Tragedy as The Hexagon Theatre fails to impress on Twitter

January 3, 2010

Tragedy as The Hexagon Theatre fails to impress on Twitter

“It’s behind you!” What? The online reputation of Reading Arts if it doesn’t wise up to how social media isn’t just about making money – it’s about making friends! The clue is in the word ‘social’.

One of Morgan PR’s Associates, Katharine Robinson, who is a Twitter expert known as @TheSourceress on the micro-blogging service, tweeted her disappointment that @TheHexagon had not followed her back. She said: “It irritates me when businesses don't follow me back. E.g. '@TheHexagon - I live nearby, I have eyes & a butt - I'm a potential customer!”

This led to a flurry of supportive ReTweets and effectively published Reading Arts’ fundamental failure to understand Twitter to over 15,000 followers – and has led to this blog, which will be mentioned on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn and will reach many thousands more. It will attract comments and that attracts more readers and it will remain popular on Google and other search engines.

Without following people back @TheHexagon makes it impossible for followers to send Direct Messages, which many users see as important as emails. The only people it does follow are celebrities and organisations, which can be seen as snubbing ordinary followers - those who would buy tickets from them.

It also means that @TheHexagon is putting itself on a par with the experts using Twitter who offer enough value that they do not need to follow people back, but a quick look at the tweets put out by Reading Arts shows they are nothing other than self promotional, they are also three weeks out of date having not tweeted since December 9th.

There is nothing wrong with a theatre promoting what shows it has on offer, just as there is nothing wrong with a business promoting what it has to sell. However it needs to be balanced with even more tweets that build relationships with your followers – not least by following them back, tweeting a welcome, ReTweeting what those followers talk about and promoting other events in their industry and geographic area.Being social!

An arts venue that has been socially media active longer than @TheHexagon is @CornExchange in Newbury which gets this important mix right and while it could follow more of its followers, it actively engages with key local Twitter folk – and reaps the reward.

We should add that we are sponsors of The Corn Exchange, but rest assured if they were not getting Twitter right, we would be quick to tell them too. For example, we’ve noticed that they are falling into the alienating trap of using Twitter language on Facebook – we explore the perils of this practice in another blog post: Don't be lazy! Use the right language on social media

Before we condemn @TheHexagon too harshly, they should be applauded for engaging with customers through Twitter, but they still have much to learn if they are not going to alienate people and actually created dissatisfaction where there had previously been indifference.

Morgan PR, who always aims to get the balance right, helps businesses thrive on social media by understanding what their customers want and expect, not least through our monthly Twitter Workshops in Newbury, which we deliver through another of our associates, talented trainer Mary Thomas.

As @TheHexagon might put it: “Quick, only a few seats left for the Twitter Workshop later this month!”


Comments

Katharine Robinson said...

This is one of my biggest social media pet peeves.

It's very sad, but so many businesses make the mistake of not following back real people. I may have chosen The Hexagon to pick on but I tried to DM a popular hotel chain just last week, only to discover they were not following me back. That potentially lost them a sale.

Companies need to realise that the internet isn't about broadcasting messages any more, it's a conversation and conversations have to be two-way.

Katharine Robinson, 03/01/2010 20:35
www.sourceress.co.uk
www.twitter.com/TheSourceress
www.linkedin.com/in/katharinerobinson
Lesley Pattinson said...

I am with Katharine, it really irritates me when you follow someone especially someone local or in the same business as you are and they do not follow you back.

To me this is not only rude but lazy, its like you want people to follow you to help market your business and get it known but you can't be bothered to be interested in those very people, social media is not about just advertising its about interacting and frankly if someone can't be bothered to follow me back and interact with me, then why should I be interested in their company or give them any business.

I had one particular incident with a children's web marketplace which was about to launch, DM for details, they didn't follow me so I couldn't DM them. I even tweeted about it so they would see and still silence, so I wont be bothering with their website, not only have they lost me a new mum as a customer but anyone I would have told about the site.

Social media is about building relationships with potential clients or those who are simply interested in what you do, its not just a message board for your advertising.

Lesley Pattinson, 03/01/2010 20:53
www.memoriesthrualens.com
http://www.memoriesthrualens.com/blog
www.twitter.com/memsthrualens
Peter Shorney said...

It wouldn't be so bad it if was an oversight. Just once in a way.

It's not possible to keep track of everyone that follows you, of course. But it's frustrating when you can see "ordinary" people being ignored.

I love the Corn Exchange for its openeness. I've had a laugh with them and it does encourage you to use their services. It seems that The Hexagon may just have needed to be pointed in the right direction perhaps. It's all about learning after all.

Peter Shorney, 03/01/2010 20:53
www.chasing-vegas.co.uk
http://peacockpete.wordpress.com/
www.twitter.com/peacockpete
Stefan Thomas said...

I think, to be fair, lots of organisations are still learning about this new world and some are not getting it right yet.

This has been a really interesting little exchange to me, and hopefulyl starts to show businesses like The Hexagon the massive opportunity that is there for them to interact with their potential customers.

Stefan Thomas, 03/01/2010 20:57
www.noredbraces.co.uk
http://noredbraces.blogspot.com/
twitter.com/NoRedBraces
Katharine Robinson said...

The Hexagon could do so well with Twitter.

Reading has a very engaged Twitter Community. If The Hexagon were to interact with those people using the #rdg hashtag and perhaps attend a Reading Tweetup (@rdgtweetup) they would find a lot of potential customers and people that would spread the word about their shows.

I hope to see them following back and joining the conversation in 2010.

Katharine Robinson, 03/01/2010 21:11
www.sourceress.co.uk
www.twitter.com/TheSourceress
www.linkedin.com/in/katharinerobinson
Graham Jones said...

Looks like I'm going to be alone on this one....but I don't think it is in the interests of The Hexagon to follow all the people who follow them. Indeed, it could very well work against them. Here's why:

Firstly, the Direct Message system of Twitter is now so full of spam it has become useless. Automated systems and services now fill my DM system with total junk; I haven't go the time to go through it - and I suspect neither would the Hexagon staff. Like many people, I now completely ignore the DM system of Twitter.

Secondly, even the most profitable users of Twitter do not follow most people who follow them. Dell Outlet, for instance, has over 1.5m followers, but is only following 25 people. This Twitter page has generated over $3m - so a direct relationship is clearly not that necessary to making money.

The Hexagon (and the Corn Exchange) do not have to build relationships with individuals as much as other businesses. Often the customers of these venues will visit just once in a blue moon, sometimes once in a lifetime. My 80-year-old father-in-law, for instance, has only been to two events at The Hexagon - they are the only two events he has ever wanted to attend. Building a relationship with everyone isn't that important to The Hexagon and the time it takes could be counter-productive - especially as Twitter is but one tool they can use and that it is only used by 245 of their potential customers anyway. So it is hardly a priority for them.

Far more important for The Hexagon is to build a community relationship using Twitter - and that's where they are failing. The overt promotion and plugging doesn't help, of course. But I don't agree they have to go the personal relationship route with their main Twitter page.

What I believe they need is at least two Twitter accounts. One to build a community relationship, where they don't follow anyone very much. And another to build personal relationships with high spending customers (group-booking people, for instance), where they would follow them all. Plus they could do with a Twitter account for the performers who go to the Hexagon, their suppliers and another for the local councillors who fund them.

In other words, the real problem with The Hexagon's Twitter page is not that it fails to create individual relationships, but that it is (like almost every Twitter user I have met) taking a "one-size fits all" approach - which, of course, never works.

So, what I'd encourage The Hexagon to do is slightly different to what you are suggesting. I'd let them carry not not following everyone on their "main" Twitter page, but encourage them to change what they Tweet about so they form a community relationship. Then I'd get them to build separate Twitter accounts for direct relationships with the people who matter.

Graham Jones, 03/01/2010 23:10
www.grahamjones.co.uk/
www.grahamjones.co.uk/blog
www.twitter.com/grahamjones
www.linkedin.com/in/grahamjones
Tracy Kellett said...

The benefits of using social media must not solely be based on advertising your 'services'.It is a great opportunity to engage with potential clients, soft-selling if you like, by developing a human face and developing loyalty.

I go to great lengths to avoid any 'sales pitches' in my tweets, as tempting as it may be, I simply hope that by tweeting 'interestingly' people will seek out my business- a far stronger and ultimately honest way to develop potential clients.

Tracy Kellett, 03/01/2010 23:39
www.bdihomefinders.co.uk
www.twitter.com/buyingagent
Peter Curd said...

I agree with Katharine that the current presence of @TheHexagon is unsuitable - however I disagree with Graham Jones on a few points.

If you decide to use a social networking tool - or micro blogging, or whatever you want to call Twitter - as a commercial entity, the purpose has to be either sales, marketing or customer support. Few other commercial purposes are suited to the medium. If you sign up you know what you are signing up for.

Assuming @TheHexagon does not want to provide more of the spam Graham Jones mentions, they must be there to "grow the business" by interaction with real people. To do this you should be following real people.

How often have I tweeted something like "I want to go out tonight, who is interested?" and had restaurants reply saying "Hey, you're a good customer - have this deal if you come to us?" along with the ability to reserve by reply? A good few times at least, and it works.

