Mobile  iPhone  Mag  Podcast
Pocket Gamer  LOG IN | REGISTER
  Reset Pass >
 Twitter     Facebook     Forum     Contact Us     RSS Feeds
 
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
WHO ARE WE?
ADVERTISE
GAMES ARCHIVE
MORE PG SITES
POCKETGAMER.biz
POCKETGAMER
FRANCE
POCKETGAMER
GERMANY
MORE SM SITES
APPSPY
FREE APP
ALLIANCE
POCKETPICKS
QUALITY INDEX
FREE STUFF
COMPETITIONS
FREE IPHONE GAMES
MOBILE GAME DEMOS
PSP GAME DEMOS
DS GAME DEMOS
BUY GAMES
BUY MOBILE GAMES
BUY PSP GAMES
BUY DS GAMES
SPECIAL OFFERS
SPONSOR LINKS
INDUSTRY
PARTNERS
Metacritic
GameRankings
Pocket Gamer on NewsNow
GamesTracker
dx.net
UK Mobile Pages Directory
Skinflint Price Comparison
 ANDROID FEATURE
Pandora creator: Kickstarter sensation Ouya could be dead on arrival
Crowd-funded console faces a tough road to market, claims Pandora’s Craig Rothwell
Product: Ouya
 
Ouya Android, thumbnail 1
The newly crowd-funded Ouya console may be breaking records and attracting thousands of generous backers, but it could end up being a commercial disaster which will cost its founders dearly, according to a man who knows a thing or two about launching new gaming hardware.

Craig Rothwell is part of the team behind the Pandora handheld, which was first announced way back in 2006 but suffered delays and setbacks before finally making it to retail.

As such, Rothwell is ideally positioned to provide an experienced viewpoint on the perils of conceptualising, manufacturing and distributing new video gaming hardware.

Rothwell’s most obvious concern is the price - the team behind Ouya are adamant that they can provide a Tegra 3-powered base console equipped with 1GB of RAM and a wireless controller for less than $99 (approximately £60).

“You simply cannot make a quality console and controller for $99, no matter how low you go in China,” comments Rothwell. “Even a Chinese semi-slave production line won't hit $99 at that spec, as the big name parts they are talking about are a set cost. "

"My feelings are that at that price - and remember you have to take off the Kickstarter fees, which brings the console and touchpad-equipped controller in at less than $99 - they will be making a loss on each unit sold.”

Ouya

The Ouya game controller (via Kickstarter)

Rothwell and his team are currently engaged in bringing the second generation Pandora to market, and he is quick to point out the harsh lessons they’ve learned from the genesis of the original machine. “With the first Pandora we didn't dare take orders until we could show all the hardware working, with exact specs, and a working case and controls.

“We worked out all costs and had quotes which we went public with, and even then everything which could go wrong did go wrong. We survived by the skin of our teeth and via some very, very kind customers and developers. In many ways, we did ‘Kickstarter' before Kickstarter was even a thing; we raised over $1.5 million back in 2009 to fund the completion of the Pandora project.

“Now we have been though that baptism of fire, and know everything that is involved, it’s clear that a race to the lowest possible price isn't how you succeed. That's generally how things can go majorly wrong; when trying to come to market with a rock bottom price, one error, one contractor messing up, and it's curtains."

"Because Ouya is already being sold at that rock bottom price before going to production, there is no way for them to adjust for error. I hope they have a big secret pile of cash they can call on if they need it.”

It’s not just the pricing that troubles Rothwell. Although it’s early days for Ouya, there are nevertheless a lot of unanswered questions about how the system will actually work once its installed under your telly. Naturally, the Pandora man has his own theories. “My guess is that you will have to pay some kind of subscription to use the console, and that is where they plan to claw back some money.”

ouya-pandora

The troubled Pandora device (CC-Licensed Michael Mrozek)

Rothwell also questions the claim that the system is truly open, and points out that the proposed developer pricing arrangement isn’t quite as revolutionary as Ouya’s founders would have you believe. “They say they are 'open' but the hardware they are using isn't open - it will require binary blobs to use and their software appears to contain DRM,” he says.

