Ktunaxa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the indigenous peoples of North America. For other indigenous peoples see Indigenous peoples (disambiguation)
This article is part of a series on
Aboriginal peoples
in Canada
Maple Leaf (from roundel).png
A life-sized bronze statue of an Aboriginal and eagle above him; with a bear to his right and a wolf to his left both looking upwards
First Nations · Inuit · Métis
v • d • e
This article is about the Kootenai tribe. For other uses of the term, see Kootenay.
Ktunaxa
Total population
1984
Regions with significant populations
United States (Idaho, Montana, Washington), Canada (British Columbia)
Languages

English, Kootenai
Religion

Christianity, other

The Ktunaxa (pronounced [kʰtʰuˈnaxa]), also known as Kootenai, Kutenai or Kootenay, are an indigenous people of North America. They are one of three tribes of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Nation in Montana, and they form the Ktunaxa Nation in British Columbia. There are also small populations in Idaho and Washington in the United States.[1] The Flathead Reservation is home to the Bitterroot Salish and Pend d'Oreilles tribes as well.

The tribes constitute a distinct stock (Kitunahan). There is evidence that they formerly lived in the eastern plains and were driven into the mountains by the Blackfeet.

Ktunaxa Group Near Tipis (ca. 1900)
Ktunaxa
Ktunaxa girls, photographed by Edward S. Curtis in 1911.

Contents

[edit] Communities

There are 4 bands in south-eastern British Columbia, 1 band in northern Idaho, and 1 band in north-western Montana, all members of the same tribal council, which spans the international border as does Ktunaxa territory:[2][3][4]

British Columbia
Idaho
Montana

[edit] History

Question book-new.svg
 This article's section "History" (or significant parts of that section) does not cite any references or sources.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2009)
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can. (August 2009)
Wikitext.svg
 This article may need to be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please help by adding relevant internal links, or by improving the article's layout. (August 2009)

Originally the tribe is said to have lived in the plains, east of the Rockies, but were driven out by the Blackfeet.[5]

On September 21, 1975, the Kootenai Tribe headed by Chairwoman Amy Trice declared war on the United States government. Their first act was to post soldiers on each end of the highway that runs through the town and they forced people, at gunpoint, to pay a toll to drive through the land that had been the tribe’s aboriginal land. The money would be used to house and care for elderly tribal members. Most tribes in the United States are forbidden to declare war on the U.S. government because of treaties, but the Kootenai Tribe never signed a treaty. The dispute resulted in the concession by the United States government and a land grant of 12.5 acres (51,000 m2) that would become what is now the Kootenai Reservation.[6]

In 1976 the tribe issued "Kootenai Nation War Bonds" that sold at $1.00 each. The bonds were dated 20 September, 1974 and contained a brief declaration of war on the United States.

These War Bonds were signed by Amelia Custack Trice, Tribal Chairwoman and Douglas James Wheaton, Sr., Tribal Representative. The bonds themselves were printed on heavy paper stock and were created and signed by well known Western Artist, Emilie Touraine.

The Ktunaxa people today live in southeastern British Columbia, Washington State, Idaho, and Montana. In Montana they are known as Ksanka. Ktunaxa is the term that these tribes call themselves, which is pronounced Ta-na-ha, with a barely perceptible ‘k’ sound at the beginning of the word. Traditionally these people have been known as Kootenay, which is an anglicism of the Blackfoot word used to refer to the Ktunaxa, so in some of their tribal organizations and activities, the Ktunaxa refer to themselves as Kootenay.

There is a widely recognized cultural distinction between Upper Kootenay, those bands based around Invermere and Windermere, BC, and Lower Kootenay, those based around Creston, Grassmere, and Cranbrook, BC, Bonners Ferry, Idaho, and the Ksanka of Elmo, Montana. This history is going to focus on the the Creston Band of the Lower Kootenay, who call themselves the Yaqan Nu’kiy Ktunaxa, or the marsh or water people of the Ktunaxa, but it will also situate this group in the broader context of all the Ktunaxa tribes.

The present day tribal organization to which the Ktunaxa belong is called the Kootenay – Kinbasket Tribal Council, and this group consists of all the bands of Upper and Lower Kootenay, as well as the Kinbasket people, who have enjoyed good relations with the Upper Kootenay for many, many years, and so were included in the Tribal Council.

