User Info
28132_Pheonix Wright Ace Attorney - Objection
Peer-IGN collection | wishlist Title: The Big Cheese
Blog Posts: 165
Comments: 3,102
Blog Created: Nov '05
Blog Tools
Friends
-1_Default twisted_devil_mind Last Post: 2/11/07 View Notes
-1_Default kyle_larson Last Post: 2/8/07 View Notes
-1_Default MJSIX Last Post: 2/9/07 View Notes
19891_Captain Mario kodeczero Last Post: 2/8/07 View Notes
-1_Default TomG1992 Last Post: 2/10/07 View Notes
-1_Default doglikepaul Last Post: 2/11/07 View Notes
7771_Mallrats Comic lltbg Last Post: 3/7/06 View Notes
43187_Ghost Recon Ubi_GhostRecon Last Post: 2/8/07 View Notes
9637_Oasis cgb777 Last Post: 2/7/07 View Notes
15308_006 uglydemon Last Post: 2/5/07 View Notes
30808_Shaolin Soccer - Lightning Hands ChampionsLeague Last Post: 2/9/07 View Notes
39676_Heroes - Claire Bennet BrianLo Last Post: 2/11/07 View Notes
28302_Brawl - Pit Aldavas Last Post: 2/4/07 View Notes
39916_ZX - Aile IceTGressa Last Post: 2/11/07 View Notes
-1_Default TheNewMasterChief Last Post: 1/26/07 View Notes
Thursday, February 08, 2007

These Aren't The Games You're Looking For. Move Along. Move Along.

"It's just a weather balloon." Though I haven't heard a PR person deliver this line yet, I'm sure it's not far off.

As many of my colleagues who cover the world of gaming know, getting a publisher to acknowledge the existence of a game that it hasn't officially announced via press release or media alert is pretty much futile. A decade ago, it was all a lot easier. You could call up virtually anyone involved in the creation of a videogame and get a straightforward response. Developers would often happily oblige sharing details about their next title in development, no matter if a publisher signed on or not.

But then things changed. Publishers -- especially public companies -- worked hard to erect walls around the development teams and star designers, lest they inadvertently release something that hadn't been run by shareholders and could impact share prices or give the competition the heads-up. This was an expected development, even though the gaming industry's pursuit of leaks and news control is much more fervent than its older brother in Hollywood. Again, no surprise. You don't tell Spielberg "don't talk about Indy 4, fool!" -- but if CliffyB acknowledges the potential-maybe-possible sequel to a game that ended in a cliffhanger, the red phone with the colorful Windows logo will no doubt start ringing. With the exception of names like Miyamoto or Kojima, game designers aren't afforded the same autonomy over their projects to operate outside the controlled PR environment. Not that movie PR reps aren't pulling their hair out when someone like James Cameron comes out and openly comments about his next movie -- but it nevertheless remains an accepted part of movie making and buzz generation.

But I digress, this isn't really what I wanted to talk about. Let's go back to the quote in my headline. What gets me is when you're staring straight at the two robots you're looking for and someone waves their arm and says they're not it. But there's no rumble in the background; no blurring of the mind. You're still staring at the robots and you start stuttering: "But... But, that's them."

It happens every week in the world of gaming coverage -- and even more so with companies like ours that wear multiple hats. For example, IGN's teams don't only write about games, they also provide pre-formatted data about games to the end user. One such data point is how suitable a game is for a certain age group: you guessed it, the ESRB rating. In order to obtain an ESRB rating, a game publisher has to get footage and other documentation of its game in front of the ratings board. It's pretty much a mandatory step in the process of creating and publishing a retail game. The game is far along and almost ready to go out, it gets submitted and assigned a rating, the ESRB rating is fed to retailers, magazines and websites, and they all display the rating so their readers and buyers know what age group the game is appropriate for.

