The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Huawei says US stance is 'protectionism'

  • alert
  • print
  • comment
  • tweet

Australian Chair says security debate “distorted” by trade war

Free whitepaper – Operationalizing Information Security

The Chairman of Huawei's Australian operations, John Lord, has proposed the nation create a national “cyber security evaluation centre” at which “all equipment implemented into major or critical Australian networks can be subjected to the same thorough security assessment.”

Lord said such a centre would mirror the UK's Cyber Security Evaluation Centre.

Lord floated the idea during a speech to Australia's National Press Club, a forum often used by politicians and other significant figures to announce big ideas or flesh out their thinking.

Lord's speech called for debate on security in Australia to stay “sober” as “If we are to find real solutions to real cyber-security problems, we cannot allow the discussion to be muddied by issues like the ongoing trade conflict between the US and China.”

That conflict, Lord said, means the recent US House of Representatives committee report that damned Huawei “... must be called for what it really is: protectionism, not security.”

Lord went on to say the committee's report is a geopolitical stunt, with the transcript of his speech offering the following:

“The fiery rhetoric of the U.S. Committee’s report may make good headline-fodder in an election year, but it should really be seen as a missed opportunity. It missed the opportunity to address the real issues at stake, to increase awareness of the common threats we face, and to develop methods of countering these threats in a realistic way. When all telecoms equipment is produced by an interdependent global supply chain, simply blacklisting a single vendor or country will not make critical infrastructure more secure.”

Huawei's proposal, in Australia at least, is a testing centre at which it will happily “offer complete and unrestricted access to our software source code and equipment” and at which Lord hopes “in the interests of national security we believe all other vendors should be subject to the same high standard of transparency.”

Lord added that he imagines the centre “could be funded by vendors themselves and operated or overseen by security-cleared Australian nationals with complete transparency of all equipment.”

Huawei will, also Lord added, “support and adopt any internationally agreed standard or best practice for cyber security in its broadest sense; we will support any research effort to improve cyber defences; we will continue to improve and adopt an open and transparent approach enabling governments to review Huawei’s security capabilities, and finally, as we have done to date, we warmly welcome the assistance from our customers in enhancing our processes, our technology, and our approach to cyber security ...”. ®

Free whitepaper – Enabling Datacenter and Cloud Service Management for Mid-Tier Enterprises

Spotlight

Credit: Hans Hillewaert. Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
Thank carbon emissions targets for the rest
Objection!
Animal libber reveals opponents' details, keeps his secret
Analysis Now if you could just fill in this Word doc about your pr0n habit...
Analysis Think we'll be richer without patents? Think again
Open ... and Shut Patent trolls go nuclear
First text
Fantasy 1-2-1 talk could land you in jail
Special report No, no, Brits, this is how a web-friendly country should be run
Viviane Reding
Comment EU digital enlightenment types mesmerised by Zuck
European Union Flag
Using a picture without paying for it? That won't be a problem
Stand by for more trouble at Lunar House, say insiders