The Movable Buffet

Dispatches from Las Vegas
by Richard Abowitz

Category: O.J. Simpson

Kato Kaelin on O.J. Simpson's life as Nevada inmate: '100% karma'

March 30, 2009 | 10:20 am

2009032718 Over the weekend I interviewed former O.J. Simpson house guest and murder trial witness, Kato Kaelin. He is in Vegas through April 8 doing a cameo (as a former family house guest) in the dinner show "Tony 'n Tina's Wedding" at Planet Hollywood. At one point he offers a funny toast during the show that he helped write.

In 1994 I was in graduate school in the Midwest, and therefore I know a lot less about the famous murder trial than people who were in Vegas and California at the time. Most of what I know about Simpson I learned covering his trial for armed robbery and kidnapping in Vegas last year. Here is what Kaelin had to say about that trial as well as the one he was connected to all those years ago.

Richard Abowitz: How did you wind up in "Tony 'n Tina's Wedding"?

Kato Kaelin: It was pretty much just a phone call. I was approached by the producer.  I love doing it. I love a live audience and the energy that comes from a live audience.

Q:  Who came up with the idea that you would be a house guest?

A: I guess the cast did. I didn't. I am replacing Barry Williams from "The Brady Bunch"

Q: Did you write the toast you gave?

A: They gave me a DVD of the show, and I was sort of left on my own to just think of lines to say. So it was just sort of trial by fire.

Q: Is it odd to you to be playing a role that jokes about where you were that night when two people were murdered?

A: I guess so. I get asked about it so much. I even put a line about it in "Tony 'n Tina's Wedding." I say, "Yes, he did it. He finally got married." But I have done a lot of other stuff. You don't know how great it is for me to be recognized for something other than the trial. People will now come up to me and say, "You did a great job on that." And I feel the more I do the better it is for me and the more that happens.

Q: What is your life like now? I assume you have your own house?

A: Yes, I can be a guest on my own sofa. My life is wonderful. I have had a girlfriend for three years,  and she is a personal trainer and a model.

Q: So looking back, when did you decide that in your opinion O.J. Simpson had committed the murders?

A: The process was that I never was in a courtroom in my life. Then I had a lawyer. And my lawyer told me to keep open-minded and to answer just the questions and don't ever speculate. I was just making sure everything I said was correct. It was nerve-racking. I was sequestered and did not hear a lot of the evidence you did until after the trial. After I heard certain things, then I believed he did it.

Q: So knowing him did not give you a feeling in your gut one way or the other?

A: It was mixed. I never saw any violence.

Q: But you knew he had a temper?

A: Yeah, exactly. Although he is just a person, he is very Shakespearean personality. He wanted everything.

Q: What do you think about what happened to him in Vegas?

A: I think it is 100% karma, I really, really do.

Photo credit: Sarah Gerke


O. J. Simpson leaves Las Vegas

December 9, 2008 |  9:39 am

Yesterday, the Las Vegas portion of the O. J. Simpson saga came to a conclusion. Simpson was shipped out of the local jail about 45 miles away to the medium security prison at Indian Springs, High Desert State Prison. Last night was was his first night spent at Indian Springs, serving the sentence of nine to 33 years he received Friday for his participation in an armed robbery in September 2007 at Palace Station.

Yes, Indian Springs is only about 45 miles away, and so Simpson must truly be learning that Vegas is a city built in the middle of nowhere. If he has a window view, he will be seeing only the bleakest and ugliest desert nothingness you can imagine. When I drove past Indian Springs I thought it was a good nomination to be Purgatory. And that is without the prison.

Back in Vegas yesterday, I happened to get off a highway exit near Palace Station, and I noticed the casino. I have gotten off that highway exit many times before but never picked up the clear view of Palace Station. The reason, of course: Palace Station, was just another casino, and when you live in Vegas, over time, small gambling properties -- despite marquees,  blinking lights and a large hotel towers -- become as invisible as slot machines at the grocery store. 

