Argos PR blunder over worker's Facebook grumble sacking

August 22, 2011

Argos PR blunder over workers Facebook grumble sacking

I heard a joke the other day that police had caught a gang of rioters who has smashed their way into a branch of Argos and stolen the catalogues. But the joke is on Argos after they clumsily sacked a cancer-suffering worker for grumbling on Facebook sparking a slew of negative PR.

After 13-years of working at Argos, 56-year-old David Rowat has found himself sacked for gross misconduct after two Facebook updates that didn’t even name Argos. The first said: “Had a great day back at work after my hols who am I kidding!!” And the second: “Back to the shambles that is work”. This was to all 89 of his friends on Facebook!

Rowat, who only ever missed work for a leg operation, told his local paper, The Romford Recorder that he was “shell-shocked” when bosses told him he had committed gross misconduct for two status updates on his private page on the social networking site. The stock room leader says he was escorted from Argos in Market Place, Romford, on Tuesday lunchtime last week by security.

“I would understand it if I had said something really bad about the company, but it was a little grumble. I’m the sole breadwinner in my house – my wife had to take early retirement because of ill-health – so I’m not sure what I’m going to do for work.”

A faceless spokesman for Argos has told the assorted media who have covered this story: “This has been identified as a gross misconduct disciplinary procedure. We take matters of this nature extremely seriously and have arrived at this course of action after an extensive internal investigation that involved multiple factors and events.

“As a responsible employer it is our duty to uphold the confidential nature of employee disciplinary procedures.”

Unless Rowat’s Facebook page makes it clear that he works at Argos and is sloppy about privacy, and even then, it seems doubtful to me that these updates would withstand the scrutiny of an employment tribunal.

It doesn’t seem as clear cut as when Argos sacked a man back in 2007 for starting a page on Facebook that declared: "I work at Argos and can't wait to leave because it's sh*t."

Obviously as the leading public relations and social media consultancy in Berkshire, Morgan PR can offer some insight here and no doubt you are asking: “What lessons can we learn from Argos and poor public relations crisis management?”

Firstly, kudos to Argos for actually having a ‘social networking policy’ in the first place when so many organisations have yet to bother. Would you know what to do if a member of staff was less than fulsome in their mention of life as your employee?

Even then, it should not be the case that an employer is as overbearing as Argos appears to be in this case – how on earth can you expect to control your employees’ thoughts and behaviours in their own time? You have to take on the chin that people may say negative things and unless it reflects badly on your brand.

Social media is such a newsworthy subject now that banning, sacking and other negative responses are likely to garner traditional headlines, while going viral on the social media platform. Also check out this update posted on the official Argos Facebook page – which is ‘liked’ by just less than 90,000. So the poison from this PR blunder is spreading here too.

Argos Facebook bluder

Incidentally, over 100,000 people are fans of a different unofficial Facebook page: I've stolen a little blue Argos catalogue pen ;) Go figure!

So foremost, best to avoid this scenario in the first place! Using employment procedures properly often takes the steam out of these reactionary types of stories whereas an abrupt, escorted from the premises kind of dismissal here almost guarantees gossip and can ensure a story becomes public. How different would this have been if Rowat had been suspended? If the story was not as daisy fresh much of the media would have ignored it.

The Argos statement – while claiming to ‘uphold the confidential nature of employee disciplinary procedures’ pours doubt and intrigue that there is more to this with: ‘an extensive internal investigation that involved multiple factors and events.’ This may have been a clumsy effort to dissuade the media from engaging, but actually it raises more questions and that never concludes a tricky PR dilemma. It is either confidential and you say nothing, or be up front!

Also, why anonymous? A named person would have been better and gives the problem ownership rather than a reinforcing the faceless corporate nature of the statement. It suggests they care and are less likely to have made this decision without serious consideration. That would mitigate the negative feelings this story creates towards the Argos brand.

So while we await the employment tribunal, and assuming no-one starts a petition or Facebook page dedicated to reinstating Rowat, take a moment to consider your own approach to staff using social media? Mostly it is better to embrace than to ban and be honest with your staff about what you expect?

