• Filter the conversation
All posts Watched posts
Click Here

Stay Connected with UrbanBaby:

Inside UrbanBaby

UrbanBabyBuzz

jack-ek.JPGEnjoy some classic snow stories with your children this holiday season with newly released anniversary editions. The Snowy Day: 50th Anniversary Edition by Ezra Jack In his 1962 Caldecott Medal winning book, Ezra Jack Keats introduced us to ... More »

UrbanBabyNewYork

new-yearsfireworks.jpgHappy New Year! VisitHappy 2012 at CMOMKids can stop by on Saturday to create colorful noise makers and add their wishes to the museum’s mural.When: Sat. 12/31, 10am-12pm & 1-4pm; All ages; Free with museum admission.Where: Children&# ... More »
  • [-]Would you guys be okay with letting your infant suckle at the father’s nipple? Not for feeding purposes, but just to calm the baby down?

    12 replies [ Reply | Watch | More
    01.02.12, 09:12 AM Flag ]
    • Nope. What guy would do this?

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.02.12, 09:13 AM Flag
    • No, give the baby a pacifier.

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.02.12, 09:14 AM Flag
    • it's inappropriate

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.02.12, 09:15 AM Flag
    • no

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.02.12, 09:15 AM Flag
    • this has to be the stupid post of the day

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.02.12, 09:16 AM Flag
    • My DH would never allow that and he wears baby wraps outside. All 3 of our DC's have tried to nurse from him much to his chagrin, he promptly went out and purchased a pacifier, and all went well when Mommy was not home.

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.02.12, 09:23 AM Flag
      • I posted above asking what guy would do this. My first got DH once when he was wearing no shirt - he learned never to carry a newborn w/ no shirt! I just can't think of a normal man sitting there and allowing a DB to suck on him.

        [ Reply | More ]
        01.02.12, 09:35 AM Flag
        • Well it wouldn't harm the baby, and it wouldn't harm the father. If it calms the baby and creates a bonding moment between the father and child, what would be wrong with this?

          [ Reply | More ]
          01.02.12, 09:43 AM Flag
          • No one said it would harm the baby just that most men would not do it, and there are plenty of other ways to soothe & bond with the baby.

            [ Reply | More ]
            01.02.12, 09:54 AM Flag
          • A pacifier will calm the baby. I think it's pretty clear by the reaction here that I'd worry about a man who thought this was okay. Way too creepy for me - but whatever floats your boat...

            [ Reply | More ]
            01.02.12, 10:38 AM Flag
    • I don't really see how it's inappropriate, But it would make me uncomfortable. I don't see a logical reason for being uncomfortable, but I wouldn't do it.

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.02.12, 09:44 AM Flag
    • Gay Uncle here. Weird and creepy. Now if your DH would let ME suckle at his nipple, that would be hot.

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.02.12, 10:44 AM Flag
  • [-]Hi. First-time poster here. I just had a baby a couple months ago and am sort of on the prowl for some mom friends. I live on the (upper) Upper West Side, am a SAHM but all I see are nannies up here. When I do see moms, often they're quite a bit older than me -- I'm 26 -- or with older kids. Does anyone have any recommendations for making mom friends without being creepy or trolling Central Park? Are there any good mom groups for the UWS like there are for downtown or Park Slope? TIA.

    22 replies [ Reply | Watch | More
    • just curious -- are you against becoming friends with moms who are older than you? not sure why you'd mention your age.

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.27.09, 12:51 PM Flag
      • not the OP, but she didnt make it sound like she was against the idea - she was saying she was 26 and has one kmid. very different than the moms who are "quite a bit older..." AND OR have "older kids." nothing against older moms or older kids, but she just seems like she wants to make friends with people in her own "social niche" right now!

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.27.09, 12:56 PM Flag
      • np- because it's relevant. 26 is young for a nyc mom and I'm sure that has made it harder to meet other moms, especially because those in her own age/peer group do not have kids yet. Don't be so defensive OR!

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.27.09, 12:58 PM Flag
        • nnp. she sounds needy and weird.

          [ Reply | More ]
          10.27.09, 01:21 PM Flag
        • I am also in my twenties, and it is hard to make mom friends because a lot of older moms mistake you for a nanny or think that they would have nothing to talk about with you. Usually it gets better if your kids are in school together, because you find you have things in common (after they realize that you are, indeed, a mom). But I definitely think the age thing can make things tough.

          [ Reply | More ]
          10.27.09, 02:13 PM Flag
          • Eh. I am in my 30's and have befriended moms in their 40's and even 50's. I just don't care. We are all in it together as far as I am concerned.

            [ Reply | More ]
            10.27.09, 02:15 PM Flag
          • I had my first at 24yo in NYC in residency. The age issue is huge even if it shouldn't be. I have always felt out of place. Peers still out partying and meeting men. Moms in NYC who are professional/wohm are generally much older. My oldest is now 9yo and I have still yet to meet another mom at school or in my job who has similar age dc. It creates a natural gap before you even begin and making new friends is hard enough on its own.

            [ Reply | More ]
            10.27.09, 03:34 PM Flag
          • this is so true. i can tell the nannies in particular don't really know what to make of me. when i do see another new mom, we never get past "how old is your baby? aw." i'm not really interested enough in making friends yet to ask, "do you want to be my friend?" not sure how to take it to next level!!

            [ Reply | More ]
            10.28.09, 12:40 AM Flag
    • try discovery center, the playgrounds obviously, st. john the divine

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.27.09, 12:54 PM Flag
    • OP IDK how much of a help Ill be, we left the UWS last year for a house in brooklyn after our second child was born. But when I was a new mom to my first, I met moms all over! central park is hard with an infant, i felt like that only works once kids are playing and interacting. We are Orthodox Jewish. I met moms at the JCC, and at Synagogue alot. That worked for me. good luck :)

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.27.09, 12:58 PM Flag
    • The Prenatal Yoga Center has new mom groups that run for 8 weeks. I joined one and loved it! Take a look at it.

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.27.09, 01:12 PM Flag
      • I agree this was awesome although -SIGN UP ASAP!

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.27.09, 01:16 PM Flag
    • OP here! Thanks for responses! And thanks for standing up for me to snotty OR. haha. Definitely not against older friends, just would enjoy someone in a similar place as I'm in. I feel silly about going to a playground at this point, since my baby can barely hold his head up. Are moms on UWS friendly/open to making new friends? (Forgive the generalization.)

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.27.09, 01:15 PM Flag
      • I think if you are friendly, most are. Definitely do Pre Natal Yoga ctr moms group it is AWESOME and still in touch with friends from here and dd is 19mos. It can be tough when db is too young for classes (which unfortunately, are often lots of nannies on the UWS). Definitely sign up for emails from Babybitesnyc.com and Big city Moms, made several friends here and it is all first time moms with newborns. They both hold weekly events.

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.27.09, 01:18 PM Flag
      • no. they're not open to making new friends at all.

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.27.09, 01:22 PM Flag
      • IME most moms of new babies are eager to make friends. see if you can find a new mom group maybe at the Y or jcc. or your pediatricians office might even have some recommendations.