But Simpson has given a notoriety to Palace Station forevermore and that odd twist of fate has made this rundown property probably the best known casino in Vegas outside the tourist corridor. That is a pity because parent company Station has three fantastic properties that equal the tourist corridor offerings without being amidst the Strip wildness (apparently, some people want away from that): Red Rock Resort, Green Valley Ranch and, newly opened, Aliante Station.  And Station could use the tourist dollars around now.

But Palace Station is not in the same league as those the newer Station properties and  probably will gain little in terms of room sales from all the free press. Palace Station remains where you stay when you can't afford someplace nicer; and with all the bargains to be had on the Strip now, that might be a harder sell than ever. Of course, even the worst room in Palace Station is still in Vegas and I bet that is heavenly compared to the accommodations in Indian Springs.


Simpson speaks then is sentenced

December 5, 2008 | 10:24 am
One of Simpson's lawyers invoked Abraham Lincoln, and another seemed to suggest that theft and gun crimes are some sort of quirk in Nevada law that Simpson, an out-of-state fellow, simply did not know.
Simpson, who did not testify during the trial, defied earlier speculation that he would not speak at this sentencing hearing to offer a lengthy and rambling account. Simpson explained to the judge: "I am sorry. I did not mean to steal anything from anyone. I thought I was confronting friends." In general, in his statement, Simpson offered a sympathetic and vindicating account of his actions before and after the incident at Palace Station for the first time in the legal process; yet interestingly, this was offered in a context that did not allow for cross-examination. Judge Glass pronounced Simpson arrogant and ignorant and sentenced him, adding in part:  "Everything in this case was on tape, and it's your own words that can be heard...that have brought you here to this seat in my courtroom," Glass said.  "I don't care what Beardsley or Fromong say now. Guns were brought. At least one gun was brought. ...Some poor tourist walking down the hallway could have been hurt. That is why we have rules in the state of Nevada....It was much more than stupidity. You went to the room. You took guns. You used force." She then sentenced him based on my understanding to a fixed term of what appears (I am not a lawyer) to be  a minimum of 16 years with a possibility of parole after 6-7  years.

UPDATE: According to Simpson's attorneys, the minimum Simpson will have to serve is 9 years before parole becomes a possibility.

O. J. Simpson: How many years?

December 5, 2008 |  8:07 am

In just a few hours, O. J. Simpson will be sentenced to a lengthy period in the Nevada penal system. Simpson will not speak at the sentencing, because he is appealing the conviction. After all, he can't very well apologize or ask for leniency in sentencing for a crime he is not prepared to accept responsibility for committing. Instead, Simpson's attorney is planning to make the rather bizarre request that Simpson's victims be allowed to testify and offer their views on sentencing. Of course, the problem with that, not to be too legalistic, is that the charges are for crimes against the state, so sentencing in this country does not depend on the opinions of victims.

In following this case, it seemed obvious that most everyone involved was a moth drawn to the remaining light cast by the dying embers of Simpson's star: sycophants of the worst sort. But according to one local defense lawyer I spoke with Thursday, no victim testimony of any sort will make a difference to Judge Jackie Glass. In Nevada, what is going to matter most is that a crime involving a gun was committed in a casino. This lawyer pointed out: You don't even have to be famous to be in a world of trouble for that mix.

There certainly has been plenty of discussion over whether Simpson's acquittal for murder 13 years ago influenced this prosecution and conviction in Las Vegas. But less discussed and perhaps more relevant is the impression many have locally that we do indeed have a two-tier system of justice -- but based on geography, not celebrity. The perception is that crimes that take place inside the tourist corridor are pursued more aggressively than elsewhere in the Las Vegas Valley. I know when my car was vandalized at my old apartment, I could not get an officer to even show up. Whereas when I had a similar car issue in a casino lot, the resort security easily summoned police to assist me.

Anyway, to get back to Simpson, his defense lawyers are asking Judge Glass that the former football player be given the minimum six-year sentence, whereas the Division of Parole and Probation has recommended a sentence of at least 18 years. The law even allows Glass to give Simpson a life sentence. 

