I was watching Fox News Sunday (don't laugh...it's about the only Fox "news" program I can tolerate that will give me some of the talking points we all have to sift through here the next day) and they were talking to that cadaver Eric Cantor. He was asked about job creation at one point. His reply?
"Um, Chris...the government doesn't create jobs."
This brings me to a question - cons ran on the promise of "job creation", yet have gone out of their way to do anything but...yet these same loons will turn around and claim Obama hasn't created any jobs...so I ask - WHICH IS IT? Does gov't create jobs only when it's convenient to do so, or do they *not* and just let the partisan sniping about *nothing* continue in hopes no one is paying attention?”
“telling someone to vote in their economic interest may see like a parrot to someone that just wants them to keep voting dem and end up with cities like detroit and chicago.”
““We've always said sequester is not the best way to go about spending reductions. It was, as you know, a default mechanism, because Congress couldn't do the job it was supposed to a couple of years ago," Cantor said.
But Eric, you were in that Congress that "couldn't do the job it was supposed" why haven't you self-terminated your job?!?!”
“Ad Hom. Your surrender is accepted. Please feel free to return when you are able to add value to the discussion, instead of acting like a 12-year old. Bye.”
“White collar and tech workers are being squeezed just as tightly as the "bottom workers". .. .. . Owners and investors are only one's doing as you put it > just fine”
Edit Preferences
Logout
