Follow this blog:
RSS

Smart paint lights your way on the highway

By | October 31, 2012, 8:39 AM PDT

By mid-2013, the Netherlands will feature glow-in-the-dark tarmac and dynamic paint that warns drivers of weather conditions.

“The Smart Highway” is a concept designed by Studio Roosegaarde and Heijmans Infrastructure. Including glow-in-the-dark roads, interactive lighting and an induction priority lane for electric vehicles, the team wants to use light, energy and road signs that automatically adapt to varying traffic conditions.

One particularly interesting feature is the luminous pathways in the road. Treated with a foto-luminizing powder, extra lighting in the dark becomes “unnecessary”, according to Studio Roosegaarde. Charging by solar technology in the day, once daylight has fled, the pathways then illuminate the contours of the road for up to ten hours.

In addition, ‘dynamic paint’ responds to changes in temperature, and then can relay traffic information to drivers. For example, if its -5C and slippery, the roads are highlighted with ice crystals.

“Research on smart transportation systems and smart roads has existed for over 30 years — call any transportation and infrastructure specialist and you’ll find out yourself,” Studio Roosegaarde communications partner Emina Sendijarevic told Wired.co.uk. “What’s lacking is the implementation of those innovations and making those innovations intuitive and valuable to the end-consumers — drivers. For this, a mentality change needs to take place within a country and its people.”

Awarded with a Best Future Concept by the Dutch Design Awards 2012, the smart highways will be in use next year.

Image credit: Studio Roosegaarde

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
17
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Snow?
Nice idea but it won't help much when there's snow on the road. Also, I wonder how durable it is and how often it has to be painted.
Posted by riverat1
1 day ago
+3 Votes
+ -
Those thoughts crossed my mind too
But surely drivers would notice the white covering obscuring the road surface...

We repaint our road symbols here in the UK yearly, I 'd think the continent does too, and the paint would last for a year or two even under heavy traffic I would imagine.

Be nice to see this in the UK too, its a great idea.
Posted by SiO2
1 day ago
0 Votes
+ -
snow
It's more along the lines of frost. I'm from the UK and feel the pain - but when it's exceedingly dark in winter I can't necessarily see any of the frost or black ice on the road. I'd love to see it in london, especially considering our often dead flood lamps.
Posted by charlieosborne
21 hrs ago
0 Votes
+ -
Smart Roads
I think one of the ideas is the material is embedded in the road surface so would last a long time. There has been some talk about heat absorbing roads that would help melt some ice or snow, although probably not great quantities like we have in Minnesota. The paint idea would be great on dry or wet roads at least and that would be a big gain in safety.
Posted by builder50@...
1 day ago
0 Votes
+ -
dark days?
How would it recharge on dark, cloudy wet days...followed by dark,cloudy wet nights?

That is, how would it charge on the days it is most needed?
Posted by RobSlack
Updated - 23 hrs ago
+2 Votes
+ -
What to do.
If you see no markings use common sense if so equipped.
Posted by Hates Idiots
23 hrs ago
0 Votes
+ -
interesting question
Good thought, i've asked the team, will update when i hear back.
Posted by charlieosborne
21 hrs ago
+1 Vote
+ -
I hope they do long term testing.
The early plasticized paints used for lane marking in the US were not properly tested before being used extensively and the taxpayers of the US have been paying the price for that miscalculation for over 20 years.

Incomplete testing resulted in tens of thousands of miles of damaged roads with miles of elongated pot holes the shape of the lane markings after a few winters. It seems the paint, lauded for its durability and ability to bond with the pavement, weakened the pavements ability to handle freeze / thaw cycles.

I hope they are smart enough to do long term testing with this or lots of hype could get very expensive.
Posted by Hates Idiots
23 hrs ago
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Long term testing
Not to mention the skid factor when wet - especally for motorcycles and scooters.
Posted by GregGold
18 hrs ago
0 Votes
+ -
Hmm.....
For snow this wouldn't do much good, but I know in the Western part of the U.S. there are a lot of people who forget that when it gets cold there can be black ice. I think this would be an effective warning system for that.