Here's where things get tripped up -- and where the famous handwave pops up again and again: a publisher submits a game for an ESRB rating that's yet to be announced by its PR team (and doesn't tell the ESRB to hold back distribution of the rating, which it can and will do); everyone gets the ratings feed; unannounced games get added to games databases and retail lists -- including IGN's external data feed to Muze (which in turn supplies big retail chains). Here's were things get all Jedi. The editor in charge of following up on the story calls the publisher for comment. The publisher says a variation of one of the two: 1) "We don't comment on rumors and speculation." 2) "That title's not on our radar."

I value our partners at PR greatly and sympathize with their challenge to control information flow, but there's got to be a way to fix this process. The notion that an ESRB listing is a "rumor" is insulting. The ESRB will rate a game if the publishers asks it. It doesn't go around and pick random titles and assigns a rating based on lucid dreams. A title listing is either a mistake or it's a confirmation that a game is actively being considered for release. The issue isn't one of overeager press or the ESRB "leaking" titles, it's the age-old multi-headed setup of the promotions engine at the big game publishers.

First of all, the process for obtaining an ESRB rating and the separate release of "prebook" information to retailers needs to be part of a chain of events, not run in parallel. A game should be announced to the public, then rated, then exposed via retail channels. ESRB ratings and retailers are services geared towards the public -- the process is broken if a publisher cannot reliably put 1, 2, 3 in a row. This is not an issue unique to the US and its ESRB, by the way. The same happens occasionally with PEGI in the UK, USK in Germany, and even with Japanese CERO ratings. The nature of the press in Japan is just such that they don't report it.

Secondly, publishers need to empower their PR teams to say "no." It happens once in a while that titles get "announced" that aren't real. "No comment" is either "yes, it's true," "no, it's wrong," or "I don't know." If the title doesn't exist, saying "no, it's wrong" does not cause any damage. It effectively ends rumor mongering before it gets out of hand and causes potential disappointments.

Lastly, publishers need to empower their PR reps to say "yes." Not to pick on KOEI, but how ridiculous is the fact that you can look up the ESRB rating for Romance of the Three Kingdoms IV for Wii's Virtual Console, but the publisher is unable to say either "we'd like to release it, but aren't sure yet," or "yes, it's coming." The game is more than 10 years old. It'll likely be downloaded by fewer Wii owners than read this blog. Where is the damage in acknowledging definite or tentative plans to release this title as a download? Will the potential of adding $8,000 of revenue to the publisher's fiscal year send shareholders into a frenzy? Will the planned announcement of this title (no doubt on a Monday morning at 5:00 am) send shockwaves through the ranks of strategy fans worldwide? Or is the worry that Matt and Bozon will be less surprised when they download the title from Nintendo's Wii Shop Channel for the first time and are introduced to a mysterious franchise they never even knew existed?

There are secrets worth keeping... and there are truths worth admitting. If secrecy is that important, publishers need to fix their information flow. But if there is no damage in telling the truth once in a while, how nice would it be if the bearded man stopped waving that hand in front of your face and just gave you the damn robots?

 

Category: Gaming
Posted: 12:08 pm by Peer-IGN      Rating:  16  1     Views: 3067

Comments (13)
2/8 12:13pm, optivillecmc posted:

Hey Peer,

Sorry to use your blog for this reason, but...

My Wii got really sick (sad!) and had to be replaced by Nintendo.
We had exchanged Wii numbers, but now my old one is gone forever (I'm welling up!).

If you don't mind, do you mind reentering me?

2357-3047-5937-7707

Thanks so much - sorry for bothering... happy
-chad (optivillecmc)

 
2/8 12:44pm, mwgiii posted:

I don't believe that even if they were empowered with being able telling the truth, that the PR Hacks would.

It's just not in their DNA. Their truth telling ability is on the same level as politicians.
 
2/8 1:16pm, snapfu1 posted:

Interesting post, Peer. Always neat to hear about the industry from a behind-the-scenes view.
 
2/8 1:23pm, KladKain posted:

I really enjoyed the Romance of the Three kingdoms series during the SNES days. In fact, I stopped playing that series when it made the jump to the playstation. 3 and 4 are probably the best of that particular series....

So, ill be right there downloading that onto my Wii!

Heres hoping that Koei Release Uncharted Waters: New Horizons on the VC..
 