Most of all, do seek professional help if you find yourself in the midst of a social media public relations crisis. Morgan PR is a public relations and social media consultancy we versed in managing PR crises, so just shout if you need help! Our number is at the top of the page.


Comments

Mike Samuels said...

Can only be a matter of time before the only people in gainful employment will be the 'jobsworths', rigidly upholding the bullying rights of the politically correct.

Interesting that Argos can spare the staff to monitor employees private Facebook pages but putting an additional assistant on the inaccurately described "customer service" counter is beyond them.

Mike Samuels, 22/08/2011 09:35
www.mikesamuelsphotography.co.uk
mike@mikesamuelsphotography.co.uk/blog
www.twitter.com/MikeSamuels68
www.linkedin.com/in/MikeSamuels68
Nigel said...

Thanks for the comment Mike

Your second point about the 'customer service' desk being unmanned while people will perceive them dedicating staff to watching Facebook for criticism is an interesting one and suggests there may be more damage caused to their reputation than first thought!>/p>

Nigel, 22/08/2011 09:50
Helen Catterall said...

It may seem severe or extreme for employees to be punished by employers for commenting on social networking websites like Facebook, but I can also see where Argos are coming from in this case. People really need to adapt and realise that comments that would once have been said once and never had an impact can now leave an indelible impression online, and can also have a severe effect on their career, reputation and livelihood.

Helen Catterall, 22/08/2011 13:13
www.catalogue-deals.co.uk/
www.catalogue-deals.co.uk/blog/
www.twitter.com/CatalogueDeals
Nigel said...

Thanks Helen,

Thanks for commenting, you are right that Argos are allowed to be concerned, but they should also understand that reacting in the way they have means that they will blunder into poor public relations.

Businesses need to understand that people have private lives and some of that will be spent on Facebook criticising them.

Nigel, 22/08/2011 21:57
TJ said...

Thank you so much for your comments.

This whole thing has left my Dad absolutely devasted and bewildered. but the whole family really do appreciate the backing that he has received in this. He is a really genuine guy and has never got involved in office politics and the comments were not meant in anyway as an attack on the company but as a general "whats on your mind" grumble.

Thank you again

TJ

TJ, 24/08/2011 15:31
Nigel said...

Thank you Tina for taking the time to comment at what must be a very difficult time for your family. I am glad that blogs like this have offered support and I hope Argos realise how wrong its approach was.

Nigel, 24/08/2011 20:49
Sharon said...

Argos is not the only large organisation to go snooping on their employees' Facebook page. I know of a number of people who have been threatened with gross misconduct charges by one of the major banks (who are obviously above criticism!) simply for posting innocuous comments on a colleague's status, which again, did not name the employer. Fortunately, on this occasion, one of the staff members got the Union on board and challenged the charges which were eventually dropped.

The more disturbing thing is that, in this case, there were only two ways that management could have got hold of the information - which was presented to the people involved as a screen print of their Facebook pages. Either a colleague who they considered to be a friend was betraying them or - a much more sinister thought - the bank has the means to hack into their employee's Facebook accounts.

Sharon, 25/08/2011 10:45
Gavin Drake said...

Just a very quick question:

How do we know he was sacked for two Facebook status updates?

David Rowat may have claimed this, but he has by his own admission, been sacked by employers he did not like. He has an axe to grind.

I'm not saying that isn't why he was sacked; but unless there is independent verification we have to take what he says as simply an accusation.

Has he shown journalists letters and correspondence from Argus citing the reason for his dismissal? Has an Argos spokesman admitted the reasons for it (their clumsy statement tells me (reading between the lines) that there is more to it.

I've had to deal with similar employment type disputes. They are a nightmare to handle as you usually have lawyers reminding you of your obligations under the Data Protection Act; and the importance of not saying or doing anything which might jeopardise any claim at an employment tribunal.

It's a no win (or rather a slow-win) for Argos.

I am not accusing David Rowat of doing this; but creating an unfair sacking story is an easy way for any disgruntled employee to generate negative publicity for their former employers who have very little option but to sit back and watch the damage to your reputation grow; unable to properly fight back until the damage is done.

