China-Russia relations and the United States: At a turning point?
By Dr. Richard Weitz
08:41 14/04/2011Russia in the New Middle East
By Zvi Magen
11:05 15/04/2011Final Warning: Central Asian dictators bought time for reform
By Gabor Stier
09:45 13/04/2011
If Ukraine sees its future in the EU, it should change the relations between capital and the government
08:30 22/04/2011James Sherr
“Russia is less concerned and attaches less significance to Ukraine’s joining the Customs Union than it does to Ukraine’s not joining the Deep [and Comprehensive] Free Trade Area with the EU. If it sees it as a real prospect, I think it will use economic pressure, and pressure with regard to energy supplies. I do not believe that we can exclude the possibility of a future energy crisis between Ukraine and Russia.”
Russia-Poland rapprochement against a backdrop of contradictions
09:15 19/04/2011By Alexei Fenenko
After the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, Poland saw itself as being the leading state in East-Central Europe. The objective clash of interests between Warsaw and Russia has its roots in that perception. First, Poland is interested in seeing a strengthened U.S. presence in Eastern Europe and NATO mechanisms. Poland’s political elite feel they need a powerful ally to counterbalance Russia and Germany.
Why do we need additional gas pipelines like Nord Stream?
09:55 18/04/2011By Roland Götz
According to one likely scenario for the period up to 2035, European economies will continue to experience moderate growth. Because energy intensity will decrease, overall energy demand will more or less stagnate. But gas demand will grow because gas will come to substitute coal and nuclear energy in electricity production. By 2035, European gas demand is likely to have increased by about 100 bcm.
New forms of cooperation needed for human rights protection
09:47 18/04/2011By Andrei Baklanov
The striking tone of a report titled “Human Rights & Democracy: The 2010 FCO Report.” Josef Stalin wrote in much the same tone, albeit in Russian – the same rigid and dogmatic pronouncements, with the same lack of “unnecessary” evidence, the same eagerness to educate the people, and the same conviction that all opposing views are wrong.