Coalition could revoke Optus and Telstra NBN agreements

Malcolm Turnbull has continued to push the benefits of a fibre-to-the-node network

Malcolm Turnbull, shadow minister for communications and broadband, has said he would overturn existing National Broadband Network (NBN) agreements if a Coalition government was in power.

While Turnbull restated his stance that he would keep NBN Co as a government-owned company to run the NBN, he said he would retain the HFC network in order to remove “barriers to competition” with the NBN.

"...we would seek to reverse the arrangement whereby Telstra and Optus are obliged not to use their HFC to compete with NBN Co on broadband data and voice, the extent to which that is possible obviously depends on negotiation," he said.

This would involve changing million dollar agreements with Telstra and Optus around the telcos decommissioning their HFC networks and migrating customers to the NBN and would include reworking two key agreements in the NBN.

This includes an $11 billion agreement between Telstra and NBN Co, with Telstra to decommission its copper and HFC network and give access to NBN Co to its equipment, and an $800 million agreement between Optus and NBN Co for Optus to decommission its HFC network.

Instead, Turnbull would keep the HFC networks in operation. With Optus due to decommission its HFC network in 2014, the telco may not even begin the transition of customers to the NBN if the Coalition wins the next federal election, which could be held as early as August next year.

Turnbull said he would expect Telstra to co-operate with any changed agreements, with David Thodey, chief executive at Telstra, previously stating a change in government would not affect the company's financial figures.

“If there’s a change of government, the current contracts give us a degree of protection — there’s the infrastructure services agreement, which is a 35-year contract, and depending how far we get, we get the payout on that or we get the revenues as they flow,” Thodey said.

Thodey also stated this year that a FTTN deployment would mean shareholders receive a quicker return.

Turnbull has been a staunch opponent to NBN Co, stating that while it is not ideal to continue to operate the company if the Coalition were in power, he said there seemed to be no other option.

“…it has been and is probably unsaleable in its present state of development and for the forseeable future,” he said.

The shadow minister also continued to push the benefits of a fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) network over fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) and has repeatedly said a FTTN network would be cheaper and faster to roll out.

“The experience in other markets (USA for example) is that FTTN networks enjoy comparable ARPUs to FTTP networks – the very high speeds (100 mbps plus) available on FTTP are not sought after by sufficient customers at sufficiently high premiums to justify the additional investment,” he said.

“That, at least, is the feedback I have had from telcos in the USA, UK, Canada and several other countries.”

Follow Stephanie McDonald on Twitter: @stephmcdonald0

Follow Computerworld Australia on Twitter: @ComputerworldAU

Join the Computerworld Australia group on Linkedin. The group is open to IT Directors, IT Managers, Infrastructure Managers, Network Managers, Security Managers, Communications Managers.

References show all

Comments

HUH

1

Slippery as per usual Mr Turnbull, but even by your standards this was pretty bad...
"“That, at least, is the feedback I have had from telcos in the USA, UK, Canada and several other countries"

While in a way this is true what Turnbull forgets to mention is the 15 year tech gap, FTTN was rolled out in the UK 20 years ago, and in various other countries 20 to 10 years ago, a the KEY point he missed is that now these countries are upgrading to FTTP.
Australia never learns a gawd dam thing in respect to catching up in what ever field you choose to pick, because it has to blindly follow a path others have laid out, instead of being able to see where it can take a large step forward in which to enable itself.

In a sense Australia is like the 3 kid of the family so used to hand me downs it never thinks anything of it.

However all that aside all this from Turnbull is a big pile of steaming crock, as this is an enabler to backhandedly stop most of the NBN contracts so they can scream they have made savings, when the educated in these matters knows that is not the case because of the nature of the funding.

Gary Khol

2

+1 bit of a long rant but I do see the point your making, and couldnt agree more.

I did feel sorry for Turnbull but the more he keeps trying to sell the 20 year old way of doing things, knowing full well there will be cries in 10 years further down the track to then upgrade node to premise.

It does pay to sometimes fork out a bit more to begin with to save a pile in the future, however that defies the 3 to 4 year cycle of politics.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the Computerworld comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: Telstra, optus, Coalition, malcolm turnbull, National Broadband Network (NBN)
Whitepapers
All whitepapers
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.
Featured Download
/downloads/product/145/microsoft-security-essentials/

Microsoft Security Essentials

Microsoft Security Essentials provides your home PC with real-time protection. It constantly uses the latest technology ensuring that you will always stay up to date ...

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in Australia