Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


US and Russia in historic arms deal

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 March 2010
RUSSIA and the United States have agreed a new strategic arms treaty, slashing the number of nuclear weapons each side has by the biggest margin in a generation.


The deal, which cuts each side's weapons by about 30 per cent, was sealed in a phone call yesterday morning between US president Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart, Dmitry Medvedev.

Mr Obama said: "With this agreement, the US and Russia, the two largest nuclear powers in the world, also send a clear signal that we intend to lead. We strengthen our global efforts to stop the spread of these weapons and to ensure that other nations meet their own responsibilities."

The two men will sign the treaty in Prague on 8 April, the anniversary of Mr Obama's call last year for united action to work towards a nuclear-free world.

A Kremlin statement said: "The presidents agreed that the new treaty marks a higher level of cooperation between Russia and the United States in the development of new strategic relations."

Chris Stephen: Major powers set to dance to same tune on Iran

The treaty limits both nations to 1,550 nuclear warheads each. It also limits to 800 the number of deployed and non-deployed intercontinental ballistic missile launchers, submarine-launched ballistic missile launchers and heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments.

It will replace the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty and is an improvement on previous agreements that envisaged each side having a maximum of 2,200 warheads by 2012. A seven-year window after ratification is given to make the reductions.

For Russia, the deal is a rare chance to stand shoulder to shoulder with the US. Moscow's status as a superpower is long gone, its economy dwarfed by that of the US, but it remains, with Washington, the owner of the bulk of the world's nuclear weapons.

The Kremlin will also be pleased that, in return for co-operating on the treaty, it won agreement from the Obama administration to delay deployment of a proposed missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic.

The US has not renounced the anti-missile plan, and Russia has inserted a provision that it can break with the treaty if such a system goes ahead.

The US, in turn, won Russia's agreement the new treaty would include the sharing of data on new weapons systems, in particular Moscow's development of a series of ballistic nuclear missiles. Diplomatically, the pact signals a cooling of tensions that flared between the two nations after Russia invaded Georgia in 2008.

Washington has tempered its calls for Georgia to be admitted into Nato, while

Moscow has indicated a willingness at the United Nations to co-operate on issues including Middle East peace and opposition to Iran's development of nuclear weapons.

The deal comes days after the signing of Mr Obama's healthcare bill, a priority for the president. White House officials are hoping the two deals will end criticism that he was incapable of turning his lofty goals into reality.

Mr Obama hopes to use the treaty, and his meetings with Mr Medvedev, as the springboard to obtain global consensus for a new non-proliferation agreement.

Yet the treaty still leaves both powers with the capacity to destroy one another many times over. The logic of nuclear deterrence – Mutually Assured Destruction – remains in place.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 March 2010 1:59 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Nuclear defence
 
1

,

27/03/2010 00:34:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

CHN,

Los Angeles, CA 27/03/2010 03:27:18
This article mentions nothing of Gilbert Arenas. I understand the momentus occasion of Russia and the U.S. strengthening START - but the Arenas story needs to be included.

Thank you, great article friends.
CHN www.comedyhub.blogspot.com
3

billengland,

27/03/2010 08:37:55
Neither the USA nor Russia can afford to keep the weapons. Other countries can, and have no intention of cutting back.
4

McNasty,

Edinburgh 27/03/2010 08:48:53
#3.
It seems the UK can afford such weapons. Or can we?
5

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 27/03/2010 08:57:30
Dismantling weapons of mass destruction is a lengthy and hazardous business, which is the real reason why they cannot simply be abolished overnight. This agreement is of course to be welcomed unreservedly, like the major powers' agreement on Iran. One major task awaits Mr. Obama, the US ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty (see: www.ctbto.org). While Russia has long since ratified, a number of other states, notably China, are awaiting US ratification before proceeding with their own. A final stop to the testing of nuclear weapons on or under the ground, in the air or in space, will effectively end the further development of these weapons and pave the way for their final abolition. It is highly encouraging to hear that the Obama administration has this step well in hand.
6

The Ayrshire Bard,

27/03/2010 09:19:47
I slept soundly last night in the knowledge that the USA and Russia are limiting their nukes to 1550 each.
It also a great relief to note that the next generation of nukes will be environmentally friendly.
7

BlantyreBill,

27/03/2010 10:17:32
As the SNP claim that Gordon Brown is responsible for everything that happens in the world, I expect them to claim this to be the result of Mr Brown's deplomacy!
8

Joe McT,

27/03/2010 11:14:14
"As the SNP claim that Gordon Brown is responsible for everything that happens in the world"

That's not fair.

Don't blame Gordon.

He clearly lives on a different Planet anyway.
9

billengland,

27/03/2010 12:21:45
#4 No.

10

,

27/03/2010 15:33:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

27/03/2010 16:49:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Western Gael,

27/03/2010 17:29:42
Neville Chamberlain would have been pleased.
13

The west awake,

Argyll 27/03/2010 18:28:08
Blantyr bill - "As the SNP claim that Gordon Brown is responsible for everything that happens in the world, I expect them to claim this to be the result of Mr Brown's deplomacy!"

- No need, Browm will probably do that himself.

He did save the world after all!

14

,

27/03/2010 19:17:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

27/03/2010 22:12:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.