Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Amish in Ohio hair-cutting case seek to avoid oath

    CLEVELAND (AP) — Some Amish people among 16 charged in beard- and hair-cutting attacks on fellow Amish are asking not to be required to swear an oath if they testify in federal court and want to delay their upcoming trial, according to court documents filed Monday.

    They request that Amish witnesses be allowed simply to affirm the truthfulness of their testimony because many Amish don't believe in swearing oaths. The defendants include members of an eastern Ohio breakaway Amish group.

    Last fall, several members of the group living in Bergholz, a village of 700 residents about 80 miles southeast of Cleveland, forcibly cut the beards and hair of men and the hair of women, acts considered deeply offensive in Amish culture, and then took photos to shame them, authorities said.

    Prosecutors describe the attacks as hate crimes prompted by a feud over church discipline.

    The defendants say the attacks were internal church disciplinary matters not involving anti-Amish bias. They denied the charges and rejected plea bargain offers and could face lengthy prison terms if convicted.

    In a move opposed by prosecutors, attorneys for Sam Mullet Sr., accused of being the group's ringleader, and other defendants are seeking to delay the Aug. 27 trial to give them more time to prepare and resolve legal issues raised in pretrial documents. The defense says the remote location, in far eastern Ohio, and restrictions of Amish society have slowed preparations for the case.

    Some defendants asked the court to prohibit references to a handful of topics, including Mullet's finances, media coverage of the case and terminology portraying his community as a cult or breakaway or splinter group.

    Prosecutors also outlined their allegations in court documents Monday and made several requests, including that the defense be banned from mentioning defendants' pretrial detention.

    Prosecutors said multiple defendants have confessed to law enforcement officers who will testify. The government also plans to use three recorded jail conversations spoken mostly in Pennsylvania Dutch and transcribed by a Holmes County detective.

    Mullet previously said he didn't order the hair-cutting but didn't stop his sons and others from carrying it out. He said the goal was to send a message to other Amish that they should be ashamed of themselves for the way they were treating him and his community.

    "They changed the rulings of our church here, and they're trying to force their way down our throat, make us do like they want us to do, and we're not going to do that," Mullet said late last year.

    Mullet's attorneys didn't immediately respond to messages Monday. The prosecutor's office had no comment about the legal filings.

     

    102 comments

    • festering neon distractio ...  •  1 day 6 hrs ago
      I always appreciate the high level of intellectual discourse in Yahoo comments ....
      • Bubba 9 hrs ago
        Big Leo is still trying to impress us with his alleged degrees. Of course, looking at his on-line icon, I can see that the degrees were probably, if ever, issued in the early days of the 20th century. This old coger loves to hear his keys klink. Otherwise, he has NOTHING to say!
      • festering neon distractio ... 17 hrs ago
        It echoes events like Larry The Cable Guy being given a show on .... The History Channel ... everything is so surreal ....
      • Precision tile and Stone 18 hrs ago
        You have to keep up in this ever changing world don't feel bad skills have to be constantly updated. I resemble that remark good thing I have my wife to communicate for me.
    • boner  •  Warminster, Pennsylvania  •  1 day 6 hrs ago
      Guy's name is mullet and he goes and cuts other peoples' hair...hilarious.
      • missouri farmboy 1 day 2 hrs ago
        james, their a bunch of inbreds what do you expect?
      • James 1 day 3 hrs ago
        What Happened to the peace loving pacifists?
      • 7 1 day 3 hrs ago
        mullet- business in front party in back!
    • R E D O X  •  1 day 5 hrs ago
      He's a nutjob...and he clearly admits his guilt ...spank him , shave him and send him home with a note to his mom !!
    • Rand March  •  Jersey City, New Jersey  •  12 hrs ago
      I fail to see why affirming an oath shouldn't be acceptable to the courts in Ohio, as it is in every other state with which I'm familiar. For similar religious reasons ( Amish... Or I wouldn't be online!), I've affirmed the oath in both NY & NJ, and presidents, including Harry Truman, have affirmed the oath of the presidency
      Refusing to swear is simply a literal interpretation of the commandment not to take G-d's name in vain. As I asked when I was told that an organization to which I wanted to belong insisted on my swearing to their oath "If I break an oath to G-d, why should you trust my oath to this organization?"
      • Big Leo 9 hrs ago
        Correctamundo. It's been part of Pennsylvania state law since 1681, when Pennsylvania was a province. The original thirteen colonies all had some provision for this before independence.
    • D  •  1 day 4 hrs ago
      I agree... Even US government uses contracts that begin with "Do you swear or affirm..."
      • kodak_ken 1 day 3 hrs ago
        Affirming is not swearing. That is why the option is given.
    • steven h  •  1 day 5 hrs ago
      Who do they think they are? POLITICIANS ?? They HATE being under oath also
    • christine  •  1 day 7 hrs ago
      Hate crimes and demanding bullies .... our world is complex...
    • Gary W  •  Dayton, Ohio  •  1 day 2 hrs ago
      Something is a-mish here
      • Eve 23 hrs ago
        *throws tomato*
    • AndrewS  •  1 day 1 hr ago
      Why would this cause a delay? Courts handle this sort of thing all the time.
    • rick  •  Minneapolis, Minnesota  •  1 day 0 hrs ago
      If only there was a religion that exempted you from taxes. Then we could all agree on our beliefs.
    • RyanC  •  1 day 4 hrs ago
      They took pictures of them to shame them.
      Why do I get this mental image of one of those old fashioned cameras with the accordion-type front lens, tripod legs, a black sheet over his head and holding up a board filled with flash powder while everyone stands perfectly still for several minutes. Now there's a Kodak moment.
    • d  •  Naples, Florida  •  1 day 5 hrs ago
      So basically the defendants want to throw out all of the evidence, not make them tell the truth, and not mention any of the publicity. Oh , and they're not a cult or splinter group. So basically throw out all evidence. Really?
    • cdb4166  •  Southfield, Michigan  •  1 day 6 hrs ago
      isn't a camera new technology
    • Ghost  •  1 day 4 hrs ago
      Promise to tell the truth, the whole truth , so help me god ? Why would they when most of the government can't seem to obey that ?
    • D Terrent  •  1 day 7 hrs ago
      Great. Another round of Amish Drive-By jokes.
    • whoever  •  1 day 5 hrs ago
      To affirm is perfectly legal and acceptable. It is done all the time. Why is this news?
    • fiddleronthe roof  •  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania  •  1 day 7 hrs ago
      If you want to punish these goof balls just shave their heads and beards, justice served.
    • yesiinhale  •  New Orleans, Louisiana  •  1 day 3 hrs ago
      Hair today, gone tomorrow.
    • beau10  •  1 day 3 hrs ago
      They live in America - let them follow the laws.
    • Porkskins  •  Norfolk, Virginia  •  1 day 18 hrs ago
      It also says in the good book to abide by the laws. There are NO special provisions for different types of faith in a court of law in the United States.
    Loading...