News

3

Gaikai months away from full-game streaming

Gaikai founder David Perry has revealed that the cloud gaming service is ready to go live with full games, not just the demos it currently hosts, within months.

Facebook remains the company's initial focus, with the service's launch on the social network imminent, but games will subsequently spread to other websites such as YouTube, Best Buy and those belonging to publishers such as Electronic Arts and Ubisoft.

In an interview with Gamesindustry.biz, Perry said that full-game streaming will be live "about three months from when Facebook launches, about 90 days from that."

Adding: "If you give me your game today I can put your game in front of more than 100 million people, easily. Quite honestly if we put you on the homepage of YouTube right now on it's own, you're already hitting that number."

Perry also commented on cloud gaming competitor OnLive, which already offers full games through its online service, MicroConsole and Android app.

"There's a very big difference between the way we're doing it and the way OnLive is doing it. They have to modify the game, they have to get the source code to the game. Gaikai doesn't require modification of the game.

"To give you an example The Witcher II was given to us and them at the same time. We went live with Witcher II immediately and now four or five months later they still don't have that live, and that's because they have to touch the code. The whole structure of Gaikai is about not touching the code. When we show World Of Warcraft it's the real thing, it's not like we had to go and tweak it to get it to work. That means that every game in history remains compatible with our solution."

Earlier in the month, Gaikai's chief product officer suggested that one of the current console makers would bow out of the hardware race at this year's E3, leading to speculation that Gaikai may be set to partner with a company in order to offer a cloud solution. Perry warns against underestimating the importance of cloud to gaming's future.

"You do not want to be the console that can't do this. You do not want to be the retail website that doesn't have playable games on it. You don't want to be the gaming website that you can't buy a game from," he said.

"[Console manufacturers] have got to take it seriously because it's better for consumers. I would play a lot more games if I fired up my Xbox, clicked on a game and it started playing straight away. I don't want to take your console from your cold dead hands, that's not the case at all.

"You're going to continue to play the way you play, but just imagine that you could have an opinion on all games because you've been able to try all of them. Each evening, flick through four or five games that just came out."

Source: Gamesindustry.biz

Comments

3
Shenzakai's picture

What about all the ppl with insufficient internet connections? What if my service provider gotten into trouble with the line to my house or when it was damaged by some street workers? What if the publisher decides to remove a specific game from the catalogue? OnLive and Gaikai are willing to take the games out of our hands under the curtain of comfortability. I want to decide when and where I play my games, without being tied to an online provider or even if I'm offline. I don't like these services and in my opinion that is not the future of gaming!
Hope that the three big players will stay focused on consoles at your home instead of this streaming thing...

mesonw's picture

I agree with Shenzy above. Keep focused on gaming without lag, and without internet dependency.
I have seen OnLive gaming and it suffers terribly from lag. Granted it comes down to a different experience for everyone depending upon connection, but the mere possibility of a game lagging your input by up to a second or more is unacceptable. The infrastructure in the UK cannot work with this kind of system... even streaming films isn't ubiquitous or totally free of quality and delay issues yet, and they can be buffered.

jb1's picture

Edge - Why are you giving Dave Perry a platform for (presumably) free advertising?

Maybe instead you should fix the terrible web site redesign, in case you haven't noticed the site has died since you deployed it.