The Review-Journal interviews a local lawyer who suggests that Glass is likely to sentence Simpson to somewhere in the range of 11 years. But based on the lawyer I spoke to, who has appeared often before Glass in the past, I will not be surprised if she gives Simpson a very, very long sentence.

Then O.J. Simpson, for whatever length of time, will be led away to begin this perhaps final chapter of his life, once again in a uniform, albeit of jailhouse issue.


O. J. Simpson staying in jail

November 7, 2008 | 10:54 am

In a surprise to no one, Clark County District Judge Jackie Glass decided she presided over a fair trial with a just verdict against O. J. Simpson. She therefore turned down the defense motion for a new trial.

Simpson will remain locked up until his sentencing on Dec. 5, which will certainly include a long residency in the Nevada penal system.


O.J. Simpson and Craig Titus share a judge

October 14, 2008 |  9:52 am

Readers of this blog's early years will recall the murder case against former professional body builders Craig Titus and Kelly Ryan. Titus wound up accepting a plea deal with Judge Jackie Glass, who these days is famous from the O.J. Simpson case. Her sentence of Titus and the appeal of that sentence being argued in front of her today both provide a hint as to how she treats celebrity defendants when sentencing. Glass will do the sentencing honors with Simpson in December.

Some history on this case: Titus accepted his plea deal shortly before the trial began, and he was sentenced in August to 21 to 55 years for second-degree murder by Judge Glass. Today Titus goes before Judge Glass again claiming she promised to sentence him to only 17 years to 55 years for the killing. The judge has previously said she does not remember that agreement. And, according to the Review-Journal:

"Judges can give whatever sentence they deem appropriate and are not bound by plea agreements."

The context is interesting as Glass, Titus claims, offered those 17 years at a point when the defense wanted 15 years for him and the prosecution 17 years, and so even then she was leaning toward a larger number when given a choice. By sentencing an even larger number became her final decision. After reviewing things further, she exercised her right to go beyond what the prosecution asked for in sentencing. 

I suspect that this does not bode well for Simpson at his sentencing in December. Today's hearing involves Judge Glass being asked to overrule herself and knock four years off the Titus sentence; he claims he would not have taken the plea had he not believed the offer of 17 years was solid. That ruling seems unlikely. Otherwise, Titus wants the deal tossed and his day in court. No matter the outcome, it will be interesting for Simpson watchers to see how Glass rules.


'SNL' on Simpson trial

September 22, 2008 | 12:07 pm

"Saturday Night Live" offers this take on the O. J. Simpson jury selection process. Too bad jury selection wasn't really this interesting.



Meanwhile, Steve Friess has exclusive photos on his blog of the replica Palace Sation hotel room created for the jurors to view. In fact, this room will never be used as the jurors made a trip to the hotel room at the real Palace Station instead.


O.J. Simpson remains biggest headliner

August 4, 2008 | 12:32 pm

I am sure it is just a coincidence that the O.J. Simpson trial begins Sept. 8 just after the traditional slow tourist season in Vegas ends by Labor Day weekend. But another plea bargain in the case today means Simpson is down to one co-defendant before the trial is all about Simpson. Local defense lawyers suspect that is what the district attorney's office is hoping to achieve. So in the weeks remaining before trial look to see if the prosecution succeeds in offering Clarence "C.J." Stewart a deal.

You would think Simpson would be old news in Vegas. But if you do a Google news search on our city, of the six related suggested topic searches, only "las vegas hotel" and "las vegas casino" are not directly connected to Simpson. No "echelon place," "bankrupt lake las vegas" or even "criss angel." The remaining search suggestions from Google on news about Las Vegas: "oj simpson," "nicole brown simpson," "sports memorabilia," and "armed robbery."

Who would think that Simpson's fame would so totally dominate Vegas coverage?


Simpson case pure Vegas

November 15, 2007 | 12:16 pm
From its sleazy beginnings to the obvious conclusion (yes, Virginia — I mean Geraldo — there is going to be a trial) the preliminary hearing episode of the O.J. Simpson show presented a narrative that is pure Vegas.

I am almost tempted to say this could not have happened in any other city. At the very least, from its structure and its settings to the people involved, everything seems to fit a nutty Vegas template.

Where else but celebrity central, the Palms, could O.J. Simpson hang by the pool surrounded and revered by admirers? Of course, that was the perfect scenery for him to pick as background to be worshiped by his alleged army of volunteers to head into this unbelievably sketchy situation.

Well, the defense did a great job of showing what sort of people he gathered.

And, of course, this ends with these comical middle-aged O.J. Simpson groupies stuffing themselves into a tiny room at a faded local's casino, Palace Station, far from the Strip of today, to remove memorabilia, tarnished now, but from a time when O.J. Simpson was as much celebrated as he was a celebrity.

Of course, in Vegas he is still a celebrity enough to find fans dedicated enough to charge into that hotel room with him, to watch his back and, as some of those testifying in plea deals now claim, commit felonies on his behalf.

At one point the defense ridiculed the idea of there even being a plan, so little thought seemed to have gone into the men's behavior.

I don't think ultimately that will work for the defense as an argument because to me the testimony actually suggested that every member of the crew seemed to have deliberately been given only part of the plan, except where all points meet: O.J. Simpson. The jury will have to decide that point as well as many others. 

The general apparent greed to sell stories, cut deals and look out for number one after the fact showed what sort of people are attracted to O.J. these days.

And that is what amazes me the most about the testimony, because, again, it seemed to show that before going into that room, only one man in the Simpson crew was greedy enough to have the foresight to suggest that he thought of gain before the event. That would be Thomas Riccio, the superstitious taper, who claimed that he got Simpson to agree to sign hundreds of copies of his now-forgotten book, "If I Did It."

As for the rest of these people, they apparently entered this life-altering experience for nothing more to gain than such "coolness" moments as hanging with O.J. Simpson at the Palms.
Ultimately, if jurors believe the defense or Riccio, the man who set up the entire affair, including renting the room at Palace Station, will be a most crucial question. It is hard not to think of the entire affair as an idiot Vegas night best forgotten by all. Certainly, there is not the local fascination with this case that greeted his arrest.

Vegas loves the new, and Simpson is sort of old news.
But as we heard in testimony, again thanks to the defense, Simpson was charging into that room with some characters to meet some characters with incredible backgrounds. Two participants testified for the prosecution that they had guns. This was a dangerous situation. And so like it or not, Las Vegas will be a perfectly fitting setting for another O.J. Simpson trial.

O.J.'s new punishment in Vegas...

November 8, 2007 |  1:17 pm
It appears O.J. Simpson has been sentenced to boredom.
A seat in the courtroom today might be the hardest ticket to get in Las Vegas, but watching his preliminary hearing on television is about as dull as court proceedings can get.

Still, it must be better than sitting there. In fact, if you are sitting in the courtroom right now, you are seeing Simpson's back and missing the highlight of the hearing. The face of Simpson works like an awesome silent film actress projecting his view on the testimony. The description by witness Bruce Fromong of the entry into the Palace Station hotel room by Simpson's group as being done in a military fashion got an eye-rolling, head-shaking performance from Simpson that would have done Lillian Gish proud.
Justice may not play favorites, but whoever is working the camera for the court does. We are getting plenty of close-ups of O.J. Simpson as the voices of witnesses and lawyers doing their thing can be heard in the background. It is clear who is the star.

FYI: The worst part is the pointlessness of this part of the case, which even Simpson's lawyers admit they are using as a tuneup for trial. As defense lawyers locally tell me and talking heads on cable confirm, the standard to go from preliminary hearing to trial in Nevada is very low. Therefore the Simpson case is almost certain to be found worthy of a trial at the end of this hearing. Then everything starts all over.


Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Comments


Categories


Recent Posts
Movable Buffet: Final entry |  November 4, 2009, 1:05 pm »
Photos from Fangoria: Trinity of Terrors |  November 1, 2009, 8:45 am »
Oops, I am a tourist (and it's expensive) |  October 31, 2009, 10:00 am »
Fright Dome: Huge haunted houses at Circus Circus |  October 30, 2009, 11:47 am »

Archives