Quantcast
lostleader's Profile - Destructoid Community Blog by lostleader
Mobile Version   |   New Site Guide   |   Suggestions   |   Themes:   Aah   Ohh   Foe

games dtoid originals community videos xbox 360 ps3 wii u pc 3ds ps vita iphone android

C-Blogs RSSSubscribe via RSS
COMMUNITY
New blogsPromotedBlogs you followContestsForums*Blogging tipsSearch c-blogs
click to hide banner header
About
Player Profile
Xbox LIVE:lostleader8
PSN ID:LOSTLEAD8R
Steam ID:lostleader
Follow me:
Twitter:@LOSTLEAD8R
lostleader's sites
Following (12)  



Hello again Dtoid, I know its been a while. While I haven't been posting on here as nearly much as I should, I'm still giving it my all to beat 60 games in the matter of a year. While it certainly doesn't look like I'm close to reaching my goal here I am far more along my actual challenge, I just haven't written it up for ya. So without further stalling for time, I present games, 37,38, and 39.

Retro Game Challenge – Date beat July 23



Impressions:

Boy is this game a call back to the NES era. If anything this game is more like a simulator for the ‘80s than a game. Just the world Retro Game Challenge creates is impressive, and that alone is worth a look into this game and makes my nostalgia tingle. There’s a memo system to write down codes that you get from in-game magazines, the magazines themselves feel like a literal blast from the past with news mock ups of delays and reviews. There is even gossip talk about released video games that you witness throughout the story. Just everything about this game makes me feel like it’s the good old days of gaming where things were creative and whimsical. Where the internet wasn’t around to damper your spirits about playing a game, and the only information you got was from magazines and kids that were lying. In other words, Retro Game Challenge lives up to the name retro.

RGC also gives the player 8 retro games to play from, and 6 of which that can be defined as completely different games. All the games feel fully fleshed out for the time of their supposed release, and could have very well been old classics companies never released till now. The sounds, graphics, and gameplay are just so similar to retro games of old that it’s eerie sometimes. They also captured the harsh difficult of past games, along with plenty of cheat codes to make the game easier.

The first game available at the start is called Cosmo Gate, and it’s a shooter that resembles the likes of Galaga. The game itself is pretty straight forward kill enemies, gain points. It’s not very noteworthy, but it certainly captures the past.

The 2nd and 5th games available are Robot Ninja Haggle Man 1&2 respectively. Both appear to resemble arcade games like Flicky, and are about killing enemies and finding the door to move on to the next stage, with the 2nd going further by adding a boss at the end of the game. While it certainly is more fleshed out than Cosmo Gate and Rally King / SP it feels more generic, and is probably the weakest game(s) in this “retro collection”.

Rally King, the 3rd RGC game, and its special edition: Rally King SP, the 6th RGC game, are the top down racing games of RGC and are similar to games like Pole Position. It’s a simple race to the finish and get first place, the only thing really noteworthy is that Rally King has drifting involved with its game mechanics, which is something I don’t remember having in most top down racers. While Rally King itself is good, the fact RGC adds another game that is pretty much exactly like it, but harder certainly feels like a rip off to the player.

By far my favorite game though is Star Prince, the 4th game, as it feels like an awesome shmup that was lost in the early ‘90s. It’s a more fleshed out Cosmo Gate with a lot of cool power ups, backgrounds, and enemies, although the bosses are all pretty much the same. Star Prince honestly doesn’t have much going for it, but it charmed me in its way to pretty much duplicate any given arcade shmup you saw in theater arcades in the early ‘90s.

The 7th game is actually a full blown RPG called Guardia Quest that requires constant grinding and actually has a decent story to it. Guardia Quest is actually pretty long too, about 10-15 hours give or take. The fact they were able to fit a whole RPG in RGC impressed me enough to say that Guardia Quest is probably the best in terms of quality, but my favorite in this collection still goes to Star Prince.

The last game RGC offers is Robot Ninja Haggle Man 3, a sequel to the rather generic Haggle Man series of this collection; however this time it comes back as what seems to be a Ninja Gaiden inspired sequel. The game focuses on tricky platforming and grinding for power ups so you can become more powerful to kill your enemies. The game itself is alright, but with the lack of creative bosses and the odd leveling up system, RNHM3 ends up being rather barebones when it could have been something much more.

Conclusion: Retro Game Challenge is a trip to the past in the most literal sense to gaming. Even if you’re not a fan of nostalgia, these games stand on their own merit, and deliver fun gameplay, while mimicking retro gaming to an eerie level. If you’re a fan of Retro Gaming this game is certainly a must.

Okamiden – date beat July 28



Impressions:

I love Okami just so very much. It gave me so much to go through within a game. The art style is amazing, the story is wonderful, the characters are awesome, the gameplay is nostalgic, inventive, clever, and basically Okami is just all kinds of awesome. Okamiden, however, is not so much like its predecessor. It’s heavily the same game as Okami is, but cuter and shorter. Chibitersu is adorable, and some of the newer characters are interesting, and for older characters it builds on them. But overall Okamiden feels a bit more like a side story within Okami, then an actual sequel to it.

I know I’m making Okamiden out to be a bad follow up, but really it is quite ambitious in its endeavors, and following up Okami is no easy task. At the least Okamiden brings a few new things in to the mix, and the partner system is a good edition. Also the ability to use the stylus throughout the game makes game play much smoother than Okami ever could make it. The story itself is pretty interesting as well, especially when it starts to interact with the first story, but it also dampers playthroughs of Okami if the player played Okamiden first. This game is also plagued with a lot of tedious puzzle solving that just makes you question the game. Like why do I have to press 3 different switches when the action could have been completed with one switch? But it still has good puzzles in it, just too many filler puzzles that outweigh the good.

Really though, Okamiden just never really captivated me enough to love it as much as I did with Okami, it just felt like it was simply building on what Okami did. I want to say Okamiden was a lazy game, but I don’t think that’s what it is. It just doesn’t offer enough to build itself as a sequel, but relies on Okami to succeed as a good game. And in that regard it works, and it works well. But as a standalone, Okamiden just doesn’t offer much to those that haven’t played the original.

