Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    History littered with failed Mars probes

    PASADENA, California (Reuters) - NASA's Mars Climate Orbiter was about a week away from wrapping up an 11-month journey to the Red Planet in 1999 when engineers noticed a problem - the spacecraft, designed to study Mars' environment, was not where it was supposed to be.

    The gap grew alarmingly over the next few days. On September 23, Climate Orbiter began the brake to enter Mars' orbit as planned, but disappeared behind the planet 49 seconds early, severing radio contact with Earth. It was never heard from again.

    Launching probes to Mars is not for the faint of heart. Out of the 40 spacecraft dispatched to the Red Planet, only 14 lived to fulfill their missions.

    Against those grim odds, NASA is poised for its most unorthodox and risky landing yet. The $2.5 billion Mars Science Laboratory is scheduled to touch down at 1:31 a.m. EDT Monday (0431 GMT) next to a mountain that may harbor life-friendly environments.

    "This is the hardest NASA robotic mission ever attempted," NASA's associate administrator for science John Grunsfeld told reporters during a pre-landing news conference last month.

    To deliver the one-ton robotic geologist near the mountain's base, engineers designed a contraption that would make cartoonist and inventor Rube Goldberg beam. The rover, about the size of a Mini Cooper car, is too heavy to bounce to the planet's surface in airbags or fly itself with rocket thrusters, systems successfully used by six previous NASA landers.

    Instead, Mars Science Lab will be lowered to the ground on a tether spooled out by a flying platform that works like an aerial crane. NASA is the first to admit the idea sounds crazy, but managers are convinced it will work.

    "We've done everything we could. We've tested everything we could test. We built everything to the best of our ability," said Doug McCuistion, who oversees NASA's Mars exploration programs. "Once you understand it, it's not a crazy concept."

    History is not on NASA's side, though the United States has fared far better than Russia when it comes to Mars exploration. Out of 19 attempted missions, Russia and the former Soviet Union have had only a few partial successes.

    Launch failures claimed nearly half of Russia's probes, including the ambitious Phobos-Grunt sample return mission last year. Other spacecraft sailed blindly past Mars or burned up in the planet's atmosphere during landing attempts.

    Newcomers Japan and China have fared no better. Only Europe, which operates the Mars Express orbiter, has had beginner's luck on Mars.

    "We learn from these things even if they aren't successful," McCuistion said.

    Investigators have attributed the failed 1999 Climate Orbiter mission to human error: The flight software used metric units while the ground system that wrote the code used Imperial measures.

    Two months later, a companion lander bit the dust - literally - when its rocket engines apparently shut down too early, causing the probe to crash to the ground.

    And even when the engineering is perfect, Mars itself can throw mean curve balls. NASA's Mariner 9 and two Soviet orbiters arrived in May 1971 to find a global-wide dust storm in progress.

    "We don't have the capability to predict these things," McCuistion said. "That is why Mars wins an awful lot of the time."

    (Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Jackie Frank)

     

    8 comments

    • tall john  •  Los Angeles, California  •  2 days 6 hrs ago
      The Martians will have the rover stripped of parts and up on blocks five minutes after it lands....
    • Eric1  •  2 days 10 hrs ago
      ...And all this time I thought it was MARS that was littered with failed Mars probes.....
    • sonny  •  Manila, Philippines  •  3 hrs ago
      Atheism littered like failed Mars probes
    • Ray  •  Los Angeles, California  •  1 day 16 hrs ago
      Curiosity will survive the few mishap of it's curiosities(rover) ( thruster, land-gear),but things will look rosy after all...
      It will be the best that is for things to come ...GOOD-WORK !!!
    • Jon  •  2 days 21 hrs ago
      US is on Crisis, what will happen when they find a life in mars indeed? will it help them pay their debts? lol..... Oh and btw, why the hell scientists are so fixated about life on other planets? yet they can't find a way how to fix human brains to stop having war? Lmao... are they so proud to think that there is no God and they themselves are just a failure who loves to deceive people with their stupid imaginations and make use of other people's money? C'mon, stop going to mars, better build better machines for world's protection against CHINA! :)))
      • sonny 3 hrs ago
        planted ! lifeform from earth !
      • William 1 day 18 hrs ago
        #$%$ L, would you care to live without the benefits of science and medicine? If so, stop visiting doctors and get off the internet.
      • Dick L 2 days 5 hrs ago
        Hey William, people are born, they live for awhile, then they die, end of story.
    • PLC  •  2 days 16 hrs ago
      Meanwhile, back here on earth...airliners are still falling out of the sky, trains are running into gasoline tankers, ships are turning over and sinking, power grids are breaking down, and Lindsay Lohan has nothing to wear. We went to the moon and back 43 years ago, but human civilization has not progressed a single day. In fact, if you watch TV, it's clear we're headed back to the Tar Pits as fast as we can get there.
    • Bob  •  Equality, Illinois  •  1 day 12 hrs ago
      ''we''nasa'' keeps going because they have billions of your dollars to spend,and they are safe in the knowledge that even if the rover''screws up an totals on landing they will just build another one''at your expense'' and keep driving limo's and eating $500.meals''all at your expense....nasa needs to have all flights canceled for 10 years so america can recouperate financially(space will still be out there-and they can continue to kill crews and equipment)..all with money they do not ever have to repay....such a waste.....
      • Chris 8 hrs ago
        Wow, you are not very smart. Let us just stop all scientific activities now. See what happens when you have to relearn all of the engineering issues. IF we stop now, we will never again be dominant in science or technology.

        Don't even ask what happens to the economy when we stop the pursuit of advanced science and engineering.
    • Jim  •  Toronto, Canada  •  3 days ago
      I was just about to say I hope that the human race doesn't start polluting Mars...........
      • Bob 1 day 12 hrs ago
        evidently there is scraps of radioactve material and spent engines all over mars*nasa just has to continue to pollute without a care....as children we had to pickup after ourselves* if,,,therre were martians they would be getting peeved at nasa's ''junkyard in space program''.....(DO NOT LITTER)...'DOH !
    Loading...