Is a Facebook 'Like' Protected Under the First Amendment?

Back in April, a U.S. District Judge ruled that hitting the Facebook "Like" button wasn't protected under the First Amendment. You know, the one that ensures our freedom of speech.

The case involved six employees who worked for Sheriff B.J. Roberts in Hampton, Virginia. In 2009, Roberts was running for reelection and one of the six - Daniel Ray Carter - "liked" Robert's opponent on Facebook. After the election, the Sheriff fired Carter and the others. The employees brought the case to court, but the judge threw out the case, ruling that clicking one "like" wasn't protected by the First Amendment.

However, Facebook and the American Civil Liberties Union are on the case now. Both have filed their own friend-of-the-court, or Amicus Curiae, briefs in appeal of the judge's ruling.

"The Supreme Court has made clear that the First Amendment protects everyone's right to express their thoughts and opinions in whatever form they choose to do so, whether it's speaking on a street corner, holding up a sign, or pressing a button on Facebook to say that you 'Like' something," ACLU attorney Aden Fine said in a comment.

"Whether someone presses a 'Like' button to express those thoughts or presses the buttons on a keyboard to write out those words, the end result is the same: one is telling the world about one's personal beliefs, interests, and opinions. That is exactly what the First Amendment protects, however that information is conveyed," says the ACLU brief. The entire ACLU brief can be read here.

Facebook makes a similar argument in its brief. "Liking a Facebook page is entitled to full First Amendment protection," says the Facebook brief. "The district court reached a contrary conclusion based on an apparent misunderstanding of the way Facebook works; the resulting decision clashes with decades of precedent and bedrock First Amendment principles."

Facebook argues, "If Carter had stood on a street corner and announced, 'I like Jim Adams for Hampton sheriff,' there would be no dispute that his statement was constitutionally protected speech."

There were other issues, unrelated to freedom of speech, that the judge cited in dismissing the case in April, according to the Hampton local paper, the Daily Press. So even if a Facebook "like" ultimately deserves First Amendment protection, it isn't clear if the issue would be enough to send the case back to court.

Also Read
 

39 comments

  • Mike Dee  •  3 days ago
    Hmm...well we can't limit to freedom of speech to just one's household..because then it wouldn't be freedom of speech. It would be the illusion of "Freedom of Speech."