There are many stories about the origins of the Ktunaxa. It is often said that they originally lived on the prairies, and were driven across the mountains by the Blackfoot or by famine and disease. The truth behind this origin story is that some Upper Kootenay did participate in a Plains Native lifestyle for part of the year, crossing the Rockies for the bison hunt. In this way they became relatively well known to the Blackfoot, and sometimes their relations with them were violent. After learning the Plains Native lifestyle, some Ktunaxa remained on the Prairies year round and had a settlement near Ft. Mcleod, AB. It is this group of Ktunaxa who suffered greatly partly because of the depredations of the Blackfoot, and partly because of small pox. After their numbers were greatly reduced, these Plains Ktunaxa returned to the Kootenay region of British Columbia. There is another origin story, told by the some of the Ktunaxa themselves but not believed by all the bands, that the people are originally from the Great Lakes region of Michigan. I[who?] looked into this belief, but I was not able to find any way to rationalize it. There seems to be no evidence at all that this is the case, not in the archaeological nor in the historical record.

The archaeological recond of Ktunaxa territory in British Columbia boasts some of the oldest man-made artifacts in Canada. There is evidence of quarrying and flint-knapping, especially of quartzite and tourmalinite, which demonstrates human occupation of the Kootenays by 11,500 BP. This oldest assemblage of artifacts is known as the Goatfell Complex, named after the Goatfell region about 40 km east of Creston on Highway 3. These artifacts are found at quarries in Goatfell, Harvey Mountain just across the international border in Idaho, Negro Lake and Kiakho Lake both near Lumberton and Cranbrook, North Star Mountain just west of Creston on Highway 3, and at Blue Ridge. All these sites are very close to Creston, within 50 km, with the exception of Blue Ridge which is near Kaslo, quite a distance north on the west side of Kootenay Lake.

The archaeologist of record for the area is Dr. Wayne Choquette, and his research has done much to clarify the origins of the Ktunaxa. From the technology represented in the Goatfell Complex at 11,500 BP up to the artifacts of the early historical period, there was no break in the archaeological record and no evidence of any technology that was not a local development significant enough to demonstrate the emigration of the region’s first inhabitants, or their replacement by a different people. It is Dr. Choquette’s conclusion that the Ktunaxa today are the descendants of those first people to inhabit the land, and there is no evidence I could find to suggest otherwise.

This is not the end of the story of the beginnings of the Ktunaxa. The Goatfell assemblage of artifacts suggests that prior to 11,500 BP, the people who came to inhabit the Kootenays may have lived in what is now the southwestern United States, during a period when British Columbia was beneath the Cordilleran Ice sheet of the last Ice Age. The evidence for this is that the Goatfell Complex, and specifically the techniques of manufacture of the tools and points, are part of a tradition of knapping that existed in the North American Great Basin and the Intermontane west of the continent in the Late Pleistocene. The prevailing theory is that as the glaciers retreated people moved northward as the flora and fauna also moved northward. From the time of the first Ktunaxa settlement in the Kootenays, until the historical period, which for the Ktunaxa begins with their mention on Alexander Mackenzie’s map, circa 1793, we know little of their social, political, and intellectual development. We can observe stone tool technologies change and become more complex and differentiated. The prevailing theory of the Ktunaxa lifestyle over this period of time is that they were probably big game hunters in their earliest prehistoric phase, but as temperatures continued to warm, the glacial lakes drained, and fish found habitat in the warmer waters, the Lower Kootenay became more focused on fishing, while maintaining the old traditions of game hunting. The Upper Kootenay, inhabiting an essentially different climate, did not become the avid fishermen that the Lower Kootenay did.

Anthropological and ethnographic interest in the Ktunaxa began in the mid-19th century. What these European and North American scholars observed has to be viewed with a critical eye, since they did not have the theoretical sophistication we expect of anthropologists today, and they imputed a great deal of their own cultural values into what they were able to witness among the Ktunaxa. They remain, however, our most detailed descriptions of Ktunaxa lifestyles at a time when Aboriginal lifeways all over the world were dramatically changing in the face of a self-confident, commerce- and resource-driven European expansionism. Many of the activities and traits observed among the Ktunaxa could be thousands of years old, but there is little way of proving that of a certainty. The earliest ethnographies detail Ktunaxa lifestyle around the turn of the 20th century. They allow us to interpret the 11,000-year period prior as a trajectory toward what the anthropologists observed. The Ktunaxa lifestyle, when first observed by Europeans, was full and rich. They observed a stable economic life and a rich social life with a detailed ritual calendar. Their economic life focused on fishing, using fish traps and hooks, and travelling on the waterways in the sturgeon-nosed canoe. There were also seasonal and sometimes ritual hunts for bear, deer, caribou, gophers, geese, and the many other fowl in Lower Kootenay country. As mentioned above, the Upper Kootenay often crossed the Rockies to participate in the bison hunt, but the Lower Kootenay did this only as an individual pursuit, and therefore it was not an important part of their economic life.

