Why swearing on Twitter is bad for your reputation

July 17, 2009

Why swearing on Twitter is bad for your reputation

It is okay to swear by Twitter, but just plain wrong to swear on Twitter!

I’m grateful to Internet Psychologist Graham Jones for Tweeting about ‘Twittergate’ and an unseemly row that has erupted via Twitter after a Conservative councillor in West Berkshire, who Twittered a rival was ‘talking b**locks’.

The councillor, David Betts, the Conservative councillor for Purley, who is the West Berkshire Council executive member in charge of highways and transport, has been exposed for levelling the vulgar language at rival councillor, Liberal Democrat Alan Macro, he heard on the radio.

Now this was almost a month ago and had he had more than 200 followers it might have erupted sooner, but honestly? He calls himself a PR Consultant on his Twitter bio, but it doesn’t take a great deal of PR savvy to know becoming the story isn’t such great practice, especially online when it will be around long after... say a local election! How many people beyond Twitter are taking offence at his language now?

Personally, on Twitter when someone I follow is a bit too free with the swearing, along with shameless selling or invites to secure thousands of followers with little effort, that is grounds for a swift unfollow and possibly even a block or complaint to Twitter.

There is little sign of contrition. Councillor Betts told the Reading Chronicle that:

“Twitter is an instant medium. It is what you are thinking at that moment. It is there for a few minutes then forgotten about.

“I woke up and heard Alan Macro talking on 107fm and thought he was misrepresenting the council’s position.

“It is not a word I would have used in the council chamber, it maybe a word I would use in the pub.”

Or one he is happy to use on Twitter where the memory is more precise than a recollection of colourful language down the pub.

He said much the same to Newbury Today, but adds:

“On reflection, I upset him and shouldn't have said that, but I've got to ask whether there was really anything to get upset about.”

Is it just me, or is this someone elected to public office suggesting that because social media is immediate it does not require common decency or self control? If social media moves too fast for to behave with respect for others than maybe it isn’t for him!

Also, what kind of shabby qualified explanation of an apology is that? I don’t doubt he is sorry about the fuss and bother and online legacy David Betts has created for himself, but I’m not convinced he is sorry about freely swearing on Twitter.

Again with the qualification! On Twitter he replied to Tim Montgomerie, editor of ConservativeHome.com that:

"On reflection, I should not have used the term, for which I apologise. However, mountains and molehills spring to mind."

This isn’t some stroppy teenager railing against the unfairness of the world; this is a member of the West Berkshire Council’s executive who kinda thinks it is okay to swear on a very public forum! A cursory search of his Twitter feed will find other profanity too.

Coincidentally, Ant Hodges from Swindon Design agency Creative Rush has written a thoughtful blog that concludes: ‘Swearing does not belong in any professional business context’.

I’ve commented there and generally I would say swearing is rarely appropriate (a misjudged hammer blow to the thumb aside), however I have one thought.

Building rapport can be essential to doing business and what do you do when your prospect swears like a proverbial trooper? Now, you could be puritanical about it and withdraw on principle, but honestly that seems a bit judgemental to me.

I know people who swear. Some of my best friends swear and on occasion even I do! Simply speaking, language has evolved and there are times, albeit rarely, when swearing in business is not wrong but is actually essential. If you are building rapport with someone who clearly has a colourful turn of phrase, being offended will not help your cause, reflecting some of that language back in the spirit in which it is meant is actually helpful.

To recap:

    • Don’t swear on Twitter. (Especially if you are an elected councillor!)
    • Don’t swear in business... unless you really have to!

Comments

Ant Hodges said...

Interesting timing Nigel - From where I sit, I think that any leader in society, business or otherwise, has an obligation to develop the right culture in the circles they mix in.

Should swearing be used to promote a better culture for society? I think not as I have said on my blog - thanks for the reference!

Ant Hodges, 17/07/2009 13:33
www.creativerush.co.uk
www.anthodges.co.uk
www.twitter.com/hodgesant
www.linkedin.com/in/anthodges
Peter Shorney said...

Interesting points here.

Personally(and what other perspective can I have on this?), it made me chuckle. I think it's a bit of a non-story, but it shows how we feel about manners and bounderies.

One minister is oh-so-terribly offended at such horrendous disrespect, while the minister in the spotlight, David Betts, said "I don't think that the points you've made are wholly accurate. With this in mind, and while I respect you very much in what you've achieved, I think you are rather mistaken."

What he did was got a spiky point across in Twitter's 140 character limit. I don't think his PR skills are questionable. He's shuffled off the image of a crusty, dusty conservative MP in those 140 characters.

Peter Shorney, 17/07/2009 13:36
www.chasing-vegas.co.uk
www.chasing-vegas.co.uk/blog
www.twitter.com/peacockpete
Graham Jones said...

Excellent advice, Nigel. It reminds me of when I was at primary school. One lad in our class swore like the proverbial trooper.

One day, my mum was coming to the school gate to collect me when Alan said:"Hello Mrs Jones, I've given up swearing."

"Oh have you Alan, that's lovely," said my mum.

To which Alan replied: "Yeah, you won't hear me b****ing well swearing again."

Just like the councillors, Alan didn't even realise he was swearing.

It is, I reckon, a major online communications problem. In the face-to-face world, we might think in such a way that makes our mind conjure up a swearword. But we would observe the people around us, consider them, "feel" the atmosphere in the room, take note of the situation and then usually push the word backwards in our minds.

Online we can't see the people around us and gauge their reactions so easily, hence swearing becomes much easier and that's why you find it all over the web.

