Medal of Honor: Warfighter PlayStation 3
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 1 Critic

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 1
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 1
  3. Negative: 0 out of 1
view
per page

There are no critic reviews yet.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
7.2 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 35 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 5
  3. Negative: 2 out of 5
  1. pre_-cision-_
    5
    I think it's obvious why no review copies were sent out after playing this game, but ill do my best to give you a honest review. For starters the single player graphics are amazing and then the multiplayer graphics are mind bogglingly bad! The few missions I played in singleplayer were very glitchy with AI getting stuck, to voice actors audio rising from to loud and dropping to almost inaudible speech. The storyline is the same old thing you played a million times over this generation, so nothing noteworthy there. Now for online gameplay this game has its supreme highs and lows. The gunplay, killstreaks, weapon customization, soldier progression, player classes, servers, clan system, party system and battlelog integration are light years ahead of any other shooter I have played this generation. It's an awesome step forward in so many areas I can see myself playing online for a long time if they fix the massive amount of bugs. The voice chat, audio sounds, weapon animations, soft spots and stat tracking as of this post are very glitchy. These glitches won't ruin anything for you but it very much so holds the game back on the multiplayer level. Personally I'm tired of paying for $60 betas, in time after they patch this game I'm sure it will be a 8 or 9 but that's a big if. EA is nothing but a hype machine making lousy games anymore and right now you get what you pay for a glitchy product that needs to be patched over time to become good.… Full Review »
  2. bigdaddyswoll
    8
    I haven't touched the story mode yet, but i will say i am enjoying the online quite a bit. The maps are nice and varied and the classes feel good to play. Played about 6 hours so far and only had one bug of falling through the screen. The graphics are noticeably lower quality then say mw3, but i'll take lower quality graphics and higher quality game play any day. I just have my usual gripe that i do with most games of what appears to be inconsistent damage from different guns. Namely dump 30 shells into someone as they turn around and kill you with 2 shots from the same gun. Neither of which being head shots. Other then that i am happy with this game as long as the online community doesn't jump ship on it like in ghost recon future soldier which i also was enjoying online.… Full Review »
  3. RussellGorall
    1
    I wish only people who actually bought the game could review this, because most would say it is terrible. There is a reason EA handcuffed reviewers with a day one update, the game is actually worse than the 2010 MOH. It continues to try and be Call of Duty, contains a pathetic 3 hour campaign, and has multiplayer that won't even dent Battlefield 3. Keep playing BF3, or wait for Black Ops 2, when a game tries to be something else you might as well play that something else.… Full Review »
See all user reviews »