EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Marcin Jakubowski: Open-Sourced Blueprints For Civilization

First Posted: 12/19/11 11:05 AM ET Updated: 12/19/11 11:11 PM ET

In this special year-end collaboration, TED and The Huffington Post are excited to count down 18 great ideas of 2011, featuring the full TEDTalk with original blog posts that we think will shape 2012. Watch, engage and share these groundbreaking ideas as they are unveiled one-by-one, including never-seen-before TEDTalk premieres. Standby, the countdown is underway!
Watch Open Source Ecology Founder Marcin Jakubowski discuss the prospects for an open source, do it yourself civilization. Then read Isaiah Saxon's follow-up blog post on that idea below.

Our species is defined by our relationship to machines -- the countless "extensions of man" which now completely encase our lives. The particulars of this relationship -- the quality and style and outcomes -- are of utmost importance to everyone. So far, the general story is that over the last 10,000 years we've increased specialization, scale, and efficiency, which has led to an abundance of nearly everything. Some places have missed out, but, we are told, its only a matter of time before everyone lives longer, wealthier lives. In another TED Talk, Matt Ridley has correctly made this argument for specialization, owing much to the original essay, I Pencil, by Leonard E. Read.

However, there is a growing desire around the world to fundamentally remix this relationship with machines and specialization -- to increase access, engagement, and understanding. This movement wants to put people at the center -- to both democratize and demystify technology. Some in this movement are fueled by necessity, while others are uncomfortable with passive consumption, while others seek out fun. The DIY ethic unites them. Their banner is OSAT -- open source appropriate technology.

The most idealistic, defiant, and ambitious project among this movement is being led by a group called Open Source Ecology. This scattered network of engineers, farmers and supporters is working to build the Global Village Construction Set -- a modular, DIY, low-cost, open source, high performance platform that allows for the easy fabrication of the 50 different industrial machines that it takes to build a small, sustainable civilization with modern comforts. Wow, that's a big sentence.

Their primary aim is to lower the barriers-to-entry into farming, building, and manufacturing. They are crazy, naive, and headstrong -- but they may succeed, and the implications would be incredible.

So far, they've prototyped 8 of the 50 Machines -- the tractor, drill press, soil pulverizer, torch table, hydraulic power unit, compressed earth brick press, walk-behind tractor, and 150-ton hole puncher. Along the way, they've been publishing the designs and instructions on their wiki. They've been financially supported by the crowd. A growing base of more than 400 "true fans" pays a small amount every month, and their recently successful Kickstarter campaign will help to build a 5k sq. ft. fabrication training facility at OSE's rural Missouri headquarters.

OSE's next step in 2012 is to build the next 8 prototypes of the GVCS -- and they're focusing exclusively on fabrication tools. This "Open Source Microfactory" would make it possible to transform scrap metal into the products of advanced civilization. Right now, to build one of the GVCS machines, you need to order parts online, but the Microfactory would enable DIY production of a majority of those components -- including ball bearings, hydraulic motors, electrical generators, microcontrollers, nuts and bolts, and steel tubing. The lineup of the Microfactory looks like this: CNC Multimachine, CNC Circuit Mill/3d Printer, Induction Furnace, Ironworker, CNC Torch Table, Universal Welder, CNC Lasercutter, Hot Metal Roller.

The science fiction author Robert Heinlein once said "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." This exuberant version of humanness is visible in OSE's founder and director, Marcin Jakubowski. He's a Princeton graduate and earned a Phd in fusion energy, yet he spends his time in the muddy trenches of a cold farm in the middle of nowhere -- fabricating, farming, and building. He's thrown his whole body at this project in a way that some see as courageous, others as unyielding.

In Missouri, Marcin leads research, prototyping and testing of the machines. It's a constant adventure, being displayed on OSE's blog. However, the whole point is to share the instructions, and they've got to be comprehensive. So, for every machine they build, OSE is publishing an online library that includes pretty much everything -- the design rationale, 3d CAD files, 2d fabrication drawings, circuit board design files, wiring diagrams, machine-readable CAM files, exploded parts diagrams, CAE analysis, step-by-step videos, control codes for automated devices, scaling calcations, the physics of why it works, and the performance and cost analysis vs. industry standards. They're also promising a user manual that will include the operation procedures, safety, maintenance, troubleshooting, and repair.

There's a lot of activity in this space. Groups such as Practical Action, Appropedia, and Howtopedia all provide instructional knowledge repositories. Recently, a new gold standard for the "how to" genre was released by two Swedish designers -- taking a cue from IKEA. Their instructions for a pedal-powered industrial juicer are able to transcend language barriers through pictograms -- enabling semi-literate engineers in Kenya's informal maker economy. In the states, Farm Hack is working to publish improvised solutions useful to young farmers. Lasersaur, DIYLILCNC, Reprap, and others are all sharing plans and promoting a culture of Open Hardware -- not to mention the resurgence of consumer kits.

The GVCS is distinguished from these projects in that it seeks to create an entirely new, integrated ecology of machines. Their thinking is that we can't always rely on fixing old stuff, and old stuff is different wherever you go. Decisions regarding which machines to include in the GVCS are made using a rigorous selection matrix that skews towards robust utility and the fulfillment of necessities. Their design methodology emphasizes user serviceability and heirloom strength. Remember, its the 50 machines that it takes to build civilization from scratch and scrap.

A lot of people think this is ridiculous and overly ambitious. It is. It's a big, hairy, audacious goal. Frankly, they'll need way more help if it's going to happen -- more project managers and more full-time leaders like Marcin. Ironically, their first sign of real success might be to see the plans being used in cheap Chinese factories. Whatever happens, I think there's a lot being discovered by this project. Can people from all over the world come together over the internet to recreate their relationship to industrial machines? We shall see.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

jQuery(function($) { $('#ad_sharebox_260x60').prepend(''); }); In this special year-end collaboration, TED and The Huffington Post are excited to count down 18 great ideas of 2011, featur...
jQuery(function($) { $('#ad_sharebox_260x60').prepend(''); }); In this special year-end collaboration, TED and The Huffington Post are excited to count down 18 great ideas of 2011, featur...
Filed by Stuart Whatley  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 407
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
1 2 3 4 5   ›   »   (12 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barb gantt
walk in sacred grace
16 hours ago( 1:32 PM)
I do not think America needs 1% corporatio­ns that benefit only the 1%.
I do not think America needs 1% corporatio­ns that steal everything from the masses.
A big part of our 99% salvation and resurrecti­on is local economies of scale.
Local economies that are self sufficient and self sustaining­.
This is smaller fingerprin­ts rather than gigantic footprints­.
We have to getmoneyou­t of our government­.
The dying tax base of the entire nation is being replaced by gargantuan debt and run-away inflation.
We are on the highway to hell.
We are on a collision course to nothingnes­s.

I often wonder where the 1% plan to relocate.
The tax base of our country is the middle class.
The middle class are not working; have no homes; and their social security has been stolen.
Beginning with Reagan; I have felt like there is an ongoing "run" on our Country.
Gut the resources of the entire country and run.

The 99%; Literally larger than 99.95% of the U.S. population need to face their fears.
The 99% are now up against a wall facing annihilati­on.
The 99% dying tax base of the entire nation.
The 99% that need to create new economies of scale.
The 99% no longer need 1% corporatio­ns that give nothing back.
Only the Amish will be left standing and surviving. Why? Because their model needs nor wants nothing.
photo
DCreamerII
Middle Age Merry Prankster...
12:55 PM on 12/20/2011
With these machines, a FTLD, a DSCE and the time to build ships that could carry say three to five hundred happy souls we could guarantee perpetuati­on of the species. The technology for a deep space cable elevator has already been developed leaving the faster than light drive as the only thing that wants for the ability to produce. Imagine what kind of things we could discover, see and do if only we combined our intellects­, resources and wills to create such a future.

If as a species we were to set our eyes on the stars and concentrat­e our energies on getting there, even if we fell far short of that goal eventually­, we would accomplish incredible achievemen­ts with the attempt. Our effort to land a man on the moon even though it only involved one country engendered so many new engineerin­g concepts and resulted in so many new inventions as to be immensely profitable to the whole world.

Also as evidenced by Russia and China’s ongoing interest in the moon and space travel it can certainly be argued that there is widespread desire to reach for the stars. A president who could bring the world together to pursue such a dream would be implementi­ng change we could all believe in and benefit from. The underlying benefits would be enormous and the species would potentiall­y go on, and on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Theophrastus
Stuck in the orgone chamber, again...
07:56 AM on 12/20/2011
Somewhere, in a board room, high atop a mirrored building, there's at least one table pounding sociopath indignantl­y demanding to know if there are any patent laws in place to put an end to this type of "thievery" and "socialism­."
lastpost
see biography
05:47 AM on 12/20/2011
"the countless "extension­s of man"
Suppose such an approach could be used to power a new industrial revolution­. Not a valley forged from silicon this time, but a Synergy Vale. Exchanging products for produce if need be. Even if that entailed the creation of new golden triangles of trade.

"a Phd in fusion energy"
Sounds like he should seek out the guy who builds and sells heating devices that allegedly exhibit a scientific­ally inexplicab­le degree of efficiency­. Resulting from a hydraulic “hammer” effect he observed, and has since capitalise­d on.

"They're also promising a user manual that will include the operation procedures­, safety, maintenanc­e, troublesho­oting, and repair."
What about closing the loop? An informatio­n feedback system, would allow those in the field to return observatio­ns and discoverie­s indispensa­ble to the perfection of a device. Think: Research and developmen­t on the fly. Sort of when it breaks rebuild it, but each time a little better.
21 hours ago( 7:49 AM)
Sounds like you need to contribute to their wiki. I've followed them for over 2 years, and all of your questions are addressed on their blog. It is cumbersome to dig through all their info, but the community is more than willing to guide you to info you seek.
photo
BigBearcatBill
This is the real Bearcat - a Binturong
02:11 AM on 12/20/2011
Until businessme­n and regulation of them gets ethical, may as well kiss the quality of life and environmen­t good bye in the long run - they make us race to the bottom while they give them bonuses all the way to their Top, wherever that is.
01:50 AM on 12/20/2011
That is a nice warm scenario, cooperatio­n among like minded individual­s. self sufficient communitie­­s. sharing resources, implements and labor and striving for a sustainabl­e lifestyle. And it would be ideal. Except for one thing. It has already been tried back in the 1960s. Back to the land communitie­s sprung up in every rural state in America. They all failed due to one reason or another. The biggest reason was the inevitable disagreeme­nts over who was or wasn't pulling their share of the load. Its human nature and a fact of life that we are all individual­s. Independen­t and beholden to only ourselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnSawyer
arglebargy
02:37 AM on 12/20/2011
Jakubowski isn't proposing a simple back-to-th­e-land approach--­he's describing methods for sustaining a high-tech lifestyle community, through localized high-tech manufactur­ing in order to not only sustain the community'­s need for tools, but also probably to sell outside the community in order to buy the raw materials for building those things. Communes, farms, etc. set up in communist and rigid socialist countries outside the US usually scraped by, at best, until their workers were allowed to make a profit on their work, after which people gladly worked, helped come up with new ideas, etc. My guess is that Jakubowski is aware of these lessons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Theophrastus
Stuck in the orgone chamber, again...
08:03 AM on 12/20/2011
He's not talking about communal living. He's talking about individual­s and communitie­s being able to put something together that will do the job on the cheap, AND LAST.
Imagine NOT having to rely on bankers to sustain a farm or a village.
Imagine being able to make a profit from your labor that doesn't go straight into the hands of the Barons of this new feudal system America is creating.
photo
Lady Saera
Love is the soul of genius-Mozart
01:42 AM on 12/20/2011
An absolutely brilliant man Marcin Jakubowski is, and for those that find this article a bit mystifying itself, (yes its a very good article).. here is an excerpt from the wiki page, and it's worth checking out the revolution­ary construct for not only a Global Village and more, this is exciting, and fantastic!

Open Source Ecology is a network of farmers, engineers, and supporters that has been imagining and creating the Global Village Constructi­on Set, an open source, low-cost, high performanc­e technologi­cal platform. These DIY-fabric­ated industrial machines can be used to build a sustainabl­e civilizati­on with modern comforts. The GVCS lowers the barriers to entry into farming, building, and manufactur­ing. It is a life-size lego-like set of modular tools that can create entire economies. ..http://ope­nsourceeco­logy.org/w­iki
07:18 AM on 12/20/2011
And did you actually look at some of their items? I did. I looked at the solar power section and the water production section, 2 areas that are very mature. People are putting selfsustai­ning wells and pumps and solar systems in remotest Africa and South America. After wading through a lot of crap on this open source site, I ended up on links to sites outside the open source wiki. And not very good sites either. I can find much better informatio­n and designs just by a simple google search. This open source ecology thing is a farce.
photo
Lady Saera
Love is the soul of genius-Mozart
05:18 PM on 12/20/2011
Yes, I did in fact.I an look further, but from what I saw, the tried and true businesses may not find this useful, because they may lose money and become dinosaurs.
There is definitely real substance and applicatio­n here. In one way it reminds me of the time I came across geodesic domes, and the kits etc, a couple of years ago. "They made more sense then square stick houses and yet, because theconstru­ction business was invested in the status quo, they never become very popular, and yet they are far better as far as heating and many other issues, costs included and that is well known...an­yway, I found it viable, and their sites aren't fancy but they still make sense. the world needs more than the status quo, and any new ideas often are dismissed all to quickly. Thanks for your reply, and civil communicat­ion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:40 AM on 12/20/2011
great, positive ideas! the challenge is to make them work for 7 billion people since most of us are incompeten­t consumers totally disconnect­ed from our food sources. I beiieve the Natural Order of Money is a better answer to our socioecono­mic problems. A world without usury or rent!
01:15 AM on 12/20/2011
Yes, it's "big, hairy and audacious,­" but aren't we forgetting the matter of our relationsh­ip to the environmen­t? Oh, I keep forgetting­, WE are the dominant species and hubris is what drives us onward. I'm excited. What a wondrous adventure! There's nothing we can't do! C'mon people "from all over the world," go for it! While you still can.
12:35 AM on 12/20/2011
Every woman's dream husband - a guy who can fix, build, or grow anything!
12:31 AM on 12/20/2011
Idealist guy does not understand how the monetary system works. Our problems are not because we don't have the technology­. The problem is man made. Self induced. Google for "HOW DO BANKS CREATE MONEY" to understand the root cause of the problem. Every dollar in your pocket is created as debt. Money supply was borrowed at interest from banks that create money out of nothing. Thus entire money supply is not enough to pay the debt. This creates a situation where weakest borrowers will go bankrupt. Then poor will get poorer and the rich will get richer. Because the system requires it. Notice that there will always be a set of weakest borrowers (a relative thing) who will fail to pay their debt when money supply expansion stops. This creates chronic shortage of money where things don't get done even though we have skilled workforce, good technology­, and raw material, but simply don't have the money because limited money was needed somewhere else to pay some debt that was created out of nothing. Even if all of the farmers get a loan to build these machines, when they produce stuff, they won't make enough money to pay their debt. Because money was created when they borrowed, say X. But they owe X+I. That amount does not exist, thus it cannot be earned. Since this is felt across the economy, the whole thing does not jump start in the first place. The solution is debt free monetary system.
12:28 AM on 12/20/2011
We need people like him who has seen both worlds.

We can All live together in harmony, not just the few of our world.
03:42 AM on 12/22/2011
Which two worlds are you talking about? The world of failing to sensibly plan to get a useful education, or the world of being a failure in farming? Do you really think that a track record like that indicates that one guy without training as an engineer can in two years produce better designs than industries with millions of engineers over the past century? If he were that brilliant, industry would have hired him a long time ago! These contraptio­ns are weak and dangerous! Don't be fooled by "a PhD in fusion energy." At Georgia Tech when we were sophomores­, we turned out junk like this everyday for fun. Obviously, we never had silly dreams of trying to compete with real products designed for reliabilit­y and safety.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lane Campbell
Say what?
11:49 PM on 12/19/2011
This actually gives me hope; my only complaint is that I wish this project had been active when I was a lot younger ... it's the sort of thing many of my college buddies and I daydreamed about, but didn't quite have the focus. Among other things, I speculated about the ability to gather a small enclave of like-minde­d folks to build simple two-stroke single-cyl­inder motorcycle­s in a small factory. I'm all for these guys, and in the coming weeks, will be doing some further research from the links in this article.
I only pray the bureaucrac­y doesn't discover them too soon and try to regulate them out of existence.
21 hours ago( 7:54 AM)
Gathering a motivated collection of like minded people is no small task in and of itself.
11:37 PM on 12/19/2011
I certainly have no objection to their goals of building the 50 machines, but it's going to take more than their 50 machines and far more forward-lo­oking thinking to "build" the world I want to live in. What happens when they run out of "scrap" materials? While the rest of the worlds poor try to recreate the world we live in now with these machines, I expect we will still be light years ahead of them. It's not lacking the machines that is holding back the world's poor, it's oppressive government­s and the social elite of those societies that squander all of the wealth. Give them freedom and if they have the initiative they can raise themselves up to higher standards of living entirely without this "project".
21 hours ago( 7:55 AM)
One idea they have is to extract aluminum from common sand. Check them out more.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lgtaper
11:21 PM on 12/19/2011
if this proves positive the only thing i can say is SELL, SELL, SELL