- Thu
- Feb 7, 2013
- Updated: 2:13pm
Trending topics
English Schools Foundation
The English Schools Foundation (ESF) operates five secondary schools, nine primary schools and a school for students with special educational needs across Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and the New Territories. It is the largest international educational foundation in Asia and was established in 1967 by the Hong Kong Government to provide a seamless, affordable English language education. The curriculum, based on the British system which has now introduced the International Baccalaureate (IB), is adapted to Hong Kong and the Asia Pacific region. ESF schools, which currently teach 13,000 students, receive a subsidy from the Hong Kong Government but also charge tuition fees to parents.
ESF to end admission priority for non-Chinese speakers
Foundation changes tack on admissions policy, with the move likely to increase the competition for primary places among expatriate children
In Pictures
Poll
- Yes: 57%
- No: 43%
- Yes
- No
Editor's Pick
The Rolex Awards for Enterprise honour people who are trying to improve the lot of humanity and the place we call home. Victoria Burrows meets the latest laureates.
The English Schools Foundation announced on Monday it will be ending its admissions priority for children who do not speak Chinese.
The move is likely to increase the competition for expatriate children seeking to enrol at its primary schools.
And it comes at a time when the ESF is seeking to secure official funding for its English-medium schools from a government increasingly inclined to view it as an outdated colonial institution.
Another change in admissions policy announced on Monday includes scrapping the priority for interviews for primary school places given to children who have attended ESF-affiliated kindergartens, from which around 600 children graduate every year.
The changes will begin taking effect from August, the ESF said. But the one most likely to alarm expatriate families is the ESF's decision to end the priority given to non-Chinese speakers for primary school places.
The policy was maintained previously on the assumption that Chinese speakers could go to Chinese-medium schools.
Such a change is likely to make it more difficult for non-Chinese speaking children to find a school place, because of the increased competition it will create for places at the ESF's English- medium primary schools.
ESF chief executive Heather Du Quesnay said that stringent interviews would be conducted for school applicants, which would include English proficiency tests.
She did not believe the new system would reduce the number of non-Chinese students at ESF schools.
And she insisted the changes had nothing to do with the foundation's on-going attempts to persuade the government to maintain, if not increase, the ESF's annual HK$283 million subvention, or subsidy.
She told a news conference the implementation of the policy to give priority to non-Chinese speakers had been unsuccessful.
She said: "It's pretty difficult to test if the child cannot speak Cantonese. We have never been able to do it. That's one of the reasons the system didn't work very well."
For years, children unfamiliar with Cantonese – mainly expatriates – were treated favourably when applying for a place at one of the ESF schools.
The schools were set up in the 1960s by the British colonial government to serve non-local families, many of them civil servants from Britain.
Each year the ESF offers about 13,000 places and the competition for these has become keen in recent years.
Demand from both local families and expatriates has grown, particularly after the government switched the medium of instruction for most of its public schools to Chinese.
Last year, more than 2,400 applications were made for places at ESF primary year one admission, according to the ESF office, compared with 1,340 in 2007. Thousands are on the schools' waiting list.
Some expatriate parents said the new arrangement would make it harder for expatriate families whose children do not speak Chinese to find a school place.
The make-up of the ESF primary and secondary schools has changed greatly in recent years.
According to the ESF's annual report, 44 per cent of its students are now ethnic Chinese.
Amanda Chapman, head of the Native English-speaking Teachers' Association, said modifying the language criteria was unfair for non-Chinese-speaking taxpayers because these families were already finding it difficult to find school places.
"They will just leave Hong Kong if they can't find a school place," Chapman said.
Willy Ewal, an expatriate father, said he believed the ESF had the right to change its admission policy. "The government wants to make it private so [the ESF] has to behave like a private school. They need the money, so money will come first," Ewal said.
An Education Bureau spokeswoman said in response to the announcement that the ESF has autonomy in deciding on its curriculum, the student mix and admissions criteria.
"In the context of the ongoing subvention review, the services provided by the ESF should be underpinned by, amongst other things, relevant parameters in its admission policy as a condition for granting new subvention, if any," the spokeswoman said.
Du Quesnay said she did not face pressure from the government over the admissions policy changes. She said fees for the next school year would be announced next month.
And she said the ESF was also considering a new "nomination rights" scheme for companies. Purchasing the rights would give them advantages in the admissions process.
Legislator Ip Kin-yuen, who represents the education sector, said any arrangements should not be at the expense of the educational needs of children.
He added that the availability of quality school places, along with air quality and high rents, was an area of concern for sustainable development in the city.
Share
- Google Plus One
- Tweet Widget
-
21Comments
Related topics
After reading this article, people also read
2:13pm
6:03pm
3:25pm
First Language of students English: 73%, yet under nationalities, only 53% of students come from countries where English is the first language. Don't know who and why they want to confuse. They have ca. 2,200 full time staff (who's kids are on top of the priority list for admission). Imagine an average of 1 kid each; that means 17% of the 13,000 places are gone and not publicly available (still better than entrance tickets to the Rugby 7s though)... add the "500k fast track entry for the super rich" spots... add the new admissions policy.... available places become very rare; which means even higher prices yet again... Many more confusing statistics...
5:09pm
4:32pm
2:59pm
2:27pm
2:10pm
What expatriate families are really upset about is that they loose their advantage from holding a foreign passport and the feeling of entitlement. However if these same families were back in UK / US do they think they could argue to keep locals out of certain schools. I do not believe so.
the best way for this to be solved is to build more ESF schools (or better yet use the schools already built)
1:04pm
12:01pm
For the life of me and all the complaints by administration and officials why doesn't the government just give the Ho Hum building to ESF and allow them to retain the campus and put all year 1 and 2 students there. this will create the ability to add 360 more students to ESF. Allowing allot more parents to send their kids to an ESF environment as little cost an no setup.
There is also the Kowloon Junior Rose street campus that will also be vacant next year. this can take an additional 360 students with no effort and little cost.
These 2 simple initiatives and the hiring of some new teachers etc... can create 720 spaces NOW. Why are we not hearing the government or parents recommending this option to solve the dilemma? Solves the problem.