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.27.09, 01:29 PM Flag
        • I agree with this totally. No matter what our age we are desperate not to be alone in this! As an aside, I'm 39 and am often surprised at how young my parent friends are. I see them as equals b/c we're going through the same kid stage at the same time. If you're the younger party you may notice the age gap more than the older party would. But I can understand how it may be a concern for you.

          [ Reply | More ]
          10.27.09, 01:45 PM Flag
          • OP here. Glad to hear that. I don't mean to make age a concern - I really don't care. I just haven't had to make new friends (outside of school or work) since, I don't know, childhood?

            [ Reply | More ]
            10.27.09, 02:03 PM Flag
    • When I had a newborn I used to walk across the park to go to a Mommy and Me group at the 92nd street Y.

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.27.09, 01:53 PM Flag
    • OP here. Love the Prenatal Yoga Center suggestion. Will also check out Big city moms, etc. Thanks so much.

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.27.09, 01:58 PM Flag
    • See if there is a BabybitesNYC group that you can get to. I met all my mom friends there (UES) when I first moved to NY. GL

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.27.09, 02:01 PM Flag
    • The First Time Upper West side Moms meetup group is amazing. There are a lot of nice moms and they have tons of events.

      [ Reply | More ]
      12.18.11, 01:02 AM Flag
  • [-]did anyone else find their husband so annoying after having a baby?

    10 replies [ Reply | Watch | More
    10.06.11, 06:33 PM Flag ]
    • Hells yes. And my cat, too.

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.06.11, 06:37 PM Flag
      • Lol! My dog was a pain in the ass, always wanting to go on walk.

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.06.11, 06:43 PM Flag
      • Oh my god, the damn cat! Ugh me too. DH I like.

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.06.11, 06:57 PM Flag
    • I hate to even think of that time!

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.06.11, 06:43 PM Flag
      • OP- that's good to know... I love my baby but I'm wondering why the hell did I have one with him!

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.06.11, 06:53 PM Flag
        • Me too! What's annoying about yours?

          [ Reply | More ]
          10.06.11, 07:04 PM Flag
    • Very much. I felt like he was the most useless person in the world for a few months. It should pass.

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.06.11, 07:08 PM Flag
      • haha. I just gave birth recently and I thought I turned into a royal bitch b/c everything my husband did annoyed me and I blamed him for everything. I can't wait until my hormones calm down.

        [ Reply | More ]
        12.16.11, 03:16 PM Flag
    • Yes, and it never got better for me. We are separated now heading toward divorce. He is still annoying!!

      [ Reply | More ]
      10.06.11, 07:10 PM Flag
      • How old was DB when you split? I don't think we will make it

        [ Reply | More ]
        10.06.11, 07:13 PM Flag
  • [-]I am a working mom and I will be moving to Staten Island, NY after Christmas with my 11 week old son. Can anyone recommend a good daycare center?

    5 replies [ Reply | Watch | More
    12.16.11, 07:54 AM Flag ]
    • roflmao-- Staten Island? working mom needing daycare? This is UB. Not laughing at your situation but at your assumption that these women lead non- insulated lives. The most rousing debates on here are about nannies, private schools, and wohm vs. sahm(of course their version of wohm means a mom whose a partner in big law or an exec somewhere...certainly not any career position where something as "lowbrow" as day care [the general belief on this board, not mine] would be a concern)

      [ Reply | More ]
      12.16.11, 09:10 AM Flag
      • I was not aware...I only joined this forum today in the hope of getting helpful advice from other parents in/near the city since I'm not familiar with the area. I didn't realize it was an inappropriate question for the audience...

        [ Reply | More ]
        12.16.11, 11:12 AM Flag
    • what part of Staten Island, are you close to Saint George or farther out?

      [ Reply | More ]
      12.16.11, 09:54 AM Flag
      • I'll be in Heartland Village area...but I'm ok with stretching the radius if it means a more reputable daycare.

        [ Reply | More ]
        12.16.11, 11:08 AM Flag
        • We are closer to Clove Lake - I would check out Richmond Hill Children's Center - see if you like it.

          [ Reply | More ]
          12.16.11, 01:01 PM Flag
  • [-]DH moved to guestroom since 3 mo. old DS' crib is in master. DH doesn't want wake up at night,. and guestroom faces street - too noisy for baby plus too small for me to share with him. I plan keep baby with me at night for at least 1 yr. Now DH is moving clothes out of our bedroom since he wakes the baby by trying to get dressed early in the am or past bedtime (long work hours). Is this a really bad idea?

    37 replies [ Reply | Watch | More
    06.21.11, 08:29 PM Flag ]
    • If you ever want to have sex again, and a healthy relationship...

      [ Reply | More ]
      06.21.11, 08:29 PM Flag
      • Seriously. BTDT. It's a slippery slope, and one that led to my DH and I now being sexless for over 4 years.

        [ Reply | More ]
        06.21.11, 08:32 PM Flag
      • ita

        [ Reply | More ]
        06.21.11, 08:32 PM Flag
      • Get a white noise machine to help baby sleep through street noise. They help a lot! Here's one from Amazon http://www.amazon.com/MARPAC-SleepMate-Electro-Mechanical-Machine-Sleeping/dp/tags-on-product/B002GTR902 Don't get the Graco one because it isn't loud enough even at full volume. There are two Marpac versions, spend the extra for the one with volume adjustment. And to answer your original question, however you all survive these early stages is however you do it. We went to our separate rooms with #1 and then moved back into the same bed when we thought it would work. Same with number two. On weekend nights, we sleep together and it's like a honeymoon. Absence makes the body grow fonder...

        [ Reply | More ]
        06.22.11, 05:44 AM Flag
    • You don't need the baby with you after 3 months. Best to get DB used to sleeping in the crib - move DB to guest room now and save your marriage.

      [ Reply | More ]
      06.21.11, 08:32 PM Flag
    • by 6 months my db was doing a feeding around 10/11pm and then sleeping for several hours until about 6 am. You have to have a plan, and stick to it.

      [ Reply | More ]
      06.21.11, 08:37 PM Flag
    • put baby in the other room, he/she will get used to the noise - sleep with husband alone

      [ Reply | More ]
      06.21.11, 08:40 PM Flag
    • Bad Idea. AFter 3 mos move DB to other room, I agree he will learn to sleep with noise. You don't want to start sleeping apart from your husband especially not for a whole year! Recipe for unhappy marriage.

      [ Reply | More ]
      06.21.11, 08:42 PM Flag
      • Having DB inb room with me for a year is not something I'm willing to compromise on. I'd never get a wink of sleep if he was in another room where I couldn't check on him easily, etc. If anything I think DH can stay in room with us, and if DS doesn't STTN so be it, we both get up. I work too but DH dumped night duty on me and moved to guest room.

        [ Reply | More ]
        06.21.11, 08:53 PM Flag
        • Np: then what's the question?

          [ Reply | More ]
          06.21.11, 08:57 PM Flag
          • Hmm. Suppose question is how bad will this be for my marriage? Maybe I will consider moving DB to other room as suggested but at 6 mo. Right now I just couldn't.

