Austin Man Facing 10 Years in Prison After Photographing Cops Making Arrest

 nye_arrest_03.jpg

It was just after midnight on New Year’s Day when Antonio Buehler spotted a pair of Austin cops manhandling a woman at a gas station during a DUI investigation, so he pulled out his cell phone and began taking photos.

That, of course, prompted one of the cops to storm up to him and accuse him of interfering with the investigation.

Austin police officer Pat Oborski shoved Buehler against his truck before handcuffing him. He later claimed in his arrest report that Buehler had spit in his face.

Buehler was charged with resisting arrest and felony harassment on a public servant, the latter punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

After spending 16 hours in jail, Buehler began seeking witnesses to the incident.

“We started posting flyers around the gas station,” Buehler said in an interview with Photography is Not a Crime Sunday afternoon.

“I went on Facebook and on Twitter and I put something up on Craig’s List.”

 

By January 4, he had obtained a video from a witness who had been standing across the street watching the exchange between Buehler and Oborski.

The video doesn’t show Buehler spitting on the cop but it might be difficult to capture that from across the street with a cell phone camera.

However, it does show Oborski pinning Buehler against the truck, making it obvious that the cop had stormed up to him rather than the other way around.

But in the arrest report, Oborski claims that Buehler was “in my face,” which is why he had to place his hands on his shoulders to “distance him away.”

Oborski also claimed that he wiped his face after Buehler had supposedly spit on him, then pulled out the handcuffs to arrest him, but the video doesn’t show that either.

All the video shows is Oborski pushing Buehler against the truck before wrestling him down to arrest him.

The video also shows Buehler's friend acting as if he is video recording the arrest, but Buehler says he was not recording.

Buehler also attempted to obtain Oborski’s dash cam video through a public records request, but that request was denied after the city attorney consulted with the Texas attorney general.

Buehler then filed an internal affairs complaint against Oborski in late January thinking that the cell phone video – coupled with dash video and audio from the patrol car, the footage from the gas station surveillance camera and audio from a recorder Oborski was wearing on his uniform – would prove that he was unlawfully arrested.

But as we’ve seen so many times before, internal affairs did not substantiate a single one of Buehler’s complaints against the officers.

Not only that, but the letter dated June 15 also informed that he would be forbidden to “view, posses or receive copies of the Internal Affairs Division’s investigation.”

The letter did say he was welcome to meet with a “Police Monitor for a Police Monitor’s Conference,” where a cop would go over the details of the investigation with him.

But naturally, he would be forbidden from recording that meeting, even though he would be allowed to take notes.

Buehler said this is a policy stemming from the police union’s contract that states the investigation will only be made public if the accusations against the officer were substantiated.

So in other words, the public must take their word that they did, in fact, conduct a thorough and honest investigation.

But despite all this and the fact the charges are still hanging over him, Buehler remains upbeat.

On July 2, he will plead his case before the Austin Citizen Review Panel, which is made up of seven cities and was created to provide oversight to the police department.

The board does not have the authority to discipline but it can make recommendations.

Buehler also took the police department up on its offer to review the investigation in person where he was allowed to view all the evidence he had not seen before.

He posted his findings on Faeebook on a post that received more than 140 “likes.”

“I found it very interesting that you can only see driver’s side, you can’t see the passenger’s side,” he said of the dash cam video.

“All the other dash cam videos I’ve seen show a wider angle where you can see both the driver side and passenger side.”

Buehler is referring to the car that police had pulled over that night prior to his altercation with them, which apparently has a tight crop of the driver’s side, which is rare indeed.

In the car were two women. The driver was undergoing a sobriety test. Oborski claims the passenger was interfering with that investigation by yelling out the window.

He also claims he had to twice walk over to the passenger side to tell the woman to settle down while he was conducting the sobriety test on the driver.

Buehler was pumping gas observing the situation. His friend was in the passenger’s seat.

“I didn’t hear her yell the entire time,” he said of the passenger. “She clearly wasn’t yelling to the degree that she was interfering like they claimed.”

nye_arrest_02.jpg

But before he knew it, Oborski had yanked her out of the car and was manhandling her.

“We pull out our cameras and try to take pictures with our cell phones,” he said. “She sees me taking pictures and says, ‘please, take pictures and videos.’

“I asked the cop, ‘why are you hurting her, she didn’t do anything wrong, stop hurting her.’

“They pick her up and walk her right past us. Oborski then turns around walks back towards me.

“’He said, ‘who do you think you are?’

Oborski walked up right up to Buehler, sandwiching him between the back of his truck.

That is where the cell phone video starts recording.

While that video doesn’t pick up much audio and the dash cam video doesn’t show the passenger’s side - and the recorder Oborski was wearing is conveniently undecipherable, coming across muffled as it had been covered - the dash cam video does provide clear audio of the interaction.

“The audio shows that he keep raising his voice escalating the situation,” Buehler said.

Oborski claimed in his report that it was Buehler who escalated the situation by continually raising his voice.

Then there is the chuckle.

“All of a sudden, he chuckles and says, ‘you spit in my face,’” Buehler said. “I said, ‘I didn’t spit in your face.’

“If someone spits in your face, do you chuckle?”

The gas station surveillance video shows the entire incident without audio, but from the beginning, unlike the cell phone video, which began recording once the two were in each other’s faces.

“It shows me taking pictures, then it shows the cops coming up to me, pushing me,” he said. “It shows I am completely passive in my demeanor.”

Today, more than six months after the incident, the case has yet to go before a grand jury, which will determine if the case will go to trial.

In the mean time, he created Peaceful Streets, a project will encourage Austin residents to record police in an effort to maintain accountability.

The program offers Know Your Rights workshops and will eventually hand out 100 video cameras to residents.

“We want to encourage people to take their liberty and security in their own hands,” he said.

Buehler has also created a petition where he is trying to gather 5,000 signatures to send a message to the district attorney to investigate Oborski and his partner.

As of today, the petition has 1,394 signature but more than 3,000 Facebook likes, which goes to show you just how lazy some of us have become.


Please send stories, tips and videos to carlosmiller@magiccitymedia.com.

CARLOS MILLER'S LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

I am immersed in a legal case where I not only want to clear my criminal charges stemming from my arrest in January, but I want to sue the Miami-Dade Police Department for deleting my footage, which I was able to recover.http://www.pixiq.com/node/add/pixiq-post

My goal is to set some type of precedent to ensure this does not happen as often as it does today where cops simply get away with it.

So I've created an Indiegogo fundraiser in an attempt to raise $3,500 by July 2 in order to prepare for my July 25 trial.

 Hair Transplant 

Also, in an unrelated PINAC matter, I recently went through a hair transplant operation and I'm documenting my recovery on this blog if you are interested. I did not pay for this transplant, which is why I'm promoting the doctor through the hair transplant blog.

Comments

My quick and dirty analysis:

There's a point at 4.47-4.48 where Buehler *appears* to possibly jerk his head slightly in a manner which *could* possibly be interpreted as a gesture which might accompany an 'aggressive' spit.

After the 'put your hands behind your back' Buehler does not appear to comply with that order and I think his actions there *might* be some justification in a 'resisting' charge; it's not a slam-dunk ridiculous charge.

Everything else - the entire approach and encounter for filming the arrest - is suspected bullshit. I'd really like to see the surveillance footage which would presumably show the entire incident from start to finish. I will say that getting involved, questioning the cop - 'why are you hurting' etc. - in the middle of an arrest in progress - was probably unwise. Don't get involved, stand back, film quietly, get your footage.

Mike

This is a good example of how recording police action could save you or a fellow citizen from going to prison. Thank God the guy across the street was recording.

Un-fucking-believable, again.And to think that once, when I asked someone about cool places to visit, perhaps live, they replied, " Austin,Texas-a cool town".
Well, fuck that one, I guess. Just sounds like one more fascist cop town.
I guess out of the actions of asshole cops like this may grow a movement of citizens who band together and demand their rights.
What was that quote..." Dishonest cops like these make the other 5% look bad"?

Is it me or did the cops walk away from their field sobriety test of the woman just to stop the guy from taking pictures and speaking his mind?

If the cop had no other reason to accost the guy and arrest him, it seems like the resisting charge is bullshit. The cop chose to instigate his encounter with the photographer, that much is clear. And to tack on felony harassment, seems like that's to overshadow the bogus resisting charge.

Also, he reports that the dash cam footage looks cropped. That's worth following up on with a FOIA or public records request, police union be damned. That a TV news station reported on it is awesome, and Antonio should ask them to request the raw dash cam and surveillance footage... at least they'd learn whether it still exists.

Dude needs a lawyer, and should contact his local Civil Liberties Union for support. Maybe the NPPA would get involved?

But I agree, keep your mouth shut and film, don't get involved.

Nice writeup, Carlos.

If he's indicted such that there's an actual criminal case, he can then subpoena the police car footage, the surveillance camera footage, and the audio from the police officer's microphone. At that point, he'll be legally entitled to it through the litigation discovery process, and he won't have to rely on the public records law.

Of course, if it comes to that, the state will likely claim that the police car video and officer audio were lost, or that the recording devices malfunctioned. Kind of like the Andrea McCarren case where the cops claimed that none of the video from nine police cars on the scene of a particular incident was available because either the video recorder malfunctioned or the footage was lost.

Why is everyone so surprised showing the cops doing what they did..!!..? After all.. they're cops, aren't they? Do we really expect anything different from them?

Rail Car Fan

I'm sorry but at 3.46-3.47 in slow motion it looks like the cop uses his right sleeve to whip something off his face. I checked it twice. Your face was about 6 inces from his face.

It's a shame that the progressive city of Austin has unaccountable policing. I have been personally involved in the Yogurt Shop Murders case for 14 years. It took DNA to get one wrongfully convicted man off death row and another released from life in prison. http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/imafreeman-1051917-aapres3/
http://www.mackwhite.com/Yogurt1.html

With Oborski so close, I suppose it's possible some moisture hit his face when Buehler was asking him to chill out. That's Oborski's own fault, though.

Equal protection under the law. Citizens can't go up to other citizens and assault them which is what this cop allegedly did. If Buehler is not under arrest, why is he being manhandled (assaulted). It is only after this mythical spitting that the officer brought the handcuffs out and tried to make the arrest. Up to that point it an unwanted touching of which I may add that Buehler showed remarkable self restraint.

I also find it laughable that the officer is claiming Buehler is in his face. Really? Video clearly shows Buehler backed up against the truck with nowhere to go and it is the officer that is in Buehler's face.

I know that Buehler has been thwarted in getting information from the department in order to defend against these charges. From looking at the video and the arrest report I would not be surprised to find out that officer Oborski has walt disneyed several arrest reports with the "spitting" charge in order to justify an arrest.

joe

Infowars picked up your story:

Austin Man Facing 10 Years in Prison After Photographing Cops Making Arrest.

http://www.infowars.com/austin-man-facing-10-years-in-prison-after-photo...

In my experience the worst criminals in our degenerating economy are the cops. These days cops are hired to make a profit for the government, any way they can, and get rid of those that don’t produce for the government. All governments have become the Godzilla of old Japanese movies. Cops don't need to use phony radar guns in Oregon to steal from a motorist. They just completely fabricate a charge then commit perjury in court. Judge Horner, Dallas, Oregon, made sure, asking cop David Peterson twice if there were no witnesses in the vehicle before their complicity in the theft. It doesn't even matter that a charge completely violates the laws of physics. Oregon cops will issue a completely bogus traffic cite, then commit perjury with the most ridiculous impossible lies in court and the judges convict anyway, as if it were a conspiracy. Their combined arrogance is complete. I know. It happened to me in Oregon. IN OREGON, DON’T DRIVE IN YOUR VEHICLE ALONE. If you want to know why, read the posts on: facebook.com/garydonoliver. That is the reason cops don’t want to be filmed. It cuts into their take from theft, and exposes their level of insanity.

Make it a federal crime for a peace officer to seriously interfer with the execution of any first ammendment right.

This would qualify.

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 10737 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.