Nature

7° London Hi 10°C / Lo 4°C

Lesbian albatrosses to raise their chick

Two females set up 'unusual' family unit after successfully incubating egg

By Kathy Marks, Asia-Pacific Correspondent

A royal albatross and a chick at the Taiaroa breeding centre in New Zealand. The colony has had two prior instances of females establishing a nest together

ALAMY

A royal albatross and a chick at the Taiaroa breeding centre in New Zealand. The colony has had two prior instances of females establishing a nest together

When two female royal albatrosses at a New Zealand breeding colony embarked on a lesbian relationship, there were some raised eyebrows. But when the pair successfully incubated a chick, wildlife experts were delighted – and surprised.

The father – one of scores of males at the Taiaroa Head Royal Albatross Centre on the South Island's wind-swept Otago Peninsula – appears to have disappeared. He will play no role in the upbringing of his week-old chick and, just like an increasing number of children, this bird will grow up with two mothers.

"It's quite unusual in the albatross population here at Taiaroa Head to have two females mating together," Lyndon Perriman, the colony's head ranger, told Television New Zealand. "Even more unusual than that is that the egg is actually fertile this season."

While homosexuality is well documented in the animal kingdom, including among seabirds, Taiaroa Head – the only mainland albatross breeding colony in the world – has recorded only two previous instances of females setting up a nest together in the past 70 years. Neither resulted in a happy ending.

The latest pair had tried nesting with a male albatross during two previous breeding seasons, but the threesome did not work out. This time, the two females took turns sitting on the egg.

Sam Inder, the manager of the centre, said: "It's an unusual situation because we've had a triangle with one male and two females for the past couple of years, and obviously that hasn't been terribly conducive to getting on with a breeding programme. This year the male left the trio, but obviously not before he had mated with one of the females."

The male has not been seen since, and Mr Inder told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation: "My personal view would be having to live with two women might be just a bit demanding."

Initially, rangers at the centre were not sure whether the female pair would stay together, so they tried them out with a dummy egg. When they proved to be good parents, the original egg was returned to the nest. Now the ladies are taking turns to guard the chick and fly out to sea to fetch food.

There are about 140 royal albatrosses on the colony with wingspans of nearly 10 feet. This season 17 chicks have hatched from 17 fertile eggs, a rare 100 per cent success rate.

Following widespread coverage of the newborn albatross with two mothers, including in the gay press, Tourism Dunedin is now canvassing suggestions for a name for the chick.

It is not the only same-sex pairing within the animal world on the Otago Peninsula, just south of Dunedin. Currently, two male yellow-eyed penguins – an endangered species like the royal albatross– are incubating an egg.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The Pope Would Say...
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 07:16 am (UTC)
.... that these two creatures are in breach of the 'natural law' and that they should not be allowed to keep the egg or any chick hatching from it. The egg would be given to a convent orphanage where it would be beaten every day.
Re: The Pope Would Say...
[info]vegesausage wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:40 am (UTC)
Is this how one makes Eggs Benedict?
Re: The Pope Would Say...
[info]sdchamp wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 09:03 am (UTC)
This is outrageous!

how dare the Independent, in this day and age label this progressive, hard-working couple as 'unusual'! thus implying that the full burden of assumed guilt and shame of the rest of the colony should somehow be laid at their nest for daring to be 'different'. It shows that the re-education programme of the rest of sea-bird poulation is a failure and that they are still locked into a primeval male-dominated-monotheistic belief system. There is an overwhelming case for awarding the Albatross Centre an enormous and unrestricted grant to enable them to properly disabuse the remainder of the colony of any smug notion that heterosexual homemaking can any longer be promoted as 'normal'. Had this tragedy occured in North London, public money would hve been available instantly........ ;-)

(no subject) - [info]dsyfgj - Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 03:24 pm (UTC) Expand
C'mon!
[info]cmon78 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 07:37 am (UTC)
Are they actually homosexual? Do they actually mate?
Or are they jointly raising a chick?
This article is pure propoganda
Re: C'mon!
[info]mournfulyoda wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 09:08 am (UTC)
I think this article is wonderful! Also, not the only same sex couple in the animal kingdom and another same sex couple penguins actually on the island, fantastic....proving it is a natural state to couple with a member of the same sex?
Re: C'mon! - The point.
[info]cejohnso wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:43 pm (UTC)
While I don't know that these two birds can be considered Lesbian (having intercourse with each other?? Hmm?), they are a homosexual set of parents. It may just be propaganda for the LGBT community on part of the Independent, but let's think for a minute. How many times as a child did your parents' sex life cross your mind? I should hope not that much, particularly before the birds and the bees talk. So, what's it matter? The success of the chick should be all that matters in the wild, and the success of the child should be all that matters in the domesticated human world, regardless of the actual sexual activities of the parents.
Re: C'mon!
[info]corporeal_v002 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 04:12 pm (UTC)

