Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Climate Change's Role in Heat Waves Still Under Debate

    It's no surprise to those who follow climate science that temperature patterns have shifted as the world has warmed up. But in a new study, outspoken climate scientist James Hansen goes a step further, saying devastating heat waves in recent years are the result of global warming.

    Since natural dynamics — such as fluctuations in sea-surface temperatures in the equatorial Pacific Ocean — contribute to extreme events like heat waves, this connection can be controversial.

    Scientists disagree on the degree to which global warming can be blamed for extreme events, such as heat waves, and Hansen, of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies and no stranger to controversy, is among those most aggressive about making this connection.

    In the last three decades, both average and extreme temperatures have warmed up and heat waves hit much large areas, Hansen and colleagues write in a study published online today (Aug. 6) in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    "It follows that we can state, with a high degree of confidence, that extreme anomalies such as those in Texas and Oklahoma in 2011 and Moscow in 2010 were a consequence of global warming because their likelihood in the absence of global warming was exceedingly small," they write. [Extreme Weather Facts: Quiz Yourself]

    Martin Hoerling, a research meteorologist at the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's Earth Systems Research Laboratory, called this interpretation "flawed scientifically."

    "The weather patterns responsible for most of today's heat waves would have happened regardless of human-induced climate change," Hoerling told LiveScience. Bringing carbon dioxide down to the level Hansen sees as safe "would not eradicate heat waves."

    Hansen's team acknowledges that dynamics other than global warming are at play when a heat wave hits, saying that the abnormally warm temperatures of late are the result of a combination of specific weather patterns and global warming.

    This description is closer to the truth, Hoerling said. "In some cases that combination is 95 percent natural and 5 percent climate change, sometimes the mix is a little bit different."

    Historically, climate scientists have shied from making a connection between an extreme event and global warming, but more and more so-called attributional studies examine these events for human fingerprints.

    For example, a 2004 study concluded that human alterations to climate more than doubled the odds of heat waves on the scale of the 2003 scorcher that devastated western Europe.

    The record-setting 2010 Russian heat wave to which Hansen refers appears to have generated some conflicting analyses. A study in which Hoerling participated concluded this heat wave was due mainly to natural atmospheric variability. Meanwhile, a more recent study led by Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., linked record high sea-surface temperatures in the Indian Ocean and tropical Atlantic Ocean — which were, in turn, influenced by global warming — with the heat wave.

    With regard to the Russian heat wave, Trenberth told LiveScience he sees his study and Hansen's as taking complementary approaches.  

    Both he and Hansen are at the aggressive end of the spectrum when it comes to attributing weather events to climate change, Trenberth said. "James Hansen and I are pushing to get scientists to think about and do statistics on this rather differently, and now we are not part of mainstream in this regard."

    Trenberth questions why an attribution study is necessary for every single event: "Human influence is changing the odds, it is pushing things in a direction where we have greater extremes," he said.

    "Could these things have actually happened without global warming? In most cases, they probably wouldn't. There are very small odds they could have occurred," Trenberth said.

    Hansen could not be reached by deadline.

    Follow Wynne Parry on Twitter @Wynne_ParryorLiveScience @livescience. We're also on Facebook & Google+.

    Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
     
     
    Top Locations Denver Reno Houston Paris Clover

    112 comments

    • Chris Jefferson  •  New Brunswick, New Jersey  •  3 hrs ago
      Funny how so many people can miss the fact that it is getting hotter.
      Even stranger that more are now acting like they knew it all along, but it is nothing to be concerned about, because it is cyclical.
      Too bad so few people know that it is because of the amount of pollutants that we put into the air, and that the amount we currently have in the air will eventually push the temperature above what our environments can tolerate.
      We are seeing evidence of that now, as the midwest returns to desert.
      We get to see what happens as this warming trend continues.
      This was all predicted, including the attitudes that people would have.
      We were warned to choose life, when we got here.
      Those who don't educate themselves enough to prepare for a human die off are choosing death.
      Those who think they can rely on some spiritual magician to save them are also choosing death.
      Read Deuteronomy 28-34, and you will see this prediction.
      • Rio Kid 49 mins ago
        Yeah, cyclical every 50,000 years.
    • bsmith2010  •  Clover, South Carolina  •  2 days 6 hrs ago
      read this
    • jim k  •  Santiago, Chile  •  3 days ago
      Well if global warming is real then it should be getting hotter.
      • bsmith2010 2 days 6 hrs ago
        i just posted some more evidence that global warming is a false alarm
      • bsmith2010 2 days 6 hrs ago
        who said anyone is denying anything
      • saint peter 2 days 14 hrs ago
        We are nothing but a grain of sand on the beach, like the sand on the beach we can't do anything about the rising tide let alone the changing of the earths axis.
    • Glowby  •  Fox River Grove, Illinois  •  3 days ago
      Gadfly pushes the limits of denial with this comment: "They (scientists) routinely ignore any data from before about 200 years ago"
      Yet Gadfly is only aware of the 200+ year old data because scientists collected it for him, and present it in their current research!
      • XYV 1 day 17 hrs ago
        looks like your a denier since you haven't given up frivolous energy use, so like the rest of the world is going to end crowd you have zero credibility
    • CB  •  Sunnyvale, California  •  3 days ago
      As they should be.....
    • R  •  1 day 14 hrs ago
      Ah, Peggy to the rescue with a stupid excuse not to look at the evidence. Leave it to Peggy to give you an excuse not to think.
      • CameronS 1 day 6 hrs ago
        Peggy usually flunks the Turing Test. If she were more effective, I'd suspect she was one of those HBGary software personalities.
    • Ziggy  •  Washington, District of Columbia  •  3 days ago
      All I got from this article is that its hot outside and getting hotter, but they can't agree on if it has to do with global warming or natural events. Now I'm not denying the importance of understanding the causes, but what about a quick follow up on how it is going to effect us in the coming future?
      • Gene Goldring 2 days 12 hrs ago
        US Citizen
        If you're going to spout off about some global cooling myth, you aren't really into this topic. It's a trolls measure of argument.
      • US Citizen 2 days 14 hrs ago
        Gore was screaming "the ice age is coming, the ice age is coming" back in the 70's. Which is it Gore? And if you are so afraid of global warming, why did you buy a house on the calif coast?
      • Gene Goldring 2 days 23 hrs ago
        The 2007 AR4 Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers is a good read as well. It's easy reading.

        Enjoy
    • Ruprect  •  Houston, Texas  •  3 days ago
      I hope these changes happen linearly and not exponentially.
      If they are linear we might have a chance but if exponentially then
      God help us.
    • SA  •  3 days ago
      I can see how, in a survival scenario most of the people will die! They have to wait for evidence instead of reading the signs and hoofing it. Like in the Thailand tsunami, some people actually ran into the sea thinking it was beautiful that the waves were going out so far, then you had the aftermath of the waves. You then had a primitive group of people close to an affected area and since they had prior knowledge of a past event, they were able to move to higher ground. They lost 2 people, I believe!
    • BIGMIKE  •  1 day 14 hrs ago
      Global warming in the U.S. ends Sept.22nd . The first day of FALL
    • Kyle  •  Lenexa, Kansas  •  1 day 13 hrs ago
      You see, when you challenge the alarmists with SCIENCE, they backpedal like Hansen did when Hoerling challenged his "study". Trenberth is no better. He's a scientist basically claiming that we've never had heat waves. Hoerling states that they are cyclical and inevitable. The 1930s had heat waves just like this, then the earth COOLED for 30 years in spite of increasing CO2 levels.
    • forestgump  •  3 days ago
      while rather a long lists, i hope you get the point.....you have no point.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in Montana is 117 degrees which occurred on July 5, 1937 in Medicine Lake and the coldest temperature ever recorded in Montana is -70 degrees which occurred on January 20, 1954 in Rogers Pass

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in Utah is 118 degrees which occurred on July 5, 1985 in Saint George and the coldest temperature ever recorded in Utah is -69 degrees which occurred on February 1, 1985 in Peter's Sink (yes that is a town and not just someone's kitchen sink).

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in North Dakota is 121 degrees which occurred on July 6, 1936 in Steele and the coldest temperature ever recorded in North Dakota is -60 degrees which occurred on February 15, 1936 in Parshall.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in Wyoming is 115 degrees which occurred on July 12, 1900 in Basin and the coldest temperature ever recorded in Wyoming is -66 degrees which occurred on February 9, 1933 in Riverside R.S.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in Alaska is exactly 100 degrees which occurred on June 27, 1915 in Fort Yukon. The coldest temperature ever recorded in Alaska is -80 degrees which occurred on January 23, 1971 in Prospect Creek Camp.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in California is 134 degrees which occurred on July 10, 1913 in Greenland Ranch in Death Valley. The coldest temperature ever recorded in California is -45 degrees which occurred on January 20, 1937 in Boca.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in South Dakota is 120 degrees which occurred on July 5, 1936 in Gannvalley. The coldest temperature ever recorded in South Dakota is -58 degrees which occurred on February 17, 1936 in McIntosh.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in Idaho is 118 degrees which occurred on July 28, 1934 in Orofino. The coldest temperature ever recorded in Idaho is -60 degrees which occurred on January 18, 1943 at the Island Park Dam.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in Nevada is 125 degrees which occurred on June 29, 1994 in Laughlin which is south of Las Vegas. The coldest temperature ever recorded in Nevada is -50 degrees which occurred on January 8, 1937 in San Jacinto.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in Colorado is 114 degrees which occurred on July 11, 1888 in Bennett. The coldest temperature ever recorded in Colorado is -61 degrees which occurred on February 1, 1985 in Maybell.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in Minnesota is 114 degrees which occurred on July 6, 1936 in Moorhead. The coldest temperature ever recorded in Minnesota is -60 degrees which occurred on February 2, 1996 in Tower.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in Oregon is 119 degrees which occurred on August 10, 1898 in Pendleton. The coldest temperature ever recorded in Oregon is -54 degrees which occurred on February 10, 1933 in Seneca.

