The Movable Buffet

Dispatches from Las Vegas
by Richard Abowitz

Category: vegas and philosophy

Psychics and skeptics coming to Vegas

May 22, 2008 | 10:34 am

John_edward One of the stranger aspects of Vegas entertainment has been the return of supposed mind readers and psychics to Strip showrooms. And, to me, worst of all, back in Vegas are the people who claim power to communicate with the dead and then sell that as entertainment. As dubious as entertainment this may be, cheap the experience is not. The ticket prices for the top entertainers in the supernatural circuit beat out even most of the top ticket prices of Cirque's five shows on the Strip.

Today through Saturday, for example, professional future-predictor Sylvia Browne will be performing at Excalibur, with a top ticket price of $137.50. Even more expensive is the bring-out-your-dead clairvoyant entertainer, John Edward, who will be at the Flamingo at  $175 for the top ticket.

In case you can't tell from my tone, I am very uncomfortable with entertainment that proclaims to predict the future or to offer communication to people's lost loved ones. This is religion or at least faith that is being packaged and sold as entertainment in Vegas. We have built a city for tourists' amusement, and the Strip should never be confused as a spiritual haven where wisdom is dispensed from its showroom stages.

Even if you believe John Edward is sincere, how is it righteous to charge people desperate for a message from those they have lost in life $175 for a ticket? This does not, by the way, even guarantee that he will call on you in the audience.

Anyway, by one of those coincidences that inspires faith, the James Randi Educational Foundation will be following John Edward to the Flamingo next month when Randi holds his annual skeptics convention to support his foundation. Amazing Randi's foundation is most famous for its Million Dollar Challenge, which offers $1 million to anyone who can demonstrate paranormal powers under scientific conditions and protocols. Actually, Browne agreed to take Amazing Randi's challenge in 2001. What happened? To this day on his website, Amazing Randi keeps track as the years tick by and Browne has yet to fulfill her promise.  Maybe Amazing Randi can come to the Flamingo a bit early this year for the convention and we can finally get the issue resolved with Browne?

Meanwhile, John Edward has refused to take the foundation challenge. That is smart of him. Why would he take the challenge? I mean, on the up side, if he passes, he would get $1 million and show scientists that there really is another world where the dead live. He would also undermine the entire community of skeptics by having famed debunker Amazing Randi proclaim his supernatural powers are authentic. He could make doubters like Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins cry in misery and failure, not to mention have the pleasure of telling that smug atheist Penn Jillette, "I told you so!" It might even cause a spiritual revolution in this country. In fact, if Amazing Randi authenticated John Edward's "powers," nothing but great things for the entire world would come from passing the test. It would sure beat a gig at the Flamingo.

Of course, there is a possible downside for Edward if he fails the test. Edward is reasonable if not psychic enough to know the outcome if his ability to talk to the dead were to be tested by the James Randi Educational Foundation. Right now people will line up to pay $175 for the chance that he may call on them in a sold-out showroom at the Flamingo. How many would still come if he failed the challenge?

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)


Las Vegas Loses Historian Hal Rothman

February 27, 2007 | 11:41 am
Last week I wrote in passing on the Buffet that my two favorite writers on the subject of Las Vegas are art critic Dave Hickey and historian Hal Rothman. Today comes news that Hal Rothman has died from Lou Gehrigs disease (ALS) at age 48.

 
I only interviewed Rothman once by phone, we exchanged a couple e-mails and I never met him in person. I wish now I had let it be otherwise; I think I was far too intimidated. No book has taught me more about Las Vegas than Rothman's "Neon Metropolis: How Las Vegas Started the Twenty-First Century" (2002). To recommend Neon Metropolis to you I've searched through the book this morning looking for a section of its wisdom and insight about Las Vegas to give you a taste. In his life, Rothman was a quote machine appearing in almost every serious article or documentary about Las Vegas (and I mean EVERY). His writing was on the same level as his speech: lively, deep and quotable. Yet, going through Neon Metropolis this morning I realized that Rothman's amazing sound bites are nothing compared to the magnified depths that come from his carefully constructed chapters.
 
Even after only three years(and, Rothman's book came out five years ago) almost any other book about Las Vegas is no longer about contemporary Las Vegas. It is about the past. Pick up a guide book from three years ago and there is no Wynn, there is still a Stardust, Pure and Tao don't get a mention and you won't get the slightest hint that Cirque has a Beatles show at the Mirage. Yet, Rothman's Neon Metropolis reads like it knows (even if it doesn't mention) all of these things about Las Vegas as well as what is coming next. In 2007, from the master planned communities, to the history of the town's golden era to the Vegas of the future, Neon Metropolis remains the single most relevant book on the subject of Las Vegas. I guess what I am saying is that I am going to resist offering one of Rothman's pithy quotes and just say that if you have any interest in Las Vegas or take any pleasure in this blog I can not recommend Neon Metropolis highly enough.
 
Finally, I remember the one time I interviewed Rothman, we spoke on the occasion of a feud about the meaning of Las Vegas between intellectual heavyweights Bernard-Henry Levy and Francis Fukuyama. After the interview was over, Rothman said almost wistfully, "You know I really wish they would have read Neon Metropolis." And, he was so right.
 


Famous Philosophers Bicker Over the Meaning Of... Las Vegas

March 16, 2006 | 10:23 pm
Bernardhenrilevi_its7bdnc Oh, dear. Is philosophy running out of important questions? French New Philosopher Bernard-Henry Levy and American high end pontificator Francis Fukuyama  got into a spat over the meaning of Las Vegas in "The American Interest:" You would think such mighty pointy heads would have fresh insight to bring to this bar argument of a question. But in fact only the most stereotypical views of our town are presented by the duo:
Fukuyama  writes: "Las Vegas is a real city with real people, not just sex workers, in it." (FYI: Mr. Fukuyama, don't let their boobs fool you the sex workers are real people, too.)
As for Levy's view---like a true French Professor--- it arrives in the form of a rhetorical question:"Francis, are you implying that all this American grandeur, this fundamental belief, this dream that has inspired so many generations of men and women throughout the world is to find its truth in this empire of imposture, this triumph of tackiness and falsehood, which you cannot deny is the other reality of Las Vegas?"
(and to think a student of Derrida introducing a duality in the first place, tsk- tsk)
No one will win this argument; both men hold shallow and obvious views. Yet, to reach these pedestrian conclusions some awful prose, lots of name dropping.  If not the best argument, at least, my favorite sentence clearly goes to Levy: "I see how some elements of this argument tie up with your earlier Kojevian observations on Hegel, on the happy animality that will be the fate of post-historical humanity." Ouch.
photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY- AFP/Getty


Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Comments


Categories


Recent Posts
Movable Buffet: Final entry |  November 4, 2009, 1:05 pm »
Photos from Fangoria: Trinity of Terrors |  November 1, 2009, 8:45 am »
Oops, I am a tourist (and it's expensive) |  October 31, 2009, 10:00 am »
Fright Dome: Huge haunted houses at Circus Circus |  October 30, 2009, 11:47 am »

Archives