I get contacted by entertainment businesses too, although personally I don't take these up as often there may be a chance in the future, plus the fact that it keeps the brand in my mind.

Careful use of Twitter can grow the business by engaging customers - I do not believe commercial entities get even 10% of the benefit by using Twitter one way. It's not a billboard, it's a social network.

Peter Curd, 04/01/2010 09:15
www.pcurd.co.uk
www.twitter.com/pcurd
www.linkedin.com/in/pcurd
Graham Jones said...

Looking back and seeing Peter's comments it's obvious I didn't make myself clear enough - the penalty for commenting late at night....!

The very reason I suggested the Hexagon should not be following everyone is a commercial one - it will reduce their profits as they waste time on dealing with Twitter when they could be doing something else that gains more income. Secondly, they can easily reply to people without using the DM system - they only need to use the @ mention and it will get through to the originator more quickly and easily. So they can, if they wish, build a relationship without using direct messaging. Plus there is an advantage - the @ mention system is public, so everyone else witnesses the helpfulness of the organisation, helping branding and community relationship growth.

You don't grow a business necessarily by connecting with individuals. It helps, but is not necessary. People are members of various groups and we respond to how those groups have relationships. For instance, if you visit your local pub regularly, you are a member of that group. You respond to how the group relates to the pub, not just how you as an individual relate. It is a mistake that many businesses make to believe that social psychology is about individuals - it isn't. Group psychology is phenominally important and is frequently missed by many businesses. The Hexagon, because of its business type, would be far better concentrating on the group psychology than on individual relationships. After all, it has 1,200 seats with an average of 8 performances a week. That's almost 500,000 people a year. Could your business easily sustain half a million individual relationships? Neither can theirs.

And who says Twitter is not a billboard? That's Peter's interpretation. But it's not Dell's - who made $3m from it. In other words, Twitter is what you make it. True, you can ignore the billboard messages from The Hexagon - but many people will find them useful. In the same way I never look at Classified Ads in the Newbury Weekly News, but it doesn't mean they shouldn't print them.

Finally, why are we bothered? They only have 245 followers - hardly worth thinking about when they need 500,000 bums on seats a year....!

Graham Jones, 04/01/2010 10:16
www.grahamjones.co.uk/
www.grahamjones.co.uk/blog
www.twitter.com/grahamjones
www.linkedin.com/in/grahamjones
Mark Shaw said...

Thanks for bringing this topic up. The issue is not one of following all those peeps back that follow you. In my experience, this is a total waste of time. all it leads to is spam, and a very diluted twitter stream with tons of meaningless bits of info.. which inevitably leads to peeps missing the important or good stuff...

So on that basis, I recommend that peeps only follow back those that it feels it wants to based on its own criteria.

The key though is to set up searches on your name / product / service.. and to be monitoring that on a very regular basis. In this way, you dont need to follow everyone, but can engage with everyone where relevant to you or your business.

The key also, is to decide what the account is actually about.. is it customer service, is it promotion etc.. as these will mean a different way to interact with peeps.

It also looks like all they are doing is using the account to promote their shows etc... I would encourage them to engage far more, listen far more... and try and personalise their brand a lot more, with a lot more interaction, that was not selling.. None of this has a requirement to be following peeps..

The other key thing, is to actually make it easy for peeps to contact you, so give out contact info.. I find it ludicrous, that peeps say that they did not contact someone becuase they were not following back.. There are tons of other ways to communicate with that organisation other than a dm message.

Mark Shaw, 04/01/2010 10:17
www.markshaw.biz
blog.markshaw.biz
www.twitter.com/markshaw
Nicky Larkin said...

I agree with alot that Graham Jones has to say. I am still fairly new to twitter, but I follow people or companies that I am genuinely interested in and I read all their twitters. Everyone has a finite time to utilise twitter or other networking tools effectively so you have to prioritise.

One pet peeve of mine is the use of LinkedIn. I started using it to maintain contact with previous colleagues, however, I get bombarded with requests to link to people I have met once or not at all and therefore would not be able to recommend etc. I really value good recommendations, therefore do not want people who I don't know well enough trying to piggyback through my links. I love recommending businesses and people that I know and trust, therefore my recommendations are usually valued by clients and colleagues. Networking isn't a quick fix, it is developing true relationships.

Nicky Larkin, 04/01/2010 11:05
www.goringeaccountants.co.uk
www.twitter.com/GoringeAccounts

Leave a Comment

Name (required)

Email (will not be published) (required)

Website

Blog

Twitter

LinkedIn

Submit Comment