Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Climate change to blame for extreme heat: NASA scientist

    Human-driven climate change is to blame for a series of increasingly hot summers and the situation is already worse than was expected just two decades ago, a top NASA scientist said on Saturday.

    James Hansen, who directs the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, wrote in the Washington Post that even his "grim" predictions of a warming future, delivered before the US Senate in 1988, were too weak.

    "I have a confession to make: I was too optimistic," Hansen wrote.

    "My projections about increasing global temperature have been proved true. But I failed to fully explore how quickly that average rise would drive an increase in extreme weather."

    Hansen and his colleagues have published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences an analysis of the past six decades of global temperatures, revealing a "stunning increase in the frequency of extremely hot summers," he wrote.

    Describing "deeply troubling ramifications for not only our future but also for our present," Hansen said the analysis is based not on models or predictions, "but actual observations of weather events and temperatures that have happened."

    The peer-reviewed study shows that global temperature has been steadily rising due to a warming climate, about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degrees Celsius) in the past century, and that extreme events are more frequent.

    The study echoes the findings of international research released last month that climbing greenhouse gas emissions boosted the odds of severe droughts, floods and heat waves in 2011.

    Hansen said the European heat wave of 2003, the Russian heat wave of 2010 and massive droughts in Texas and Oklahoma last year can each be attributed to climate change.

    "And once the data are gathered in a few weeks' time, it's likely that the same will be true for the extremely hot summer the United States is suffering through right now," he said.

    Another well-known US scientist and former skeptic of global warming, Richard Muller, last week made a very public turnaround, saying that a close look at the data had convinced him that his beliefs were unfounded.

    "Call me a converted skeptic," wrote Muller, a professor at the University of California Berkeley, in an op-ed in the New York Times.

     

    566 comments

    • sickofitall  •  5 days ago
      YA THINK???
    • Andrew  •  5 days ago
      For the billionth time, weather events are not more frequent/extreme than they were 100 years ago, the only difference is that now we have someone there to document and record every heat-wave, hurricane, tornado, or snowstorm that happens globally.