            [ Reply | More ]
            06.21.11, 09:05 PM Flag
            • db is only 3 mos, there will be many things you think you are *not willing to compromise on* that you may change your mind about. Personally we all slept better with db in the crib, in her own room, with a monitor turned on high.

              [ Reply | More ]
              06.21.11, 09:14 PM Flag
              • yup. or you can get a light and sound monitor that flashes a bright light if there is noise from db's room. honestly, op. you need to get over this anxiety or you'll be crippled by it

                [ Reply | More ]
                06.22.11, 05:46 AM Flag
            • you are substituting love for your husband with this misplaced overanxiety for your new baby. seek help. seriously. it's bad for your marriage and bad for your own mental health.

              [ Reply | More ]
              06.22.11, 05:45 AM Flag
            • Create a co-sleeping area next to your side of the bed for thee baby. If it wakes to nurse, you can role over and nurse her almost in your sleep, you and DH and can have sex in guest room.

              [ Reply | More ]
              06.22.11, 11:31 AM Flag
        • NP: Honestly you should try it for a few nights. If I had my choice, I'd have my kids in the bed until college (or they wanted to leave - which I realize would be much earlier) -- but DH was not for the co-sleeping (afraid of rolling over on DB). So happy now that they both just go to bed at 8 and wake up at 7. Sometimes what we think we want isn't best - I'm not the type of person to be open to doing something differently when I have it in my head - but I've learned from my DH that it's okay to give and take a bit and I can't tell him I'm not going to "CIO" unless I try it first. Well - what do you know? When I try it for a week (with a 10 min. max) I end up w/ a kid who just goes to sleep on his own w/ no drama.

          [ Reply | More ]
          06.21.11, 09:07 PM Flag
        • I have 2 DCs and I co-slept with each of them until they were 3-4 months old, b/c I was nursing, etc. DB and I slept in guest room. After that time, DB went into crib and I went back in with my husband. I used a monitor and heard every sigh and rustle, but DB will learn to sleep better on their own and trust me when they get more mobile sleeping with DCs is NOT restful. I know you can't imagine leaving your DB but you can and you should. Your marriage will pay the price if you don't bend on this point.

          [ Reply | More ]
          06.21.11, 09:07 PM Flag
          • OP - I figured this may be the case. Maybe a year is too long, will have to mentally prepare myself to move him sooner. Not what I wanted to hear but thanks for the reality check I supppose.

            [ Reply | More ]
            06.21.11, 09:14 PM Flag
            • OR- I know how you feel and I think many moms feel this way. You can't imagine not being with him at this point. Just trust me that you are doing both yourself and your DB a great service by learning to sleep well independently. GL!

              [ Reply | More ]
              06.21.11, 09:23 PM Flag
              • This was my experience soon - before you know it DB sleeps *better* in the crib.

                [ Reply | More ]
                12.14.11, 06:36 PM Flag
        • NNP: It sounds to me like you need to relax about DB a bit - if you couldn't sleep at all without worrying that DB is ok. Did your DH decide to move his clothes to the guestroom or was it because you complained that he was waking DB when he came in the room?

          [ Reply | More ]
          06.21.11, 09:13 PM Flag
          • LOL of course bc I complained.

            [ Reply | More ]
            06.21.11, 09:15 PM Flag
            • This is not good. You are definitely setting yourself up for issues here. Your husband needs to feel like he and his needs are a priority, not just the baby. Give him his room back. DB WILL get used to the noise in the guestroom.

              [ Reply | More ]
              06.22.11, 05:27 AM Flag
        • My kids still sleep between me and DH at 4 and 6, and yes it's a problem, we don't get much chance to have sex. But that's not the point of my response.. I was going to say how about getting a sound and movement monitor, you can hear DB and the alarm will go off if DB stops breathing or pad detects no breathing (this happens occasinally, db is just breathing very shallowly)

          [ Reply | More ]
          06.21.11, 09:13 PM Flag
          • Without a doubt I'd get that. Right now I'm that crazy FTM who's checking on him 5x / night w. the light from my iPhone. DH was beyond annoyed when he was in the room with us.

            [ Reply | More ]
            06.21.11, 09:18 PM Flag
            • omg - no wonder your husband moved out of the room

              [ Reply | More ]
              06.22.11, 05:28 AM Flag
          • OMG - you DO NOT need a sound and motion monitor or to check him w/ your iphone light. GO TO SLEEP woman - most especially since you work. Sorry for the caps - I know you're just a nervous FTM - but you need to learn to relax. DB is already 3 mos. no need for a motion monitor unless DB has serious medical concerns. I would suggest putting DB in the guest room w/ no monitor. Believe me - when DB needs you, you'll hear him/her. It's the best thing you can do for your DB and for your marriage. They don't need you hovering 5x a night now, or at all in a few years.

            [ Reply | More ]
            06.21.11, 09:56 PM Flag
            • I disagree, SIDS can happen to a perfectly healthy baby with non-smoking parents, with safe mattress and crib. Just get the monitor op then you can sleep at night.

              [ Reply | More ]
              06.21.11, 09:59 PM Flag
              • Sids is most likely to happen with infant sleeping in separate room.

                [ Reply | More ]
                06.22.11, 06:50 AM Flag
        • I'm a little more concerned about the husband "dumping" the baby on mom at night - that seems to be the tension here more than the baby being in the room.

          [ Reply | More ]
          10.10.11, 04:22 PM Flag
    • I was about to post that there's nothing wrong with this idea, I slept in room with DB bec I was sah for a year and dh started a new job (after being unemployed for a long time) shortly before DB was born. Worked great. But then I remembered that we have a lousy sex life. Never connected the dots.

      [ Reply | More ]
      06.21.11, 09:00 PM Flag
    • Your baby is only 3 months old. 3 months old still need a lot of care at night. I could have never survived breastfeeding etc if i was in between two rooms multiple time a night. Listen to your instincts and your body. You need to put your babies needs and your own first right now.

      [ Reply | More ]
      06.22.11, 06:49 AM Flag
      • ^^^ but let him keep his clothes in his room. :)

        [ Reply | More ]
        06.22.11, 06:52 AM Flag
    • Yes it's a bad idea! And don't worry about noise waking your baby. Babies can and do (if given half a chance) learn to sleep even in very noisy environments. Both my children and my granddaughter learned to sleep with us playing loud music and talking in the next room. DH and now DS, DD & her DH are all musicians.

      [ Reply | More ]
      06.22.11, 11:22 AM Flag
    • A little off the topic at hand, but just please be careful when breastfeeding in bed. I found it difficult to stay awake, and there is a very real risk of suffocating the baby, even without rolling over onto it. After a close call once, I decided going into the room was safer because it forced me to sit up in the rocker, which was safer for baby. Maybe this would help address your original question too?? GL.

      [ Reply | More ]
      06.22.11, 11:22 AM Flag
      • The co-sleeping area for our DB was a mattress pushed against ours only 4 inches lower. when I was donned nursing I pushed DB over the edge back onto his bed. I never rolled over or fell asleep on him and yet never had to wake fully up and get out of bed. Also if he stirred I could just reach over and pat him w/o getting up.