Ktunaxa social life as observed by the anthropologists consists of vision quests, reverence of tobacco, a Sun Dance, and Grizzly Bear Dance, a midwinter festival, a Blue Jay Dance and other social and ceremonial activities. There were different societies or lodges that people belonged to, such as The Crazy Dog Society, the Crazy Owl Society, and the Shamans’ Society. These groups took on certain responsibilities in Ktunaxa society, and membership in a lodge came with obligations in battle, hunting, and community service.

A remarkable technology among the Ktunaxa is the sturgeon-nosed canoe. It is the focus of international interest because of its excellent design and it’s similarity to a canoe of the Amur River region of Siberia. Hugh Turney-High, the first to write an extensive ethnography of the Ktunaxa, however focusing on the American bands, records a detailed description of the harvesting of the bark to make this canoe (67): “A tree […] growing rather high in the mountains is sought. Finding one of the desired size and quality, a man climbed it to the proper height and cut a ring around the bark with his elk-horn chisel or flint knife. In the meantime a helper cut out another ring at the base of the tree. This done, an incision was made down the length of the trunk connecting the two rings. This cut had to be as straight and accurate as possible. A stick of about two inches in diameter was used carefully to pry the bark from the tree. The bark was wrapped up so that it would not dry out on the way to camp. The inside, or tree-side of the bark sheet, became the outside of the canoe, while the outside surface became the inside of the boat. The bark was considered ready for immediate use. There was no scraping or seasoning, nor was it decorated in any way.”

The process that defines the entry of the Ktunaxa into the written record of the European immigrant society that was growing around them is the arrival of Christianity to their territory and their early relation to it.  We have more information about this process than we do about any other sequence of events that the Ktunaxa were involved in at the turn of the 20th century.

The Ktunaxa had been exposed to Christianity as early as the 18th century, when a Lower Kootenay prophet from Flathead Lake in Idaho by the name of Shining Shirt spread news of the coming of the ‘Blackrobes’ (Cocolla 20).  Ktunaxa people also encountered Christian Iroquois sent west by the Hudson’s Bay Company.  By the 1830s there was a blending of Native and Christian ceremonies among the Ktunaxa, which occurred without the presence of European missionaries or pressure, but rather through their contact with Christian Natives from other parts of Canada and the United States.

Father Pierre-Jean de Smet in 1845-6 was the first missionary to tour the region, with a view to establishing missions to minister to Native peoples and assessing the success and needs of those already established.  It had been a priority of the Jesuits to minister to these newly discovered non-Christians in the New World.  This is a phenomenon that of course had been going on in Eastern North America for 200 years already, but the Ktunaxa were not the objects of the church’s attentions until the mid-late 19th century.  A Jesuit by the name of Philippo Canestrelli lived among the Ksanka people of Montana in the 1880s and 90s, and wrote a much celebrated grammar of their language, published in 1896.  The first missionary to take up a permanent post in the Yaqan Nu’kiy territory, i.e. the Creston Band of Lower Kootenay, was Father Nicolas Coccola, who arrived in the Creston area in 1880.  It is from his memoirs, corroborated by newspaper reports and Ktunaxa oral histories that the early 20th century history of the Ktunaxa is constructed.

In the first stages of Ktunaxa - European contact, mainly the result of a gold-rush that began in earnest in 1863 with the discovery of gold in Wild Horse Creek, the Ktunaxa were little interested in European-driven economic activities.  There was an attempt to recruit them to trap in support of the fur trade, but few Lower Kootenay found this worthwhile.  The Lower Kootenay region is, as mentioned above, remarkably rich in fish, birds, and large game, and so the economic life of the Yaqan Nu’kiy was notably secure, and thus resistant to new unfamiliar economic activities.

Slowly though, the Yaqan Nu’kiy began participating in European-driven industries.  They served as hunters and guides for the miners at the Bluebell silver-lead mine at Riondell.  The richest gold mine ever discovered in the Kootenays was discovered by a Ktunaxa man named Pierre, and staked by him and Father Coccola in 1893.  This mine, sold soon after its discovery by the pair, made the Ktunaxa man rich, though not as rich as it made the mining company thereafter, and Father Coccola had new and significant funds with which he built a hospital and more than one church.

While there was sometimes conflict between the Yaqan Nu’kiy and the local settler community at Creston, their relations are characterized much more by peaceful coexistence, and never reached the pitch of the relations between the surrounding European society and the Lower Kootenay in Bonner’s Ferry, Idaho, who officially declared war against the U.S. government in 1974 over land claims.  As one would imagine, the conflict that there was between the Creston Band and the local settlers usually had its origin in land use.

