BREAKING NEWS ARCHIVE:
Nov. 5, 2011
DNA Deep Throat and Zana [from the
11/5/11 Byte Of Pye]
Dear Mr.
Pye:
I agree with your conclusions [that humans are genetically engineered]
and will give you a few hints, if you wish [speaking] as a “DNA Deep
Throat.” First, look up the huge discontinuities between humans and the
various apes for: (1) Whole mitochondrial DNA; (2) genes for the Rh
Factor; (3) and human Y chromosomes, among others.
Regarding #3, I refer you to K.D. Smith’s 1987 study titled “Repeated
DNA sequences of the human Y chromosome.” It says “Most human Y
chromosome sequences thus far examined do not have homologues [same
relative position or structure] on the Y chromosomes of other primates.”
Human female X chromosomes do look somewhat apelike, but not the male’s
Y.
This means that if humans are a crossbred species, the cross had to be
between a female ape-like creature [i.e, “creature of Earth”] and a male
being from elsewhere.
- DNA DEEP THROAT
There
is more to the letter, but these three paragraphs will be the focus for
this Byte. The last paragraph is dealt with extensively in the eBook,
and has generated much comment among readers because of the story of
Zana, an almas type hominoid that lived in a village in Russia for 40
years, and which crossbred with human men to produce several dominantly
human offspring.
The sex-determining chromosomes are X and Y. If you obtain an X from one
parent and an X from the other, you are a female. If you have an X from
one and a Y from the other, you are a male. So the Y confers "maleness,"
yet it is by far the smallest of the chromosomes delivered to any
offspring.
In the 1987 study Deep Throat referenced in 1999, the term "most" was
used when pointing out that human Y sequences do not match with the Y
sequences of higher primates (chief of which are chimps, supposedly the
closest genetic relative to humans). However, since then it has been
well established that in all chromosome comparisons between chimps and
humans, their differences average 2% to 3%. Yet the difference between
their Y chromosomes is 30%!
Obviously, something very dramatic happened to the human Y, something
that can't possibly be explained by standard Darwinian evolution. The
only plausible answer is, in fact, genetic engineering, but we all know
mainstream science would, at all costs, avoid openly considering that as
a possibility.
Now let's consider Zana. Let's assume, as I do, that she was one of four
general types of hominoids, the almas type dominant in Russia. Let's
further assume, as I do, that her type existed with all the others
throughout the Miocene Epoch, from 23 million to 5 million years ago. I
cover all this in considerable detail inIntervention Theory Essentials,
where I support it with ample evidence.
If those assumptions are correct, then she had to have 48 chromosomes,
as do all the "higher" primates other than humans, with 24 coming from
each parent. Humans have only 46, which means a mating between Zana and
a human was "off" by one chromosome, her 24 to her partner's 23. Such a
difference in the basic chromosome count can indeed produce hybrid
offspring, and the range between chromosomes can even be more extensive,
as with mules.
Horses have 64
chromosomes and donkeys have 62. Together they can produce mules, which
have 63. All male mules are born sterile, but very rarely female mules
will have estrus cycles and can therefore produce offspring with either
donkeys or horses. Thus, mule sterility is not universal or absolute.
Sometimes the chromosomal material in horses and donkeys can line up
exactly "right" to produce fertile offspring.
I think this is what must have happened in the case of Zana and her
human sexual partners. In the thousands of times she might have had sex
in the 40 years she lived in Tkhina, on eight occasions the two
chromosome packages lined up exactly "right," and she produced living
hybrid offspring (four of whom reached adulthood and were able to
produce human families).
I don't pretend to understand how it happened because until we are able
to line up an almas genome with a human genome to compare them, base
pair by base pair, nothing about it can be established with any
certainty. However, given that almas do exist in Russia, and
hominologists over there search for them as researchers search for
bigfoot here, sooner or later one will be found and its DNA will be
available to any scientists with the nerve to study them.
This is where we are with the Starchild Skull right now. We are trying
hard to obtain the means to secure its entire genome so it can be fully
compared with a human genome. When we can finally do that, the many
differences between them will produce a percentage of difference that
will establish its credentials as a full-on alien rather than the hybrid
we thought it was for so long.
This is how science is done....how real science is done.... You keep
pushing hard out at the cutting edge, thrashing your way through
inevitable mistakes and misinterpretations, never being daunted by them,
using them to your advantage, to build on and make headway. And finally
you reach a point of knowledge that is incontrovertible and complete,
after which you rest, and then you seek out another great unknown and
start moving toward it.
["Deep
Throat" was the euphemism used by Mark Felt to protect his identity as
he revealed the Nixon administration's involvement in the Watergate
scandal to reporter Bob Woodward in 1972.]
|