UK

7° London Hi 10°C / Lo 4°C

Osborne tries to win back trust after 'wobble' on spending cuts

Shadow Chancellor says safeguarding Britain's credit rating will be his priority

By Andrew Grice, Political Editor

George Osborne, with (from left) Jeremy Hunt, David Willetts, Theresa Villiers and Kenneth Clarke, speaks to workers in London where he set out eight benchmarks against which voters would be able to judge a Conservative government's success

PA

George Osborne, with (from left) Jeremy Hunt, David Willetts, Theresa Villiers and Kenneth Clarke, speaks to workers in London where he set out eight benchmarks against which voters would be able to judge a Conservative government's success

George Osborne invited voters to judge an incoming Tory government on an eight-point "contract" on economic policy yesterday but refused to spell out how deeply the Conservatives would cut public spending this year.

The Shadow Chancellor laid out eight key "benchmarks" but came under pressure from business leaders to reveal more detailed proposals on cuts. He admitted he was taking a "political gamble" by making his first priority to safeguard Britain's AAA credit rating on the international markets because some investors believe there is an 80 per cent chance of a downgrade. His pledge could backfire spectacularly if Britain were downgraded soon after a Tory election victory.

In a keynote speech, Mr Osborne sought to steady Tory nerves after David Cameron admitted the party would not make "swingeing cuts" in the 2010-11 financial year. Although the Tories deny a U-turn, the move was seen as a tactical retreat because big cuts later this year might have put the fragile economic recovery at risk.

In a shift away from previous Tory warnings about an "age of austerity," Mr Osborne outlined a "new economic model" to secure growth. He promised a "more solid" private sector recovery driven by investment and exports, instead of the consumer borrowing and government debt seen under Labour.

"We will set out a plan in our first Budget to eliminate a large part of the structural deficit in the first Parliament. We will make a start in 2010," he said. But under repeated questioning from journalists, he declined to put a figure on this year's cuts. He said £1.5bn of savings he trailed last autumn were "examples" of cuts but refused to say whether that would be the final figure for 2010-11. Tory officials insisted the party would cut faster than Labour.

The Shadow Chancellor said people should hold a Tory government to account against the eight benchmarks. The others are: creating a more balanced economy; to "get Britain working" by reducing youth unemployment; easing tax and regulatory burdens on business; raising the private sector's share of the economy; boosting the productivity of the public sector; creating a safer banking system and a "greener economy" by cutting greenhouse gas emissions and winning a larger share of global markets for low carbon technologies.

Mr Osborne said the Tory blueprint had won the backing of several prominent businessmen including Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou, founder of easyJet; Stephen Murphy, chief executive of Virgin Group and Andrew Witty, chief executive of GlaxoSmithKline.

Business groups welcomed the Tory plan but called for more clarity on cuts. Richard Lambert, director general of the CBI, said: "Business will now want to see more detailed plans explaining how these proposals could be delivered, and over what sort of timescales."

Tory policy: The eight-point plan

1. Macroeconomic stability Preserve Britain's AAA credit rating by eliminating a large part of the structural deficit over a parliament. Verdict: Gamble. More details needed on cuts.

2. A more balanced economy Create conditions to boost exports, business investment and saving as a share of GDP. Verdict: Harder with a slimmed-down financial sector.

3. Get Britain working Reduce youth unemployment and the number of children in workless households. Verdict: Where's the money coming from?

4. Britain open for business Improve UK's international rankings for tax competitiveness and business regulation. Verdict: Easier said than done.

5. Ensure the whole country shares in rising prosperity Raise the private sector's share of the economy in all regions, especially outside London and the South-east. Verdict: At odds with Tory pledge to end "top-down" government.

6. Reform public services Deliver better schools and a better NHS. Verdict: harder when budgets are cut.

7. Safer banking system Reform bank regulation and structure. Verdict: Good – but banks will fight their corner.

8. Greener economy Reduce UK greenhouse gas emissions and increase share of global markets for low-carbon technologies. Verdict: Same as Labour.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

gutless and stupid
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 12:47 am (UTC)
the conservatives are showing themselves up as gutless and stupid.

they should have stuck to the deep cuts line and held their nerve because everyone in this couuntry down to the smallest child knows that we are bankrupt and have cut spending.

By taking fright and changing tack they have made fools of themselves and us and probably condemned us for................. get your gun- 5 more years of Gordon Brown, in which event put it your mouth and pull the trigger
Re: gutless and stupid
[info]littleglimmer wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:03 am (UTC)
My guess is ff Labour should win the election, which is unlikely, Gordon Brown will not last the year. He will be subject to a leadership contest and will lose. The new PM will move Alastair Darling to the edge and call another election early 2011.
Re: gutless and stupid
[info]sceptic_000 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 12:49 pm (UTC)



If labour do manage to win, against almost surreal odds, I would probably have to follow hakies advice...
GCSE'echonomix'Osborne
[info]paulstpancras wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 01:07 am (UTC)
The child Osborne is a fool. He simply hasn't a clue. Clarke or Hague would make a better shadow chancellor - Michael Fabricant would do a better job.

