Next Borderlands 2 DLC revealed?

 GamerOuTLaWz

 you dont need to buy it if you dont want it

 GamerOuTLaWz Go troll somewhere else. Borderlands is an amazing game.

 Egotte gotta luv them haters...

 g1rldraco7 Apparently there was 10 hours of content in the first DLC, I'm so excited to see what's next.  I bought the season pass too ^_^

 cephas90  g1rldraco7 If you do the side missions (not including the main last raid boss guy), It's upwards of around 8-9 hours, depending on how fast you play.

 cephas90  g1rldraco7 i finished all missions in about 7 hours.. A couple to many fetch quests but overall good DLC

 sortajan I dont think he reads his stories or our comments, otherwise he may have figured that out by now

 XspidervenomX  yeah it annoys me no mater how much i level up they are there with you on the same or above your level and after you kill the enemys of an area a number of times they become a waste of ammo as they stop giving any xp.

@XspidervenomX Incorrect. I've ran across many lvl 52 enemies in the new expansion & have found 3 weapons that I swapped out for weeps that I had been carrying for at least 30 hours. There's still plenty of reasons to play.

 gatsbythepig *sigh*

The nature of the headline is meant to imply uncertainty. That is, the claim is unconfirmed as yet, and so a question mark makes it clear that he's not making an announcement.

parrot_of_adun

*belch*

 Implying uncertainty in the headline delineates why this article shouldn't have been written in the first place. Or at least the subject should have been researched until there was no more confusion in the title. At that point, the germane information could be disseminated as news.  

Right now this is essentially a rumor with a question for a headline.

 gatsbythepig Yeah. He's reporting on a rumor. You just seem to be entirely unfamiliar with the common practice of reporting on such things or using the form of a question to make that clear. There's nothing wrong with either.

 parrot_of_adun That's an incorrect assumption, and you can always ask if you don't know.  I am tired, along with many other users, of myopic reporting when there is a 'Rumor Blog' section.  

Just because it is a common practice, mostly by this site, doesn't make it any more acceptable.

 gatsbythepig Take issue with the well accepted (and not at all problematic) standard then, not the reporters who do no less than is expected of them.

 parrot_of_adun Thanks for the advice but your opinion on a 'well accepted (and not at all problematic) standard' shows that we do not agree on that point and means that I will continue take it up with the reporters who are expected to deliver news.  I would suggest you do the same, but you are content with what you are receiving.

I gotta ask, is this Eddie on a different account?  Because you seem adamant about protecting this type of reporting.

 gatsbythepig He might as well start asking, his news articles are terrible anyways

 blackothh  These "articles" are minor news snippets. They can't, by virtue of their very nature, be of much substance. Makuch says all that can be said, and no worse than anyone else could, really. If the website he works for has tasked him with writing up throw-away news bits, then it's not up to him what to write about, nor can he just compose magna opera about such trivial news things. This is just his job. I would sooner question the purpose and quality of posts that exhibit such an odd bent against these articles.