      Besides, the historical record shows a rise/fall of temperatures through various points of (recorded) human history up to 3-4 degrees (with the low being a few hundred years ago) and the world didn't magically end...
      • JOHNd 5 days ago
        @Andrew. You're simply wrong. There is no shortage of reliable records of the extent and nature of extreme weather events for a great many particular places from 100 years ago, and beyond. Places like Boston, or New York. Extreme weather events can be and are recorded - things like extreme temperatures, amount of rain, days of rain, days of drought, etc. You can then plot the occurrance of such events by year, or by decade. And what they are finding, is that the standard deviation, or the VARIABILITY of those extreme events, is going up over time. It's getting warmer over time, but also, the extremes of temperature and of certain other kinds of events are going up over time, for specific places, where records are available and have been kept for the entire period of the study. What you are saying "explains" the impression of greater variability would only be true if a scientist were dumb enough to include data from an ever-wider geographical area over time, and sorry, Andy, no scientist would be dumb enough to do that, and would be ridiculed and ignored, if he did.
      • zcompguy 5 days ago
        And you got that degree where?
    • m  •  Prairie Grove, Arkansas  •  9 days ago
      Everyone, you can get trees to plant from the Arbor Day Foundation. They send species that are good for your area. It helps the planet!
      • Mick 5 days ago
        Today Illinois State Climatologist Jim Angel says that July was the 2nd hottest on record and the 4th driest. July 1936 was hotter and July 1930 was drier. Illinois population in 1930 was 7.6 million. Illinois population in 2010 was 12.8 million. The increase in population of 5.2 million people dropped the temperature. Gosh - humans are causing a global cooling. Proven by empirical data. Help! The sky is falling.
      • bsmith2010 5 days ago
        Pauling was physist which makes im a little more smart about the subject than a scientist
      • m 5 days ago
        Obviously you can't do an experiment the size of Earth, so it's like an astronomy problem (except that we live here, which makes it pretty important and sometimes contentious). It turns out trees aren't quite as helpful as I thought (but still a very good idea to plant). We need to reduce the carbon emissions somehow. Taxes reduce smoking a bit, but there are certainly still a lot of smokers. Nobody has all the answers but we all need to contribute to helping, and make sure we're not just part of the problem.
    • 6  •  7 days ago
      Why are all the politicians who complain about global warming travelling all over the world by jet when they could teleconference?
      • Wolf 5 days ago
        Or they could use even less energy and just shut up since they aren't accomplishing anything anyway.
      • c 5 days ago
        yes they need to row across the ocean , i will feel better about them then
      • m 6 days ago
        LOL @ Michael
    • Andrea  •  5 days ago
      HOPE...AND climate CHANGE...
    • CharlieTX  •  5 days ago
      Yeah, yeah, yeah - it's getting hotter everywhere. Well, except here and this year is a lot cooler than last year and a lot wetter too. In fact, it's about normal here in North Texas, but the hot weather has shifted to another part of the USA. So, sounds like a normal weather pattern, not global warming. We'll know for sure about the global warming theories in about 1,000 years. Until then, one model and one theory is about as good as another. It is totally and absolutely un-provable without centuries more data. And before anyone starts pelting me with nasty-grams for being ignorant, I have the usual degrees, patents, papers, publications and presentations at national and international fora. Plus, I've developed models similar to the complex ones the climatologists use, and they are so full of assumptions that they ALWAYS reflect the personal beliefs of the model developer. So what we have here really is a shouting match, not a solid scientific discussion.
      • JOHNd 5 days ago
        @Charlie You can tout your degrees and qualifications all you want, but your comments still show you haven't a clue what you're talking about:
        1. You are denying what even the CEO of Exxon now admits, which is that the planet is significantly warming. It's ignorant by now, to continue to deny this fact.
        2. You have zero basis for the claim that "one model and one theory is about as good as another." It's not the way science works, and you should know it. All the models and theories that have survived the rigors of peer-review and criticism within the relevant communities of scientific expertise agree about these things:
        a) The atmospheric Physics of greenhouse gasses implies that we should see about the warming that we are now recording, due to the rising amounts of CO2 in our atmosphere over the most recent 100 years.
        b) It is primarily CO2 from burning fossil fuels that is causing the dramatic rise in atmospheric CO2 we are seeing.
        c) The world is warming, and the Sun cannot be primarily responsible, since total solar output has not increased for the 40 years that it has been reliably measured.
        d) The WAY the world is warming is consistent with enhanced GHG concentrations (relative tropospheric warming, and stratospheric cooling) and NOT CONSISTENT with solar forcing.
        If these things were not all well-established within the scientific community, then you would not have NASA and the NOAA and the Meteorological Societies and National Academies of Science of every major nation in agreement over them, which they are. You are entitled to your dissenting opinion, but not to claim that it is based upon any deep understanding of Science, as you are pretending it is - if it were, you would not find yourself in disagreement with virtually every credible scientific organization in the world, and with the description and explanation under the title "Global Warming" that you could read in any new encyclopedia at your local library, or at Wikipedia, if you wanted to save yourself the trip.
    • Tony Montana  •  5 days ago
      They keep pushing this article day after day like a car salesman................LOL
    • robert  •  5 days ago
      No kidding #$%$ tracy.
    • Spirus40  •  Columbia, South Carolina  •  7 days ago
      Just a layman observing the debate on man made climate change. I think I'm going to side with the guys who just put a car sized rover on Mars within a few meters of where it was supposed to land. They seem like they know what they are talking about.
      • Pete 5 days ago
        We're still not as warm as we were 1000 years ago when the Vikings were raising sheep and cereal crops on the coast of Greenland. Warm is good anyway . . . who wants to go back to when the Thames froze over regularly?
        There's nothing that can be done by us anyway. Reduce carbon emissions? Yeah, right. Tell that the the developing world that they can't generate power, or drive their cars. Hansen is a shill for the hoax of man made global warming.
        Ask London how their summer is going. One of the coolest and wettest on record.
      • bsmith2010 5 days ago
        habib is the idiot
      • b 7 days ago
        R - MMI - the 50 retired NASA former employees are upset about Hansen's pushing for people to finally act on this issue, but they had ZERO science to dispute climate change. GISS is one of the top centers for climate observation and research in the world.
    • Steven  •  Knoxville, Tennessee  •  9 days ago
      Whatever the reason for the warming...I'm glad I replaced my air source ac/heatpump for a ground source ac/heatpump 2 yrs ago.
      Record highs of 108 this summer didn't even cause it to run in second stage...and the electric bills are significantly lower to boot.
      Taxpayers paid for one third of the cost of it...Thanks people!
    • Shadez  •  Winnetka, California  •  7 days ago
      Well, something to remember is the fact that there are a LOT more people on this planet contributing to global warming now than there were in 1988.
    • Jim  •  9 days ago
      As to whether warming is good, the questions are raised in regards to the pace of change (species can't evolve when the pace is too rapid), food production difficulties because of drought and water shortages (coupled with well-established national borders and competing nations), coastal flooding, and if the relatively small amount of current warming will trip known and extremely frightening tipping points (namely, methane release in the arctic and ocean floor).

