Black Ops 2 multiplayer gameplay videos, screens reveal new maps

stato257 on 1 Oct '12 said:

Looks EXACTLY the same as i've been playing for the past 4-5 years. Oh Dear...

munkynutz84 on 1 Oct '12 said:

Thanks for this reminds me why i don't need to buy this - Same old multiplayer I was starting to get caught in the hype train but i'll rent it for the campaign at some point. I never was a real fan of this franchise i've always preferred halo, Not long now!!!

BazJitsu on 1 Oct '12 said:

Looks EXACTLY the same as i've been playing for the past 4-5 years. Oh Dear...

That's exactly what I thought. I don't see it as a bad thing though. I love COD, for all its flaws. I think this will correct a lot of the issues that were present in MW3.

KK-Headcharge78 on 1 Oct '12 said:

Looks EXACTLY the same as i've been playing for the past 4-5 years. Oh Dear...

http://www.specsavers.co.uk/

Either that or your understanding of the word 'exactly' is somewhat demented.

Anyhow it's COD and it looks how I expected, still not convinced on the setting but hell it looks fun and not too realistic which is what the series is all about. Not sure what the f**k Halo has got to do with it either

RustySpoon80 on 1 Oct '12 said:

Looks EXACTLY the same as i've been playing for the past 4-5 years. Oh Dear...

I agree, graphically it is exactly the same (I am a cod fan and I can see that). However Treyarch have applied some major changes to the franchise this year (not just new maps). And zombies alone makes its an essential purchase (for me).
I'll be keeping an eye on Medal of Honour though as the Frostbite 2.0 engine destroys cod graphically.

TheBusterMan on 1 Oct '12 said:

Surely it can't be as bad as last year's MW3? I felt terrible after buying that.Soon traded that in.

Drusus on 1 Oct '12 said:

So I'll see you guys at launch then yeah?

Looks like a lot of fun to me, be sure to keep insulting it's graphics though, graphics are so important. Doesn't matter if CoD has been fast, fluid and fun gameplay for all those years what matters is they didn't drop their frame rate to 30 and make it look slightly prettier like Battlefield did (when they gimped the console Battlefield).

Just vote with your wallet and don't buy it, I can dig insulting games for bad gameplay, I'm all about that but graphics aren't important, aesthetics are important and CoD is fine the way it is. It'll up the graphics when it goes next gen.

I'm buying it because I'm a sheep, a sheep who eats good games and poops awesome.

KK-Headcharge78 on 1 Oct '12 said:

So I'll see you guys at launch then yeah?

Looks like a lot of fun to me, be sure to keep insulting it's graphics though, graphics are so important. Doesn't matter if CoD has been fast, fluid and fun gameplay for all those years what matters is they didn't drop their frame rate to 30 and make it look slightly prettier like Battlefield did (when they gimped the console Battlefield).

Just vote with your wallet and don't buy it, I can dig insulting games for bad gameplay, I'm all about that but graphics aren't important, aesthetics are important and CoD is fine the way it is. It'll up the graphics when it goes next gen.

I'm buying it because I'm a sheep, a sheep who eats good games and poops awesome.

sigourney beaver on 1 Oct '12 said:

doesn't look bad ill see how much i get hyped up on release week before buying it, im abit fed up of modern and future settings in shooters now tho they've let ww2 die down and id like to see it make a return in the next one