      The hottest temperature ever recorded in New Mexico is 122 degrees which occurred on June 27, 1994 in Lakewood. The coldest temperature ever recorded in New Mexico is -50 degrees which occurred on February 1, 1951 in Gavilan.

      Source: wikipedia
    • Paul  •  2 days 6 hrs ago
      This should explain it all: LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company! BIAS with no real knowledge! Who are their scientist? They have none........just media partners!
    • Glowby  •  Fox River Grove, Illinois  •  2 days 13 hrs ago
      A favorite tactic of deniers is say that climate research grants would dry up if it weren't for AGW.
      It'll never dry up. Governments will always pay for the best info they can get on climate. It helps them plan agricultural activities and resource allocations, better compete against other nations, and raise the GNP. Governments can't afford to bury their heads in the sand about changing climate. They all know it's real. If researchers deliver flawed or fraudulent work, they don't get any more work. If global temps were holding steady instead of shooting up, that info would be valuable too, and science would still search for answers as to why it's happening.
    • mike  •  3 days ago
      Martin Hoerling referring to Hansen's paper Perceptions of Climate Change called it "flawed scientifically." And he's right

      Reference Period and figure 9 along with the related text explain the results hansens many papers have posited several different reasons for the choice of a 51 - 80 base period. chosing this period a relatively flat trend exaggerates any trend in the decades it is compared to. At least in this instance he shows how this choice drastically alters the results fig 9

      Claiming 51 - 80 is a proper base line when this periods temp is claimed to be dominated by anthropogenic aerosols and stating this is a suitable normal is flawed This period is also dominated by the cold phase of the PDO the largest natural driver of temp fluctuations Thank you for speaking out Martin Hoerling

      PNAS Perceptions of Climate Change

      ". Although we had multiple reasons for choosing
      1951–1980 as a base period to define temperature anomalies, as
      discussed under Materials and Methods, we must ask: Do our
      conclusions depend on the chosen base period? Could we just
      redefine climatology based on the most recent decades, perhaps
      leading to a conclusion that the only climate change has been a
      small shift of mean temperature that may be insignificant?
      The effect of alternative base periods on the temperature
      anomaly distribution is shown in Fig. 9. Use of a recent base period
      alters the appearance of the distribution. Climate variability
      increased in recent decades, and thus the standard deviation
      increased. Therefore, if we use the most recent decades as base
      period, we “divide out” the increased variability. Thus the distribution
      function using 1981–2010 as the base period (Fig. 9, Right)
      does not expose the change that has occurred toward increased
      climate variability."
    • R  •  3 days ago
      Jean, care to provide evidence, or shall we simply assume you are both a liar and a hypocrite
    • Jeff S  •  Kansas City, Missouri  •  3 days ago
      Scientists are NOT debating this. They KNOW that while a warming climate will mean more heat waves, ALL real climatologists understand that day to day, month to month, and even year to year weather means little in the scheme of climates. The ONLY people who claim otherwise are those that are trying to stir up publicity for themselves so they can make a name for themselves, and of course those that have no clue what they are talking about.
    • Jefe  •  3 days ago
      I have been thinking it is definitely hotter than I ever remember and over the weekend the paperboys father said, "It's the hottest damn month I ever remember." That was confirmation enough for me. Whatever the reason it's defintely hot as hell out.
    • scott  •  Trevor, Wisconsin  •  2 days 13 hrs ago
      There is absolute proof of AGW. That Flat Earthers deny science is irrefutable. Flat Earthers are too stupid to know they are stupid. Flat Earther Science, "5,000 years ago man conquered the dinosaurs."
    • Glowby  •  Fox River Grove, Illinois  •  2 days 3 hrs ago
      "Free" has performed for us what's known as the "Gish Gallop". Named for the infamous creationist debater, it describes his style of argumentation where he presents a series of lies, half-truths, unsupported assertions, etc; and refuses to respond to any challenges. Instead he simply delivers more lies, half-truths, unsupported assertions, etc.