Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

close
 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Study questions kidney cancer treatment in elderly

    In a stunning example of when treatment might be worse than the disease, a large review of Medicare records finds that older people with small kidney tumors were much less likely to die over the next five years if doctors monitored them instead of operating right away.

    Even though nearly all of these tumors turned out to be cancer, they rarely proved fatal. And surgery roughly doubled patients' risk of developing heart problems or dying of other causes, doctors found.

    After five years, 24 percent of those who had surgery had died, compared to only 13 percent of those who chose monitoring. Just 3 percent of people in each group died of kidney cancer.

    The study only involved people 66 and older, but half of all kidney cancers occur in this age group. Younger people with longer life expectancies should still be offered surgery, doctors stressed.

    The study also was observational — not an experiment where some people were given surgery and others were monitored, so it cannot prove which approach is best. Yet it offers a real-world look at how more than 7,000 Medicare patients with kidney tumors fared. Surgery is the standard treatment now.

    "I think it should change care" and that older patients should be told "that they don't necessarily need to have the kidney tumor removed," said Dr. William Huang of New York University Langone Medical Center. "If the treatment doesn't improve cancer outcomes, then we should consider leaving them alone."

    He led the study and will give results at a medical meeting in Orlando, Fla., later this week. The research was discussed Tuesday in a telephone news conference sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and two other cancer groups.

    In the United States, about 65,000 new cases of kidney cancer and 13,700 deaths from the disease are expected this year. Two-thirds of cases are diagnosed at the local stage, when five-year survival is more than 90 percent.

    However, most kidney tumors these days are found not because they cause symptoms, but are spotted by accident when people are having an X-ray or other imaging test for something else, like back trouble or chest pain.

    Cancer experts increasingly question the need to treat certain slow-growing cancers that are not causing symptoms — prostate cancer in particular. Researchers wanted to know how life-threatening small kidney tumors were, especially in older people most likely to suffer complications from surgery.

    They used federal cancer registries and Medicare records from 2000 to 2007 to find 8,317 people 66 and older with kidney tumors less than 1.5 inches wide.

    Cancer was confirmed in 7,148 of them. About three-quarters of them had surgery and the rest chose to be monitored with periodic imaging tests.

    After five years, 1,536 had died, including 191 of kidney cancer. For every 100 patients who chose monitoring, 11 more were alive at the five-year mark compared to the surgery group. Only 6 percent of those who chose monitoring eventually had surgery.

    Furthermore, 27 percent of the surgery group but only 13 percent of the monitoring group developed a cardiovascular problem such as a heart attack, heart disease or stroke. These problems were more likely if doctors removed the entire kidney instead of just a part of it.

    The results may help doctors persuade more patients to give monitoring a chance, said a cancer specialist with no role in the research, Dr. Bruce Roth of Washington University in St. Louis.

    Some patients with any abnormality "can't sleep at night until something's done about it," he said. Doctors need to say, "We're not sticking our head in the sand, we're going to follow this" and can operate if it gets worse.

    One of Huang's patients — 81-year-old Rhona Landorf, who lives in New York City — needed little persuasion.

    "I was very happy not to have to be operated on," she said. "He said it's very slow growing and that having an operation would be worse for me than the cancer."

    Landorf said her father had been a doctor, and she trusts her doctors' advice. Does she think about her tumor? "Not at all," she said.

    ___

    Online:

    Kidney cancer info: http://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/kidney-cancer

    and http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/kidney

    Study: http://gucasym.org

    ___

    Marilynn Marchione can be followed at http://twitter.com/MMarchioneAP

    Loading...

    19 comments

    • Spider Monkey  •  2 days 15 hrs ago
      If you think this study is strange, wait until 2014...
    • Norbert  •  2 days 15 hrs ago
      Oh, no - we, the patients, should get second opinions and make intelligent choices. Just like always?
    • Bez_Dawg  •  2 days 16 hrs ago
      Gov't studies encouraging you to die. Owebamacare at its best.
    • alice  •  2 days 17 hrs ago
      There have been more and more so called observational studys published where they advocate no care for the elderly because of life expectancy. So if you are 65 you should just die rather than try to live because you cost to much. This is Oamacare. They will set up death panels they just wont go by that name. And we will see many more studys like this one where we will be told there is nothing that should be done for the elderly unless you are rich or famous or a polititian in which case you will move to the front of the line. The rest of us peons can just die quietly please.
    • NightShift  •  2 days 14 hrs ago
      Just read another article titled, "Research study shows cancer treatment is worse than cancer". Looks like Obamacare has already started.
    • amwhoiam  •  2 days 21 hrs ago
      Translation: Obamacare will influence more studies in the future.
    • NightShift  •  2 days 14 hrs ago
      Last week there was a study saying mammary tests were no longer needed. Just below the above article is one citing that prostate cancer does not need to be treated. If will be easy for the government to control health care cost by simply saying our conditions do not merit any treatment. Dying younger will also remedy their problems with Social Security. What a great strategy.
    • Chet  •  2 days 15 hrs ago
      Obamacare already denies cancer treatment to individuals over 76.
      You need to read the bill - because Congress didn't.
    • pauls  •  2 days 7 hrs ago
      so medical treatment is now unwise, nobody saw that one coming, now the bean counters are practicing medicine. They have a calculator who needs a medical degree. Not buying it.
    • NightShift  •  2 days 14 hrs ago
      To further reduce healthcare costs, I wager the government will be citing all kinds of studies that indicate health care is not needed. Then, Obama can claim how he even fixed health care.

    Follow Yahoo! News