By the turn of the 20th century, some Yaqan Nu’kiy were engaged in agricultural activities introduced to them by the European settlers, but their approach to the land was of course different.  An example of the type of conflict which would come up between White and Native farmers is shown by a newspaper article in the Creston Review dated Friday, August 9, 1912:

“A dispute over the rights to cut hay on the flat lands, between the Indians and the white men, which might have resulted in bloodshed, was settled Wednesday by W.F. Teetzel, government agent, of Nelson, who told both Indians and whites that if violence is done, no one would be allowed to cut hay on government land.  […] The principal trouble this year occurred when some Indians threatened Frank Lewis and drove him from the hay he had already cut.  The Indians claim they have cut land at this particular place for years while the old-time ranchers say that hay has never before been cut there.  Mr. Lewis complained to Policeman Gunn who, as the definite boundry [sic] of the Indian reservation is not known was at a loss what to do because no violence was committed whereby he could act.  […] Mr. Teetzel arrived from Nelson Wednesday and in conference with Chief Alexander, got him to promise to see that Mr. Lewis got his hay, and warned him to keep the Indians from violence under penalty of losing the right of cutting hay on the flats.  This warning he also gave to the white men.  This is not the only one of the cases occurring this year.  One farmer whose place is located near the reservation has been continually bothered by the Indians cutting his fences and turning their cattle in to graze on his property.” Yet, in the very same year we hear this report in the Creston Review, June 21, 1912: “[Indian Agent Galbraith] says everything is in good condition and the majority of the Indians are at work picking berries for the ranchers who find their help useful and profitable.”

These examples illustrate the dynamic of relations between two peoples: the Ktunaxa whose lands have been vastly reduced by the introduction of a reserve system, and the European settlers who are constantly looking to expand their industries and their access to the land.

As the years of the 20th century wore on the Yaqan Nu’kiy gradually became involved in all the industries of the Creston valley: agriculture, forestry, mining, and later health care, education, and tourism.  This process of integration separated the Yaqan Nu’kiy from their traditional lifeways, yet they have remained a very successful and self-confident community.  They also gradually gained more and more control over their own affairs, with less involvement from the Department of Indian or Aboriginal Affairs and more self-government.  Like most tribes in B.C., the Yaqan Nu’kiy did not have a treaty defining their rights regarding their territory, but a careful and more or less cooperative treaty negotiation process with the Government of Canada has been ongoing for decades.  The Creston Band of the Ktunaxa today boasts 113 individuals living on the reserve, and many others living off-reserve and working in various industries in Canada and the United States.

Through long years of integration, the Ktunaxa feel that they have lost some traditions that are very important to them.  They are taking bold steps to rectify this situation.  There are 10 living fluent speakers of Ktunaxa both in the U.S. and Canada.  The Yaqan Nu’kiy have developed curriculum for grades 4-6, and have been teaching it for four years.  They are currently involved in designing curriculum for grades 7-12, and this requires meeting special B.C. curriculum guidelines.  Concurrent with this, there is a vibrant effort to record oral stories and myths, as well as to videotape and describe the making of their traditional crafts and technologies.

[edit] See also

[edit] Literature

  • Boas, Franz, and Alexander Francis Chamberlain. Kutenai Tales. Washington: Govt. Print. Off, 1918.
  • Chamberlain, A. F., "Report of the Kootenay Indians of South Eastern British Columbia," in Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, (London, 1892)
  • Finley, Debbie Joseph, and Howard Kallowat. Owl's Eyes & Seeking a Spirit: Kootenai Indian Stories. Pablo, Mont: Salish Kootenai College Press, 1999. ISBN 0917298667
  • Linderman, Frank Bird, and Celeste River. Kootenai Why Stories. Lincoln, Neb: University of Nebraska Press, 1997. ISBN 0585315841
  • Maclean, John, Canadian Savage Folk, (Toronto, 1896)
  • Tanaka, Béatrice, and Michel Gay. The Chase: A Kutenai Indian Tale. New York: Crown, 1991. ISBN 0517586231
  • Turney-High, Harry Holbert. Ethnography of the Kutenai. Menasha, Wis: American Anthropological Association, 1941.

[edit] References

Search Wikimedia Commons Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Kootenai (tribe)
Search Wikisource Wikisource has original text related to this article:
  1. ^ Kootenai Reservation, Idaho United States Census Bureau
  2. ^ Language Geek information about Ktunaxa
  3. ^ Ktunaxa Nation Council Society infopage, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada website
  4. ^ Ktunaxa Nation website
  5. ^ Wikisource-logo.svg "Kutenai Indians". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 1913. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Kutenai_Indians. 
  6. ^ Idaho’s forgotten war

[edit] External links

v • d • e
Rotating globe.gif   Indigenous peoples of the world by continent: (disambiguation)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ktunaxa"