Osborne has called it wrong - and badly advised Cameron - especially since the banking crisis/credit crunch of 2008.

He is undermining the pound, provoking a sterling and credit crisis, making it worse for the British economy and destroying the credibility of the city.

Cameron lacks leadership by keeping fool Osborne in place. Cameron would be irresponsible in not shuffling his cabinet and making Osborne responsible for agriculture.
Re: GCSE'echonomix'Osborne
[info]49niner wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 05:27 am (UTC)
Boy George is an apt name for Mr Osborne. And look what has happened to his alter ego from the 1980s. Tagged and sweeping the streets. You have been warned!
Re: GCSE'echonomix'Osborne
[info]allan365 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:49 am (UTC)
He is only in the job 'cos he's Cameron's poodle and David knows George is so useless he could never challenge Cameron for the leadership as no one would take him seriously.
Re: GCSE'echonomix'Osborne
[info]aleph_i wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 11:48 am (UTC)
What exactly do you expect from a man with a 2nd in History and a string of political jobs. Hardly the credentials to run an economy, never mind a G7 economy.
Same old Tories
[info]complete_cynic wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 02:45 am (UTC)
4. Britain open for business Improve UK's international rankings for tax competitiveness and business regulation.

Why do I get the feeling that they will try to achieve this by driving down the pay and conditions of the working men and women of this country creating even more job insecurity than we have now.

Oh yes - because that is what they attempt to do every time they are in office.
CREDIT RATING IS VIP:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 07:18 am (UTC)
Until the untrustworthy Brown and his Government open the Treasury books for inspection and necessary audit, who knows what will be found? G.O is quite correct to tread carefully and ensure the right steps to recovery are taken in an organised and well structured manner.
Typically Mr.Grice's headliner is again misleading.
Re: CREDIT RATING IS VIP:
[info]sceptic_000 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 01:00 pm (UTC)



Let's have the entirely trustworthy, champaign swilling, luxury yacht dweller Osborn for the next few years, eh bygarie !
BETTER OSBORNE THAN BROWN OR DARLING
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 07:43 am (UTC)
Champagne socialist Labour has failed. They pretend to represent the working class, but abandonded the very same working class years ago and overtaxed (113 stealth taxes) the middle classes to fund their failed schemes. Labour have ruined our pensions, ruined our savings, ruined our jobs, ruined our businesses, ruined our economy and ruined our country. Their support has gone and they are floundering. Roll on a General Election, only 92 days to go. Hopefully Brown and his shower will all experience a massive drop in salary and perhaps join the dole queues, like the millions they have thrown onto the scrap heap.
Also, intend to introduce the Lyons Report on revaluation of property for Council tax purposes on 1st June. That will see another massive hike in tax.
Voters Left Frustrated
[info]littleglimmer wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:17 am (UTC)
What an opportunity Osborne had to announce some credible measures but sadly it is just vague sixth former stuff again with a hint that private businesses will see happy days at Government expense.
This country has come to expect that the PM is a media-friendly front man but the Chancellor has to know about economic management, whatever policy beliefs he/she might have.

The electorate must be getting a little short on patience as Osborne isn't showing much grasp of economics. Just think, he was only eight years old when Thatcher came to power. Not sure if people are happy to turn everything over to someone who was Michael Howard's third choice for Shadow Chancellor.
Is this a manifesto?
[info]iankemmish wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:38 am (UTC)
On the one issue on which the Conservatives appear determined to fight the election, we are asked to believe that "cutting a large part" in five years is somehow more stringent than cutting half in four years. This seems merely to be handing the government a hostage to fortune - it appears that it was beyond the wit of Conservative HQ to water down their previous "aspirations" without making them weaker than the Government's. Surely that wasn't so difficult a thing to do?

What bothers me is the Mr Osborne's aspiration to preserve our currently abnormal interest rate landscape. Both the deficit and the low interest rates are part of the the response to the crisis. We are being asked to choose between a doctor who says he will reduce the patient's medication before taking him off the respirator, and one who says he will take him off the respirator before reducing the medication. Mr Osborne's problem is that in this fight he has voluntarily chosen the losing hand - interest rates are not set by the Chancellor. They are nominally set by the MPC, but actually set by the Fed, who are unlikely to time the global sea change in interest rates to suit the British Chancellor's hopes.
Re: Is this a manifesto?
[info]weeble13 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 09:47 am (UTC)
It is amazing how the Torys and Labour seems to have shrugged off their devotion to hardcore city mentality of freedom of the market...i.e. a deregulated city environment. They both loved this plastic money world...and now they are reformers, to some extent anyway (at least in verbal critism if not actual action). The audacity of these performers knows no ends. I can't believe anyone would actually vote for these (expletive)...but then a load of people also see fit to vote for holocaust deniers, (BNP)so that doesn't boad well for the future really.