Conclusion: I can’t say Okamiden stands on its own, but when played after Okami, it’s a game that wets the appetite of those that wanted more from Okami. While a lot of the game is stuck in Okami’s shadow, it still offers exactly what Okami offered, and really that’s enough to give it a play. Also chibitersu is cute, so what’s not to love.

Legend of Zelda - Date beat August 5th



Impressions:

I’m a bit ashamed to say that I never beat Legend of Zelda till today. Considering that I was a big fan of the series ever since one of my grade school friends introduced me with Link’s Awakening. But I can’t say the first Zelda really pulled me in either, while I did miss out during the NES era, I was given a chance to play it during the gamecube era, thanks to the collector’s edition. Zelda provided to be too hard for me, and because I had no idea where to go I decided to give up and move on to other games. The fact that it was just so wide open, and gave you no direction of where to go was just off putting to me. But when I got Zelda via the ambassador program, I decided to just go for it, for the sake of this challenge and my gaming honor. With me playing Zelda on a portable handheld, the help of a “save state”, and the internet, I was able to finally beat this game.

Usually I’m against using the internet for helping me game, or at the least, ashamed of it, but Legend of Zelda is just too open ended to not ask for or seek help. There is just so much to this game, and the NES is only able to store so much information to tell you where to go or what to do. I may be a bit of an old hat in gaming, but I had a lot of trouble finding some of these dungeons. I also had to use the “save states” the 3DS gives you to beat this game. It still proved to be too hard for me not to. Just some of the enemies in this game, mainly wizarobes, give out so much damage for one attack that you are down like 10 hearts in a matter of seconds. And is it just me, or is the heart drop rate really small in dungeons? I swear I could kill 10 enemies, and get maybe 1 heart if I’m lucky. I really just don’t understand how kids younger than me had an easier time with this game, maybe we were just tougher back then? Games nowadays tend to hold our hands quite often too, so I guess I just got soft. But either way Zelda certainly is Nintendo hard in my book.

I know I’m complaining a lot about it, like “ya, games back then were hard”, but in the end I did find Zelda to be quite an enjoyable game. In fact, I would say that it gets better with each play through. I mean despite my hang ups with my first playthrough I know I can go back to this game and play it differently than I did last time, and that excites me. I can’t exactly say that about other Zeldas, no matter what, I still have to beat all the dungeons as a kid first before I become an adult in Ocarina of Time, can’t exactly go to turtle rock right away in Link to the Past, nor can I get anywhere during the 2nd half without my horse in Majora’s Mask. I mean when was the last time you could say you beat the 3rd level before you beat the 1st? Sure Mega Man gives you that kind of option, in a way, but it’s not inside a full blown world. This type of exploring is really fun, and needs to be a little more present in video games. I mean everyone’s first playthrough of Zelda may not be exactly the same as others. No one person gets the exact same experience. As well when you are actually done with this game you can change your routes, were you go, what you do, etc. You can effectively make speed runs in any way you want, make challenges like the no sword run. The actual end to Zelda is just your imagination on how to play it, and I think that’s what makes it such a great game.

Conclusion: Legend of Zelda is not for the light hearted, it can sometimes be unfair, frustrating, and confusing. But Legend of Zelda is a classic for a reason, and if you give the time of day to play it, it will give you something fun and unique to play over and over again











I'm getting closer and closer Dtoid. While I still haven't fully caught up with my present self in writing these articles, I can say right now that I'm a little over the 3/4th mark on my 60 game year challenge. I just need to write my thoughts on the latest games I beat, and tell you about them Dtoid! For now here's some catch up commentary of games 34, 35, and 36 that I beat during this challenge

Professor Layton and the Unwounded Future – date beat July 8



Impressions:

Layton games have always been an odd form of addiction and torture. Sometimes I know the answer right away, and other times I have spent an hour just trying to figure out one puzzle. Despite this, Layton games always catch my attention when I play them, and I can beat them within a week’s time because of how addicting it can get. Unlike other games I get addicted to though; Layton games don’t leave me with such a heavy impression, Unwounded Future however did. Unwounded Future is, for all purposes, about how Layton got his hat. I know that sounds really stupid at first, but when you played the game all the way through you should understand where I’m getting at. Pretty much all this game centers on is how and why Layton is the way he is. You really do feel for Layton in the end, and honestly the ending got me to smile in a bit of a bitter sweet moment. We want Layton to be happy, but that simply isn’t possible. I think that ending, that moment, will stick with me the most. But as for the rest of Unwounded Future, well it certainly is filled with a lot of twists, and turns that I honestly doubt anyone, aside from Layton himself would be able to figure out.
Aside from the story, Unwounded Future gave the Layton series a few new key features and overall the game had a diverse amount of puzzles. Rarely, I felt like I was doing the same thing over and over again, and that was something the previous two Layton games were suffering from heavily. The hint system is even more robust with super hints that can often just solve the puzzle for, and I will honestly admit I used it for quite a few puzzles. There was also a new feature in Unwounded Future that I would like to see more of in the rest of the series, and for the best way I can describe it, it was a battle of wits. This really gave Layton a lot more conflict, and climatic moments that really not present in the other two games. I mean Layton had some pretty awesome moments in the other two games, but when you see the pictrats appear, and then that calming music turns on it kinda ruins the mood, you know? The pacing just felt better in Unwounded Future because it felt like you were in on the action, instead of in calm music land solving puzzles while a movie plays for you afterward.
Despite all this though, I can’t really say I liked Unwounded Future more than Diabolical Box though. There was just something about diabolical box that made it a bit more interesting, that it was a bit of a tighter package of mysteries together. Unwounded Future's only real flaw I see is that the plot itself is all over the place, I mean I beat it, but I still can’t make much sense of it. I understand how everything took place, but I think Diabolical Box simply had better transitions compared to Unwounded Future. Still though, Unwounded Future is a close runner up as the ending alone gives it a lot of impact on the player. Honestly felt like crying at the end, but I couldn’t help, but smile as I learned I truly cared what happen to Layton and Luke. At some point these two characters climbed into my heart.

Conclusion: Unwounded Future may not be my favorite Layton game, but I think I’ll remember it the most. The characters are just far more endearing this time around, and somehow I care about them so much more. Puzzles can still be hit and miss, but the pacing is far better this time around, and overall the ending really just makes this game so special.

999: Nine Hours, Nine Persons, Nine Doors -date beat July 12



Impressions:

If there was anything that blurred video games, and how they fit into any kind of media, 999 would be the best example. I have to say playing through this “game” really made me confused for what makes a video game, a video game. The story started out rather dull, if only for the constant explanations, but as I learned more and more about each character I became compelled to keep playing this game. The characters just had so much depth to them that you get lost in their stories and explanations. Like how did they learn about this? Who is this person really? And why is this all happening to them? The story had a pretty awesome idea behind it too, that quite frankly I’m rather interested to see if any of what was mentioned in the story is actually real. And after a while I wanted to desperately get past the puzzles it gave me just to continue the story. Beyond this point the puzzles just weren’t cutting it; the story was far too good and the puzzles were in the way. I was just so tied up in 999’s story to realize that what I was playing was actually a game. And I have to wonder, did I read 999? Experience it? Or played it? The only thing I truly know is that 999 had an amazing story and concept to it.
Whatever 999 is, it still has puzzles in it to break the story together, and give you some interaction with the game. The puzzles themselves were often clever, but rather frustrating to execute. It took me far longer to get these puzzles done then I hope to care for, and it tended to break tension with how long it took. If the puzzles actually took place in real time I would have been dead twice over just because of how long these puzzles can take to figure out. Knowing that, I still think an actual timer on the puzzles would make this game far more interesting and tense. At the very least the puzzles were challenging, but not so hard that I couldn’t figure it out on my own. 999 also has multiple paths, but you really only need to play it twice to get the true ending, and luckily for me that’s exactly what I did. The first ending I actually got was amazing, tense, and confusing. It pumped me up so much that I just had to play 999 again to get the true ending. And although I’m still trying to make sense of the true ending in my head, 999 will stick with me with its great story and characters. Thankfully I won’t have to wait long for the much needed sequel.

Conclusion: 999 is one of the best things I have ever read, and as a game it certainly has put a hold on me that not many games can say they have. I like to think of 999 as more of an experience then a game, something that can be taken with you into real life, but perhaps that isn’t all true. Either way anyone that plays this game will likely fall in love with it, its characters, and the ideas that it shows. I know I did.

Wild Guns – date beat July 21



Impressions:

While browsing through the interwebs I came across this little gem called Wild Guns. It was in a list of games that people probably haven’t heard of and I certainly never have. Once I saw this game I knew I had to get it; so through a quick search on Amazon I saw the game was heavily priced. Down, but not out I decided to just watch some more gameplay of this game, and see exactly what I was missing. Then I stumbled on a review of Wild Guns that mentioned it was on the Wii Virtual Console, and me having an extra 800 wii points knew it was destined to be! I hooked up my Wii as soon as I could and started playing it. It amazed me so much, the music, the high risk gameplay everything about it just made me stand in awe. What turned out to simply a play test turned into something a little more, and before I knew it I wasted 2 hours just learning the ropes and passing two levels, and going on a third. I knew I wasn’t going to be able to beat it then, so I decided to save it for another day.
Wild Guns was obliviously a game I loved the moment I started playing it, but really what’s not to love about it? There is literally a guy named Clint and a girl name Annie shooting at robots in the Wild West! The game itself seems to be based off true grit, but with a more parody, '90s video game take on the movie. It’s also really hard, like you get hit once and you die hard. It’s also somewhat short too, but don’t let that discourage you; there is plenty to replay as I doubt anyone will get good at this game right away. Wild Guns is very high risk, high reward, the better you play the more likely you build meter for your super mode which makes you invincible and rack up more points. You also get power ups, and bombs to aid you as well. You can either plan cautiously and dodge enemy fire, or go the more offensive route, and counter attack them when they throw things like dynamite at you. There is a lot to learn and do in this game, but by all means this game is more than fair. While you have to go through a whole stage on one continue, you can go through the game with as many as it takes, but leaving you on the stage you were last at.
The only real bad thing about Wild Guns is the control scheme, while it certainly works and works well I might add, the game only uses the d-pad and three buttons. The SNES had three other buttons, but they do nothing at all, while one button, shoot, is needed for three separate things. Hold shoot to, shoot, tap constantly to use your lasso, and tab shoot and dodge to perform a side dodge. Why couldn’t they button the lasso and side dodge as a separate button? It’s not like I don’t like the layout, but it certainly is odd that they don’t consider it an option. Aside from that, Wild Guns is amazing gem from the SNES era, and well worth the 800 wii points it will cost on the virtual console.

Conclusion: Wild Guns is certainly one of those gems of a game that you see every so often. It’s wonderful, executed well, has a great premise, and its only fault is not getting enough attention. The music alone is worth a look, but the game itself is an amazing high risk, high reward arcade shooter. Seriously get it if you can!











lostleader here, and still as ambitious as ever to getting through my 60 year game challenge done! Finally making it to the end of June, but I still have the rest of the summer of games that I have beaten that need to get up here on Dtoid! Here are the games I beat for 31, 32, and 33 of my 60 game year challenge!

Castlevania: Order of Ecclesia date beat June 19



Impressions:

Order of Eccelsia certainly is an oddity in the castlevania series, not that it’s different ,but that it combines two different things to make something new all together. It’s like combining Simon’s quest and Symphony of the Night, it has the challenging gameplay and exploration of SotN along with visiting different locations like Simon's Quest. I don’t know how to exactly describe it ,but a lot of this game makes sure that skill wins overall. Sure there are RPG elements from the older metroidvania games, but if you can't beat the boss because you lack the skill, grinding to higher levels won't make it easier to beat the boss. There are also plenty of new areas to explore ,but a lot of the exploration is more like traveling to different locations then actually exploring them. In fact the vast amount of these areas are pretty straight forward and some of them don’t even have a save point, which can be rather bothersome your first time playing through them and hoping for one. Thankfully enough the game designers weren’t so cruel to leave you stranded ,and they give you a magic ticket that lets you travel back to a village you frequent so you can save and plan your strategy for the stage you’re at. That may seem like it makes the game too easy, but you will be needing those tickets throughout the game. This is mainly due to the game throwing too much at you at once, and gives you no save point in sight to make sure you are actual progressing through the game. Course this leads to a lot of backtracking throughout the same areas you been through so while it can be tedious, it never gets quite so tedious as Simon's Quest did.
Speaking of biting off more than you can chew, the bosses in this game are impossible to beat! Or at least it seems that way at first. The majority of OoE is just figuring out boss patterns, adjusting your play style to them ,and living long enough to beat them. And frankly I love that about OoE. Sure I didn't like it at first, but I kept pressing forward and when I finally beat that boss I've been struggling with it, it gives me a certain sense of accomplishment that is rather rare in games these ages.I remember screaming phrases like "oh ya I beat you, but you didn't think I could do it, did you?" or like " hell yeah I won!" Just bursting out with joy when you beat a boss, not the game, a boss? Ya I haven't had that feeling in a while. Course OoE isn't all about beating bosses as it does have a story to it, and while
the story itself can be heartwarming at times it’s just not really there. In all honest the game really only focuses on one character throughout the game, and unfortunately it’s not the main one. It would be nice if they actually treated Shanoa as an actual character rather than a tool throughout the game that the player uses but it’s just not the case.In the end I truly do like Order of Ecclesia, it just gives you that “I did it” moment and frankly that is rather rare nowadays.As well it even borrows a page from SotN ,and pretty much has a second game to unlock after you "beat it". Still though, I really would have liked Shanoa to have explored better, but I suppose that was just asking too much.

Conclusion:
Order of Ecclesia brings back old Castlevania toughness with some metroidvania style gameplay. While it can be tough grinding now and again, a lot of this games fun comes from overcoming what you thought was impossible at first, and that’s something every game should try to offer!

Castlevania: Circle of the Moon -date beat June 21



Impressions:

After playing Order of Ecclesia I have to say this is quite a disappointing bunch of bosses. I know it's rather harsh to judge past games because of what the newer ones had, but in truth the old castlevania games also had some of the best bosses. But CotM? Save for a Dracula that can pretty much K.O. you in one go, these bosses are really easy. Throughout most of the game I was a bit under leveled yet I had no problem taking any of them down, in fact the toughest time I had with this game is just walking to the next location to progress.There are just many reasons why these bosses just don't work, and for one there actually aren't a lot of bosses compared to other castlevania games. The majority of the game is just traveling around, and finding equipment to get better at moving around the castle instead of fighting a bunch of bosses. Second, the bosses are just honestly kind of dumb, playing a majority of castlevania games throughout this challenge, I have to say these are pretty weak bosses and references compared to the rest of the series. A lot of the other castlevania games have a lot of references to mythological creatures, but this one just kinda dropped the ball. The difficulty was a big problem too, all the bosses patterns are rather easy to get down, and the "boomerang" weapon easily breaks this games difficulty. I seriously killed death on my first try simply because I spammed boomerangs, it really gets to the point that no other weapon should be used. It is not so much an issue of a broken weapon, I love those in single player games, but the fact it just distracts so much attention to actual strategy in a castlevania game is sad. One of the bigger parts of Castlevania is fighting "monsters and demons" from different myths and having a difficult time till you finally nail a pattern down and beat them. This castlevania however was all about boomerang spam.
Aside from boss fights though I do like this game a bit, and I have to say its one of the better GBA castlevania games.The story is sub par, really isn't there the majority of the time, but the music is a nice call back to the old school games. I like the fact you can use a whip, but this is probably due to using a lot of different weapons in the games I have been playing before it, either way it makes a nice design choice as a lot of the game really does make use for the whip itself. I also really like the fact this game plays a bit more like metroid then it does castlevania compared to the other ones. See in castlevania its simple grind and exploration, but with metroid your always looking for something to further your progress. CotM however works more like metroid making its main focus on exploration and movement, compared to bosses and grinding, which I suppose is the trade up for what was mentioned earlier. Nonetheless I have to say I enjoyed this game quite a bit, especially considering I played through it within a matter of two days. While the game is indeed short, especially for those a little more skilled, CotM does have a nice niche of replay value as you can play through the game again focusing on different aspects of the games mechanics. If your more into spells you can be a magician instead, or if you want to focus on strength then you can do that. Its an interest bonus for sure, and frankly should be added to more castlevania games. But for now I think Castlevania is better off following the lead of Order of Ecclesia then Circle of the Moon.

Conclusion: What it lacks in creative and challenging bosses, Circle of the Moon makes up for pure exploration, nostalgic music, and interesting ways to replay the game. While I can't recommend this over most of the Castlevania games I played, it still as the addictiveness of any castlevania game, and that should be a good enough sale for anyone.

Pokemon Conquest date beat – June 27



Impressions:

When I first saw Pokemon Conquest I realized it was the type of game that was “just so crazy that it might work”. And wouldn’t you know that phrase matches this game perfectly. I never would have guessed I like playing a game with as much micro managing as conquest gives you. Literally the whole main game is a tutorial to teach you the basics of what you are going to do post game. This kinda makes post game a big downer in the way just like cakes feel like lies. I just grew so attached to my units, and having to start over from scratch really doesn’t feel worth it, but overtime with two post game episodes under my belt I have to say it could be worse. Sure I may have lost all linking percentages, and everything may feel like a lie, but it is for the greater good. If I had all my broken units there be no challenge in the game, and post game certainly offers so much more then what the main game lets on. See in the main game the AI is terribad, nearly never responding to empty castles or putting up a great fight. In post game everything changes, enemies are more aggressive and strategy is a lot more involved. As well I barely scratched the surface of post game, with nearly 4 pages full of side missions and already 25 hours under my belt you beat this would take a large amount of time to complete all the episodes.
As for the main game itself, it’s a little disappointing that it ends up being one big tutorial, but it does give you the opportunity to do what you want and leave you room for grinding. That can help in post game if you plan things correctly, but only if you actually plan it. Really wish a lot more strategy games did make you play through a main story like Conquest did though, as its an easier way to not baby a player, and actually adds to the game more than it hinders it. In a way it’s like Lyn’s story in FE7, it pretty much is its own game, but sets up for the bigger adventure, without just throwing you in the deep end. The story itself is also a little bit interesting as it provides for a nice little history on Nobunga, but blends ruthless dictatorship with cutesy pokemon sprites so it ends up being a lot more light-hearted than what history would like you to believe. But that's probably why Conquest is so interesting, blending two things that shouldn't match make for an interesting recipe, it could end up horrible like Street Fighter in 3D or wonderful like Kingdom Hearts.Conquest's gameplay is also quite addictive, just finding each units best link or as I like to call it, OTP (one true pairing), and managing units to go to certain castles really burns a lot of your time and you find yourself picking it up for 10 minutes only to find a hour has gone by. And really that's something that doesn't happen to me often, but Conquest is just one of those games that gets you wrapped up in itself.

Conclusion: Pokemon Conquest works so well that it wraps you into things that may seem tedious at first, but makes them come out as fun in the end.With tons of episodes for post game, getting the best out of resources, fighting and defending from enemies, and making sure you make your army the best they can be, conquest gives you so much to handle that you will never be truly bored of it. Conquest is also the best spin-off Pokemon has had since Pokemon Snap, and while it’s a bit of a shame it took so long, it is well worth looking into for any Pokemon fan or tactic RPGer.











Howdy Ya'll. I've been awfully busy doing nothing and updating my backloggery. Ya, decided to finally updated it, although I got it a long time ago, I never updated it. So without further Apu, My backloggery: http://www.backloggery.com/lostleader . Also ya finally posting the midway point of my 60 game year challenge! I assure you though, I have gotten much further and continue to strive to complete this challenge! Also will try to update this little blog a little better, but I'm sure we all heard that one, ya?


‘splosion Man – Date Beat May 13



Impression:

‘splosion Man was simply a game I heard about amongst forums, and honestly didn’t pay much mind to it. That was till a faithful holiday season when it was on sale for 150 MS points. I mean, it’s a game worthy of praise being sold for pretty much a candy bar, hell ya I’ll try it! And well I didn’t like. Well that is to say when I played through it, I didn’t like. I mean it seems from the 1st set of levels that its pretty much just ‘splode and venture through some random labs. Certainly not something that gave me much to look forward to or care about. So I decided to just drop it, and move on with other games and pay no mind to it. Then during this 60 year game challenge I picked it back up, and learned to love ‘splosion Man.
I’ll admit, it took me some time, playing this game time after time and barely just reaching the midway point in the game, and it clicked! The game is tough as nails but its forgiving, challenging but fun. However there was so much more to just the ‘sploding. Really what first turns out to be a simple mechanic turns out to be a wonderful device for some very clever platforming. I can’t imagine another point in time in my life that I had this much trouble with a game, let alone a platformer. It wasn’t really that it was annoying me, or it felt unfair, but rather it was just, in general, challenging. Like I was back to the old school days of games and all the charm was packed in a newer coat. Really there is so much quirkiness to this game and charm that it just ends up growing on you. It really captures a spirit and some of the music is just really, really catchy! I have to say by the end, I love ‘splosion for what it is, quirky over the top platforming goodness. And frankly I wouldn’t want it any other way.

Conclusion: ‘splosion Man captures the spirit of old school platformers by both being hard and incredibly quirky. Luckily its far more forgiving compared to its older cousins, but sometimes it does feel rather trying and the fact it doesn’t really explore any other environment, save for a lab, is rather disappointing. But mostly I’ll remember the laughs.


PixelJunk Shooter –date beat May 18



Impressions:

Having a few extra bucks from buying Skull Girls on the PSN I occasionally look to see the daily deals and when I saw the PixelJunk games for a dollar I was shocked and interested. So, of course, I bought them all, and for a mere 3 dollars no less! 4 new games, all from the PixelJunk series, a series I didn’t really know about but I was interested in. After playing them for about 20 minutes each, I came to realize I wasn’t exactly ecstatic about my purchase, maybe I needed to play them more? Maybe I just don’t get it, but then I finally played PixelJunk Shooter! This is the PixelJunk game that clearly stands out as the best. The story is interesting, the gameplay is fun, and the puzzles are inventive. Just everything about it just stands out to you and says play me! The music will also get you in a bit of a bouncy mood, which is nice compared to the other ones, which currently seem absent in my mind.
There isn’t much too really complain about with PixelJunk Shooter, aside from nitpicking, but it does have problems like every game does. For one thing, the game doesn’t really punish you, it’s pretty much a walk in the park compared to the rest of the PixelJunk series, and it’s not a hard series to begin with. You can literally kill the people you are trying to save and still move on, and even if you don’t save enough you simply restart from the same screen you were at. There doesn’t seem to be a real game over screen either because you can just keep dying and it doesn’t matter, you respawn at the same point and try to solve it. This really takes down the challenge a lot in this game, and to have some sort of punishment may have made this game last longer artificially and given it more of a sense of accomplishment, but perhaps that isn’t exactly better for some. As well the game is rather short, it honestly didn’t take me that long just saving the survivors at all, and getting most of the treasure only held me back for another hour or two. But really it’s a great game, and any complaints I have don’t really matter much to me, I had lots of fun, and I think everyone that plays this game will too. It's a simple game that uses the elements to solve puzzles, simple concept, but effectively making it an good game.

Conclusion: PixelJunk Shooter is certainly the one PixelJunk game you want to play if you only play one of PixelJunk games. With an easy difficulty, a lot of fun, and inventive puzzles this game will make anyone have a good time, and especially make them bounce to the music.


Castlevania: Portrait of Ruin -date beat June 12



Impressions:

Portrait of Ruin continues what SOTN, and Dawn of Sorrow left off, Classic 2-d Metroidvania goodness. There is a new cast of characters to play as like Charlotte, and Jonathan as well as a few that are unlocked once you beat the story, like the sisters and Richter from bloodlines. But all in all it’s pretty much just another Metroidvania game. Other than the fact there is additional character with you at all times and there is some team work it's just more of the same. Teamwork stuff and power moves affect the game so little that it really isn’t as noticeable as you would think. In fact most of the time I left my partner on the side lines because it was far more useful to have them come in for a power attack rather than have them drain my meter to perform special attacks. Overall I don’t understand why they tried to make this mechanic and just instead developed the characters more then what they did. Both characters seemed interesting at first, but they just don’t interact throughout the story like you think they will, no real bonding points or cutscenes really make it clear. Other characters in the story have this problem too, but the main characters where really lacking in development and its sad because they did have the potential to be interesting.
I also have to wonder why Dracula was really involved with this game, the story didn’t really call for it and frankly I would have loved to see Charlotte and Jonathan just travel the world rather than thru portraits. Its fun going to places other than Dracula’s castle for once, and PoR really did bring that part out. However all these segments do end up suffering in lack of detail or exploration and in turn make Dracula’s castle the same. There doesn’t seem to be much detail in either sections and that’s because they are trying too hard to deliver two things at once to players when really they should have focused on one or the other. I didn’t feel like I was exploring Dracula’s castle once again, but rather just jumping from point A in the overworld, and finding point B in it only to do the same thing I did in A, but in a different location. Also save points were often scattered far too much and that tended to make the game annoying when exploring newer areas. But not everything is all bad, once you beat the game you’re reward with tons of new stuff to play with, like a sisters mode, cap levels, hard mode, boss challenge, and a bunch of other cool stuff. It can at least be said that Portrait of Ruin does deliver content and for that I admire it. I can’t say Portrait of Ruin is my favorite Castlevania game, but it’s far from the worse.

Conclusion:
Portrait of Ruin really could have been better if we didn’t actually return to Dracula’s castle. However that is not the case, and while it’s not a bad game, a lot of potential was missed. Still Portrait of Ruin offers a lot to players and I think if you’re even remotely interested in Castlevania you will have fun with this game.











Finally games 25-27, almost there to the midway point, Dtoid, hopefully I'll have my summaries of the last couple of games up tomorrow as well. Either way, for now, enjoy catching up to where I currently am in the challenge. Or should I say was?

Captain Commando –date beat April 9



Impressions:

I, like many people out there, have not heard of Captain Commando till Marvel vs. Capcom. Frankly I wasn’t that interested at first, till I saw his team. A mummy, a ninja, and a baby? A BABY?!? In a mech suit? It certainly stuck with me that Captain Commando was a bizarre game, and when I found out that Capcom Collection Vol. 2 had both Captain Commando and Strider, I knew I had to get it. And frankly after I got it, I forgot about it, and it was sitting on my shelf unopened till this very day or rather the day I beat it. But today was a little different and my friend wanted me to come over and hang out and I figured, why not bring it along? Little did I know my friend and I would beat it within the 2 hrs. we hanged out at his house. It really shocked me, after getting past the 6th stage I knew we be able to beat it before I had to leave and sure enough we did.
As for Captain Commando, well the game is short and easy. Granted my friend and I were dying left and right, and if this were an arcade we be down 10 bucks. But this was the console version and we abused our free life's like no tomorrow. To say the least the game screams 90’s like no one’s business. Over the top characters, typical music for beat'em ups, floor food, and of course, terrible recorded voice audio! As we beat the game and Captain Commando shouted his name, we both laughed at the terrible audio quality because it just sounded so stupid compared to the audio nowadays. Still though, playing this game really brought back memories of playing in the arcades and hooking up with strangers in order to beat a game, and I loved it for that. It certainly wasn’t the best beat up I ever played, but it was nostalgic and overall good for a quick playthrough. And the fact it’s so short I may actually play this game again with another one of my friends, and maybe to actually play this game correctly as well instead of spamming to save my life.

Conclusion: Captain Commando certainly holds the spirit of the 90’s and while it isn’t the best beat up, it certainly is up there, if only for it’s over the top characters. I honestly don’t know why this series isn’t given another chance, I think it can set the gaming world on fire, I mean a Baby in a mech suit?! How can that not get someone's attention with that?!

Kid Icarus 3D Classic – date beat April 21



Impressions:

After playing the HAAMAZING game know as Kid Icarus Uprising I decided to finally devote my time to the game that inspired it all, the original Kid Icarus. Like all lucky people that pre-ordered Uprising you got the 3D classic, Kid Icarus, free of charge. And starting out, well I was reminded why the phrase “Nintendo Hard” exists. I mean, my goodness perhaps the hardest level is the first simply due low health and learning the ropes of the game. But after several off putting attempts I finally past the first level, which took me several weeks of giving up each time I got a game over. At the least the game does save after every stage so it’s at least a bit forgiving. However for the biggest part of it all the game sure doesn’t tell you anything about itself. I literally had to watch a Let’s Play just to find out you can use different items. I was also surprised to learn that experience was acquired thru high score. Truly a feeling I haven’t felt in a long while, learning and discovering new things about a game you just played by watching someone else play it, it just felt so nostalgic.
Really though, this game is pretty awesome, despite my constant complaining. In good truth the game has a lot to offer despite how short it actually is. In fact you could probably beat this whole game in 2hours ,or 1 if you’re good at it. Kid Icarus 3D certainly does feel like an old fossil coming back to life reminding us of a simpler gaming time. One where it was hard to do just about everything, and information was limited, and praised for knowing it. But what it doesn't give is the feeling of Kid Icarus in 3D, the tacked on 3D is so gimmicky, and poorly executed that its hard to notice much of a difference with the slider on. Pretty much the only thing that changes is the background to give the front ground a more pop up feel to it, but it really doesn't work well at all. That’s not to say the remake wasn't needed though, the original had a lot of problems. For the most part the game was made easier for the player by making a lot of the enemies and damage output weaker. There is also a lot less lag to Pit and jumping compared to the original which makes this game far more enjoyable then its older counterpart because its simply more playable. Never the less Kid Icarus is a classic in its own right, and was glad I could experience both it and its newly released game.


