon.
  • 2 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 1 users disliked this comment
    Squanto 18 hours ago Report Abuse
    I think it's more likely that T Rex was a scavenger rather than a cannibal. Cannibalism would result in the rapid demise of the species whereas scavenging would help insure survival. Since T Rex lived for many millions of years it's more logical to believe it was a scavenger.

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.