Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

close
 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Susan G. Komen CEO Steps Down. Will This End the Planned Parenthood Controversy?

    Aurora Jewell, Mandi Moshay and Kirsten Dees hold up signs outside at a Planned Parenthood in Seattle, Washington. …Six months after the Susan G. Komen Foundation decided would stop funding Planned Parenthood -- and then quickly reversed itself after angering people on both sides of the abortion debate -- founder Nancy G. Brinker is stepping down as CEO of the breast cancer charity.

    Related: Planned Parenthood decision puts spotlight on Susan G. Komen's politics

    She will take on a new role focusing on fundraising, strategy, and company growth once a new CEO is in place, the company said in a statement late Wednesday.

    "I was asked by the Board in 2009 to assume the CEO role," Brinker said. "Three years into that role, and 32 years after my promise to my sister to end breast cancer, I want now to focus on Susan G. Komen's global mission and raising resources to bring our promise to women all around the world."

    Brinker's departure isn't the only top-level change. President Liz Thompson will be leaving the organization sometime in September to "pursue other opportunities," and board members Brenda Lauderback and Linda Law are also stepping down.

    "It is truly unbelievable that Komen, a group that until this year had been considered America's sweetheart charity, has suffered such financial and personnel upheaval in the wake of making what ended up being a temporary decision to loose ties with the nation's largest abortion provider," Jeanne Monahan, director of the Center for Human Dignity at the conservative Christian Family Research Council, told Reuters. "Sadly, the greatest victims of this Planned Parenthood shakedown are women suffering from breast cancer.

    There's no doubt that the company has been affected by its decision in February to defund, and then refund, Planned Parenthood. The original decision angered Komen supporters, who took to social media to point out that the breast cancer charity's grants, which totaled about $580,000 in 2010 and $680,000 in 2011, had been earmarked for breast-cancer screenings at the women's health clinics, not abortion or birth control services. Hundreds of thousands of people -- some of them from Komen's other affiliates -- publicly denounced the defunding and swore they'd stop donating to Komen.

    Just three days later, Brinker announced that funding for Planned Parenthood would continue after all. She issued a public apology for the way her organization chose to allocate its funds, a move that outraged many of its pro-life supporters. Several high-ranking Komen officials, including Senior Vice President of Policy Karen Handle, who claimed responsibility for the defunding decision, resigned.

    Still, the resignations and apologies were too little, too late -- the group's poor response to the public outcry may have done more damage than the flip-flopping on funding. Since then, participation in Komen's famous Race for the Cure 5K runs and walks has dropped by as much as 30 percent, according to USA Today. Donations have dwindled. The brand itself, famous for it's ubiquitous pink ribbon, has been tarnished.

    "You hate to see the organization slowly bleed away its staffing and its talent," Daniel Borochoff, the president of CharityWatch, told The New York Times in March. "They may very well need to get a new board and a new chief executive."

    Neither Thompson nor Brinker said that the moves were related to the Planned Parenthood controversy, though Thompson did say that Komen "is on an excellent path to recovery." When asked about Planned Parenthood, Komen spokeswoman Andrea Rader told the Associated Press that "I think Liz (Thompson) made clear in her statement that we feel that we've moved past that."

    At least, the company seems determined to put the Planned Parenthood issue firmly behind them in order to focus on the future.

    "Our mission is clear and consistent, and will never change, regardless of the controversy earlier this year," Brinker said. "We are doing everything in our power to ensure that women have access to quality cancer care and the support that they need, as we seek answers through cutting-edge research."

    Copyright © 2012 Yahoo Inc.