Conclusion: The 3D totally sucks, but this game is called a Classic for a reason. Kid Icarus is a literal blast from the past being challenging till the end, but still retaining that 80’s charm. While it’s shortly lived, the challenge, highscores and multiple endings gives you something to crawl back too.
.
Prototype – Date Beat May 5



Impressions:

When Prototype first came out I got it mixed up with the game Infamous a lot. I mean the stories seemed similar, they were both released around the same time, and with me being on a personal boycott for Activision I decide not to venture into it. As well it didn't really seem that deeply engaging to me. But for Christmas my friend got this game from his older brother, and after he beat it said I could borrow it. So I decided, for the sake of this New Year’s Resolution, I’d play Prototype.
Now was it just me or was this game rushed? There was a lot that seemed missing throughout the game and it really felt like they were just trying to hurry it along and make the release date. A lot of the characters just seem to “disappear” with in the story with no real explanation later on. This could be due to it being in the "web of intrigue", but that’s a rather sloppy way of doing it considering that its quite noticeable and doesn't make for good story telling. As well a lot of missions just feel like, “do this because I said so” and Alex is all like ‘okay I’m going to do it”, "he does it", repeat process. There is a story to this, but aside from the beginning and the end it just felt like it was filler and they were trying to hurry with just the parts they actually did. Just so much of the story felt like it was there and you can tell there were parts missing, but you couldn't quite put your finger on it. It was really distracting and it left me with an unsettling feeling. But by all means the story doesn't damper the gameplay but it certainly makes playing the game more of a chore then part of interesting story.
Not the say gameplay is without its flaws though. The lock on system just doesn’t lock on properly. You can be facing your target, but it will lock on to the bigger target behind it, and when you do try to switch targets there are so many targets to choose from that you often stumble on the wrong one. This can get really frustrating fast as a lot of enemies only leave you with so much time to counter attack. As for the bosses they seemed like they were interesting, but just ended up dull and boring. The game certainly seems like it can get some great bosses out of its concept, but a lot of it just falls apart in pratice. More often then not you are faced with wave after wave of enemies that try to attack you while you’re trying to attack the boss, and the boss does so much damage to you, that you have to play a constant hit and run game otherwise you die and have to start all over. This makes boss battles tedious and annoying rather than challenging which is a big let down to say the least. This is very apparent in the final boss battle which is just the biggest let down I've experienced throughout this challenge and perhaps my gaming career. It doesn’t help that it’s a rather unfair fight either, considering he can pretty much OHKO you each time he touches you! And its time too, so you're put into a rock and a hard place of playing hit and run, while trying to constantly attack him, making the fight more of a headache then an exciting last battle. Really the best time you will have playing Prototype is just exploring the city and doing stealth missions. While stealth missions can get annoying, they offers a nice change of pace for the game, and if they focused more on stealth missions the game would have been a lot more interesting. As for just exploring the city, there is just so much you can do to kill time, like gliding around, hoping around builds, doing varies side missions, and mini games like racing around the city collecting orbs. If Prototype just focused on delivering just one of these kind of things that the minigames or stealth missions offered I'm sure it would be far better than what it is now, but for what we have is an unfocused gaming trying to do everything, and giving nothing of great value. It's a shame too because there is a lot of potential in Prototype that just seems like it was barely missed.
.
Conclusion: Prototype is only a shadow of what it could have been, it certainly was there, but it just never did flesh out. But for what it is, Prototype is still pretty interesting, and certainly brings something to the table; just don’t expect it to be a grand venture.[img]










4:40 AM on 06.22.2012   //   lostleader

Oh dear Dtoid, seems I slipped up a bit and forgot you wonderful people. Either way I still have a challenge to be updating, so better late then never, yes? I'm still working hard on it and only have 25 more games to go as I write this. But for now here are games 22, 23, and 24.

Mega Man X4 – date beat March 16



Impressions:

After playing both Mega Man X2 and X3, I honestly though this series in the Mega Man franchise didn’t deserve to continue. A lot of the past two games just felt like it was trying to make lighting strike twice, which of course didn’t happen. Mega Man X4 however truly felt like a good game that could stand on its own merit, and dare I say I actually like it more than the original. I’ll let it be known that I’m just not a fan of this series, but MMX4 just did something for me that turned my head in awe. While I don’t think it can be argued that X4 beats X in terms of level design, X4 gave me the option to play as Zero and frankly that’s what hands it its victory. There is just something about Zero and the way he plays that truly makes this game what it is, and in comparison, playing as Mega Man X is just boring. Just the way Zero is all about risk and reward makes the game so much more fun and makes this game different enough to separate from the original series. Mega Man X just feels like an even more beaten up song and dance routine, he's always underpowered in the beginning, gets stronger and eventually destroys everything in his path. X just hits too many of the same buttons for me to say that its different from the original series, because each time I play as X I just wish I was playing his original counter part. On top of that, there is a constant need to charge his blaster to take down enemies, that I just get really annoyed and is inconvenient at times, it doesn't make the game challenging, just tedious. Now Zero on the other hand, doesn’t get to be all powerful like X, aside from a few power ups, Zero plays the same beginning to end. So what it really comes down to is recognizing patterns and learning when to attack and when to dodge. Zero isn’t helpless though and the fact he tears through everything with a simple slice makes all the difference. Really Zero is what I wanted from the X series, different yet familiar gameplay, and he delivered it. So why didn’t they just focus on him after X4? So much wasted potential.
As for everything I didn’t like, well, pretty much everything with Mega Man X. I think I just don’t like playing as X simply because his counterpart is just better at doing his job then he is, I’m not sure, but at the very least I know it’s a personal problem. The levels are also very hit and miss. While a good majority of them are fine, the gimmicky ones like peacocks’ stage and the bike riding stage are just things I can do without. I admire they are trying to change the formula a bit, but these levels just don’t turn out nearly as fun as the other ones, and frankly I’d rather have more traditional levels. The fact the levels were split in two and some stages dragged on more than others certainly wasn’t appealing either. But in turn the last few levels really had nothing in them but boss so those became too short.X4 was certainly lacking in the level design department, but the bosses themselves were fun and interesting compared to some of the last ones in the previous two games. The story is also a literal joke as the voice acting is so bad that anyone else could probably do a better job if they tried. Despite these faults though, I still find X4 a pretty good game overall and I really like playing as Zero, you know fully, Mega Man X3...