    Who is this judge? He should be fired for silly rulings.
  • Daryl  •  2 days 16 hours ago
    The First Amendment allows massive political spending to buy advertising, and elections. but not a 'like' comment? These judges are more political than the people who run for election sometimes.
  • ernest  •  3 days ago
    We as Americans have debated this before, & the vast majority of is feel that, what people do on their own time, should have no barring on employee's jobs as long as it doesn't effect their work performance. This is why companies should not but thier noses into wether or not their employees drink, smoke, engage in sexual activitites, who they sleep with, & how they worship or what they believe, or if the believe, and which candidates & officials they support.
  • GF  •  Fresno, California  •  2 days 17 hours ago
    Thumbs down to the judge who ruled that a thumbs up is not protected as free speech.
  • Ganjed  •  Shakopee, Minnesota  •  3 days ago
    Nope, facebook is the modern devil. You are selling your soul if you live your life through FB.
    • Valerie 19 hours ago
      our personal likes & dislikes are just that PERSONAL ,everyone has the right to their own opinion . There is enough of society already trying to dictate what we should & should not like ,why do you think today's teens feel like they can not possibly meet expectations or fit in
    • Landon Ritchie 2 days 11 hours ago
      feel sorry for those quadriplegics who use facebook as theirr only means to be social. I guess they all have no soul.
  • Ed  •  Savannah, Georgia  •  2 days 15 hours ago
    I was terminated by a major not for profit organization in our community when my grandson and I were disallowed from participating with the organization in a major annual parade because my grandson was considered an insurance liability. Folks under the age of 18 have participated in this parade and others in the past. When I made mention of this fact on my Facebook page, even with a perfect performance record, I was terminated for "misconduct." Since the state of Georgia is a so called "right to work" state, I have no avenue of redress. So much for "free speech."
    • phoenix 18 hours ago
      that's rough. the internet is a cold, harsh mistress though. she keeps a record of eeeverything....forever....and she'll never let you forget it ;)
    • my name's my business 1 day 14 hours ago
      and so much for 'right to work' - it really means 'right to fire'.
    • Ed 2 days 8 hours ago
      I feel a fellow "friend/employee" snitched. I had previously exposed unethical behaviors via the chain of command and there were some incompetent and unethical fellow employees and members of senior management who were looking for any feeble excuse to get rid of me despite my excellent job performance record. The attorney I consulted asked "who did you #$%$ off" to get terminated for such a trivial event?
  • Betty Olson  •  Duluth, Minnesota  •  1 day 18 hours ago
    facebook sent my granddaughter a message the other day telling her she used the ''like''button too much, i think that is crazy that fb told her that, big deal if she pressed it too many times.
  • Colonel Cuddles  •  2 days 17 hours ago
    Facebook is a disease... Avoid it like one.
    • Colonel Cuddles 14 hours ago
      Oh, please elaborate. I don't watch basketball, at all by the way.
    • my name's my business 1 day 5 hours ago
      I imagine that many people who agree with the colonel spend many hours in front of a TV watching a few guys run back and forth bouncing a ball and trying to put it through a hoop. Over and over and over again.......
    • Colonel Cuddles 2 days 15 hours ago
      Ok, "Edwardo" Pffft Bahahah!
  • P  •  3 days ago
    That's why you do not use Facebook in the first place!
  • Rick  •  2 days 17 hours ago
    I canned my Fb page...too much drama and figured I'll see my pals face to face; I'm old school and life is awesome! haha
  • Ray  •  Globe, Arizona  •  2 days 17 hours ago
    Sure makes makes me wonder. give them shorter terms in office so WE can weed them out.
  • my name's my business  •  1 day 5 hours ago
    I'll probably get some thumbs down here but let's look at this from the employer's point of view - doesn't he have the right to fire someone whom he sees as a disloyal employee? A similar situation would be if an employee of restaurant ABC wrote a letter to the local newspaper saying 'Don't eat there, restaurant XYZ is better', and then signing it. I fully respect the employee's right to say what he wants, but the employer should be able to have reasonable expectations of loyalty. There's a big difference between reprisals from the government for speaking one's mind, and reprisals from an employer. Common sense on the part of this employee would have gone a long way. Keeping his FB page private prob would have helped too. Having said all that I'm not sure why everyone got fired; maybe there's more here than is being told.
    • my name's my business 18 hours ago
      Just to clarify - I do think that clicking the FB 'like' button should be considered free-speech; I'm just not sure that free speech should protect against all consequences. It doesn't offer protection against slander for instance.
  • Ryan W  •  2 days 14 hours ago
    So if i "Like" Marijuana on my fb page...ill be fired by my employer? i guarantee only reason FB is on the case is because they dont want to lose users and such from unliking
  • Mr Frost  •  Dayton, Ohio  •  2 days 18 hours ago
    I had cancelled my account the day they made that rulling, I'm glad they are doing something about it.
  • Freedom  •  San Diego, California  •  2 days 18 hours ago
    When you use face book you open yourself to a lot of scary criminal types. Not to mention your a fool.
    • my name's my business 1 day 14 hours ago
      Freedom - no you don't, unless you don't bother to use the privacy settings. Then you're a fool (note: it's 'you're' not 'your'.)
    • justaguy 2 days 14 hours ago
      I would argue if you do not set up your privacy options you are waiving your right to privacy but you by no means give up your 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech.
  • Scott  •  Houston, Texas  •  2 days 12 hours ago
    We do have freedom of speech and the judge is wrong saying that the "Like" is not the same as speech. However, people need to understand that freedom of speech is NOT freedom of consequence from what you say. How many times have we literally crucified a politician for simply saying something? If these guys had clicked "Like" on a white supremacist groups FB page they would have still been fired but instead of people speaking out for their right to free speech, these guys would be crucified in the media and the Sheriff and the Judge would be applauded.

    It seems that many people support free speech ONLY IF they also support what was said. If the Sheriff cannot fire them over what they said, then people need to stop getting others fired for saying things that can be considered bigoted, racial, or unpopular. I am sorry but you cannot have it both ways.
  • justaguy  •  2 days 14 hours ago
    The only logical way I can see a judge making this ruling is they were really old and had no clue what facebook or social media was.

    Still that makes this even scarier since once a person is appointed to become a judge they can hold that position for life. Why is that scary? If the people having final say on what the law means are to out of touch with reality they cannot make good decisions.
  • Ryan W  •  2 days 14 hours ago
    This is so stupid its amazing its even an issue.
  • sky_fire  •  2 days 18 hours ago
    American people ..legal's or illegal's..we have no first amendment rights..Home Land Security has a new federal law..it says..in order for anyone to get a driver license in the United States..you have to give Home Land Security your social security...Do you have any idea how many people now has access to your privacy..Any cop in United States has access..regardless ..if this cop is a good cop or a bad one..Does anyone know ..how easy it is to hack into the DDS..while I was getting mine renewed..there computer system kept crashing.Authorities will till public its hard to hack there programs..Wrong with budget cuts..state of economy..there is no money for anything better.Go talk to a person who can't here..about 1st amendment rights. We have come to a point in our existence ..we have come to point of our existence..we are being track by cell phone's every time a person uses a cell phone..government can track you..now ..with so many knowing our social security..lot more can track you.Every one is afraid of the mark of beast.Me does think ..we have already been mark.
  • still free in mentone  •  Los Angeles, California  •  2 days 17 hours ago
    Yes , you can say all the stupid stuff you want . Facebook is evil , quit Facebook .