Gavin Drake, 25/08/2011 14:14
www.gavindrake.co.uk
www.twitter.com/gavindrake
www.linkedin.com/in/gdrake
Nigel said...

Thanks for your comments Sharon - reading up on this case in more detail reveals they had print outs of the 'offending' comments which again as you say makes you wonder how it was seen. Certainly it does depend too on the privacy settings of the user.

Nigel, 25/08/2011 16:07
Nigel said...

Thanks Gavin, you make good and reasoned points, but I would say that Argos clearly had the opportunity in answering journalists' questions about this case to give them a steer if it wasn't true.

Also, having been a journalist the stories all have the ring of a reticent family and not the scorned employee trying to get even and that gives added credibility to the Facebook claims.

Nigel, 25/08/2011 16:11
Tom Savage said...

As someone who managed a large number of staff for many years I am confused.

Let's face it. Few of us relish returning to work after our holidays. That's grounds to grumble in itself. Secondly, If you question someone in a fairly junior position within any company they will probably be able to point out what they perceive to be a 'shambles' somewhere in the organisation.

When someone (or someone close) gets cancer their priorities in and outlook upon life can change dramatically.

As a responsible employer I would have taken all these issues into account before acting. A word in the ear, yes. Questioning what the shambles is, Yes. Sacking? Definitely not - UNLESS - this is the last straw - the culmination of a series of misconduct where the disciplinary procedure had been followed. Nevertheless, it's a brave employer who would use such a minor infraction as a tipping point to sack someone.

There is another explanation of course. Maybe the place IS a shambles and a very defensive employer decided that a FB message was a personal attack, and grossly over-reacted.

Either way, this is a huge own-goal for Argos. I imagine that next Monday morning there will be a whole lot more Argos employees grumbling, on the quiet, afraid to speak their minds, whispering amongst themselves. Would I like to work in such an environment? Definitely not.

Tom Savage, 26/08/2011 09:13
Andy Grand said...

Surely anyone in this situation only has themselves to blame for not locking down their Facebook profile properly, or for adding people who can't be trusted. How else would Argos know what he posted? Moral of the story - don't add your colleagues or anyone else you don't trust.

Andy Grand, 02/09/2011 09:14
lisa said...

In this day and age & freedom of speech we shouldn't be punished so severely over a small grumble about work, each & every one of us in the whole world has had a grumble about work once in their lives its human nature,we're all normal,it's discusting argos should be totally ashamed.

lisa, 16/09/2011 12:34
Harold Amdon said...

My wife works for Argos and so their reaction to Mr Rowat's innoquous comments does not surprise me. My wife too has been on the sharp end of Argos's overreaction, despite an exemplary record and service above and beyond expectations. The incident rests with a member of staff purchasing an item in-store and requesting an insurance for the item. Unbeknown to my wife the staff member was underage and unintitled to the product. As a result my wife is bearing the brunt of Argos's overeactionary team and is being disciplined for the offence.

Now whilst Argos feel justified in doing this, a quiet word would have sufficed. Unfortunately my wife's honesty and trust in her employers has been seriously misplaced and has completely shattered her faith in the company.

My point to this is that in this case, as with I'm sure so many others, is that the store manager can bring a complaint without first ascertaining any of the facts. In my wife's case she was called into an office and had to face a panel without any forewarning. Also she was not asked if she would like any representation or, if indeed, she was entitled to any nor was she offered a record of the meeting. By the way, the manager had a representative sit in on the proceedings for themself and left with a bundle of notes and other printed documents.

This way of working is both illegal and misrepresentative and takes no account of the employees rights. If this form of disciplinery process is common, and the way store managers move from store to store I'm assuming it is, then it will only be a matter of time before they are brought to book over it.

Going back to Mr Rowat's case, if such a slap dash approach was used for his disciplinery process then Argos may be in for a further spate of negative PR.

Harold Amdon, 21/09/2011 16:48

Leave a Comment

Name (required)

Email (will not be published) (required)

Website

Blog

Twitter

LinkedIn

Submit Comment