The result is that people like our councillors in this spat then think to be "cool", "hip", or "down with the groove" need to demonstrate their online credentials by swearing because "that's what you do online".

If ever we needed evidence that politicians of all kinds are out of touch with the real world, this is yet another example.

Graham Jones, 17/07/2009 13:36
www.grahamjones.co.uk/
www.grahamjones.co.uk/blog.html
www.twitter.com/grahamjones
www.linkedin.com/in/grahamjones
Nigel Morgan said...

Ooh, you've got to love the cut and thrust of debate!

While local musician Pete Shorney thinks the councillor (whatever the opinion they have of themselves they are neither ministers or MPs!)is being hip and cool!

However, the (if I may) more world wide web wise Graham Jones takes a distinctly different viewpoint and suggests that the councillor has proven himself even more out of touch by swearing online and not considering his audienc

I wonder if David Betts will be commenting here anytime soon?

Nigel Morgan, 17/07/2009 13:50
Peter Shorney said...

Don't get me wrong, Nigel. The words "hip and cool" should never be put in the same vicinity as the word "MP". ;-)

Peter Shorney, 17/07/2009 13:54
www.twitter.com/peacockpete73
peV said...

When used to be 'with it' or display 'aggressive assertiveness', it's just another yawnworthy (Twitter) 'unfollow' offence.

For a politician to make such a display only degrades their reputation to that of the 'angry at the world' teen trying to make their voice angrily heard amid the sea of life-seasoned veterans. Some teens (and those older who should know better), not all, of course.

People mostly misjudge the context and situation in which profanity is used, usually getting the whole thing wrong and make themselves look ridiculous.

On the flipside to this of course, we do now seem to live in an age where the public 'skin' is getting thinner and perhaps overly sensitive, something perhaps in conflict with our long evolved British 'robustness'...?

peV, 17/07/2009 14:35
www.twitter.com/DarthTurnip
Adrian Scott said...

Excellent advice Nigel.

It comes down to professionalism and being taken seriously. Don't drop your standards just becasue your using a new media channel. Be consistent, be professional.

Adrian Scott, 17/07/2009 14:39
www.companioncomputers.co.uk
www.twitter.com/Adrian_Scott
www.linkedin.com/in/BusinessWebGuru
Rachael said...

Really interesting blog. I've got to say I use the odd bit of bad language, although, it's in context, I try not to be outwardly offensive with my use of "French" but I have to agree if you're a business on twitter NEVER EVER swear, I don't think people realise quite how quick twitter injects into google and you do not want potential clients searching twitter to see rants/foul language.

To be honest, I really don't like tweeters who overly swear, sometimes it isn't so much the words it's more the context in which it's used. I don't think that some people realise when they tweet it actually comes across as quite aggressive and rude.

I don't unfollow people for their use of fruity language, however, I do and will unfollow people when I feel it's arrogant and rude behavior that they're displaying.

Rachael, 17/07/2009 14:44
www.rachaelblogs.co.uk
www.twitter.com/rachaelblogs
peV said...

Been thinking a little more about this, and it does make me wonder about the reasons 'why' swearing (a) is so commonly used, and (b) there is sometimes an overreaction to it.

Our society has become progressively de-sensitized over the decades - even our children are bombarded by often horrific imagery in the media, whether it be fictional or real-world. A movie, for example, that may have been rated as a strict 18 perhaps twenty years ago, may now only achieve a 12 or 15 rating.

As a species evolved to thrive in high-risk and dangerous situations (survival instincts, danger sports, etc), perhaps we are continually trying to recapture our risk addiction in a world where (our) government legislates to soften up and wrap in cotton wool? So we try to 'shock' ourselves back to humanity as we think it should be, to inject a little conflict else we don't feel alive otherwise?

(I thought about the subject of risk earlier and compared it with my own past risk-obsession with mountaineering - I did it, not because "it's there", but rather by facing a situation with an alarming probability of death, only then, did I know I was alive.)

On the thin-skin observation I made earlier - perhaps we are deliberately trying to thin our own skins in society in order to 'feel something' (anything) because we know how de-sensitized we have become, so we can feel some 'shock' at something that perhaps wouldn't have been considered particularly outrageous in the first place?

Maybe this is why we have become so unbalanced about its' use - not knowing when and when not to use it?

My word I've got awfully deep and philosophical for a Friday afternoon! LOL

peV, 17/07/2009 16:01
www.twitter.com/darthTurnip
Nigel Morgan said...

Well, somewhat belatedly I have received a direct message from the swearing councillor in question, David Betts, and he politely refuses to take part in this debate. He says:

"Sorry Nigel, but I have no intention of stirring this particular storm in a tea cup."

Now there's a shame!

Nigel Morgan, 24/07/2009 12:39
Nikki Pilkington said...

Only just seen this :)

As someone who frequently says "Bloody" and "B*gger", the odd 'B*llocks" isn't really going to put me off using someone, especially in the context stated here.

OK it's maybe not the best way to promote yourself, but to me, it shows he is passionate about his own opinions and not afraid to show it.

There was a PR company in Milton Keynes in the 90s who had a long running ad in the local press that was basically a full page spread of the word "Bullsh*t" (not starred out), with his message underneath - he gained more clients than he put off, I'm sure.

Nikki Pilkington, 07/08/2009 11:08
www.nikkipilkington.com
www.businessontwitter.cm
www.twitter.com/nikkipilkington
www.linkedin.com/in/nikkipilkington

Leave a Comment

Name (required)

Email (will not be published) (required)

Website

Blog

Twitter

LinkedIn

Submit Comment