        [ Reply | More ]
        06.23.11, 10:04 AM Flag
  • [-]I'm decorating ds's nursery and want to paint a quote on the wall...something about love, or baby boy's, something sweet or even cutesy...does anyone have any ideas? favorite quotes that might work? please help- i've been googling quotes online for an hour and am going crazy!!

    35 replies [ Reply | Watch | More
    • This is tacky. Don't do it.

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 06:30 PM Flag
    • blech. That said, check etsy

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 06:30 PM Flag
      • ^for wall decals...

        [ Reply | More ]
        11.30.09, 06:30 PM Flag
      • what's etsy? people would really think it's tacky?

        [ Reply | More ]
        11.30.09, 06:31 PM Flag
        • etsy.com. And yes, super tacky

          [ Reply | More ]
          11.30.09, 06:32 PM Flag
          • do you mind explaining why? i'm the kind of person who tends to find many things tacky, but i'm not really understanding why this would be. i appreciate your honest opinion.

            [ Reply | More ]
            11.30.09, 06:33 PM Flag
            • Seems very contrived and cheesy. I can't explain it much more than that.

              [ Reply | More ]
              11.30.09, 06:33 PM Flag
              • Tacky bec it is absolutely not for db but for whomever comes into his room who is able to read and recognize where quote is from, so probably not most young children. Db nursery should be for him.

                [ Reply | More ]
                11.30.09, 06:38 PM Flag
                • op here, ok, this i actually agree with myself. what about an inital monogram? isn't that good for db so he can see his letters and begin to familiarize himself with them?

                  [ Reply | More ]
                  11.30.09, 06:48 PM Flag
    • maybe a lyric from "Beautiful Boy" by John Lennon???

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 06:30 PM Flag
      • that song isnt really cutesey, even though I might use " Life is what happens to you when your busy making other plans"

        [ Reply | More ]
        12.01.09, 10:13 AM Flag
    • I would do something that you can get framed and hang it on the wall.

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 06:34 PM Flag
      • I like this idea more!

        [ Reply | More ]
        11.30.09, 07:27 PM Flag
    • I don't love this decor idea, but Golden Slumbers by the Beatles is my favorite song. "Golden slumbers fill your eyes, Smiles awake you when you rise, sleep pretty darling, do not cry, I will sing a lullabye...." You can't go wrong with the Beatles.

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 06:34 PM Flag
      • wow....i'm rethinking this now....does ANYONE not think it's cheesy??

        [ Reply | More ]
        11.30.09, 06:36 PM Flag
        • it's your audience. most moms here are battle-scarred. you need a site that's more new moms- I'm sure they would show more enthusiasm.

          [ Reply | More ]
          11.30.09, 06:41 PM Flag
          • ha. I'm a new mom of a 2mth old girl ad would NEVER think to do this!

            [ Reply | More ]
            11.30.09, 06:42 PM Flag
        • I think it could be nice. And I definitely don't go for the cutsey stuff. I think it would help if you made the font a bit modern or edgy or un-cutsey, if that makes sense? Don't use cursive or gold or flowy stuff - that will cheese it up, big time.

          [ Reply | More ]
          11.30.09, 07:46 PM Flag
    • I like the frame idea also - this way you could easily change it or take it down vs. having to repaint the whole wall/room.....

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 06:42 PM Flag
    • I don't think it's cheesy at all. When my dd gets to be a little older I plan on doing this. I want a quote from Mother Theresa as a reminder of how to live her life. She said "We can do no great things with small love, only small things with great love." Have always loved that quote and would love dd to understand that it is so important.

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 06:50 PM Flag
      • op again, see...i think that's really sweet? especially if it's something meaningful...maybe it is better for an older child.

        [ Reply | More ]
        11.30.09, 06:52 PM Flag
    • Huge Peter Pan freak here: "So come with me, where dreams are born, and time is never planned. Just think of happy things, and your heart will fly on wings, forever, in Never Never Land!"

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 07:15 PM Flag
      • Isn't that Kenny Loggins?

        [ Reply | More ]
        11.30.09, 07:48 PM Flag
    • Put it in a frame, or on a cushion. Or you will be repainting room pretty soon.

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 07:16 PM Flag
    • i think it's not tacky, but more cheesy because you're trying to get other people to be like 'awwww'..maybe you could have it in a picture frame or something? but on a wall..yeah it's cheesy

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 08:48 PM Flag
    • The major motion picture aside, I've always loved, "Let the wild rumpus start!"

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.30.09, 08:59 PM Flag
      • I don't think it's cheesy, I think it's inspired. I want to go upstairs right now and paint "Be the change you want to see in the world." on the walls of my kid's room. Words are powerful and beautiful. Nothing wrong with using them to decorate.

        [ Reply | More ]
        12.01.09, 06:27 AM Flag
      • ITTTTTA.... I did a 'Where the Wild Things' mural with that quote are in my DS nursery 7 years ago....

        [ Reply | More ]
        12.01.09, 10:15 AM Flag
    • How about "Shit happens"?

      [ Reply | More ]
      12.01.09, 08:49 AM Flag
    • I think Metalica makes really good children's room quotes "Sleep with one eye open, clutching the pillow tight".

      [ Reply | More ]
      12.01.09, 09:20 AM Flag
      • I'm thinking of some Morrissey quotes that would be fabulous..."and you leave on your own...and you go home and you cry and you want to die."

        [ Reply | More ]
        12.01.09, 09:36 AM Flag
        • Boy with a thorn in his side, behind the hatred there lies a murderous desire!"

          [ Reply | More ]
          12.01.09, 11:23 AM Flag
    • [ Removed by moderator ] [ More ]
      12.05.11, 10:29 PM
    • I had a giant poster in my room as a child that said "War is not healthy for children and other living things."

      [ Reply | More ]
      12.06.11, 05:45 AM Flag
  • [-]BEST MOHELS FOR A BRIS IN LONG ISLAND OR NEW YORK CITY???

    15 replies [ Reply | Watch | More
    01.21.09, 05:26 PM Flag ]
    • please do a search. it's been discussed.

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.21.09, 05:27 PM Flag
      • We just attended the most unique and wonderful bris ever. The mohel was Dr. Rick Roberts (TheRoyalMohel.com).

        [ Reply | More ]
        11.24.11, 11:01 AM Flag
        • He was warm, extremely friendly and very professional. The ceremony was different from any other bris we have attended. We took his business card and will be using him for our son's bris.

          [ Reply | More ]
          11.24.11, 11:10 AM Flag
    • Dr. Eric Diamond was great! Baby didn't cry. He arrived an hour early to set up and even called us the next day. We were very pleased with him. We have heard horror stories about other circumcisions from friends so we made sure to get a MOHEL who is also a UROLOGIST. We were very happy with him.

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.21.09, 05:29 PM Flag
    • Used Dr. Diamond. was happy with the results.

