Skip to Content

Get the perfect Travel Gadget for the jetsetter on your list!
Holidash Blog
AOL Tech

Posts with tag security

YouTube Virus Turns Out to be False Alarm

YouTube Virus Turns Out to be False Alarm
Rumors are flying that YouTube is infecting unsuspecting computer users with a computer virus. Before we go any further, let us just calm your fears -- it's not true. But that doesn't mean it's safe to let down your guard.

It turns out that out-of-date antivirus programs are erroneously labeling clips on YouTube as containing Actns/Swif.T, a particularly nasty piece of malware that urges you to install a software package called Antivirus 2009. Of course, Antivirus 2009 is a piece of spyware, and a notoriously difficult one to remove at that.

Since YouTube generates its own Flash code for playing back videos, it is unlikely that it would host malicious code. Even so, Flash has proven to be quite insecure (as we're sure you've learned from the piles of crap installed on your computer via MySpace pages).

So keep your guard up, and that security software up-to-date. [From: ValleyWag]

Canada Dropping the Ball on Spam, Expert Says



One prominent Ottawa professor is blaming lax Canadian legislation for what he identifies as a proliferation of spammers in the country, Ars Technica points out.

The Chair of Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa's School of Law, Geist cites a report by anti-spam software provider Cloudmark in his claims that Canada has emerged as a safe haven for spammers. That report found that Canadian servers shipped out the fifth largest volume of worldwide, Web-based e-mail spam, outdone only by Iran, Nigeria, Kenya, and Israel.

Ars Technica, though, cites a study by Cloudmark-competitor Sophos that placed Canada well outside of the top ten spam-producing countries -- interestingly, the United States is ranked numero uno.

Regardless of specific data, everybody seems to agree that Canada needs anti-spam legislation. In fact, Canada is the only G-7 country not to have anti-spam legislation in place.

To our reckoning, if the Great White North isn't crawling with spammers now, by the time that news gets out, it will be. [From: MichaelGeist.ca via Ars Technica]

McDonald's and Other Big Brands Used to Spread Computer Viruses

McDonald's and Other Familiar Brands Used for Viruses
Yeah, we know, it always seems like another day, another virus around these parts, but we feel it's our duty to keep you informed of any threats to your security (ID theft, computer viruses, etc). So, we hope you're paying attention to yet another warning of a nasty virus that uses some seriously deceitful means to trick you. The latest is a series of trojan viruses that show up in your e-mail in-box purporting to be coupons, but, in reality, are just another means to install malicious software.

Have you ever been the victim of a computer virus?



As seen in the above picture, one of those says it's from McDonald's and is delivering you "FREE giveaways and AWESOME savings." Actually, all it's giving is a file that, if you run it, will give hackers control of your machine and access to your data. According to CNET, similar e-mails are appear to come from Coca-Cola and Hallmark as well -- the latter even including a goofy-looking holiday card! It, too, is just another delivery means for corrupt software. So, update that anti-viral software and, as always, watch where you click! [From: CNet News]

Reports Of Mac Security Vulnerability Appear to Be Overhyped



Apple caused a bit of a stir among Macintosh users this week when it seemed to say users would be wise to install "multiple antivirus utilities so that virus programmers have more than one application to circumvent." But wait, aren't Macs supposed to be virus free and virus defeating right out of the box? It's the Windows users who have to be constantly vigilant against viruses, spyware, Trojan horses and all sorts of other online baddies.

Well, the stir may have been for nothing. It started with a simple updating to a help page, or "KnowledgeBase" article, on the Apple Web site that revised the computer company's position on how its customers should protect their machines. The page has since been removed by Apple but you can see a saved version of it here.

Apple spokesman Bill Evans told CNET "We have removed the KnowledgeBase article because it was old and inaccurate." Macs have built-in protection against malicious software and security threats "right out of the box," he explained. "However, since no system can be 100 percent immune from every threat, running antivirus software may offer additional protection."

Microsoft Windows has been criticized throughout the years for having many security vulnerabilities while Macs have the reputation of being safe. Part of the reason is that Windows really does have more holes in its system where hackers can get through. The other reason is that Windows so dominates the market that hackers see it as a more attractive target.

Now, a day later, the reports are urging calm for Mac users. That doesn't mean you should let your guard down for those 419 scams. (We just love talking about those.) [Source: CNET.]

Apple Reminding Mac Users They're Not Immune to Viruses



Surely you've seen the Mac vs. PC commercials in which Apple loves to make a fool of the bungling PC, played by John Hodgman. In one commercial, embedded after the break, Apple shows a sick PC, coughing and saying he's been infected by some virus. The noble Mac offers a hankie and says he's immune. However, showing what little truth there is in advertising, Apple's not nearly as confident when it comes to making recommendations to customers.

The Zero Day blog at ZDNet recently noticed this statement on Apple's site:
Apple encourages the widespread use of multiple antivirus utilities so that virus programmers have more than one application to circumvent, thus making the whole virus writing process more difficult.
In other words, Macs are indeed not immune and, not only should users install an anti-virus program, Apple recommends that they install more than one! Somehow we don't think we'll see this warning pop up in the next round of commercials. [From: Zero Day]

New E-Mail Scam Targets the Previously Scammed



As if you didn't feel bad enough about yourself after being taken in by that e-mail from the Nigerian prince enlisting your help to gain access to nonexistent millions, now you've got to worry about guarding yourself against a scam targeted at those who have already fallen victim to Internet con-men.

Those infinitely malleable 419 scams that harvest personal info from the less cautious among us are now targeting those who have already fallen for the scheme. E-mails are starting to land in in-boxes promising cash compensation to those who have been fleeced by a Nigerian based scam before.