Conclusion: Perhaps the greatest reason why this game is so great is because you can play as Zero. He mixes the game play style enough to make X4 feel fresh and enjoyable. Otherwise I think this game would have been far more criticized over level design and the gimmicks in certain stages if it was just Mega Man X.

Kid Icarus: Uprising –date beat March 28



Impressions:

I honestly didn’t know what to exactly expect from Uprising. And yes I saw the trailers, yes I was aware of how the game played back in the 80’s, but I don’t think anything really prepared me for what I got. At first glance, Uprising just seemed like another game with some bad jokes here and there, you know campy humor, but as I played through the game I generally laughed out loud numerous times and was just having so much fun with it. There was just so much to this game that it just overwhelmed me with joy. I fell in love with Uprising and its wonderful twisted characters, constant breaking of the 4th wall jokes, and general awesome and challenging gameplay. I can safely say that it was one of the few times in my life that I felt like a kid again. I was enjoying myself so much and loving every bit of the story that I just wanted to keep pressing forward, and play till the end.
Then I beat it, and while I can’t say it got dull after that, I can say I wanted more of whatever what was just served to me. I can’t really remember how much fun I had with the whole cast of characters, and certainly couldn’t tell you the last time I heard a cast of voice actors that good. But never the less the game that I knew and loved had ended, but only to arise was a different game in multiplayer. Ill be frank, I’m not one for the whole multiplayer stuff in any kind of game, but for once in my life I was hooked on it. There were just so many things to do for multiplayer, and it was all worth it because of how incredibly balanced Light vs. Dark was. I found myself spending hours on end just figuring out which weapon was best for me, and then fusing an even better weapon to gain an upper hand on the field. Or placing different modifiers on it or figuring out which weapons would make a better weapon and the risks and costs of making said weapon. And for a moment there, I forgot about my 60 game year challenge and just played Uprising constantly. Heck it didn’t even end there as I went out to a couple of the meet ups at Gamestop to get some of the Kid Icarus cards and play a few local battles. As well the soundtrack always kept me pumped and listening to it never got dull. Really the game offered so much to me and the only thing that was ever wrong with it was the horrible land controls. But changing land controls to a button lay out simply made the problem nonexistent.Uprising is the best kind of game a system can hope for and certainly is the best game on the 3DS to this date. Heck I'm still playing it to unlock all the achievements it has and looking forward to the next set of cards Nintendo has in store for us!

Conclusion: Uprising has everything you could ever want in a game, charming characters, wonderful jokes, some drama, great gameplay, multiplayer, fusion systems, achievements, amazing soundtrack and even a bloody card game. With only bad controls going into the pile of, “what uprising needs to fix” I’d say it’s a win win of a game!


Pokemon Black –date beat April 8



Impressions:

This game took a while to get, and frankly I didn’t know I would be playing it by this time this year, but here we are. And its not the matter that I thought Black and White sucked or weren’t as good as the last generations, in fact after playing them, I have to say B/W is certainly the best constructed Pokemon games to date. No, the fact I didn’t get B/W was because a lack of full interest and that the games hardly ever go on sale or lower in price. Without something to push me to buy it, I didn’t feel the need to buy it, but when I picked up Kid Icarus: Uprising, I had enough left over to get Pokemon Black for far less than I expected so I figure, “just go for it!”.
Playing through Black I have to say it really cracked down on battles being “easy”. This is certainly a hard game for Pokemon standards, and I loved the challenge to it, the AI is at least smarter, and there are hardly any trainers that can just be taken out easily, you really have to pay attention to your battles, especially post game. I also have to say that the new battle system is amazing and makes the Pokemon stand out a lot more and gives a lot more feel for the Pokemon universe. Also love the fact there is a lot more to explore post game, TMs are infinite, and HMs aren’t used nearly as much. And really it's just that Pokemon Black does a lot of little things that just make everything else so much better, and it has been a long time coming for the Pokemon series to fix these things. You really don’t see how stale a series you love is till they make a far better sequel to give light on how crappy the past games were.
Black is also the first Pokemon game that really felt like a RPG to me, and I’m still not sure it’s a good thing or not.There is a lot of scripted scenes and a few battles that require certain things from you, as well you don’t get to chose what to do or who to name quite as often as you may like. And while this may be fine or even better for most, for me there seems to be a loss of feeling I use to have as a kid. I think the reason I loved Pokemon so much when I was little was because you get to chose who you want and you decided ultimately how things will play out, you train, and you work hard to achieve your own goals. But with Black there were a few times I felt very forced to do something Gamefreak wanted me to do and frankly it turned me off this game every now and then. It wasn’t enough to make me quit, but enough to put me in a bad mood. I think that’s my major complaint about this game, and I think that is why I don’t like it nearly as much as the older generations. And by no means is this game actually worst, rather its just different from what got me into this series. I don’t despite it, and in fact I liked to see something more when B/W 2 comes out, because this maybe what Pokemon needs to get better than it already is and that’s what I want.

Conclusion: Pokemon Black improves so many small things that in the grand scale of things, Pokemon has never been better, but there also seems to be something lost in transition from old to new. Black most certainly is a different Pokemon then from what I’m used to, and although I don’t like some changes to the series, overall it’s a good transformation, and I hope to see more of it.











Back to Top



Advertising on destructoid is available through Please contact them to learn more