Proof: log a + log b = log ab

Topic page

Logarithm properties

Introduction to logarithm properties
Introduction to logarithm properties (part 2)
Logarithm of a Power
Sum of Logarithms with Same Base
Using Multiple Logarithm Properties to Simplify
Operations with logarithms
Change of Base Formula
Proof: log a + log b = log ab
Proof: log_a (B) = (log_x (B))/(log_x (A))
Proof: A(log B) = log (B^A), log A - log B = log (A/B)
Logarithmic Equations
Solving Logarithmic Equations
Solving Logarithmic Equations
Logarithmic Scale
Richter Scale

Proof: log a + log b = log ab Proof of the logarithm property: log a + log b = log ab

Previous Change of Base Formula Next Proof: log_a (B) = (log_x (B))/(log_x (A))

Back

Proof: log a + log b = log ab

⇐ Use this menu to view and help create subtitles for this video in many different languages. You'll probably want to hide YouTube's captions if using these subtitles.

Hello.
Let's do some work on logarithm properties.
So, let's just review real quick what a logarithm even is.
So if I write, let's say I write log base x of a is
equal to, I don't know, make up a letter, n.
What does this mean?
Well, this just means that x to the n equals a.
I think we already know that.
We've learned that in the logarithm video.
And so it is very important to realize that when you evaluate
a logarithm expression, like log base x of a, the answer
when you evaluate, what you get, is an exponent.
This n is really just an exponent.
This is equal to this thing.
You could've written it just like this.
You could have, because this n is equal to this, you could
just write x, it's going to get a little messy, to the log
base x of a, is equal to a.
All I did is I, took this n and I replaced it with this term.
And I wanted to write it this way because I want you to
really get an intuitive understanding of the notion
that a logarithm, when you evaluate it, it
really an exponent.
And we're going to take that notion.
And that's where, really, all of the logarithm
properties come from.
So let me just do -- what I actually want to do is, I
want to to stumble upon the logarithm properties
by playing around.
And then, later on, I'll summarize it and then
clean it all up.
But I want to show maybe how people originally
discovered this stuff.
So, let's say that x, let me switch colors.
I think that that keeps things interesting.
So let's say that x to the l is equal to a.
Well, if we write that as a logarithm, that same
relationship as a logarithm, we could write that log base x of
a is equal to l, right?
I just rewrote what I wrote on the top line.
Now, let me switch colors.
And if I were to say that x to the m is equal to b, it's the
same thing, I just switched letters.
But that just means that log base x of b is
equal to m, right?
I just did the same thing that I did in this line,
I just switched letters.
So let's just keep going and see what happens.
So let's say, let me get another color.
So let's say I have x to the n, and you're saying, Sal, where
are you going with this.
But you'll see.
It's pretty neat. x to the n is equal to a times b.
x to the n is equal to a times b.
And that's just like saying that log base x
is equal to a times b.
So what can we do with all of this?
Well, let's start with with this right here.
x to the n is equal to a times b.
So, how could we rewrite this?
Well, a is this.
And b is this, right?
So let's rewrite that.
So we know that x to the n is equal to a.
a is this.
x to the l.
x to the l.
And what's b?
Times b.
Well, b is x to the m, right?
Not doing anything fancy right now.
But what's x to the l times x to the m?
Well, we know from the exponents, when you multiply
two expressions that have the same base and different
exponents, you just add the exponents.
So this is equal to, let me take a neutral color.
I don't know if I said that verbally correct, but
you get the point.
When you have the same base and you're multiplying, you can
just add the exponents.
That equals x to the, I want to keep switching colors, because
I think that's useful.
l, l plus m.
That's kind of onerous to keep switching colors, but.
You get what I'm saying.
So, x to the n is equal to x to the l plus m.
Let me put the x here.
Oh, I wanted that to be green.
x to the l plus n.
So what do we know?
We know x to the n is equal to x to the l plus m.
Right?
Well, we have the same base.
These exponents must equal each other.
So we know that n is equal to l l plus m.
What does that do for us?
I've kind of just been playing around with logarithms.
Am I getting anywhere?
I think you'll see that I am.
Well, what's another way of writing n?
So we said, x to the n is equal to a times b -- oh, I
actually skipped a step here.
So that means -- so, going back here, x to the n
is equal to a times b.
That means that log base x of a times b is equal to n.
You knew that.
I didn't.
I hope you don't realize I'm not backtracking or anything.
I just forgot to write that down when I first did it.
But, anyway.
So, what's n?
What's another way of writing n?
Well, another way of writing n is right here.
Log base x of a times b.
So, now we know that if we just substitute n for that, we
get log base x of a times b.
And what does that equal?
Well, that equals l.
Another way to write l is right up here.
It equals log base x of a, plus m.
And what's m?
m is right here.
So log base x of b.
And there we have our first logarithm property.
The log base x of a times b -- well that just equals the log
base x of a plus the log base x of b.
And this, hopefully, proves that to you.
And if you want the intuition of why this works out it falls
from the fact that logarithms are nothing but exponents.
So, with that, I'll leave you with this video.
And in the next video, I will prove another
logarithm property.
I'll see you soon.

Questions
Tips & Feedback

Be specific, and indicate a time in the video:

At 5:31, how is the moon large enough to block the sun? Isn't the sun way larger?

Have something that's not a question about this content?

Post a tip or feedback
General discussion about the site
Report a technical problem with the site
Request a video or feature

This discussion area is not meant for answering homework questions.

Formatting tips

Cancel or

( total)

Share a tip

When naming a variable, it is okay to use most letters, but some are reserved, like 'e', which represents the value 2.7831...

Suggest a fix

At 2:33, Sal says "double bonds" but should say "single bonds."

Have something that's not a tip or feedback about this content?

Ask a question
General discussion about the site
Report a technical problem with the site
Request a video or feature

This discussion area is not meant for answering homework questions.

Formatting tips

Cancel or

Answer more questions

Visit Community Questions to answer new questions in Logarithm properties.

Discuss the site

For general discussions about Khan Academy, visit our Reddit discussion page.

Flag inappropriate posts

Here are posts to avoid making. If you do encounter them, flag them for attention from our Guardians.

abuse

disrespectful or offensive
an advertisement

not helpful

low quality
not about the video topic
soliciting votes or seeking badges
a homework question
a duplicate answer
repeatedly making the same post

wrong category

a tip or feedback in Questions
a question in Tips & Feedback
an answer that should be its own question

about the site

a question about Khan Academy
(Visit our FAQ)
a post about badges
a technical problem with the site
(Report a problem)
a request for videos or features