View previous topic - View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mark240473 Kudos: 37
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 5:00 pm |
|
|
I'd like to try it, but I have just recently upgraded my TV, so I don't think I'll be buying a 3D enabled TV any time soon. _________________ Has anybody got a cabbage patch?
I'm thinking of giving up cabbages. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StonecoldMC Kudos: 39
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 5:01 pm |
|
|
Wow. Were living in the future !
Were getting closer to the Holodeck with every passing year . _________________ Gaming since 1992. God do I feel old. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shellster2 Kudos: 36
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 5:23 pm |
|
|
i'm not wearing stupid glasses on my already stupid glasses! _________________ Sweet Bobby |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark240473 Kudos: 37
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 5:30 pm |
|
|
shellster2 wrote: | i'm not wearing stupid glasses on my already stupid glasses! |
Haha, me neither!
I wonder if you can get 3D contact lenses.... _________________ Has anybody got a cabbage patch?
I'm thinking of giving up cabbages. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leefear1 Kudos: 33
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 5:36 pm |
|
|
After watching UP in 3D I can't think of anything I want less than 3D TV! Absolutely fantastic film but the 3D was more distracting than beneficial (especially the stupid reflections in the sides of the glasses...). Although at least the 3D Stereoscopic tvs will not need the glasses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Trevor_Compton Kudos: 31
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 5:41 pm |
|
|
I wonder if they have standardized the tech enough that you can go get a prescription pair og 3d glasses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leefear1 Kudos: 33
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 5:41 pm |
|
|
Trevor_Compton wrote: | I wonder if they have standardized the tech enough that you can go get a prescription pair og 3d glasses |
The Stereoscopic TVs do not require glasses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
svd_grasshopper Kudos: 33
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 5:44 pm |
|
|
it projects into your living room?! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leefear1 Kudos: 33
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 5:49 pm |
|
|
leefear1 wrote: | Trevor_Compton wrote: | I wonder if they have standardized the tech enough that you can go get a prescription pair og 3d glasses |
The Stereoscopic TVs do not require glasses |
Correction. I assumed that Stereoscopic meant Autostereoscopic. It seems that these Stereoscopic TVs do require glasses (which is just rubbish). Although the autostereoscopic tvs also have the problem of letting multiple people view the image even if there is the benefit of not needing glasses.
3DTV is rubbish full stop! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Barca Azul Kudos: 26
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 6:02 pm |
|
|
So not confusing at all then?
BTW - Isnt Avatar also releasing on the 360 and Wii? will it also be 3D on these? If so, why would the PS3 need FW to do so? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yerbluesjohn Kudos: 22
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 6:05 pm |
|
|
Kotaku is awesome eh? I thought that article was a bit too well written and researched. _________________ Gamertag: kitsuneyo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ewko117 Kudos: 21
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 6:23 pm |
|
|
"The Stereoscopic TVs do not require glasses"
Yeah but tests have shown they can induce excessive Migrane's after periods of extended use (over 4 hours), cant see that working if you have to stop playing after 4 hours, my average tops 4 hrs most occasions
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ewko117 Kudos: 21
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 6:23 pm |
|
|
"The Stereoscopic TVs do not require glasses"
Yeah but tests have shown they can induce excessive Migrane's after periods of extended use (over 4 hours), cant see that working if you have to stop playing after 4 hours, my average tops 4 hrs most occasions
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sinthetic Kudos: 30
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 8:13 pm |
|
|
the only good 3d is in cinema's on top movies like UP.
i watched that stupid magic show on 4 and it was f**king shite, 3d my fat ass.
this won't catch on for 3 years minimum and i'm not going to be buying a 3d tv, i've already got a top hd tv. _________________ http://ps3trophycard.com/profile/sammysin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkodan Kudos: 6
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 8:54 pm |
|
|
Watched the Avatar game being played in 3D at the Eurogamer Expo and it was actually very impressive. Can see it working very well with COD/Uncharted type titles. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mkwuk Kudos: 15
|
Posted: 19 Nov 09 11:11 pm |
|
|
I can think of few things worse than '3D games'.
Gaming can be a strain enough on the eyes as it is, without all that 3D nonsense.
The problem for me is that 3D in the sense of these 3D films isn't the same as actual, real-life 3D... as I see it, my eyes witness a 3D world in the same way a television screen witnesses it - the 3D elements are there, but don't protrude into my line of vision like these 3D films do - it's not realistic in any way _________________ http://backloggery.com/main.php?user=mkwuk
http://mkwuk.t83.net/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bongo fury Kudos: 2
|
Posted: 20 Nov 09 12:09 pm |
|
|
tried out the 3D tv without glasses in Harrods a few months back, only works if you are standing directly in front of it and makes you feel a little dizzy (it works a bit like those plastic flip image things you get in cereal packets and on rulers etc). Also the resolution was pretty crap so it would be no good for games at the moment. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|