    Also on Shine:

    Susan G. Komen vs. Planned Parenthood: Why the controversy will continue
    What's next for Susan G. Komen Foundation?
    Former Susan G. Komen VP Karen Handle: Planned Parenthood "Hijacked this Great Organization"

     

    295 comments

    • Katrina  •  1 day 7 hours ago
      Buh bye, private jet, couture gowns, champagne sipping, Empress Brinker. Let's bring Komen back to the real women who struggle with cancer and how to pay their bills every day.
      • just me 5 hours ago
        planned parenthood is called planned parenthood for a reason.
      • Chuck 5 hours ago
        Sc 1, your comment makes no sense. Because a Foundation chooses not to fund a particular cause does not mean that they were telling your friend that she should have died. Your comments are just like Yahoo. Blow everything out of proportion. Susan G. Komen Foundation is a Charity for the cure of Breast Cancer (in case you haven't heard of them before). Since they do not have unlimited finds, they need to choose which areas will benefit more from the limited funds that they do have. Unfortunately, they will have to say no to some areas. Does that mean that they want people to die? NO! So if Rady Childrens Hospital does not give money to Alzheimers groups, do they wish them to die? What about the Muscular Dystrophy Association. Should they give money to the kids in Africa that are starving?
      • Gwendolyn 9 hours ago
        You forgot to mention that percentage that goes towards abortion services. Was this left out intentionally.
    • Tana  •  11 hours ago
      I set up a memorial fund in my mother's name at the non-profit that I work for. I now ONLY donate to this fund as I know how the money is spent; 100 % goes to survivors of DV for emergency expenses. Maybe "bad press" about large charities such as Komen, American red Cross, and United Way have effected my opinions of big charities, but it seems that once big money is involved...less and less on the money collected actually goes to those in need.
    • Bryn B  •  1 day 0 hours ago
      Too late, Nancy Brinker, your brand is ruined. The whole debacle pulled back the curtain on your scam of exploitation of the death of your sister for greed. You live in a beautiful home, you make $500k a year suing anyone who tries to help cancer causes if they even consider using the color pink, even if unintentional, or use a ribbon. Greed is not what the cure for cancer needs.