Cory Doctorow from Boing Boing received one recently that read:
THIS IS TO OFFICIALLY INFORM YOU THAT YOU HAVE BEEN SELECTED AMONG THE 40 LUCKY VICTIM OF SCAMMED TO BE COMPENSATED WITH $500,000.00.FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS,THIS WAS CONCLUDED BY THE SENATE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA,SENATOR wALLIS KELLY WITH DELEGATE FROM THE UNITED NATION AND WORLD BANK AT THE AFRICAN UNION SUMMIT WHICH TOOK PLACE IN ADDIS ABABA IN (ETHIOPIA) AIMED AT REDEEMING THE COUNTRY'S IMAGE AND ALSO TO TRY TO PUT ANEND TO THE INCESSANT SCAM REPORTS BY FOREIGNER ESPECIALLY FROM USA AND AROUND THE GLOBE.YOU HAVE BEEN LISTED AND APPROVED FOR THIS PAYMENT AS ONE OF THE SCAMMED VICTIMS TO BE PAID THIS AMOUNT.
As usual, you should never give out personal information via e-mail, but if you feel so inclined, you can save your fellow human some trouble and engage in a little scam baiting. Every minute spent replying to your e-mails is time the fraudsters aren't trying to prey on someone else. [From: Boing Boing]

German Scientists Try to Clean Up 'Naked Scanners'

German Scientists Try to Clean Up Naked Scanner
Airports worldwide are starting to see new full-body scan machines that have the unfortunate side effect of revealing your goodies. Of course, the fact that security agents get an eye-full of your naughty bits has some privacy advocates concerned and has prevented them becoming common place in most countries.

Reuters reports that German scientists are looking to address some of these concerns. They've taken the scanners into the lab to see if they can produce an image with the private parts automatically blurred out. Critics of the highly detailed scanner dubbed it the "naked scanner," and are spearheading the effort to prove the scanner can effectively reveal weapons without producing an image of a passenger's naked body.

The U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has previously defended the scanners, saying the images produced were family friendly enough to, "make the cover of Reader's Digest." After seeing the images, however, we can safely say that the only way 'Reader's Digest' would ever publish images from the scan is if they were purchased by 'Hustler.' [From: Reuters]

How to Avoid ID Theft (Video)

It's rare that a day goes by when you don't hear some story about somebody getting their identity stolen, and often it happens from plain old human behavior online. We've come up with a few tips on avoiding ID theft, and stuck them in the above, user-friendly video. Take a look, and, as always, let us know if you have any questions!

Spam on the Rise Again, Say Experts




While the volume of spam recently plunged in the wake of the McColo shutdown, some experts suggest that spam is again on the rise, according to stories by Computer World and the BBC.

Researchers at IronPort Systems and MessageLabs agree that spam numbers have increased over the last week, although their exact figures, and predictions for the future, differ.
A senior product manager with IronPort, Nick Edwards reported to Computer World that, despite an increase of nearly 10 billion since McColo's shutdown on November 13th, spam volume is still at less than half of the 153 billion prior to that date.

Matt Sergeant, however, a technologist at MessageLabs, does not deliver such cheery news; he claims that the amount of spam currently online is nearly two-thirds of what it was prior to November 13th.

While folks at IronPort seem to be optimistic about spam numbers remaining low, and Messagelabs researchers seem more cautious, both Edwards and Sergeant are confident that spam levels will not return to their high-water mark. This, they say, is largely due to the destruction of the Srizbi botnet, which -- Sergeant told Computer World -- had accounted for half of all spam.

Still, there is dissent among the ranks of anti-spam researchers. According to the Washington Post, Srizbi was resurrected earlier this week According to the article, the worldwide network of Srizbi-infected computers -- over 500,000 strong -- are equipped with a feature that, in the event the master servers go down, will locate the new servers once they are established. If they're right, we should see a huge spike in spam volumes in the not-too-distant future.

At this point, there's little to do but wait and see. [From: Computer World and BBC]

Why You Shouldn't Believe What Wikipedia Says About Drugs



The errors of omission in drug information found on Wikipedia, the online collaborative encyclopedia, can be dangerous, doctors say. While most of the details on what a pharmaceutical can do are accurate, it's the missing pieces that can cause harm – and some drug company representatives have been caught deleting information from Wikipedia entries that make their drugs look unsafe.

Dr. Kevin A. Clauson of Nova Southeastern University in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, did a comparison study of Wikipedia versus a peer-reviewed free Web site called Medscape Drug Reference, which people can use to research drugs and their effects. He and his team looked for answers to 80 different medical questions on both Wikipedia and Medscape. They found that while Medscape came up with answers to more than 80 percent of the questions, Wikipedia could only muster up answers to 40 percent. And often those Wikipedia answers were missing important side effect information, such as how the anti-inflammatory drug Arthrotec (diclofenac and misoprostol) can cause pregnant women to miscarry, or that St. John's Wort can interfere with the action of the HIV drug Prezista (darunavir).

Wikipedia has had problems with accuracy before when users input incorrect information or when people deliberately edit entries with misinformation, either as a prank or with a more serious agenda.

Still, Wikipedia's collaborative nature does allow for the community at large to offer edits and corrections, a point that wasn't lost on Clauson and his fellow doctors. After 90 days, they found the Wikipedia articles showed an improvement in their accuracy.

Still, they say for drug information people should go to medlineplus.gov or medscape.com.

So, we want to know: when you have a medical question, where do you look online? [Source: Reuters.]

Switched Video

 



Featured Galleries

AOL Tech Network


Latest Reviews from CNET.com

CNET provides the latest tech news, unbiased reviews, videos, podcasts, software, and downloads, making tech products easy to find, understand and use.

Top Product Reviews

AOL News

Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in: