Edward Snowden

29-year-old American Edward Snowden, a contract employee at the National Security Agency, is the whistleblower behind significant revelations that surfaced in June 2013 about the US government's top secret, extensive domestic surveillance programmes. Snowden flew to Hong Kong from Hawaii in May 2013, and supplied confidential US government documents to media outlets including the Guardian

NewsChina

'America owes explanation' for hacking, says editorial

Thursday, 13 June, 2013, 6:24pm

The United States should explain to internet users around the world why it accessed their private conversations, credit cards and emails, one of China's leading dailies said in an editorial on Thursday.

"We have to figure out how we are affected by the [hacking], we have the right to ask the American government for an explanation," the editorial read. "For instance, on whether the 'Prism programme' has been used in commercial negotiations between Chinese and US companies," referring to a programme by the US' National Security Agency, which tracks web traffic and phone records.

The editorial on the Global Times website appeared half a day after US whistleblower Edward Snowden confronted the South China Morning Post with what he said was conclusive evidence the US had been infiltrating Chinese and Hong Kong networks for years through its "Prism" programme.

The Global Times is one of China's most widely-sold daily papers. Its editorial line has a reputation for being stridently nationalistic.

It offers a hint at a consensus forming among Chinese decision makers on how to deal with Snowden seeking refuge in Hong Kong as Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying and Hong Kong's Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying refused to comment on the case. 

The editorial argued that Snowden's statement has "confirmed speculation" on US hacking. 

China's response to an extradition request for Snowden to the United States will depend on what kind of explanation the US will give for its hacking, the editorial argued. Hong Kong and the US have a treaty that obligates the city to surrender the whistleblower if the US should make such a request, but the treaty grants Beijing a final say in matters of national security.

"We should be more clear about America's real side and its hypocritical side, we can't be stupid and naive," the editorial read. "This issue directly touches our vital interests."

Snowden's allegations lent credence to long-standing Chinese allegations that the US has been accusing China of hacking US companies to whitewash its own hacking of Chinese companies and institutions.

While the US should explain why it hacked Chinese computers, China will not get the apology it wants, said Bonnie Glaser, a China expert at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D C.

"[Hacking] is just what governments do," she said in a phone interview. "What are you apologising for? Apologising suggests that you are not going to do it again and implies you did something wrong."

"I don't think this is against the norms that exist in the international community," she said. "We are trying to protect our national security. I think the Chinese are doing the same."

Comments

bluefirestorm
In this editorial and in other places within SCMP.com, SCMP has named/called Snowden a whistleblower. By calling him a whistleblower, it shows the bias/judgment made by SCMP editorial team. By calling him a whistleblower implies some belief he has exposed something illegal.
A more objective term would be data leaker.
And rather than making this story about Snowden, this saga might be best called "NSA data leak saga" rather than "Snowden whistleblower saga".
What this saga has shown is that a lot of people don't understand technology involved in surveillance.
I hope SCMP doesn't mean to become Snowden's Chief Mouth Piece.
boundless informant !
As all know, once a pirate was found and caught after robbing a boat,his punishment would probably be death sentence---had his head cut off----I had seen a photo taken in the late 19th century, several pirates' heads rolled on the sand of a beach.Their heads were cut off by Qing Dyansty's executioners after caught by the navy of the Emperor.At the scene, there were British officials witnessed the execution.Now a big nation's secret agency had been diliberately hacking into our computers in the past four years to get info.that it needed.Was it equal to the acts of pirates ? I wonder.Why such modern pirates are exempted from punishment or even an apology offered to the victims of their acts or just a reasonable explanation for their pirate-like act:hacking which is illegal in our society.Maybe it is also not allowed in that big nation as well !
heimaogui13
撒谎的混蛋 !!! 見鬼!
aguabranca6480
美國政府不是最典型的『賊喊捉賊』嗎?
richieskerr
The United States recently went on the offensive in the burgeoning cyber-war claiming that China has conducted hacking attacks directed at the United States, even publishing photographs of a Chinese military installation purported to have been the source of these attacks. Was this revelation timed to cover up its own hacking attacks on China dating back at least to 2012? If this is the case, it was a particularly disingenuous and contrived campaign. In any even, the recent revelations of Edward Snowden make clear that the United States has been actively identifying foreign targets for cyber attacks since October of 2012. This begs the question of the peculiar timing of the United States campaign revealing Chinese hacking attacks. The U.S. has claimed that its own attacks will be measured, and in retaliation for foreign attacks. The American people will never know if this is the case or not, since they have no way of confirming the source of these attacks on their own and have to accept the good word of their own government.
big bro's watching !
Hacking is just what governments do.But why was our Hong Kong Internet Exchange at Chinese Univ.hacked for as long as four years ? The Exchange tackles most of our internet communications as it is our hub of internet activities. Besides,it is learnt that besides the Exchange at C.U.,our major officials,businessmen and even students' computers/moble phones have been hacked by the National Security Agency since 2009---these are all civilians and their privacy should be respected and their personal secrets should not be made known by the hackers---especailly a state-type as the NSA of America ! We Hong Kong people have every right to demand an explanation from the U.S.Consultate here in Hong Kong and a proper apology for their acts committed in the past four years and a guarantee that no such acts would be committed against us in the future ! Right ?

Login

SCMP.com Account

or