2/8 1:51pm, backofthefridge posted:

Maybe your just asking the wrong questions!
 
2/8 1:59pm, sng-ign posted:

peer-ign posted:
There are secrets worth keeping... and there are truths worth admitting. If secrecy is that important, publishers need to fix their information flow.
IGN religiously follows the rules laid out by game PR. If we didn't, we would not be IGN.
 
2/8 2:00pm, sng-ign posted:

BTW - ROTK4 is awesome. The game editor denies you placing a high score, but you can pretty much ass rape the game to your liking.
 
2/8 2:39pm, Peer-IGN posted:

>IGN religiously follows the rules laid out by game PR. If we didn't, we would not be IGN.

That made no sense, Ng. It's not about following the rules of gaming PR. Here's the story about RottK IV. Daemon reported all the information that he can report about the game being rated by the ESRB.

My point is, why couldn't KOEI acknowledge plans to release the title for VC if it has already submitted it to the ESRB for a rating? I used this one as an example since this type of game is rather insignificant versus, say, Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories, which Rockstar didn't want to talk about when the PS2 version got rated by the ESRB the week before that. We all know that getting an ESRB rating is not the genesis of a game -- it should be a final step before publishing and thus be treated by publishers like that.

There is no reason to not announce a game prior to getting an ESRB rating or when a title is submitted to the ESRB. To then pretend that it doesn't exist AFTER it's been rated is just plain silly. We've been through this so many times now.
 
2/8 3:05pm, MarkRyan-IGN posted:

It's not a beard until it's a half inch long or longer. Robots can't grow beards anyway, so I don't see your point.
 
2/8 3:11pm, __Icarus__ posted:

So what secret are you hiding?
 

Archive
February 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Friends' Posts
-1_Default doglikepaul
Feb 11 '07 6:24 pm PST
Vote for a new header for next month pretty please!!!

Well I just want to get this over with so if you can vote for a header pretty please with a...

39676_Heroes - Claire Bennet BrianLo
Feb 11 '07 5:41 pm PST
The Wrap - February 11th

What an eventful and slow week we’ve had. On one hand we had the biggest TV event of the...

-1_Default brainchild138
Feb 11 '07 5:07 pm PST
I've gone Greek!

Today I was inducted into Alpha Chi. It's an honorary society. Here's some crap...

-1_Default Next-Gen-Gamer
Feb 11 '07 3:59 pm PST
Desktop Sunday

Don't expect this to be a new feature. I just needed a title for this entry. Please feel free...

36100_chobotcollege sng-ign
Feb 11 '07 3:12 pm PST
Classic cartridge cleaning

So the new guides guy -- who you all know as Andre 'Twilight Princess Wii Sucks Big Donkey...

43159_Iron Man Flash1103
Feb 11 '07 2:41 pm PST
I bought Castlevania: Portrait of Ruin today

Well since the results for the poll I had posted previously were overwhelming I went out and...

-1_Default THE-I.A.L.S.
Feb 11 '07 11:01 am PST
Jessica Chobot(her real last name?) is pure love

Damn! Look how beautiful she is!: ...

39916_ZX - Aile IceTGressa
Feb 11 '07 9:21 am PST
And yet the homosexuality continues.

Once again, I've been subjected to sanctions over some minor shit all because of some issues...

8140_Magikarp Mykas0
Feb 11 '07 6:22 am PST
In case you're wondering...

...what I've been doing these days, well, I've been playing the latest port of "Final...

-1_Default whatwebe
Feb 10 '07 9:12 pm PST
Idea: Best WWII Game EVER.

So I just finished playing Call of Duty 3, which was by all accounts a pretty fun WWII...

© 2007 IGN Entertainment, Inc (6.12.15.2300, ASPNET1) 0.296


IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | TeamXbox | GameStats | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | AskMen.com
CheatsCodesGuides | FilePlanet | 3D Gamers | Direct2Drive | Rotten Tomatoes | GamerMetrics
By continuing past this page, and by your continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1996-2007, IGN Entertainment, Inc.   About Us | Support | Advertise | Updated Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA.