PaleoJudaica.com A weblog on ancient Judaism and its context E-mail: paleojudaica-at-talktalk-dot-net ("-at-" = "@", "-dot-" = ".") |
Tuesday, April 26, 2011 MORE METAL CODICES? It just goes on: Jordanian police recover 7 ancient manuscripts (AP) This is a bewildering announcement by Ziad al-Saad, the director of the Jordanian Department of antiquities, which says that these "manuscripts" (no other description) were taken from "local smugglers." Apparently he associates these with the metal codices (70 manuscripts, possibly "the most significant find in Christian archaeology since the 1947 discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls," whatever that means). The story is not very coherent: the documents were found both by Jordanian archaeologists and then stolen, and then a couple of paragraphs later they were found by a Bedouin. It sounds as though the Jordanian Government has gotten hold of some possibly ancient "manuscripts" of uncertain nature, but which they seem to be associating with the metal codices and which they are now trying to authenticate. No point in saying more than that until we have more details. It just had to be seven of seventy manuscripts didn't it? Well didn't it? HT Joseph Lauer. posted by Jim Davila | 9:39 PM NEW TESTAMENT APPOINTMENT: I am very happy to announce that Dr. Scott J. Hafemann has been appointed Reader in New Testament Studies at the Divinity School of the University of St. Andrews. He will be taking up his new post in September. posted by Jim Davila | 10:50 AM COPTIC WATCH: Scribbled by a community of nuns – Ancient Coptic graffiti adorns walls of 3,200 year-old Egyptian temple. The graffiti in question are from the fourth century CE. Here is the abstract (booklet downloadable here) of the scholarly paper: Jennifer Westerfeld (University of Louisville)This would be an important source for non-literary early Coptic as well as for the sociology of female Egyptian ascetics in late antiquity. I would love to see what nuns in the fourth century had to say when they wrote graffiti. posted by Jim Davila | 9:52 AM KJB@400 WATCH: Historian David Starkey has a cheerleading piece on the King James Bible and its back-story in the Daily Mail: The publishing sensation that made England conquer the world. posted by Jim Davila | 9:44 AM MAARIV: Early Coins Found at Khirbet Qeiyafa. This sounds like an exciting discovery. A tenth-century-BCE Hebrew(ish) inscription was also discovered at Khirbet Qeiyafa in 2008. posted by Jim Davila | 9:37 AM WHAT COMES OF THIS: Giants in Ancient Warfare. Via Rogue Classicism. For the ancient Book of Giants see here. posted by Jim Davila | 9:29 AM Monday, April 25, 2011 SOME NOTES on divination technical terminology by Duane Smith: Divining Balaam: A Problem With Omens. posted by Jim Davila | 1:56 PM ASKING THE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS: Deane Galbraith: How Do You Know When You’re Having Sex With a Fallen Angel? Some Handy Hints from a Biblical Scholar. Some of these could double as seduction tips for mortal guys as well. posted by Jim Davila | 10:29 AM THE SUBTERRANEAN EXCAVATIONS IN JERUSALEM are the subject of a long Haaretz article: Jerusalem's time tunnelsThe article is clearly suspicious of Elad's funding of the excavations (background here and follow the links), but it does make an effort to interview parties on both sides of the debate. Some highlights: After a few dozen meters, the tunnel suddenly drops from street level into the sewer below, which Josephus described. Once work is complete, visitors touring the City of David tunnels will be able to descend beneath the Old City walls and emerge from the ground at the Davidson Center, the archaeological park between just within the Dung Gate, to the immediate southwest of the Temple Mount. In the future, visitors may even be able to enter the Western Wall tunnels and continue all the way to the Via Dolorosa, in the heart of the Muslim Quarter. From there, it is a quick walk to the immense Zedekiah's Cave under the Muslim Quarter buildings. All told, this means that visitors could potentially spend hours on end exploring subterranean Jerusalem from end to end of the ancient city (though not including the Temple Mount), barely seeing the light of day.Sigh. Of course he did. By the way, there is an interesting cycle of legends around Zedekiah's Cave. I didn't realize until now that there actually was such a place. I assume it isn't really eighteen miles long (Num. Rab. 2.9). Archaeologist Dr. Ronny Reich is considered the father of the new tunnels. He and Shukron conducted most of the excavations. Reich was recently appointed chairman of the archaeological advisory council, the supreme professional body of the Antiquities Authority, after which he announced he was retiring from Jerusalem excavations after 40 years.I could just keep excerpting and commenting, but I'll stop here. Read it all. posted by Jim Davila | 10:07 AM THE SAMARITAN PASSOVER is the subject of a brief slide show in the Jerusalem Post/Reuters: Samaritans celebrate Shavuot atop Mt. Gerizim. Other recent coverage of the Samaritans is noted here and here. posted by Jim Davila | 9:43 AM TOURISM REPORT: Masada Most Popular Pay-to-Enter Tourist SiteMasada was in third place last year. posted by Jim Davila | 9:38 AM SACRED TRASH, by Adina Hoffman and Peter Cole, is reviewed by Neal Gendler in the Jewish Chronicle: ‘Sacred Trash’ an engaging read despite ‘design quirks’. Excerpts: The combination is a readable, engaging and very edifying 241-page text of varying intensity. The parts about the quest, even something of a race, to find the geniza and bring its contents to England, and about the generations of scholars who discovered and pursued different areas of emphasis, read almost like a novel. But explanations of some of the most significant literary findings are thicker, more like an academic paper. And the authors are casual with precise but unusual words such as agon, vatic and sacredotal.More reviews here. posted by Jim Davila | 9:32 AM THE LOD MOSAIC is now on display in San Francisco: Large mosaic unearthed in Israel on view at Legion of Honor. Background here. posted by Jim Davila | 9:27 AM ARAMAIC WATCH: Aramaic finds in Saudi Arabia? Archeological finds announcedThe second millennium BCE sounds early for Aramaic inscriptions. If the date is accurate, this would be an extremely important find. I would guess the first half of the first millennium or later to be a more likely date. Perhaps there is an error here or perhaps the pottery and the inscriptions are from different strata The article also reports on the discovery of Old South Arabian inscriptions and other finds at other sites. posted by Jim Davila | 9:23 AM Sunday, April 24, 2011 FAKE METAL CODICES WATCH: Tom Verenna has published a message by Philip Davies on the metal codices. I quote it in part, with my comments: Ok. Clarification:This in reference to Professor Davies's quoted comment in the Sheffield Telegraph article: "I think some of them may be authentic, and as yet I can’t work out what sort of a hoax they might be." I think his point here is that the metal used to make the plates may in fact be quite old (as noted already in the earliest media coverage). Such old metal can be scrounged. But everyone is interested in the inscriptions and images, which clearly are modern fakes, so it seems confusing to bring in the word "authentic." Is the metal of the plates ancient? We are told in that Jewish Chronicle article that Oxford metallurgist Peter Northover has produced a report that "concluded that their [the plates from one of the books] composition was 'consistent with a range of ancient lead,' and that it was clear from the surface corrosion that the book was 'not a recent production'." Until this research has been made available and reviewed by other specialists in ancient metallurgy — preferably by being published in a peer-review journal — I don't think anyone should take it seriously. We have no way of knowing now whether it is being represented accurately in context. In theory, if the metal is ancient, it could have had some ancient markings on it too, and it seems as though Philip may be hinting that he thinks this to be the case. But I've seen nothing to indicate than any markings on the codices are actually ancient, whereas there is ample evidence that many of them, including all the writing, are fake. If something like this turns out to true, which I doubt very much, the images and writing that have been under discussion will still be fakes, although written on ancient metal with some other markings on it. That is the most generous interpretation I can put on Philip's comments. What is most curious to me is the trouble taken to bind hundred ofI see no reason to believe the cave story without verification by archaeologists that it is the real provenance of the codices. The simplest explanation at the moment is that the cave story is made up. As I have said ‘forgery’ is not quite the right term for objects thatIf not "forgery," then at least "fake." (Me, I'll go for "forgery" too.) I don't know what it means to say that the objects are not making any claim to be anything. Producing fakes with fake ancient Greek poached from an ancient inscription, Hebrew lettering in faux ancient scripts, and fake iconography poached from real (and fake!) ancient objects is making an implicit claim that the artifacts are ancient. Since the writing and images are in fact modern, the artifacts are fake, whether or not the metal used to make them is ancient. The Shapira scroll forgeries (bottom of post), for example, made a similar implicit claim to antiquity, but no explicit claim (by, say, including a dated colophon etc.). That said, Philip is raising some interesting questions about why the codices were made and why they were made in this particular way. As for why they are being hawked the way they are, to paraphrase Robert Heinlein, the answer to a question that begins "Why have they ...?" is frequently "money." The only real information we have right now is that the Elkingtons seem primarily interested in hawking the codices to the media in the hope of making money from a documentary and a book. I am not implying that they are the forgers; I have no idea who the forger(s) might be. Remember, the forgery could be fifty years old and the motives of the forger(s) long since lost in more recent developments. If it turns out that the metal is ancient — which, again, remains to be seen — we can only be thankful that the writing and images are such crude fakes. If this had been done by people who knew what they were doing, we might