It is amusing to see Camerons simple minded and patronising presentation falling apart though. Not a class act Cameron - not really officer material old boy. A marketing presentation thats now appearing to be transparent. Oh dear. Blag sussed out. Old school tory (expletive) after all. Like wot Mandelson would like to be..especially the money part. I know, forget love and honour, lets make Mandelson PM!...then we'd really see some real evil by blighty on the world stage!....and in your lives of course you lucky little punters! CCTV in every home linked to an on line anti paedo database survaylance op. You've got nothing to hide if you're doing nothing wrong citizen. Play the game, consume and 'you'll be allright'.

Osbourne is like the ridler character in Batman - greasy and untrustworthy..again, not a class act. Darling I think is quite good, maybe its the Outer Hebridies laidbackness..worth picking up on some of the speaking tricks used by these guys, kids, if not the meaning of what they are saying/doing. Look, we've got a real situation here. Eco Earth Crisis. Haiti for real, in you personal reality coming your way. (type thing). Hair shirts? No, just transcendance of material consciousness...but that implies implosion of GDP! Yes, because manic consumerism is trashing Mother Earth, weirdo. So stay outa my head, stop trying to break liberated awareness and in fact start having some respect for such.
UKs credit rating
[info]weeble13 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 09:51 am (UTC)
It is possible I think for this to implode in fact...for the world financial system to turn on the UK as the next underdog to get beaten up and kicked out into the cold. Someone always has to lose at the dealing speculative game after all, and sometimes that loser is an entire country. Lots of money can be made by betting against the pound (potentially)..especially if the inherent worth of the currency is in question.
Re: UKs credit rating
[info]littleglimmer wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 10:13 pm (UTC)
"The Conservative government was forced to withdraw the Pound Sterling from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism after they were unable to keep sterling above its agreed lower limit. The most high profile of the currency market investors, George Soros, made over US$1 billion profit by short selling sterling."
Wiki.

The good old free market, eh? Post- 1979 Toryism at its finest. Yes, it's alright when you're on the winning side with house price going through the sky, pension dividends rocketing, interest on savings soaring. Don't give a thought to the thousands who lose out to your greed. Not so funny when you lose out to even greedier bastards than you.

Please give me a clue that Cameron and Osborne are a different kind of Tories.
Re: UKs credit rating
[info]sceptic_000 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 11:33 pm (UTC)



Well said, with some feeling.

Bravo, made me smile...
A crash in super slo-mo
[info]watzat wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 10:45 am (UTC)
The question of how the Tory's should respond to Brown's end of lease pre-election mega borrowing and spending splurge has received no definitive answer despite being a year and more on the table. The simple truth is that massive borrowing has not ended the recession, merely postponed and perhaps worsened it. By failing to assert this unvarnished message, by failing to challenge the cosy consensus that we are out of the woods, the Torys will fight an election in all probability at the fag end of this fake recovery against a narrative of Brown's titanic but successful struggle as saviour of the British Economy. I can only assume they prefer not to win.
Re: A crash in super slo-mo
[info]littleglimmer wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 10:26 pm (UTC)
Come on, Brown and Darling almost daily emphasise that the recession recovery is very delicate and it is too soon to say it's safely over. There is no consensus that we are out of the woods and you know it.
Whether you like it or not, the last three months have been pretty well according to what Brown and Darling were saying a year ago.
Thanks to Gordon Brown reducing the massive debt we had inherited from the Tories we wouldn't have been able to get this far. Without a credible manufacturing base (you know, that thing that made Britain 'Great'), this country had most of its eggs in the global financial services basket and was at the mercy of the US-led collapse. See Barack Obama for more details on that if you think it was caused by and was preventable by Gordon Brown and the relatively puny UK.

How to deal with it was either borrow money to provide jobs so that most of the country can keep working and buying goods, or shut down spending and have a revisit of the last two recessions with the mountain-high unemployment (at �64 per week JSA that's cheap on the Government), but businesses and shareholders protecting their profits. Both approaches have their supporters.
Tories, it's time to panic
[info]falanf wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 03:52 pm (UTC)
Yup, you Tories, it's now time to panic. If only you had listened more closely to Hapless Dave and Boy George and then urged the Party to change their leadership months ago you might be in a better position. Instead, you concentrated on slagging-off Labour and their leadership - it's called kicking a man when he's down. You'll be lucky to get a hung parliament at this rate, particularly when your leaders have to engage in real debates with grown-ups.
Just because
[info]geiseric wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 10:34 pm (UTC)
Just because the Tories are not entirely sure how to fix the economic chaos created by Gordon Brown is not a good reason for re-electing Gordon Brown.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date