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.21.09, 05:30 PM Flag
    • hey, dr. d, stop self-promoting

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.21.09, 05:31 PM Flag
      • a happy customer, not dr. d. He just did my sons bris and wouldnt take a dime from us because my husband just lost his job. thought it was the least I could do since im up all night with a baby anyway. was very happy with him, and so was my sister who used him last year for my nephews bris.

        [ Reply | More ]
        01.21.09, 06:11 PM Flag
        • What is the least you could do? Post a fake question, so you can answer it and say something nice about your doctor?

          [ Reply | More ]
          12.06.09, 09:01 PM Flag
          • NP: Jeeze could you be nastier?

            [ Reply | More ]
            11.08.10, 06:27 PM Flag
    • By far the highest recommended Mohel in New York - and real professional, is Rabbi Friedman of NYmohel-dot-com He has many letters of recommendations on his website. He is very popular - so you must book him early.

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.23.09, 08:31 AM Flag
    • We used Dr. Rick Roberts (TheRoyalMohel.com). He was great!!!

      [ Reply | More ]
      12.06.09, 08:58 PM Flag
      • Very accomodating.....Very patient!!..answered all of our questions before and after the ceremony.

        [ Reply | More ]
        11.06.10, 02:03 PM Flag
    • We used Dr.Jeffrey Mazlin, a New York OB/GYN Reform Mohel. We also used him again for our second son! We couldn't be happier! His website is www.NYMohelMD.com.

      [ Reply | More ]
      01.14.10, 11:10 AM Flag
    • zimmerman just did our sons bris, very happy with results... in brooklyn

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.08.10, 06:13 PM Flag
    • For our ceremony, we went with Dr. Steven Sherwin. Very professional and personable, would recommend to others, stevensherwinmd.com.

      [ Reply | More ]
      08.09.11, 07:48 AM Flag
  • [-]39 weeks and the baby is predicted to be over 9 pounds at birth (based on multiple scans and stomach size). My Doctors are recommending a c-section at 40 weeks (or about 3 days before I am due). I don't want to risk baby getting stuck, having shoulder issues etc. but also don't want to "jump the gun" in what's sometimes c-section happy nyc. My ultrasounds were done with Eddleman/Stone - anyone found the weights quoted accurate or significantly under? Any advice?

    58 replies [ Reply | Watch | More
    03.04.10, 03:27 PM Flag ]
    • I had weekly sonograms for low fluid issue and then due to gestational diabetes (to watch for

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:00 PM Flag
      • for big baby syndrome). Last sonogram said that dd was 7lbs. Birth weight ...5 lbs 12 oz. Was shocked and then was told that sonograms could be plus or minus a pound. I'm not suggesting you don't follow your doc's advice (had a friend who had your reco, she pushed for vaginal and pushed and pushed and wound up with an emergency c), but just thought you know that the weight is not accurate all the time.

        [ Reply | More ]
        03.04.10, 04:02 PM Flag
        • Thanks - that's what I am concerned about - feels like all stories I ever hear was that the baby ended up being UNDER not at or over what they thought.

          [ Reply | More ]
          03.04.10, 04:05 PM Flag
    • dr told me i was carrying a 8.5 pounder around 34 weeks and to watch it not gain much more... ds was 7. 10

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:03 PM Flag
    • Those scans are often way off. Is this your first? If I were you, I'd be OK with being induced a little early but would try to have the baby vaginally. I gave birth to a ten pounder and one close to 10 pounds, and both births were vaginal and went fine. If you fail to progress, they'll do a c-section anyway. By the way, my scans indicated both my babies would be 6.5 to 7 pounds. Also, the birth weight often correlates to the mother's birth weight. If you were a big baby, chances are better that you'll also have a big baby. Good luck!!!

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:05 PM Flag
      • Yes first. And I was pretty big 8 pounds 11 ounces I think.

        [ Reply | More ]
        03.04.10, 04:08 PM Flag
    • Yes, I have found the ultrasounds weights to always be inaccurate. My babies were sometimes bigger than anticipated and sometimes smaller than anticipated.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:06 PM Flag
    • My peri was very accurate. I was late and my baby flipped forward and I couldn't get her out - so I had to have the entire labor, then the C which was the worst - and my epi didn't work. Nightnmare. Wish I had a scheduled C

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:12 PM Flag
    • I wouldn't get a C-section unless you need to. I ended up having to have a section because the head was too big but honestly, I wouldn't elect to have one in a million years! The recovery sucks

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:16 PM Flag
      • I think that's the problem - what does "need" to mean you know? I'd tend to agree. But then have Dr.'s saying its probably better. I'm sure I'll go through and the baby will come out 7 pounds.

        [ Reply | More ]
        03.04.10, 04:35 PM Flag
        • Drs say that you "need" it because it's easier for them for you to have a c-section. If you don't have any other problems, ie. gestational diabetes, there is no danger in you trying to go natural or give birth vaginally.

          [ Reply | More ]
          03.04.10, 05:59 PM Flag
    • US predicted 8lb baby, surprised when she came out 6lb 4 oz.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:17 PM Flag
      • ditto. predicted 8.25 and was 6lb 7oz

        [ Reply | More ]
        03.05.10, 06:47 AM Flag
    • Wow. It was the complete opposite for me. My sonogram predicted that dd would be around 4lbs and my doctor complain that my stomach was measuring much smaller than it was supposed to. But dd was 7lbs and change! So they can be wrong both ways.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:34 PM Flag
    • my MIL is an ultrasound tech and she says its not accurate with a 20% error margin.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:51 PM Flag
    • Hm, would they maybe induce you now vs. scheduling a C? I am not sure about this but I did give birth vaginally to a 9 lb 2 oz baby (he was measuring at about 8 lbs?) and it was totally fine (um, with an epidural). Recovery also fine, but he was my 2nd and 1st was 6 lbs and change....

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 04:55 PM Flag
    • My baby was supposed to be over 10, and they wanted to schedule a C-section... he turned out to be 8 lbs! Thank goodness he came before they could schedule the section.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 05:05 PM Flag
    • Sorry, your drs are looking to schedule their vacation and not be interrupted. Those size things are very inaccurate. They told me #1 was going to over 8lbs, but was 6lb 6oz.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 05:10 PM Flag
    • My baby was 2 lbs less than they predicted.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 05:14 PM Flag
    • It depends. My OBs both were surprised at the US measurement, but in palpitating my abdomen felt that the baby would be big (both times). Just over 9+ lbs both times. I was told that if you are a taller/bigger woman and you measure big, that it is more likely that the baby will be big, versus a smaller woman.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 05:16 PM Flag
    • Why not try to labor on your own? If baby doesn't come out you do a section. At least you will have tried. You may regret if you don't, especially if the baby turns out to be smaller than measured on the us.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 05:55 PM Flag
      • NR. emergency c-sections are worse than planned ones, based on everything I've read. but I could be wrong.

        [ Reply | More ]
        03.04.10, 06:51 PM Flag
        • OB RN mom here. You should def try to labor. Sonos are a really inaccurate way to estimate fetal weight. Most MD's aren't super skilled at estimating by feel either. Midwives are much better at it because they don't rely on sonos. Unless you're diabetic, there's no reason you would grow a baby that is "too big" to push out. Also, even if you ended up with a c-section after a trial of labor, it would likely not be an emergency c-section. People use that term much too loosely. Trust your body's ability to birth vaginally. You'll be fine.

          [ Reply | More ]
          03.05.10, 06:36 AM Flag
          • eddleman is the exception to the rule--he is super skilled

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.28.10, 07:59 AM Flag
    • FWIW, plenty of OBs (including traditional, mainstream docs that delivered my 3 DC, all over 9lbs) would not recommend a c-section on this basis. This is really a judgment call on your OB's part, not a medical necessity.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 06:28 PM Flag
    • That sounds crazy to try to schedule a c/s just for size as opposed to inducing. With my first my dr tried to do that bc she was measuring large and I'm pretty thin but I said no way and dd was born 9 lbs 10oz. I did have to have an episiotomy and tore but it's better than an induction or c/s and I did it with no drugs. This time (36 wks) my new doc is estimating at least 10 pounds with ds but does not suggest a c/s. She is willing to induce a week early (which I don't want) but I don't get why any dr wouldn't at least let a woman try to birth naturally and only turn to c/s if medically necessary.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 06:30 PM Flag
    • I agree with other posters in that ultrasounds can be inaccurated--I've known them to be off by 2 lbs (over, not under) and also a 9lb baby does not mean a csection! I've had three babies over 9 lbs--one nearly 10 lbs--and they were surprisingly easy deliveries. And I am not a big woman, I have small hips, etc. I know that it might not be the case for you, but don't assume that just b/c a baby is big doesn't mean it can't come out the normal way. Drs recommend csecs in these cases b/c they don't want to be liable, which is understandable, but do consider all your options.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 06:34 PM Flag
    • I heard this from my midwife(without the c-section part).That baby was gorgeous, just under 7lbs and the placenta was supersized. I don't know how much I believe projected birth weight estimates, even with imaging; every womb is its own Universe.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 06:49 PM Flag
      • and ita w/poster above:If all is in typical progress, there's little chance your body can't well accommodate your baby's grand entrance(or exit...).

        [ Reply | More ]
        03.04.10, 06:52 PM Flag
    • mine were significantly under with stone. i found they were really inaccurate and even recommended an induction which, fortunately, didn't have to happen.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.04.10, 06:54 PM Flag
    • Get the c-section. At 40 weeks I was ENORMOUS and they predicted a 9+lber. The baby was, in fact, 8lbs 7oz. A scheduled C was a great decision.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.05.10, 03:54 AM Flag
      • Sorry, I mean 8lbs 12oz (his bday is 8/7, duh).

        [ Reply | More ]
        03.05.10, 03:56 AM Flag
    • The guess weights are notoriously inaccurate, and they usually err on the larger side (baby is usually much less heavy than predicted). I think it's strange that your doctors are recommending a C-section solely because they *think* that the baby *might* be over 9 pounds. Assuming that that is their only reason, I would just wait for labor to begin naturally.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.05.10, 06:18 AM Flag
    • Around 40 wks, they estimated my ds at approaching 9 lbs; he went another 10 days and only came out at 8.4. Luckily my midwife was not one quick to induce.

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.05.10, 06:30 AM Flag
    • I delivered an 8 lb, 11 oz baby without knowing the size ahead of time - it was my second, but my dr. never offered or recommended an ultrasound after the 20 week scan (no other problems). I didn't know this was routine?

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.05.10, 06:41 AM Flag
      • The baby has consistently been at least a pound above average (and around 88-90% percentile) through all of my ultrasounds. I don't think its usual to keep doing them but in my case recommended to see if things have changed. They didn't - the baby keeps getting bigger :) but concerned that if something has been throwing it off (amniotic fluid or something) that would stay consistent anyway. Anyway thanks for all the responses. I think I might try and postpone the scheduled C a bit longer and see what happens. Anyone happy the DID do it?

        [ Reply | More ]
        03.05.10, 07:23 AM Flag
        • i posted below with the big babies--yes I am glad I did--go back to eddleman a few days before the c section--make sure he gets a good measurement of the babies stomach-torso area--that is how is is judging the size--good luck!

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.28.10, 07:59 AM Flag
    • Eddleman/Stone told me at 36 wks that db would be about 7lbs - she was born right on time and was 8lbs 13oz fwiw

      [ Reply | More ]
      03.05.10, 06:47 AM Flag
    • Just following up on this (I was the original poster and you guys were so helpful) - baby was 8.5 Ugh....

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.28.10, 07:48 AM Flag
    • Eddleman accurately predicted my babies would be 9+--I in fact had 10.3 and 10.7 babies on my due date. You will know by the size of you how big that baby is--have the doctor do a fundal mesurement as well.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.28.10, 07:56 AM Flag
      • ^^I delievered via c section--and not all because of the size--i was physically falling apart -pressure was up, protein in my urine--so we opted to take the babies out--as an induction would have been a non starter--

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.28.10, 07:58 AM Flag
    • It is not the told weight but the size of the head that causes problems. My dd was only 7lbs but my hips were too narrow and my two days of natural labor ended in a c-sect because db could not get past ground zero. Go figure.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.28.10, 07:59 AM Flag
    • Are you a small person? I deliverd by 9.7 lb baby vaginally with no problems but I'm tall.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.28.10, 08:03 AM Flag
      • Yes I am small. But think I could have managed 8 and a half pounds. Mainly just wanted to follow-up that the US was off (below). Good news is that the baby is healthy and really that's all that matters. I do wish I had gone for vaginal but of course its all hindsight.

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.28.10, 08:07 AM Flag
        • how big was the baby?

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.28.10, 08:09 AM Flag
          • 8.5 (not the over 9 predicted)

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.28.10, 08:11 AM Flag
        • Sorry - I didn't see that you had already delivered. Congratulations!

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.28.10, 08:12 AM Flag
          • you delieverd 8.5 on your due date--you might have been a week or two late and COULD have seen 9/9.5 pounds easily--don't fret about it--beautiful healthy baby!

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.28.10, 08:16 AM Flag
            • Thanks - that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me about it :)

              [ Reply | More ]
              04.28.10, 08:19 AM Flag
              • I am the poster with the 10.3 and 10.7 babies who were measured by eddleman--I agonized over this...

                [ Reply | More ]
                04.28.10, 08:23 AM Flag
                • Did you have a C or go Vaginally?

                  [ Reply | More ]
                  04.28.10, 08:25 AM Flag
                  • i went with the scheduled c--less about the weight and size of the baby and more about the fact that I was literally falling apart--i couldn't walk, my pressure was up my platelets were very low, I was just done..

                    [ Reply | More ]
                    04.28.10, 08:28 AM Flag
    • Mine was predicted 7 1/2 pds and she came out via C-Section at 9 POUNDS!! Thank goodness I listened to my OB!!

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.28.10, 08:31 AM Flag
    • Tough call. I was in the same position--39 weeks, type 1 diabetes and a very tall DH--db was est. at 8.5 lbs so they wanted to induce or C-section because of possible big shoulders. Long story short, we ended up inducing and having a pretty wonderful, not too difficult vag. birth with no complications--DB was 10 lbs! But I'd talk through all of these concerns with your OBs and go through the pros and cons. Good luck!

