The biting behavior of the orb web spider, Nephila clavata.

Aug. 2,2005. M.Sekine

The orb web spider, Nephila clavata, bites its prey before it wraps up its prey in silk, because it has as little silk for wrapping up its prey as the genera Tetragnatha and Cyrtarachne. (Shinkai, E. and Takano, S., 1987. Kumo Kihon 50. [translation: The Fifty Basic Spiders.] Shinrin-Shobo,Tokyo. ) Some nature books for children explain that this spider takes aim and bites the head or the thorax of its prey entirely in the first instance. (Oda, H. and Nanba, Y., 1999. Ami o Haru Kumo Kansatsu Jiten.[translation: Observations on the Weaving of Spider Webs.] Kaiseisha,Tokyo.) This explanation sounds plausible. Can that be true?
I threw the two-spotted cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus, (with a length from 23mm to 25mm) into the spider's web. Then I observed how the female Nephila clavata (a length from 20mm to 30mm), located in the upper part of its web, made a dash for the cricket and bit the cricket before it wrapped up its prey. I did this on 66 separate incidences on Oct. 31, Nov. 3, Nov. 14 and Nov. 21, 2004 in Nara Prefecture.
When I threw each cricket into the spider's web, the cricket was attached to the web at different angles. Then the cricket floundered in the web, so the cricket often faced downwards.
Also, on 6 occasions the crickets were located with its head facing upwards. In these cases, the first bite of the spider was mostly on the head of its prey. In 83% of instances this occurred. Also, on 8 other occasions the cricket's heads faced sideways. Finally in 52 instances, the cricket's heads faced downwards. In these cases, the first bite of the spider on the thorax, abdomen, wings or legs occurred at an almost equal rate. (See Fig.2, Fig.3) It suggests that the spider bites the near part of the cricket, i.e. the head, thorax, abdomen, wings or legs in the first instance.
When the spider bit the head or the thorax of its prey for the first time, the spider wrapped up its prey immediately. Regarding the head, it occurred 80% of the time. But with the thorax, it occurred 100% of the time. (See fig.1) But, if the first bite of the spider was not on the head or the thorax of the prey, the spider tried to bite it again. More often than not it was to the thorax. (See Fig.4) After the second bite at the thorax, the spider wrapped up its prey immediately. (See Fig.1)
On whichever parts of the prey the spider bit for the first time, if the prey didn't get weakened and still struggled, the spider might try to bite the nearby part of its prey again. I suppose that the second bite of the spider is at the thorax as a natural result, because the thorax is the middle part of insects' body. Perhaps, when the spider bites the head or the thorax of its prey, the venom, which the spider injects into its prey, has an effect on its prey. I suppose that the spider injects the venom into the nearby part of the nervous systems of insects.
Another interesting point is that, viewed as a percentage, the spider wrapped up its prey immediately when the first bite was on the wings or legs 23% of the time. Perhaps, the spider bit the base of wings, so it had the same effect on its prey as on the thorax.
In conclusion, when the cricket is caught in a spider's web, the female Nephila clavata bites the near part of the cricket, i.e. the head, thorax, abdomen, wings or legs in the first instance. If the first bite of the spider is not on the head or the thorax of its prey, the spider tries to bite it again. More often than not it is to the thorax.
In addition, one case was observed in which the spider bit at the tip of the abdomen of its prey and the next bite was at the anterior part of the abdomen, and the cricket escaped. Also, one case was observed in which the spider bit the leg off its prey and the cricket escaped. In the other case, the spider wrapped up its prey immediately without biting it. Perhaps, in the latter case, the prey was small and weakened, so it was not necessary for the spider to bite its prey.

The relationship between which parts of its prey the spider bit and the subsequent action of the spider.

Fig.1 The relationship between which parts of its prey the spider bit and the subsequent action of the spider.

A pie graph on which part of the prey the spider bit in the first instance. (n=65)

Fig.2 A pie graph on which part of the prey the spider bit in the first instance. (n=65)

The correlation between the position of the prey and on which part of the prey the spider bit in the first instance. (n=65)

Fig.3 The correlation between the position of the prey and on which part of the prey the spider bit in the first instance. (n=65)

The comparison between the part of the prey re the first bite and the second bite of the spider when the spider didn't wrap up its prey after the first bite.

Fig.4 The comparison between the part of the prey re the first bite and the second bite of the spider when the spider didn't wrap up its prey after the first bite.

See Also:Wikipedia Deutsch

RETURN

1