have had a much harder time determining authenticity. Scary thought. Background here etc. etc. posted by Jim Davila | 8:37 PM HAPPY EASTER to all those celebrating. posted by Jim Davila | 9:21 AM Saturday, April 23, 2011 ANOTHER PROFILE OF THE SAMARITANS: Samaritan community in the West Bank (PRI's The World). posted by Jim Davila | 12:52 PM HAPPY ST. GEORGE'S DAY. posted by Jim Davila | 9:49 AM THE THEME OF "PARADISE" is explored from numerous different angles in an Haaretz article by Aviva Lori: Intimations of immortality. It includes, inter alia, comments from Rachel Elior and Guy Stroumsa on ancient Judaism and ancient Iran: Prof. Rachel Elior from the Hebrew University is an expert on Jewish mystical thought across the ages. She recently edited a thick volume titled "A Garden Eastward in Eden: Traditions of Paradise" (Magnes Press, Hebrew ), which examines the representation of paradise in religious, literary, artistic and cultural works from ancient times to the present.Worth a read. posted by Jim Davila | 8:21 AM Friday, April 22, 2011 TODAY IS GOOD FRIDAY. Best wishes to all those observing it. posted by Jim Davila | 9:48 AM THE MYSTERY OF THE LAST SUPPER by metallurgist Colin Humphreys, is reviewed in the Los Angeles Times: Last Supper was not Jesus' last supper, researcher saysThose dates sound suspiciously precise. Most historical Jesus scholars would be cautious about narrowing the time down beyond a range of a few years. The article has a little to say about scholarly responses: Humphreys' book is likely to create a stir among biblical scholars, whether or not it alters prevailing views.The book is published by Cambridge University Press, so one would hope that means it has been thoroughly vetted and is worth looking at. Nevertheless, I want to hear from some top-flight historical Jesus specialists and I think it's a little odd that the media treatments I've seen so far don't quote from any of them. And all the more so after a breathless e-mail blurb for the book arrived in my mailbox yesterday from CUP. My favorite quote in it was "A gripping read that is hard to put down" by ... get ready ... Sir John Houghton, Chairman of the Scientific Assessment Committee of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change. Call me suspicious, but that makes me wonder how seriously CUP is taking this whole peer review thing and how hard they might be finding it to get endorsements from the above-mentioned historical Jesus scholars. More on the book here. UPDATE: Professor Geza Vermes has e-mailed to note that Sir Colin has been at this for quite a while. Back in 1984, before he was Sir Colin, his ideas about the date of the Last Supper were noted in a New Scientist article. Vermes wrote in a response that Humphreys showed "the kind of naivety to which scientists inexperienced in historico- literary matters tend to be prone." In his e-mail today he adds "Of course, he claims to have solved the mystery of the star of Bethlehem too." Not looking promising here, either for Sir Colin or CUP. UPDATE (23 April): Mark Goodacre pokes some holes in the theory: Dating the Last Supper a Day Early? posted by Jim Davila | 9:45 AM A REPORT ON SAMARITAN PASSOVER, which began the day before Jewish Passover this year: Photo-op on Mount GerizimMore on the Samaritan Passover here. posted by Jim Davila | 9:21 AM Thursday, April 21, 2011 CONGRATULATIONS TO MYRTO THEOCHAROUS: Another Successful PhD Defense in Cambridge. Her thesis title is "Inner-Biblical Echoes in the Septuagint of Hosea and Amos." posted by Jim Davila | 12:51 PM NEW TESTAMENT APOCRYPHA WATCH: A couple of recent blog posts relate news about developments in research on some New Testament apocrypha. First, at Apocryphicity, Tony Burke announces the publication of his new edition of the Greek text of the Infancy Gospel of Thomas: CCSA 17: De Infantia Iesu Evangelium Thomae. Second, at his eponymous blog, Alin Suciu announces his identification of a new Coptic fragment of an apocryphal gospel (?): An Apocryphal Fragment Sold at Sotheby’s (The Pseudo-Gospel of the Twelve Apostles). posted by Jim Davila | 10:29 AM ARAMAIST PAUL FLESHER has a brief essay out on the James Ossuary: UW Religion Today Column for April 24-30: The Burial Box of James the Brother of Jesus: 10 Years On. Excerpt: In 2004, the Israel Antiquities Authority brought charges against Golan for forging antiquities. But all did not go as planned. Some expert witnesses changed their evaluations, and others could say little more than they could not make a determination. The trial dragged on for years: 138 witnesses testified, with 52 of them being experts in some area of antiquity or archaeology. The trial ended and the judge has been considering his ruling ever since. Indications are that he will announce a verdict soon.The judge's verdict will be interesting and not irrelevant to the question of whether part of the inscription on the James Ossuary is forged. But (I say it again and again) ultimately the only way for the genuineness of the whole inscription to be established is in the pages of peer-reviewed journals and monographs. As I said before (see next link), I'd like to know of any such publications on the inscription. So far, no one has replied. Oded Golan's recent essay on the forgery trial, the James Ossuary, and the Jehoash inscription is noted here. posted by Jim Davila | 9:38 AM TALMUD IN CONNECTICUT: House approves certificate program in study of Talmudposted by Jim Davila | 9:26 AM Wednesday, April 20, 2011 FAKE METAL CODICES WATCH: The Economist has taken up the story in the context of Easter and "Hebrew," i.e., Jewish Christianity: Early religious archaeology: An Easter enigma, Whatever happened to the Hebrew Christians? (no author given). The article is pretty up to date on the story as far as it has been covered by the mainstream media, but note this: ... But a dissonant voice has come from Peter Thonemann, an Oxford University historian who was shown a photograph of a copper engraving, apparently found along with the lead codices; what he saw, at least, was a crude forgery, he insists. But so far, no scientific authority in a position to judge has seen more than a fraction of the objects.This is misleading and is clearly slanted toward wishful thinking that somehow the bulk of the codices might be genuine. The "copper plate," first, is inscribed in Greek that is an obvious forgery; second, it is a plate in one of the bound codices (see photos here and note the binding); and third, the plate has clear connections with some of the other plates in the other codices. It is from the same cache. The new line seems to be that we can't judge until all the codices are made fully available for study. That simply isn't true. There's ample evidence from what has been released that the codices are fakes. It would be interesting to have all the material available in order to understand the hoax better, but that isn't going to somehow make some of them genuine. If only the unnamed author if this piece bothered to consult specialist blogs, he or she would have had much more material and could have produced much better coverage. Background here, where some of that much better material is collected. posted by Jim Davila | 5:08 PM FAKE METAL CODICES WATCH: The Sheffield Telegraph interviews Philip Davies on the codices, repeating much hype and silliness from earlier media coverage, albeit with a small dose of caution: Prof’s mystery textsThe interesting part is the quotation from Philip: “It is extremely exciting and a very curious case - it’s not normal for books to be bound on both sides,” said Philip. “They may be sheets of secret signs and people may have prayed over them.”Some thoughts: First, can someone please publish those "[t]ests" that supposedly "suggest the scrolls [sic] date back to at least the first century AD"? Until they have been peer-reviewed by specialists in ancient metallurgy, I am not going to take them seriously. Second, "what sort of hoax they might be" is an interesting question that is worth following up. If someone intended to make money from them, this turned into an epic fail once the Jordanian Government took an interest. It would be helpful to know when they were forged and, if possible, who did it and why. Third, that "carved image of Christ" has a suspicious similarity to the "Mona Lisa of the Galilee" mosaic. And there are other, similar problems with the iconography and script of the codices (see here, here, here, and here). Fourth, as for "I think some of them may be authentic," I'll take the liberty of quoting myself (with an added link): So just because one of the codices is a fake, does it mean they all are? Let's see. Some guy makes a major epigraphic discovery. So what does he do? He goes out and finds a forger and has the forger make up some very similar fakes and salts the real cache of codices with them. You believe that?I'm all for keeping an open mind until the evidence is in, but in this case we are past the point of being extremely cautious. The evidence is compelling that this supposed cache of ancient texts is fake. On a more positive note (so to speak), the fakeness of the codices did get some coverage in the MobyLives column of the Melville House Publishing Co. yesterday: Newly discovered Christian codices both timely and fake. It's not major media, but it did make it into Google News. posted by Jim Davila | 10:21 AM CONFERENCE: Les manuscrits de la mer Morte et la littérature paulinienne/The Dead Sea Scrolls and Pauline Literature; Colloque International, Metz, 14-16 juin 2011/International Colloquium, Metz, june 14-16, 2011. I noted this in February, but Timothy Lim has written to ask me to publicize it again, so here it is. It looks like a good conference. I wish I could go, but I'm already attending the Sixth Enoch Seminar at the end of June and I can only do so much conferencing. posted by Jim Davila | 9:40 AM BOOK REVIEW: of Hoffman and Cole, Sacred Trash, by Judy Bolton-Fasman in the Boston Globe: Centuries of once-forgotten Jewish history brought to light. Excerpt: Hoffman and Cole’s vivid portrayal of the discovery of the ancient Cairo Geniza — the world’s richest depository of Jewish manuscript fragments, which the authors playfully describe as “a kind of holy junk heap’’ — is equal parts treasure hunt for the sacred and historical and Herculean rescue of important texts.More reviews here. posted by Jim Davila | 9:31 AM I KNEW THIS WAS LEONARD when I saw the headline: Creighton prof studies comics religiouslyHe also has a column called "The Bible in the News" at BAR, noted, e.g., here. posted by Jim Davila | 9:14 AM |
|
|||