      Here is Wikipedia's write-up of the Permian-Triassic extinction event:

      -----

      The Permian–Triassic (P–Tr) extinction event, informally known as the Great Dying, was an extinction event that occurred 252.28 Ma (million years) ago, forming the boundary between the Permian and Triassic geologic periods, as well as the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras. It is the Earth's most severe known extinction event, with up to 96% of all marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species becoming extinct. It is the only known mass extinction of insects. Some 57% of all families and 83% of all genera became extinct. Because so much biodiversity was lost, the recovery of life on Earth took significantly longer than after any other extinction event, possibly up to 10 million years. This event has been described as the "mother of all mass extinctions."

      Researchers have variously suggested that there were from one to three distinct pulses, or phases, of extinction. There are several proposed mechanisms for the extinctions; the earlier phase was likely due to gradual environmental change, while the latter phase has been argued to be due to a catastrophic event. Suggested mechanisms for the latter include large or multiple bolide impact events, increased volcanism, coal/gas fires and explosions from the Siberian Traps, and sudden release of methane clathrate from the sea floor; gradual changes include sea-level change, anoxia, increasing aridity, and a shift in ocean circulation driven by climate change.

      -----

      Here are the risks, and scientists are not unclear as to whether these risks exist. We can choose to ignore these risks - and all our actions to this point indicate we are choosing this option.

      I personally think the term #$%$ Sapiens' is too generous.
    • TomCat  •  Denver, Colorado  •  7 days ago
      Interesting that Lovelock's quotes never made a splash.
    • Moose Knuckle  •  7 days ago
      Since the first man has walked upright on this planet we have been inventing ways to make life easier, and conquering our environment. We have come to a place in time where we assume we are the top of the food chain, all knowing and controlling. Enter a little chaos into our pathetic lives and we want to master and control it. We think we have absolute control over everything around us and if we do not like what is going on we can just change it. Well I think old mother earth is going to show us we control nothing when it comes to her warming and cooling trends over the millions and possibly billions of years she has existed. After reading the fine Agenda 21 on the United Nations web site, and seeing who the great leaders, past and present are who endorsed this thing, I will never be convinced of global warming/ climate change, because this document will tell you it is a hoax, and a way to control you and manipulate you into your own demise. The simple facts of the matter and only truth I can find is that mother earth is over populated at the present time and we are still breeding like cockroaches. We can not even feed every person on this planet at the present time period, or provide them with employment, and if something is not done for population control we can not sustain our selves as an inhabitant of this planet. We are consuming natural resources at an alarming rate. The one natural resource that everyone better be aware of as not being an infinite one is CLEAN FRESH DRINKING WATER, the hell with all others, with out this we will cease to exist. Nothing I said in my simple list of fact can be denied, period. Just look around the world at the chaos going on and ask yourself; What is causing it?
    • Ted  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  8 days ago
      Why highlight the last six decades but refer to total warming for the last century? Because the 1930's had a run of hot summers that far exceeds what we have seen lately. Of course even Hansen admitted there is "vitually no other explanation", in other words the choices are man-made or natural - but definitely one of those two reasons is behind the warm US temperatures this summer.
    • don  •  8 days ago
      we're sitting in the middle of a drouth in most of this country. i hate to see it but we'll be looking at food shortages before long. it'll be a mess.
    • c  •  5 days ago
      Nasa scientist ..same as goverment researcher...yes the climate always changes...i actually think were heading toward a ice age
    • m  •  Prairie Grove, Arkansas  •  7 days ago
      You can sign the "Climate Change: The Point of No Return" pledge at The Rainforest Site.
    • Rich  •  Pontiac, Michigan  •  8 days ago
      The earth will weather all the climate change that humans can throw at it. The earth will be just fine.
      The problem is with the number of humans that it will be able to sustain.
    • MN  •  7 days ago
      Well we don't have to worry because Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and every GOP politician have already assured us it is all fake and obviously they are smarter than planetary scientists, geologists, climatologists, and meteorologists. Who cares what people who's job it is to study these things say, politicians know whats right every time when it comes to things they don't have any comprehension of.