Like Mother Like Daughter: Laurie Simmons Passes Reality-Bending Legacy to Girls Star

<< Previous | Next >>
LS_Day30-meeting-

Day 30/Day 2 (Meeting)

Photo: Laurie Simmons


<< Previous | Next >>

Laurie Simmons’ daughter, Lena Dunham, has recently been thrown into the spotlight with the success of her new HBO series, Girls, but Simmons herself has been a well-known New York photographer for over 30 years. Both women seem to enjoy blurring fact and fiction, with viewers of Simmons’ work wondering if what they’re seeing is real or simulated, and viewers of Girls questioning how much of the show is from Dunham’s own biography.

Much of Simmons’ work has involved shooting small figurines in dollhouse scenes meant to resemble, or at least comment on, real life. Simmons says the work was originally designed as a way to challenge the perception that photography always tells the truth.

“My concern was to tell the most realistic lie I could,” she says.

As for Dunham, she takes her mother’s notion of a “realistic lie” and runs with it in her own work. The title of Dunham’s first feature-length movie, Tiny Furniture, which she both wrote and starred in, was inspired by Simmons’ dollhouse photography. In it, Dunham plays a character, Aura, who is a recent college grad living at home and trying to make it as a writer in New York, all of which was true of Dunham at the time. Upping the reality stakes, Dunham casted Simmons as Aura’s mom (who is a photographer) and her real life sister as Aura’s sister in the movie. The film is even shot in the family’s actual apartment in New York.

In the movie Simmons plays a cold and severe mom, which she says is not the case in real life.

“That wasn’t me,” Simmons says. “Those were just lines that Siri [the character] read.”

The biggest difference between the movie and the real world, says Simmons, is that unlike the movie where it is just a house full of women, their family also includes a dad — the painter Carroll Dunham.

“The really huge difference is that there is a very present father, a very involved father,” says Simmons. “The house is also a lot messier and there is a dog.”

Girls takes a different angle on the struggling-writer-in-New-York theme, but still makes one wonder about how much the real-life Dunham represents Hannah, the character she plays on the show. The most surprisingly true parallel to Tiny Furniture is that, like in the movie, Dunham, 26, lived at home up until a couple of weeks ago. Even though she is a growing television star she just recently found her own place in Brooklyn.

“I think it’s time, but I would have never complained [about her living at home],” says Simmons. “I really am crazy about her.”

Simmons’ most recent body of work uses a life-size Japanese sex doll as her newest model. Instead of dollhouses, Simmons has been photographing this figure in the real world and the work inches even closer to that line between true and false she’s been skirting for years.

“I realized that I could take this doll and put it into the landscape and suddenly I was on scale with everything else,” Simmons says. “It was like the entire rest of the world got unlocked. After 25 years or whatever it was of shooting on table tops it was a dream come true.”

The series, which is called The Love Doll, blurs the line so closely that Simmons says a crowd of visitors at the work’s first opening in Paris believed the doll in the photos was a real person.

“I’ve taken this to a really different place and people were quite confused,” she says.

While Dunham’s writing is gaining mainstream attention, Simmons’ work has had a far-reaching impact mostly in the world of art and photography. Barbara DeGenevieve, the chair of the Department of Photography at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, says she has long admired Simmons’ work both for the way it’s examined gender but also in the way that it’s been so consistent over the years. By using dolls as her subject throughout her career, DeGenevieve says that Simmons in many ways created a unique niche that could never be filled any other way.

“She was a revelation because she was able to do with dolls these things that might in some ways would have been cliché if she worked with real people,” DeGenevieve says. “That’s what’s nice about working with inanimate objects, you can make them do things that are metaphorical and symbolic, things that you would never ask a human to do.”

DeGenevieve says she’s also fascinated with the dynamic between Simmons and Dunham and credits Simmons for helping her daughter build a successful career. Growing up around a photographer and a painter exposed Dunham to two people who were willing to struggle and prioritize their work and she also saw the ebb and flow of the art world.

“You have to take a lot of shit as an artist, and you can’t really hide it from the kids when things aren’t going well,” Simmons says. “This show didn’t sell so therefore you can’t go to camp. [Lena] understood that there are peaks and valleys.”

That’s been useful because while receiving a fair amount of praise from some, Dunham’s show Girls has also been criticized by others. Some critics have called it out for having an air of privilege because it’s about a group of fairly well-to-do young white women. Mostly, however, the show has garnered a lot of attention for Dunham’s unique way of filming and thinking about sex, body image and female sexuality.

Dunhman, who is not as skinny as your cliché Hollywood actress, is not afraid to put her body out there, nor is she afraid to tackle the weird intimacies of what happens in the bedroom between consenting partners.

“It certainly hasn’t emerged quietly,” Simmons says.

Simmons admits to keeping tabs on her daughter’s reviews — she has a Google alert set up — but says she’s not worried about Dunham’s ability to handle the pressure.

“Lena has a really healthy body image and healthy sense of who she is and I’m really proud of that as a mother,” Simmons says. “You don’t have to be a Hollywood starlet to express yourself.”

The Pocket Camera Moment

ts_essayrevphone_f

Photographs taken with an iPhone 4S.
Photo: Brent Humprheys

“Any school-boy or girl can make good pictures,” declared an Eastman Kodak ad for the Brownie box camera soon after it launched in February 1900. It was an astonishing claim, given the unwieldy equipment, arcane chemistry, and extravagant expense of 19th-century photography. Sold for a dollar and preloaded with film, George Eastman’s ultra-portable, one-button cardboard shooter could hardly match professional rigs in image quality, but by sponsoring contests, starting clubs, and charging just pennies for prints, Eastman nurtured something else: photography as a social activity.

Eastman sold 150,000 Brownies in the first year. Within a decade nearly a third of Americans owned a camera, and even those who didn’t could not avoid the “Kodak freaks” who toted their Brownies everywhere and traded snapshots for their scrapbooks. The mania only intensified when Kodak introduced a folding pocket model that could print photos directly onto penny postcards. (More than 677 million postcards were mailed in 1907 alone.) By transforming how people engaged with photography, Eastman transformed how they engaged with one another. Shared experiences no longer had to be experienced together.

We’re in the midst of another Brownie moment. Yes, we’ve had cell phone cameras for years, and they can’t compete with DSLRs on f-stops and focal lengths. But, as with the Brownie, image quality is secondary to the social nexus. Always at hand, an iPhone camera is easy to use unobtrusively, and apps such as Instagram and Hipstamatic facilitate effortless sharing of images, automatically optimized as eye candy.

Instagram in particular is on fire. The free app doubled its audience to 27 million users in the first three months of 2012, and that was before the Android version. And before it was purchased by Facebook for a cool billion. Pre-Instagram, you could text a photo or email it from your smartphone and eventually post it on Flickr, but that all took effort. Instagram has made sharing compulsively easy.

Not only is Instagram a full-fledged social network—with users sharing and commenting on one another’s images—but you can post on other networks like Twitter, where photos are becoming as important as text as a mode of communication. “Pictures are the quickest way to grasp information,” says Wikimedia Foundation researcher and avid Instagrammer Parul Vora. “There’s a reason our brains have evolved to be more than 30 percent visual cortex.”

The 17 preprogrammed Instagram filters are the secret sauce, cleverly designed to distract the eye from amateur compositional defects by exaggerating color saturation or introducing flare. “The human desire to get noticed is now very much connected to the technological capacity to make something noticeable,” says Andrew Clarke, head of strategy at ad agency Butler, Shine, Stern & Partners, where he’s currently orchestrating the US relaunch of Nokia. Filters can make mediocre shots look good and good shots look great, which helps engage strangers. More important, filters alter the mood, visually adding layers of meaning. (The ’70s Instamatic color gamut exudes nostalgia—even for people born in 1993.) You’re sharing not just what you see but also how you feel about it, a crucial element of visual communication previously accessible only to pros with pricey equipment.

On assignment in Afghanistan to document the troops’ daily life, New York Times photographer Damon Winter observed the ubiquity of smartphone photography among the soldiers—so he chose to take pictures with Hipstamatic on his iPhone. Unencumbered by a DSLR, he was able to make social connections with the enlisted men and capture more casual, unguarded moments. His choice was validated when a series of these images was awarded third prize by Pictures of the Year International in February.

Hipstamatic was just a onetime tool for Winter. But the convenience of iPhonography has proven decisive for reporters like the Times‘ Ashley Parker, who supplements her writing on the presidential campaign by posting pics to Instagram. Through these channels, breaking news is folded into the social life of Instagrammers, adding to the communal experience shared at a distance—another upshot of George Eastman’s vision.

His company ultimately lost that innovative streak. In 1975 a Kodak engineer named Steve Sasson built the world’s first portable digital camera by cobbling together parts scavenged from a Super-8 and a cassette player. Baffled colleagues asked, “Why would you want to look at photos on a TV?” A company that once led a visual revolution got stuck in the status quo and today stands for nostalgia: An app developer called Taplayer now offers a filter that makes digital pics look like they were shot with a Brownie.


The Euthanization and Funeral of a Navy Destroyer

<< Previous | Next >>
Stephen_Mallon_1

Photo: Stephen Mallon


<< Previous | Next >>

On August 10 of last year, the USS Arthur W. Radford was dragged 26 miles off the coast of New Jersey by a tugboat. Her valves were then opened and water was allowed to seep in. As she was pulled lower by the weight of the incoming water, special holes cut in the hull of the ship also started to fill, speeding the process.

Over nearly four hours, the 563-foot Navy destroyer – the longest ship ever sunk on the East Coast – was slowly submerged in the ocean water while the demo crew looked on.

Photographer Stephen Mallon went along for the ride with the contractors, American Marine Group, to document the ship’s final voyage. For Mallon, who never outgrew his childhood fascination with big trucks, airplanes and demolition equipment, it was a dream come true.

“I still get chills from the smell of airplane fuel,” says Mallon, who is probably most famous for his behind-the-scenes photos of US Airways Flight 1549 being hauled from the icy Hudson river after it made an emergency landing.

Currently Mallon has an exhibit of the USS Radford photos in Williamsburg, New York. The photos chronicle all steps of retiring the ship, including the cleaning and stripping of the boat — a process heavily monitored by a series of organizations including the Environmental Protection Agency and the Coast Guard.

Mallon takes us into the ship’s guts as it is cleaned and prepped and we come across relics of time past like graffiti scrawled on the walls by sailors who were on one or more of the ship’s 10 world-wide deployments. There is a stark loneliness to the picture of the Radford being pulled out to its grave by a lone tugboat, calling up images in some ways of a mini funeral procession.

The USS Radford went into service in 1977, but was decommissioned in 2003. These types of ships were built with thinner steel to be more maneuverable and so they have to be removed from service due to metal fatigue and normal wear and tear.

Radford had been cannibalized for parts and would’ve been headed to the scrap heap if the states of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey, along with the Navy, hadn’t stepped in to give her a more purposeful fate. She now rests 120-130 feet underwater where she serves as an artificial reef. The State of Delaware says studies have shown that artificial reefs create an environment that is up to 400 times richer in food sources than the normal ocean bottom. This helps the sea life but also attracts people who want to fish and dive in this flourishing sea environment.

The photos are part of Mallon’s larger long-term project called “American Reclamation” which chronicles the recycling industry in the United States. Mallon, who calls himself a “concerned photographer,” says he wanted to dig into the back story of this process which often happens out of sight.

“It’s a conversation that people are having all the time, a conversation about how effective it is,” he says.

During the series Mallon has looked at how everything from cement to computers are recycled, but the most famous part of project to date is a series of photos that chronicle how old New York City subways cars are cleaned and dumped into the ocean as another way to form artificial reefs.

Currently Mallon is working on his next series of photos but says he can’t reveal the details just yet. He does promise, however, that, like his previous work, it won’t disappoint.

“This one is going to be even bigger and historic than the last,” he says.

Instagram Camera Concept Lets You Share Photos in Meatspace

Instagram could be headed for a meta implosion of ironic proportions. First there were cheap plastic cameras and Polaroids that people thought were cool, but seemed to take crappy photos, so they fell out of use and popularity. Then everyone had cameras on their phones but their photos looked really crappy. So Instagram made phone photos look intentionally crappy by emulating the photos of the old, cheap cameras.

Now we’re back where we started as Instagram could potentially be made into a camera itself.

At the moment it’s just an idea, but the Socialmatic camera proposes to turn the clocks back on the digital Instagram revolution by making a device that takes those cool, retro-looking photos and actually prints them on paper instantly.

“People want to feel more reality, I think we are going to be bored of total virtuality,” says project founder and Italian marketing consultant, Antonio De Rosa.

The Socialmatic is not De Rosa’s first product idea, and while it seems like a good one, it will be very difficult to pull off, even with funding. There are no real specs for how the hardware would work or how it would be built. For now it’s just a cool mock-up and an idea. De Rosa also wanted to make an iWatch and an iCam but says neither of those came to fruition.

To make the project a reality, De Rosa is running an Indiegogo campaign that is just getting off the ground. He’s trying to raise $50,000 to create the first prototype that he could shop around and hopefully use to secure a manufacturer that would mass produce the device.

Or, De Rosa says, he hopes the Indiegogo campaign might also attract enough attention to actually get Instagram, and now their owner, Facebook, interested.

Getting these giants to buy in is actually his first choice because there are still a lot of tricky issues to work out — like how his camera is going to create photos that mimic those on Instagram. And at the moment De Rosa’s virtual camera mock-up directly borrows from the Instagram design, which he knows will have to change if he doesn’t get their backing.

“Maybe in this time, with the IPO, Zuck and co. can have the need to have something ‘real’ in their hands,” he says.

Today there are plenty of apps that help you print your Instagram photos. But unlike those programs — where you often have to wait for your photos to be printed and mailed to you — Socialmatic creates instant gratification – like a Polaroid for Instagram.

“Instagram is a first step, making photo and share it. But is this enough?” De Rosa asks. “I want to have real emotion. I want to have real colors.”

De Rosa says that the Socialmatic camera doesn’t completely turn its back on the virtual aspects of its inspirational app. Along with the camera he’s also proposed to create an app that would allow people to post their Socialmatic photos on Instagram and elsewhere online via the camera’s WiFi or Bluetooth connection.

De Rosa also takes Instagram’s social media prowess seriously and says each analog photo created by the camera would be printed with a QR code that could be used to identify the photo’s creator. Say for instance you came across a cool Socialmatic photo hanging at a coffee shop. All you would have to do is snap a photo of the QR code with your mobile phone to identify and start following the user who shot it.

When Shooting Food, It’s Really All About the People

<< Previous | Next >>
Enchiladas

Three generations of women in the Enriquezes family gather and cook the family recipe for enchiladas suizos.

Photo: Penny De Los Santos


<< Previous | Next >>

Penny De Los Santos is one of the world’s premier culinary photographers, and while her exotic food photos will make your mouth water, they’re also a gateway to the larger bond that food creates across all cultures.

“I realized that through the avenue of food there was this whole entire storyline that I had never though about but quickly realized was incredibly amazing,” says De Los Santos, 42, who is based in New York City.

For seven years now, De Los Santos has been traveling the globe shooting food and the people who make and enjoy it. Her photos have a depth that goes beyond just plates and ingredients; they capture the stories and moments around one of life’s necessities.

When she was fresh out of graduate school, De Los Santos won a prestigious internship with National Geographic magazine that helped launch her photojournalism career. For years she covered more traditional photojournalism stories as a freelancer that she says explored everything that is “weird, fucked-up and wonderful” in the world.

Then one day she got a call from Larry Nighswander, a former editor of hers from National Geographic who was then at the food magazine Saveur. He wanted to send her to cover a story about some of the last icehouses (local coolers where locals meet for beer and food) in Texas. Not knowing how to photograph “food,” she tentatively said yes.

“He said don’t worry too much about it, just focus on what you do know about photography,” she says. “He told me to do the same things I normally do to cover a story but to do it around food scenarios this time.”

Scared to death, De Los Santos said she shot the hell out of it to try and ensure she delivered what Nighswander wanted. She shot the food and the beer, but also tried to give a sense of place, relying on the storytelling techniques she was used to as a photojournalist.

A month passed and all of a sudden she got another call from Nighswander, this time asking her to travel to Peru.

“He was like, ‘It’s the same thing this time, look for moments, look for light, tell a story and keep an eye out for the food,’” she says.

Peru is where things finally clicked. Wandering through the rich markets of this South American country, she figured out that she’d found what in many ways was a magic door and a new way to enter people’s lives and create compelling photography.

“I was like, ‘Shit, this is an untapped market and I really, really like it,’” she says. “I haven’t looked back since.”

De Los Santos has been to more than 35 countries for Saveur alone, but her work isn’t all glamorous globetrotting. To pay the bills she does quite a bit of advertising and cookbook work. She’s had to work hard to master the art of shooting actual food, which takes a lot of styling and relies on good lighting.

Today she says she is just as particular about the plates of food as she is about the people who make and enjoy them. She often works with a food and prop stylist and she isn’t afraid to ask things to be re-plated, or re-cooked until it looks perfect.

“It’s the same principals of great photography,” she says. “Even though it doesn’t move,  food still has a moment.”