Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

close
 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The American pet population is getting smaller

    The American Veterinary Medical Association has found that Americans own fewer cats and dogs than they did in 2006 – 2 million fewer dogs, and 7.6 million fewer cats, to be exact. It's not a huge decline in pet-owning households percentage-wise – 2.4 percent – but it's the first such decrease since 1991.

    Karen Felsted of Felsted Veterinary Consultants in Richardson, TX presented the numbers at the AVMA's annual meeting in San Diego, and said the dip in pet ownership is "clearly" thanks to the bad economy, and called the dwindling "significant." Ownership of pets of all species had shown steady growth since 1986, when the AVMA began conducting the survey (it's performed every five years and surveys fifty thousand households). Between 2006 and 2011, though, the trend reversed itself. The AVMA's CEO, Ron DeHaven, theorized that people are less likely in the last few years to replace older pets who have died – because they may not be able to afford a new one.

    Y! Sports: British Olympian's dog watches her compete

    Another reason given for the decrease: fewer Americans are living in families, and families are more likely to keep pets. Stephen Zawistowski, science adviser to the New York ASPCA, told USA Today that pet ownership is more common in families with two parents and children; those families are more likely than singles, child-free couples, and older people to keep pets.

    Other interesting numbers:

    In 2011, 56% of U.S. households owned a pet – that's the number that's down 2.4% from '06. Among the pet households, 62.2% were multiple-pet households.

    Dogs are the more popular pet – in 36.5% of households, to the cats' 30.4% -- but cats are more numerous (74.1 million to dogs' 70 million), indicating that they're more likely to live in those multiple-pet households. Cat ownership showed the larger decrease, however; the percentage of households owning a dog shrank 1.9%, but the drop in cat households was 6.2%.

    Other pets had even more marked declines in ownership, with bird-owning households down a whopping 20.5%. Perhaps more understandably given their size and the expenses involved, the pet horse population dropped even more significantly – 32.9% -- and only 1.5% of the population had horses they considered pets.

    Ownership of "exotic or specialty pets," including fish, ferrets, hamsters and other rodents, snakes, reptiles, and livestock (hens, for instance) kept as pets, accounted for 10.6% of households, and dropped a more modest 16.5%.

    These numbers and more are in the 2012 U.S. Pet Ownership and Demographics Sourcebook, due out this fall.

    Are you surprised by the decline in pet ownership? Do you have fewer pets than you did five years ago? Crunch the numbers with us in the comments.

    Copyright © 2012 Yahoo Inc.

    More from Shine Pets:
    Moving house with pets: 5 ways to reduce the aggro
    Housecats are more murderous than we thought (look out, frogs)
    Dog thefts on the increase

    Loading...
     

    12 comments

    • Amy  •  1 day 6 hours ago
      At the moment I have 3 cats and 1 dog...2 of the cats are elderly and don't have much time left, the dog is a 14year old lab...not much time left there either. When they pass, I will not be getting new pets. The price of decent quality pet food is so expensive now and having 3 old animals has me pretty much tapped out from vet expenses.
    • Allison  •  Minneapolis, Minnesota  •  1 day 12 hours ago
      we have a dog and live in an apartment, but most places won't accept our dog because of her size and breed (lab/bordercollie).
    • Rlirs  •  1 day 23 hours ago
      My youngest is going off to college. Two of my three dogs died in the last year (old age). I am down to 3 cats and one is going to live with my daughter next year when she gets an apartment. I would like to get down to one dog...maybe. I want to travel and be a little freer. I will definitely "replace" my pets as they pass away with fostering shelter pets that need a home. It is a great thing to do for anyone that wants a pet, but not in the place for a lifetime commitment. Good foster homes are always needed.
    • E  •  Wood-Ridge, New Jersey  •  5 days ago
      One reason could also be that because of the economy less people are able to afford their own home, meaning more are renting. Many apartments have regulations against pets, many allow cats not dogs. For that reason I'm surprised that dog ownership is higher than cat.
      • Shai 4 days ago
        I am the proud owner of two cats and one dog, all rescued at different times. I can tell you vet bills can be out of this world! From unexpected care, two checkups a year, flea prevention, heart worm prevention, food, and Heaven forbid healthy dog treats...our vet is wonderful though. He raises money throughout the year to help families who cannot afford vet care for their pets. Animal care takers you have surely changed the quality of life for your animal(s), and If your anything like me, they have changed yours more positively than anyone will ever understand.
      • jack 4 days ago
        Cats are Better than Dogs Anyday.......
      • Robin J. Sky 4 days ago
        You also have to consider that more dogs, although thought of as pets, are also working dogs. A sheepdog on a farm, or a service dog for someone with a condition, or even hunting dogs- those dogs are not given up so easily. Cats, on the other hand, few people train to offer anything more than companionship, and the downsizing of a pet cat is often much easier to justify in that respect.
    • Tara  •  San Diego, California  •  3 days ago
      Another reason for the decline not mentioned? Landlords rarely allow pets anymore. It's terribly sad that animals sit in these shelters or get surrendered for this reason. Even when pet deposits are offered, most landlords are strict on their no pet policy. I cannot comprehend how they are okay with lowering the quality of life for animals and their owners alike just because a little damage (material items that can be easily fixed with money) could be caused.
      • the lizard 1 day 13 hours ago
        Absolutely! I'm glad you mentioned this because I was just about to. That, other than being able to afford the care, is the other biggest problem! How about signing a legal document stating that you are completely responsible for any damage from the pet? I'm sure it's not that hard for a landlord to have a paper drawn up by a lawyer stating something to that effect.
      • Diana E 3 days ago
        And CHILDREN can do way more damage to a property than a cat can anyway! There's no deposit or extra rent every month for a child!
    • RachelP  •  5 days ago
      I downsized from three cats to one dog.
      • the lizard 1 day 13 hours ago
        Excellent question Rlirs...........
      • Rlirs 1 day 23 hours ago
        What happened to the cats?
    • katie  •  Flint, Michigan  •  4 days ago
      5 years ago i had no pets and now 2 dogs 3 cats and 5 hen
    • Vivian  •  Omaha, Nebraska  •  1 day 9 hours ago
      Five years ago I had one cat. I have added two dogs, a husband and two step daughters since then!
    • Cara G  •  Spokane, Washington  •  4 days ago
      That's clearly not the case with everyone. In 2006 I had two cats. Now I have five.
    • Pauline ann  •  Coventry, United Kingdom  •  4 days ago
      Interesting
    • R Young  •  4 days ago
      LOL we got to be able to eat something
    • Ann  •  2 days 22 hours ago
      Dang, I was hoping the article was going to say the numbers were lower because people are spaying and neutering their pets more often.

    PET PICK OF THE DAY

    Pet Pick of the Day

    Moving with pets, safely and unstressfully

    Cut down on agita (and escape attempts) with these 5 ideas

    Posted by Sarah D. Bunting