This system also would be great where light pollution is a concern by reducing the need for street lights.
Posted by cmwade1977
22 hrs ago
+1 Vote
+ -
Old news?
It seems we have dynamic, weather-indicating lane stripes in the US already. On dark, rainy nights they disappear! happy
Posted by lmarks@...
22 hrs ago
0 Votes
+ -
Clean roads...
They must count on very clean roads in the Netherlands. Snow cover, sanding and other debris would cut down on some of the effectiveness. I can see the benefits of having brighter markings on the road surface to help drivers stay on them, especially rainy and foggy periods, but weather and temperature symbols? Most cars already show outside air temperature. Even without that bit of technology, I sure hope drivers are already aware enough to notice precipitation types and what they might mean as they motor on down the roads!
Posted by MaineBikah
22 hrs ago
+1 Vote
+ -
Financial priorities first?
Wonderful idea when we are all basking in lots of funds sloshing about but here in the UK the roads are full of potholes and a nice piece of ordinary tarmac would be great. Also potholes would appear as dark patches and the driver would not be aware if it's missing or fouled paint or a great big hole!! Cute idea but a bit impractical to say the least, good lights and a competent driver would be better.
Posted by Peter J Blaylock
21 hrs ago
+2 Votes
+ -
Smart Highway Paint
What colour will be used to indicate potholes?
Posted by jimnpat
20 hrs ago
0 Votes
+ -
LOL
nt
Posted by SiO2
18 hrs ago
0 Votes
+ -
Potential savings in lives & money
Black ice is a major danger in most of the temperate zone, this won't prevent it (there are ways to prevent it using heat pipes, commonly in use in certain road sections in Germany & Sweden,) but any warning is helpful.

Durability shouldn't be an issue, as durable road paint clear top covers are available if nothing else.

Most luminescent materials will recharge even on cloudy days, and they will recharge with traffic from headlights (albeit not as well.)

Even with more frequent repainting, the material has distinct cost and reliability advantages over streetlights in lower traffic zones, and is a great assistance in high traffic zones if power to lights goes out...like it did last weekend over he US East coast.

A the US rebuilds thousands of bridges, installation of such markings, and/or heat pipe geothermal warming of bridge decks should be considered strongly simply from a safety stand point.

Temperature detection for surfaces could have been included in vehicle design (along with a lot of other assistance technology,) but like seat belts in the 1950's car manufacturers resist the idea of incorporating safety features (though that is changing these days.)

Equipment maintenance is increasingly important to safety as roads get heavier traffic and vehicles get increasingly automated. The vehicles of the future are very likely to include maintenance as part of the purchase/lease costs, simply because at some point the cars will refuse to run if they have equipment problems...just as many cars will stop if you miss payments today.

The more highly automated the vehicles become, the safer the roads become, and the higher the number of vehicles you can operate safely at higher speeds.

For instance, automated vehicles which communicate and act as 'trains' can run at least 10x closer to each other safely than manually controlled vehicles, this means 140,000 vehicles per lane per hour instead of 14,000 and no stop&go; traffic which means far fewer accidents and more predictable travel times.

Automated vehicles eliminate drunk drivers, drivers who are tired, highway hypnosis, inattention and other driver-related issues...they can even avoid and report potholes permitting maintenance to repair damage before it becomes a major danger.

Imagine using your 2 hour commute to eat breakfast & catch up on news, paperwork, sleep or phone calls, without having to pay any attention to to the car or road.

Imagine the safety advantages of people leaving bars even with less than the maximum alcohol in their systems (even below legal limits your reflexes and eyesight are adversely affected, your emotional stability is lessened, and your overall capabilities diminished,) being able to crawl into your car and start for home and pass out or sleep or whatever.

We've been technically capable of doing much of this for over 30 years, and it becomes cheaper every day, such systems added to current vehicles would add between 5-15% to vehicle costs, but decrease accident rates by 95% or more.

These systems can be designed into new vehicles (many new vehicles already have parts of such systems designed in,) and could be retro-fitted to older vehicles at moderate cost.

Even using the systems to run vehicles in traffic at their current average spacing (which is usually 2x-3x closer than what is safe) would increase safety greatly, and decrease average travel times (since manual drivers changing lanes to the 'faster' lane, speeding up excessively rather than maintaining the average speed and accidents are the major causes of stop & go traffic which decrease fuel efficiency and travel time greatly.)
Posted by wizoddg
17 hrs ago
0 Votes
+ -
At what cost ?
Sounds like a decent idea. However, at least in Illinois, the state cant afford to fix a pothole, let alone miles of roadway with decorative/informative paint symbols.
Posted by blueknight@...
3 hrs ago
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!