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.28.10, 09:21 AM Flag
    • My friend just delivered at 10 lb baby. They estimated it at 9 lbs. While the kid weighed 10 lbs she didn't have a particularly large head and my friend was actually shocked to learn the weight since she delivered her naturally, no drugs, no interventions. Just let nature and millions of years of evolution do it's thing. If anything goes awry, that's what your doctor is there for. Both my dc's were natural births and were the most empowering, wonderful experiences of my life.

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.22.11, 01:56 PM Flag
  • [-]Am I overpaying my nanny? $650 cash for 60 hrs/wk + 3 weeks paid vacation. 1 newborn DS, Brooklyn. Found out nanny previously made $600/wk. However she is someone I've known my whole life so complete piece of mind when I go back to work & VERY experienced.

    84 replies [ Reply | Watch | More
    04.25.11, 10:09 AM Flag ]
    • no, that is only about $10 an hour.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 10:10 AM Flag
      • It's actually 9.25/hr. You pay straight time for first forty hours and time and half for each additional hour.

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 07:34 PM Flag
    • i think this is fair (though a little on the high side), seems worth it though

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 10:10 AM Flag
      • HOW? It is $10.83/hr. Honestly OP I think you are short-changing your Nanny. Either you should pay more or cut down on her hours.

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 10:13 AM Flag
        • I understand your point, it does seem low. That's why I offered $650 even though she made bw $550-600 before. That is just the going rate in my area (very outerborough).

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 10:17 AM Flag
          • Did she work 60 hours before?

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.25.11, 10:25 AM Flag
        • you should read the thread below where a mother of two is contemplating taking a job paying 65K.

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 10:30 AM Flag
          • A 40 hour a week job. With benefits.

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.25.11, 10:32 AM Flag
            • You don't get it, do you?

              [ Reply | More ]
              04.25.11, 10:36 AM Flag
    • That seems really low -- do you include a metrocard or cell phone or anything?

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 10:19 AM Flag
      • No. I agree it seems low by Manhattan standards but in my area, avg. is $9-10/hr.

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 10:23 AM Flag
    • That's what I paid our nanny 5yrs ago, so it sounds low to me, actually. But what's done is done, so give her good raises to start building it up over time.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 10:21 AM Flag
      • Where are you located?

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 10:23 AM Flag
      • Nanny salaries went down at some point in a last few years.

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 10:24 AM Flag
        • Well, we wouldn't go down just because starting salaries might have been lower. We've been raising her every year. Live in Manhattan.

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 10:26 AM Flag
          • yes, that's you. op is asking about market rates not your rate.

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.25.11, 10:31 AM Flag
            • I speak from my experience. Our combined prices makes up the market rate.

              [ Reply | More ]
              04.25.11, 10:35 AM Flag
            • And how does one determine market rates? I'm assuming she's not asking nanny agencies, but what others are paying their nannies. Hence, this answer is totally relevant.

              [ Reply | More ]
              04.25.11, 10:39 AM Flag
              • what she paid 5 years ago is not exactly relevant today.

                [ Reply | More ]
                04.25.11, 10:44 AM Flag
                • Sure it is! It shows that OP's prices are outdated.

                  [ Reply | More ]
                  04.25.11, 10:48 AM Flag
                  • Do you know what happens to salaries during the recession?

                    [ Reply | More ]
                    04.25.11, 10:49 AM Flag
                    • Sure. I kept working, and mostly got cost of living increases, one good raise, and some years flat. My salary did not go down during this time.

                      [ Reply | More ]
                      04.25.11, 10:52 AM Flag
                      • Lots of salaries went down - esp. in finance where bonus is large part of total pay

                        [ Reply | More ]
                        04.25.11, 10:55 AM Flag
                        • Bonus is discretionary. That's not part of base salary. We didn't decrease nanny's bonus either, but we didn't raise her as much as we raised in prior years. But seroiusly, you are not comparing Wall Street finance jobs with nanny salaries, are you?

                          [ Reply | More ]
                          04.25.11, 11:16 AM Flag
                        • np: Nanny salaries absolutely went down from 2007 til now. I hired a new nanny pre-recession and a new one recently. The asking salary now is significantly lower and the # of applicants much higher. Clearly your lack of experience with hiring nannnies pre and post-recession has left you with a lack of real-world knowledge about this topic.

                          [ Reply | More ]
                          04.25.11, 12:37 PM Flag
                  • Manhattan prices are higher in general though compared to other boroughs.

                    [ Reply | More ]
                    04.25.11, 10:50 AM Flag
    • Seems low to me particulary since after 40 hours you should be paying over-time like any salaried job. Do you pay on the books and pay her taxes? Provide her health insurance?

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 10:23 AM Flag
    • She could make more at Starbucks with health insurance..

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 10:23 AM Flag
      • she would net a lot less.

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 10:25 AM Flag
        • But she would have health insurance, disability insurance and social security benefits.

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 10:30 AM Flag
      • starbucks wouldn't give her 60 hours a week, so she's be making 1/3 less

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 10:25 AM Flag
        • the 650 is cash!

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 10:35 AM Flag
          • OP - I am paying $1-2 more per hr. then she made at last job w. 2 DC instead of 1. I'm just trying to confirm that the extra pay is worth it, since I can trust her (hard to do with a newborn). I know $650 still sounds low, but pay in my neighborhood is significantly lower then the more expensive parts of Bklyn or Manhattan.

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.25.11, 10:47 AM Flag
            • OP, I pay less then this in Manhattan. You pay her well. If you are really happy with her then it is worth a little extra, unless its a hardship.

              [ Reply | More ]
              04.25.11, 10:52 AM Flag
            • Then there's your answer. But you're certainly not overpaying her!

              [ Reply | More ]
              04.25.11, 11:39 AM Flag
    • Seems low to me, but if she agreed to it - then no problem

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 10:25 AM Flag
    • For context, we pay $17 and hr on the books with travel expenses and health insurance for one child.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 10:27 AM Flag
    • I pay my nanny 100K, 4 weeks of vacation, and I just gave her tenure.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 10:46 AM Flag
    • don't let all the nannies on this board confuse you. 650 cash is a very reasonable salary, some would say it is quite generous. in fact, all you nannies need to get off your blackberries and iphones and get back to work!

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 11:01 AM Flag
      • I am not a nanny and I thought it sounded low. OP explained that she is competitive for her area. I believe her. The end.

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 11:13 AM Flag
        • wow. is your sense of humor always so microscopic?

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 11:15 AM Flag
      • I am not a nanny and live in an outerborough and thought her salary was too low.

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 11:17 AM Flag
    • This is fake, right? This is low (and I live in Queens).

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 11:15 AM Flag
      • how is 650/wk low? that's the equivalent of 50K+ annually. and although it may be 60 hrs, there is a lot of downtime, particularly for a newborn who pretty much just sleeps all day long. you are the employer. you get to decide the pay. if it is too low, no one will take the job.

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 11:22 AM Flag
        • I pay $660 a week for 1 DC in Forest Hills. Yes, I think $650 for 60 hours is too low.