Its a promotional advertisement for lesbians. There are many other animals who cooperate in looking after each others offspring. This observation implies sexual preference but that's theorising...
Re: C'mon! Here's the point.
[info]cejohnso wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:44 pm (UTC)
While I don't know that these two birds can be considered Lesbian (having intercourse with each other?? Hmm?), they are a homosexual set of parents. It may just be propaganda for the LGBT community on part of the Independent, but let's think for a minute. How many times as a child did your parents' sex life cross your mind? I should hope not that much, particularly before the birds and the bees talk. So, what's it matter? The success of the chick should be all that matters in the wild, and the success of the child should be all that matters in the domesticated human world, regardless of the actual sexual activities of the parents.
C'mon
[info]leonore1935 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:57 am (UTC)
Exactly my thought, calling this a lesbian relationship is complete nonsense. There is no sexual activity involved simply co-operation. Whichs is more remarkable
Albatross deadbeat dad
[info]slimemoldlives wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 09:47 am (UTC)
What is Harpy Harridan going to do about him?
Natural Law.
[info]xoixoi1 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 09:56 am (UTC)
The religious bigots are always going on about homosexuality being against natural law or "gods law". The evidence is overwhelming that homosexuality exists throughout the animal kingdom. The idea that humans are special or fundamentally different is further interupted by the evidence provided by genetics. There are several great advantages to having a homosexual subculture in human societies. We know that the sisters of gay men have higher fertility rates, opening up a new field in fertility research. Gay men are over-represented in the world of arts and culture as well as, strangely enough, mathematics (Herman and Kosh, 2003). They also act as a barometer of newly emerging sexually transmitted diseases. Gays and lesbians are just as capable as heterosexuals in raising a family. The evidence from the Scandanavian countries proves it. We have all been exposed to centuries of propaganda from religions and social ultra-conservatives. Its time for the truth to be reported.
love is what matters...
[info]dinkle69 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 11:24 am (UTC)
The Pope is obsessed by sex and cross dressing, not love. I wonder why? Facts must be hard for him to wish away.

The Pope at heart believes in worshiping power and strength, and how to maintain it over people. That is the basis of his morality.

Fear is is tool, not love. Unfortunately all religions tend to gravitate to fear, rather than rational observation of the world around us.
POLYGAMY actually.
[info]antizion wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 06:16 pm (UTC)
We're not being told the whole story but it looks as if 1 male had 2 females (dunno if he shagged em both) but then he did a runner when he found out about the child.

The 2 co-wives now take turns looking after baby.
Do they think gay?
[info]yorkie31 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 07:36 pm (UTC)
I doubt that animals have any concept of sexuality as we know it. They are two females and only one has a chick the other is doing what nature intended and helping rear the chick. Perhaps we should send the council round so that they can ask them questions and tick the correct boxes on a form.
Did they?
[info]thepapalcorset wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:02 pm (UTC)
They totally did. According to the colony's website, they are not just good friends.
http://www.albatross.org.nz/news.html
see the news item from Jan 18... and expect a reaction from the vatican.
Re: Did they?
[info]antizion wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 11:23 pm (UTC)
All we have is the following quote:

"It's quite unusual in the albatross population..to have two females mating together, even more unusual than that is the eggs actually fertile this season," says Department of Conservation (DOC) ranger Lyndon Perriman.

The 2nd part of this sentence is nonsense - eggs from 2 lesbian albatrosses being fertile????

As for the 1st part - how did the 2 female birds attempt to mate?
Did just 1 of them try to impregnate the other or did they both try to imregnate each other?
If the same bird kept going on top of the other then all that means is that it seems to think it is a male!
i.e. a sick bird with its brain wires crossed!
MAYBE
[info]elq1 wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:19 pm (UTC)
the dad donated his sperm, flew to Thailand and had a sex change operation? Has any of you considered that option already??
Re: MAYBE
[info]thepapalcorset wrote:
Wednesday, 3 February 2010 at 08:23 pm (UTC)
albatrosses using a turkey baster... a beak's almost a substitute for an opposable thumb.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date