“What they are doing with regards to developer fees is also nothing new; they want to charge developers 30% to release a game on their console. What's the point in doing all that work for their comparatively tiny audience when you can get a better deal releasing on iOS or ‘normal’ Android via Google’s popular Play Store? You might as well get a HDMI cable and an iControlpad and use your super-powered Android Tablet on the TV. You can do that right now, without the need for the Ouya.”

Ouya has already smashed its Kickstarter target and still (at the time of writing) has almost a month to go before funding closes.

The interest in the system has been nothing short of astronomical, but as Rothwell knows only too well from his journey to market with the Pandora, expectation has a habit of coming back to haunt you. “When all the hype dies down, this machine could well be DOA, and Ouya could be looking at a giant black hole of losses.”
 

Reviewer photo
Damien McFerran 12 July 2012
Have your say!  
Show: Latest | Oldest
Joined:
Jul 2012
Post count:
1
Jimsk | 15:59 - 13 July 2012
As somebody involved in bringing hardware to market, I have to say that mcobit smashed this on the head. You don't have to be unlucky to get unreliable suppliers... You *will* get unreliable suppliers. We actually had our units built in the UK as supply became an issue and with the suppliers in your own country, you can always drive out and give them a kick up the arse!

Prototyping is horrendously expensive, even if you get it right quickly.
Then there is electrical testing and field tests. Will it have wireless of some description? That will need testing and signing off.

Seriously, good luck to all involved but can't help thinking they've really not grasped the seriousness of what they are trying to achieve.
Joined:
Jul 2012
Post count:
1
Frankz | 15:44 - 13 July 2012
Considering you can buy an Android tablet for less than $99, up the specs and remove the LCD touchscreen and you aren't far off the Ouya. If a Raspberry Pi costs about a 3rd of that (non-profit) and runs Linux, XWindow and can playback 1080p movies I think they can do the Ouya for the price they quote.
If the dev tools are available for homebrew I am really looking forward to it.
Joined:
Jul 2011
Post count:
360
aros | 09:46 - 13 July 2012
Worth the risk, I'm gonna chuck in the £80 to pre-order one to the UK as it could turn out very well. As this thing runs on Android there won't be a huge amount for developers to do as building games to work with this will surely match adding physical controls for Xperia Play and the knock off plug in control pads that are seeing a few games released
Joined:
Jul 2012
Post count:
1
mcobit | 06:26 - 13 July 2012
HyperWarlock,
Craig shure knows what he is talking about. You don't just add up the costs of the parts, but you need to calculate the molding for the parts, the creation of the pcbs, the prototypes, etc. All of that adds to the cost and if you are unlucky you have some other problems like unreliable companies, bad parts etc. All he wants to tell is, that you have to have some money to back it all up.

I think the pricepoint is quite low, too. They should have gone for something like $200.

If there are cheap chinese gamepads for $10, well, there is a reason for them to be that cheap. The quality is just awful and the sell millions. You don't want that low quality for your prestige kickstarter product...
Joined:
Jul 2012
Post count:
1
Baldilocks | 04:50 - 13 July 2012
Want cheese with your whine Rothwell?
Joined:
Jul 2012
Post count:
1
somewhatcool | 01:47 - 13 July 2012
The only people who invested in Ouya are indie developers (joke). Seriously, Android games on a TV? ok we have the good, the bad and the ugly of android games. Mostly ugly followed by bad and a few (very) few good ones. Playing an android game on a smartphone or tablet is retro fun, the fact you can play (mostly free) games to kill time while you wait for your big brother to finish his turn playing Battlefield 3 on the Xbox has its place but playing mostly crap android games on TV? Please get serious. Indie developers take note I believe gamers play games on their smartphone/tablet because its not available on the console/TV/PC, there is psychological kick (albeit mostly sadistic) about playing a game exclusively on their smartphone/tablet not available on the Xbox, PS3, etc. Did the people who are making Ouya do a serious focus group test? or just thought to themselves "hey this game would be great to be played on tv". I think the later. Its very isolated, self belief, prejudiced, subjective thinking to believe Xbox, PS3, smartphone, tablet owners will rush out and play games on this, a snow ball chance in hell. Either they have a better graphical game on their Xbox or they already have the android game on their smartphone or tablet. The bottom line Kids like playing android games on their smartphone/tablets, not on television. Lets imagine they dont own a smart phone or tablet, would I buy my kid for Christmas a Ouya or a Nexus 7 tablet. Sorry thats not a trick question. NEXUS 7 is the answer. I think Ouya went on Kickstart after the venture capitalists stopped returning their calls, because of the release of the Nexus 7. I sincerely wish Ouya (which for a four letter word somehow I keep forgetting) the best of luck against Xbox and PS3. Wow $2 million is such a lot of money, a drop in the ocean to launch a console. Lets get back to the real world with some facts, Xbox 360 was released in 2005, Microsoft was estimated to be losing $125 per box just on cost of goods. Over its lifetime, the business segment containing the Xbox is down more than $5.5 billion -- not including the cost of acquisitions such as the 2002 purchase game developer Rare, which cost more than $300 million. There is some weird thinking that kids will just magically start buying this Ouya console. It does not work like that, Microsoft spent half a billion dollars just on marketing for the Kinect alone. I could go on and on but I think you get the point.. its more Oh yeh (Ouya) I believe it when I see it.
Joined:
Jul 2012
Post count:
1
spinron | 23:11 - 12 July 2012
There are plenty of Android TV set-tops being offered in China for less than $70, global shipping included. They are based on a variety of SoCs, some are quite powerful. At any rate, T3 is quite low cost, it's a small die, and we'll be seeing quite a lot of it everywhere in the very near future. Looking at iSuppli's analysis of the Nexus 7 BOM, I can't see why they can't hit the $99 with a little wiggle room to spare. It's really the T3 reference design with a few modifications, sans display and battery (but with a controller--PS3 bluetooth controllers that are quite nice can be had for less than $10 today--FOB China).

OUYAs publicly states that the hardware they ship will be rootable, and users can install stock Android instead of their software. It's in their FAQ, plain and simple. It just doesn't get more open than that in real life. The nVidia binary blobs isn't a practical issue for anyone in this ecosystem (it's standard practice in nearly every Android device in existence).

DRM? Where did you see that referred to? I hope that they do have good copy protection for games because Android piracy is a serious issue that's deterring developers from supporting the platform. As long as it doesn't get in the way of legitimate users, the only people who'll have a problem with it are pirates.

If OUYA's copy protection will be better than what Google does, it can be a reason for developers to work with them rather than Google Play. Also, the fact that they have a uniform platform, hardware-wise, makes development and optimization *a lot* easier than what's needed to target current Android variety.

All in all, I think they have a pretty solid case.
Joined:
Dec 2010
Post count:
209
PG BBilson | 21:54 - 12 July 2012
Kickstarter takes a cut from successful projects - "If a project is successfully funded, Kickstarter will apply a 5% fee to the funds raised. If funding isn't successful, there are no charges."
Joined:
Jul 2012
Post count:
1
HyperWarlock | 19:53 - 12 July 2012
I don't think they will make a loss with every unit sold, I'm sure they have worked all of the pricing out. Also Kickstarter doesn't charge fees. this guy has no idea what he is talking about.

Just because he made mistakes doesn't mean others will too.
Please leave your comment below
POPULAR FEATURES
LATEST COMMENTS
LATEST FROM FORUM LATEST VIDEOS
VIDEO REVIEWS
LATEST SCREENS