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 11:23 AM Flag
          • Hijack--I live in Forest Hills and am expecting twins. How much should we offer for a part-time nanny (3 days/week, about 26 hours total) to start when they're 3mo? Would $16 an hour be okay?

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.25.11, 02:00 PM Flag
            • I think that's more than okay, yes.

              [ Reply | More ]
              04.25.11, 07:43 PM Flag
        • So when newborn stops sleeping all day long, she'll adjust the price? One nap = $700/wk, but two naps a day = $650/wk?

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 11:24 AM Flag
        • How is it equivalent of $50K+ annually? You're insane. I cleared more than that making $40K.

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 11:27 AM Flag
        • I think you have problems doing math.

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 12:44 PM Flag
        • The comment about newborns and sleep is a joke. In my nanny experience the first year is absolutely the hardest! When they're older they sleep yes, sure. But they are also MUCH more independent. Typically you would make more for a newborn than an older child. I'm not saying the OP is under paying, just commenting on what a silly statement that is.

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 02:41 PM Flag
          • Whoops. Meant to say "when they're older they sleep LESS"

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.25.11, 02:41 PM Flag
    • $10 an hour? Get real.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 11:22 AM Flag
    • I interviewed around 40 nannies when I was looking for someone and there were plenty who reported getting around 650/wk for 60 hrs, even in Manhattan. Don't let the haters make you doubt yourself.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 11:34 AM Flag
    • you probably won't keep her long

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 11:35 AM Flag
    • The pay sounds good. The hours are very high. I know many will disagree, but I won't have a nanny working more than 50hrs. I'd rather hire a second pt person to supplement one day a week. I just feel 5 12hr days is too much and nanny WILL burnout. Sure, there are many people desperate for work and they'll take the job w/o complaining, but I think your child's care will suffer from their exhaustion.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 11:54 AM Flag
    • 750 a week on the books, 50 hours per week, 6-8 week paid vacation (2 weeks her choice, 4 ours), bonus. 1 DC, Manhattan.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 12:04 PM Flag
    • That's under $9.29/hour--way too low. (40 hours at straight time; 20 hours at time and a half).

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 12:08 PM Flag
    • When you all say "bonus", what do nannies expect around the holidays? I am pregnant with our 1st child and unsure what to offer a potential nanny.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 12:23 PM Flag
      • you don't "

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 12:29 PM Flag
        • ^"offer" the bonus while hiring. You give it right before Xmas. First year of employment is usually one week's pay. For future years, it is between 1-2 weeks depending on who you ask and where you are.

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 12:30 PM Flag
          • great to know. thank you!

            [ Reply | More ]
            04.25.11, 12:35 PM Flag
            • Having trouble with your nanny? We have all seen the nannies in the park on their cell phones or shopping with their friends while your children sit in the stroller. Do you need help hiring a nanny? Do you want to have better communication with your nanny and know what they are really doing when you are at work? Don't worry The Nanny Concierge is here! I will come to your home and speak with both you and your nanny and observe the dynamics of the household. Then I will sit down with both you and your nanny to help bridge the communication gap. In addition, hiring a nanny is overwhelming and time consuming. To minimize the time commitment required to hire a nanny, I can assist you with the hiring process by screening resumes, conducting prel...

              [ Reply | More ]
              04.25.11, 02:13 PM Flag
              • Also, you know there are laws that protect nannies now. You should look into them seriously. You have to pay OT for over 40 hours.

                [ Reply | More ]
                04.25.11, 02:23 PM Flag
                • There are also laws about paying taxes. I don't think the OP is terribly concerned with laws.

                  [ Reply | More ]
                  04.25.11, 02:51 PM Flag
                • Most of us who pay a salary for 50 hrs on the books are aware of this and incorporate it into the salary breakdown. IME, most nannies still prefer to be paid a set weekly salary rather than an absolute breakdown because otherwise there is risk of not making enough.

                  [ Reply | More ]
                  04.25.11, 02:59 PM Flag
                  • Long time nanny here with many nanny friends. This is very true. Most nannies prefer a set number for a variety of reasons, and the overtime is worked in. That said, I think what the OP is paying does sound a little low. Though considering it's in cash, I guess not. I won't do the under the table thing, but legality aside that does make this a much higher salary.

                    [ Reply | More ]
                    04.25.11, 03:27 PM Flag
    • You mentioned that your main question is whether this is worth it. Absolutely YES from what you've told me so far!

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 03:28 PM Flag
    • no. underpaying, if anything.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 03:30 PM Flag
      • It is incredibly low. I wonder about the caliber of nanny one gets with a salary that low????

        [ Reply | More ]
        04.25.11, 03:44 PM Flag
        • OP - As an example, a neighbor pays $500/wk. for a live-in nanny w. 1 DC. 7 days per week (incl. staying up nights), also cooks & cleans for the family. Nanny pay seems to be very low around here, but I'm trying to pay well since this is someone I know.

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 05:13 PM Flag
        • The same calibre honey....the one who talks on the phone while the kids play by themselves in the park. Geez only the underpaid nannies must be doing this, right?

          [ Reply | More ]
          04.25.11, 07:15 PM Flag
    • nope. sounds good.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 05:47 PM Flag
    • We paid $650 for our nanny when she started - ds was 3 months. But 50 not 60 hrs. That's a lot!

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 06:48 PM Flag
    • Seems totally fine. You could cut down the vacation time to 2 weeks though. I have friends in Brooklyn, LI and Queens who pay a set amount for the whole week which works out to be $8 or so per hour and their nannies are happy and so are they....

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 07:05 PM Flag
    • Dont let people tell you otherwise. I pay my nanny $450 a week for a 8am to 6pm job 5 days a week. She gets 2 weeks paid vacation and that too when I am away. She helps cook and clean especially the days when I am working from home. She is great and she likes her job and has been with us for 3 years. And yes we live in Manhattan. I find it totally ridciulous that people pay insane amounts to nannies. I work in marketing and dont earn enough to pay high amounts to my nanny and dont get swayed by what people around me pay....

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.25.11, 07:11 PM Flag
    • I think it's low - you don't want to short change the person caring for your precious children! If you calculate overtime (which is the law) you are paying about $9.29/hr net. If she worked 40 hours, it wouldn't be so bad. I pay my nanny very well and pay on the books - GTM handles it all. You want to make sure the nanny caring for your children is well taken care of. You mentioned cash - if that refers to paying her off the books, you could be in trouble for non-compliance on tax issues and Worker's Compensation/Disability in NY.

      [ Reply | More ]
      04.28.11, 10:11 AM Flag
      • I think the pay sounds fine. We pay $600/wk in Manhattan for about 50 hrs/wk. We give 4 weeks of paid vacay (she takes off when we're off) and metrocard. We just can't afford to give more than that. We interviewed 45 nannies and I'd say 90% were ok with that pay.

        [ Reply | More ]
        05.05.11, 01:16 PM Flag
    • Where did you find your nanny?

      [ Reply | More ]
      11.20.11, 08:05 PM Flag
Refresh » New Post »