      The Pink Stinks.
      • Just me 10 hours ago
        Avon also used to use pink ribbons for raising breast cancer awareness funds. I know a lot of their money went to research and screening for women in underserved areas. If the research brings us any answers, it will all be money well sepnt.
      • Alter Ego 22 hours ago
        Planned Parenthood is not what the cure for cancer needs.
      • AnnG 23 hours ago
        totally agree pink ribbon is a SCAM!!
    • Denise  •  9 hours ago
      this pink thing is getting out of hand....and who is really making money?
    • Pat  •  South Bend, Indiana  •  1 day 5 hours ago
      That's good about Brinker, but they still will never see one red cent from me. They are just like the corporate Humane Society. Most of the money that is donated goes to someone's pocket....
    • Jesus Rules!!!  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  18 hours ago
      As a breast cancer survivor, I find this Susan G. Komen charity a farce. How dare they ask for money to "find a cure for breast cancer" then use the money for their own personal benefit. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Money truly is the root of all evil!!!
      • Mary 9 hours ago
        Be strong all breast cancer survivors!
      • Eurhythmie 10 hours ago
        All charities need money to administer services and to organize events. But I think Komen has way too many high salaried executives.
      • cmc 13 hours ago
        they are not the only charity to misuse donations. people who give to any charity need to research how the money is being used before they donate.
    • Buck  •  1 day 10 hours ago
      The Komen charity is more charitable for the board members than its cancer supporters.
    • Jane  •  18 hours ago
      When you act like a fool and infuriate both sides by misdirecting funds from your original charter than you lost. SGK can close the doors.
    • b  •  5 hours ago
      that whole planned parenthood thing was the straw that broke the camel's back for me. it came right after i found out how much the CEO made, and just what percentage of the donations were going to research and what percentage was going in the management's pockets.
    • M.  •  21 hours ago
      Didn't they know there was gonna be an out cry,you can't shut something down
      and hope it goes away..To many people involved and so much money is at stake...
      This was bound to happen,sooner or later...
    • Veronica  •  3 days ago
      that's not even that much money to raise -- how much was she paying herself every year? I saw her clothes and her 'coif', those shoes are designer....
      • sweet1also 2 days 0 hours ago
        Well its not just Komen I dont domate to, I dont donate to United Fund. The very large organized charities do pay outrageous money to "employees" do not pay taxes and gicve a very small percentage of what they get to the cause.
      • JoanK 2 days 3 hours ago
        It's sad that people can start a fund like this and play on peoples feeling to become rich. And the worst part is most of these business to help others only help the top group in the fundraisers. We are better off keeping our money for rainy days.
      • Jacqueline 2 days 8 hours ago
        This company have raked in billion of dollars to fund research for breast cancer,but they placed political view in front of their true goal, cancer affect DEM/GOP, this should never happen. Now she seeing funding pulling out, because of the stand they have made. I'm glad this has happen, because she need to know who really made this company work!
    • niki  •  1 day 0 hours ago
      For all of the money that has been raised for breast cancer there should be no cancer. They don't want to find a cure or we would have one. It makes too much money for the drug companies for them to find it.Now they have finally after all of these years decided that Kemo is bad for cancer patients. We have all known that for years. it kills all of the good cells with the bad, It does not know the difference.So now what do they have to give you. ???? Unless you want to give all of the unwanted babies a home then butt out and don't condem the mom for the decision she makes either way. But you will whether she gives it up or gets an abortion , So how about the dad, lets give him some of the blame he deserves.Not just the woman.
      • Denise 9 hours ago
        Chemo crippled me!
      • Earth Angel 13 hours ago
        I think they actually do have cures ... Has anyone ever thought the possibility that if they can keep us sick, they can continue to get rich. I find it hard to believe there si really no cure.
      • Worker Grrl 14 hours ago
        Chemo. As in chemotherapy. Drug companies would LOVE to come up with a cancer drug. Don't be foolish into thinking otherwise. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$!
    • My Two Cents  •  3 days ago
      I'm sick of Susan G. Komen. They're starting to believe the hype. I will never give to them again.
    • Dee  •  Mason, Ohio  •  3 days ago
      I don't understand why you have to pay 25.00 to walk in this walk and where does that money go? Not all women can afford to pay 25.00 to walk in this walk. The money raised should be enough. I don't think Susan Komen would have wanted women to have to pay to walk for this cause. Especially women whom can not afford it.
    • linda  •  Livonia, Michigan  •  10 hours ago
      depression, i was going to say, was described before all these hmmmm took over; as being that which keeps us from going insane in an overt manner as long aas you eat or don't lose weight. so if you treat it run the risk they will hurt themselves or others; if they are successful in their use you have a happy person who is crazy or may turn crazy if they stop.
      this concern with depression , the other depression of much more concern (the weather); where they use or cause the traits of a human to create or transfer a picture of this weather problem.
      another of those; doing this is a hysterical undescribable spontaneous effort to describe something despicable. one of those; don't show me , just tell me.
      puff the magic dragon as near as i could see was in the indian ocean.
      with these creating scenes, transfer this terror without interpretation.
    • linda  •  Livonia, Michigan  •  10 hours ago
      depression; this is before the 'new' enlightened generation took over, all specializing so no one person would have a complete picture of what. this i would assume protects the nucleus of mortgages & credit cards.
      i heard that 'dad' made 80g.
    • Jennifer Schecter  •  1 day 3 hours ago
      I still support finding cures for breast cancer and will give money, but not to this company! I hope they get buried into the ground. All they care about is pocketing the money we give.
    • Katie  •  3 days ago
      It's not the whole PP thing that turned me off of them, it's their use of funds for litigation against other charities for using their trademarks. Their hearts seem to be in the right place, but their actions are misguided. Trademark rights just seem so petty in the face of what they're trying to accomplish.
    • Susan  •  Syracuse, New York  •  7 hours ago
      My sister survived her breast cancer only to have it come back through out her body. She lost her battle 3 months ago at age 48. I've said it before and will continue to say there is no money in a cure. I would much rather donate to clinics and hospitals who are treating these precious angels.
    • Sandy Gina  •  3 days ago
      Anyone that give them money is a fool. They sit on most of the cash they raise. they have lavish business digs, pay themselves well, etc....life is good to be an SGK executive. You have to ask yourself why they hoard so much cash? If they were really working towards a cure, wouldn't their bank account at near zero, always? It's not, in fact they bank more than 50% of the money they take in. Why? Want to really help a woman (or a man) with breast cancer? Make a donation directly to them. Don't freaking pay for some executive's lavish lifestyle. You people are so dumb it's kind of scary.

    Join us on Pinterest

    DAILY SHOT VIDEO